January 6 defendants pursue millions in claims through obscure federal process | US Capitol attack | The Guardian

Keyword – US news
Trefwoorden – US Capitol attack, Trump administration, US news, US politics
Title – January 6 defendants pursue millions in claims through obscure federal process | US Capitol attack | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/sam-levine
Link – January 6 defendants pursue millions in claims through obscure federal process | US Capitol attack | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T10:00:29.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/17/january-6-defendants-compensation-process

January 6 defendants who assaulted police officers are pursuing legal claims for millions in compensation from the Trump administration using an obscure federal process with minimal oversight, but which offers the Trump administration a way to compensate those responsible for violence even after scrapping its “anti-weaponization fund”.

The defendants are pursuing their claims using the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) , which allows individuals wronged by the government to file claims for monetary damages. The justice department has complete and unchecked discretion over whether to settle the claims, giving the Trump administration a powerful vehicle to reward those responsible for violence on January 6. The claims would be paid out from the judgment fund, a perpetual appropriation allowed for by Congress and the same pot of money Trump’s $1.8bn slush fund was going to draw from. All of the defendants seeking compensation received a pardon from Trump.

There was fierce bipartisan pushback to the “anti-weaponization fund” proposed by the administration last month after Trump reached a settlement with the Internal Revenue Service. In particular, members of Congress were concerned that people who harmed law enforcement officers on January 6 might receive compensation. “If you’ve been convicted of assault on a cop … doesn’t seem to me like people who are victims,” Josh Hawley, a Republican senator from Missouri, told NBC News .

While the “anti-weaponization fund” appears to be on ice for now, FTCA claims and lawsuits could provide another avenue for payouts.

“It risks turning the judgment fund into exactly the sort of slush fund that the ‘anti-weaponization’ was going to be,” said Rupa Bhattacharyya, a former director in the civil division’s tort branch at the justice department, who worked on FTCA claims and now is the legal director at the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at Georgetown Law.

“If the treasury department is not going to enforce the restrictions on the use of the judgment fund, which is to settle impending or imminent lawsuits where there’s some risk of liability, then there’s no limit on what you can use that judgment fund money for, so long as someone files a bogus claim,” she said.

The justice department agreed to settle FTCA claims filed by Michael Flynn, a former national security adviser, and Carter Page , Trump’s foreign policy adviser, for $1.25m each earlier this year.

Many of the January 6 defendants are represented by Peter Ticktin, a Florida attorney who is a longtime friend of Trump. He said he had filed about 400 FTCA claims on behalf of January 6 defendants and expects to start frequently filing lawsuits now that the six-month waiting period has expired.

There may also be advantages to pursuing compensation through FTCA claims instead of the weaponization fund, said Mark McCloskey, a Missouri attorney who is representing many January 6 defendants. There were no restrictions on who could apply to the weaponization fund, making the pool of applicants so big that it could lower the per capita recovery, he said.

“The weaponization fund, for the brief fleeting moment which it allegedly existed, had no policies, procedures, or anything that would indicate what kind of evidence they would have required, what kind of format of a filing they would have required, or anything like that,” he said. “I never thought the weaponization fund, as a practical matter, was very meaningful. Whereas the FTCA gives you a statute with teeth that you can, as long as you can prove your claim, you have a right to recovery.”

Among those seeking money are Kenneth Joseph Thomas, an Ohio man who was sentenced to nearly five years in prison after being found guilty for assaulting several police officers . Video showed him shoving multiple police officers and throwing himself into a line of officers as he shouted for other rioters to “hold the fucking line”. Also seeking compensation is John George Todd III , a Missouri man sentenced to five years in prison after being found guilty on several charges, including injuring a Capitol police officer.

Both men are among nine plaintiffs seeking at least $1m each in damages in an FTCA suit filed 29 May in Washington DC. They say they are entitled to damages because they were unfairly and vindictively prosecuted by the government.

Andrew Taake , a Houston man sentenced to six years in prison and who pleaded guilty to assaulting police officers with bear spray and a whip-like weapon, is also seeking at least $2.5m in damages . Taake is entitled to damages because he received inadequate medical treatment and an unfair trial, his lawyers said in their FTCA lawsuit, filed last September in Washington.

Bhattacharyya said she believed the justice department could defend itself against the “malicious prosecution type claims” the January 6 defendants were bringing, and she hoped it would do so. When Trump filed his $10bn lawsuit against the IRS, the justice department did not try to defend itself against the suit.

“Most of these plaintiffs were indicted by grand juries, brought before a court. Many of them pled guilty, others were convicted, they were sentenced by judges, and so those sorts of malicious prosecution claims are eminently defensible,” she said.

Those who pleaded guilty or were convicted of assaulting police officers should still be entitled to payouts, McCloskey said. “The vast majority of people that pled guilty to or were found guilty of such offenses were either coerced into confessions based on threats of life imprisonment and threats against their family or went to trial in courts where the evidence was faked, rigged, perjury was testified to and fair trials were not had,” he said. There is no evidence of wrongdoing in the January 6 prosecutions.

In Taake’s case, the Trump administration is defending itself against the claims and seeking to have them thrown out. In February, a federal prosecutor in Washington wrote that many of the claims should be thrown out since the lawsuit did not name proper defendants and certain requirements were not met before the suit was filed.

The Trump administration faced immediate and bipartisan backlash after it announced it was creating the loosely controlled $1.8bn fund to resolve a $10bn lawsuit filed by Trump related to the leak of his tax returns. Some Republicans objected strongly to the idea that those who assaulted police officers could receive payouts.

“The concern my constituents and I have is that money possibly going to folks who hit cops,” Nick LaLota, a Republican congressman from New York, told NBC News. “Especially when there is video evidence, they shouldn’t get a dime from our government.”

Adam Schiff, a Democratic senator from California, introduced legislation last month that would bar anyone convicted of an offense related to January 6 from receiving a payout from the federal government. Among other things, the bill would amend the FTCA to prohibit those who were pardoned for actions related to January 6 from being eligible for claims.

“President Donald Trump still wants to pay off violent insurrectionists who attacked police officers on January 6th, despite any claims from members of his administration that say otherwise,” Schiff said in a statement. “Our taxpayer dollars should not be used to pay out criminals, and we can pass a law right now to prevent this president or any future administration from paying off their friends and political allies.”

Walter Parazaider, founding member of Chicago, dies aged 81 | Culture | The Guardian

Keyword – Culture
Trefwoorden – Culture, Pop and rock, Music, US news
Title – Walter Parazaider, founding member of Chicago, dies aged 81 | Culture | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/owen-myers
Link – Walter Parazaider, founding member of Chicago, dies aged 81 | Culture | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T18:34:46.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2026/jun/17/walter-parazaider-death

Walter Parazaider, a co-founding member of the rock band Chicago, has died at the age of 81 following a battle with Alzheimer’s disease.

His daughter confirmed the news in a Facebook post on Wednesday morning.

“My father, my hero, is gone. He went peacefully about 20 minutes ago,” she wrote. “There’s no more pain. No more struggle … This was the worst six years. The hardest season of my life. And I’m so grateful that my dad is not suffering anymore. I love you poppy, my Pal.”

Parazaider was a co-founder of the group best known for 1970s and 80s soft rock classics like If You Leave Me Now and Hard to Say I’m Sorry. He played reed instruments and saxophone with the band from its inception in the late 60s to his retirement in 2018.

“He had put up a good fight with Alzheimer’s and unfortunately it ended tonight,” his wife JacLynn told TMZ . “We are going to miss him for sure … We were married for 59 years and we had 59 wonderful years.”

Born in the small town of Maywood, Illinois, Parazaider was inspired by the Beatles’ work on Revolver to start a rock band with a horn section, and helped found Chicago (initially called the Big Thing) in 1967 with Peter Cetera, Terry Kath, Robert Lamm, Lee Loughnane, James Pankow and Danny Seraphine.

“A Rock & Roll band with horns was Walt’s idea,” the band said in an Instagram statement. “He put the band together and they rehearsed in the basement of his mother’s home. He is also the one who did the hard work to book shows for the young, unknown band, performing top 40 covers at local bars in and around Chicago.”

As founding member Lee Loughnane put it in an interview with The Guardian, “We just got together and did a rehearsal at Walt’s basement and we never stopped playing together again.”

“It sounded great and we enjoyed it. We liked what it sounded like and every gig that we had from that time on – we started booking club dates – and we just learned enough songs to get through the night because we were playing like six hours a night: 45 on, 15 off.”

Parazaider played the well-known flute solo in the 1970 Chicago single Colour My World, as well as the recognizable saxophone on 1973’s top five hit Just You ‘n’ Me.

In 1976, Chicago reached number one in the US and UK with the soft rock balled If You Leave Me Now, written and sung by bass player Peter Cetera. The song was certified platinum and has been extensively used in films such as Shaun of the Dead, The Secret Agent as well as a fan-favorite episode of Sex and the City.

Chicago continued to have hits into the 80s with top 10 singles including Will You Still Love Me?, Look Away and What Kind of Man Would I Be? The band was inducted in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame in April 2016.

In their Instagram statement, Chicago wrote: “We are forever grateful for his contributions. Perhaps his greatest gift was bringing people together. This amazing music may have never been heard had it not been for Walt’s vision.”

‘I get a gold star when I go to the gym’: the adults using sticker charts for motivation | Well actually | The Guardian

Keyword – Wellness
Trefwoorden – Well actually, Life and style, Psychology
Title – ‘I get a gold star when I go to the gym’: the adults using sticker charts for motivation | Well actually | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/amelia-tait
Link – ‘I get a gold star when I go to the gym’: the adults using sticker charts for motivation | Well actually | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T16:00:39.000Z
Category – Lifestyle
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/wellness/2026/jun/17/adult-sticker-charts-motivation

T here is a sticker chart on the kitchen cupboard in the Gray family home in Birmingham, England – the two Gray children, aged four and 10, get excited when it’s time to add another gold star. But they aren’t being rewarded for brushing their teeth or learning their spellings; this is someone else’s chart entirely.

“They know that mommy gets a gold star when she goes to the gym,” says Bek Gray, a 33-year-old healthcare professional who has been using sticker charts to motivate herself for one and a half years.

“There’s only so many times you can get told off by an app or your watch,” says Gray. “This is a nicer way of trying to motivate and discipline yourself.”

Gray had a gastric sleeve in September 2024 and bought her first sticker chart shortly afterwards – since then, she has lost 142lb while simultaneously gaining muscle. “It sounds really silly but I don’t think I would’ve pushed myself as much without the stickers,” she says. It changed her mindset from “Ugh, I’ve got to go to the gym” to “I need to get my three stars this week!”

Last year, my ability to self-motivate became so poor that I also started using sticker charts. I typed up a list of daily goals, printed out a bunch of pages and glued them to some cardboard backing, so I could tear off a new sheet each day. Instead of stars, I opted for little coloured dots – different colors tracked when I exercised, how many fruits and vegetables I ate and whether I’d flossed or read that day. I wasn’t motivated by the stickers themselves (although the constellation of gold, silver, purple and blue did look pretty), but by a sense of momentum and accountability – I didn’t want to see an empty page when the evening rolled around. And if I already had four stickers in my “fruits and veg” box, I was often compelled to push for five, so I could achieve my government-mandated goodness .

Lucy Mountain is the 34-year-old, London-based business owner of Silly Little Star Charts , the brand Gray buys. Founded in 2024, the company has charts for chores, workouts, sobriety and even staying away from your ex. While the business was originally a side project for Mountain, who has her own fitness app, it proved so successful that as of last summer, it is now her main source of income.

“It’s been so amazing to see how many people really respond well to it,” Mountain says. While critical social media commenters consider the charts infantilizing, users like Gray say their lives have been changed. One reviewer wrote: “Something about getting to stick a silly gold star on to the sticker sheet keeps me accountable”, while another claimed: “This chart is the only reason I got up to go to the gym today.”

“It’s not just about tapping into your inner child,” Mountain says. “I do just think it’s a system that works.”

Why exactly might it work? “Humans and animals work for rewards. That is their nature,” says Kou Murayama, the principal investigator at the Motivation Science Lab at the University of Tübingen in Germany. Unlike a child, you might not find the sticker itself to be a valuable object, but you can nonetheless still feel motivated by it. “Hitting a goal itself serves as a reward for humans,” Murayama says, “even if it does not give you tangible rewards such as food or money.”

Rewards for repetitive daily tasks could help with the tedium. “The problem with long-term goals such as eating fruit and vegetables [regularly] is that the goal is never complete,” says Thomas Webb, a professor of psychology at the University of Sheffield in England who researches self-regulation. After all, you won’t one day have eaten enough fruits and vegetables for life. Webb says sticker charts create a mechanism to “complete” the goal, at least for a day.

According to “goal-setting theory”, conceived by the psychologists Edwin Locke and Gary Latham, goals that are specific, proximal (that is, shorter-term) and challenging can be especially motivating, says Murayama. “Sticker charts at least meet the first two criteria – perhaps the third one too,” he says.

Gray has found her charts motivating for almost two years, but mine “stopped working” after a few months. If I had good momentum in the morning and quickly got a few stickers on the page, I could keep going for the rest of the day. But if I failed to get started, the stickers didn’t entice me to begin, and I often wrote the rest of the day off. Amazingly, the technical, academic term for this is the “ what the hell effect ”; once we’ve slipped up, we see ourselves as failures and give up completely.

Mountain has a fix for this: silver stars can be used on skip days to prevent people from feeling demotivated. “It’s trying to keep momentum going, because it’s not about perfection,” she says. “It’s just about trying to be consistent as much as you can.”

Murayama has a theory about why I couldn’t, well, stick with it. “Humans have a fundamental need to take control of ourselves or be autonomous,” he says, arguing that sticker charts initially satisfy this need. But over time, one could come to feel that the chart is actually in control. “Humans really don’t like to be controlled. Once you come to interpret the charts that way, either implicitly or explicitly, it will backfire,” Murayama says.

Nikos Ntoumanis, a professor of motivation science at the University of Southern Denmark, concurs. “Rewards can be a double-edged sword,” he says. He believes that ideally, rewards like stickers should be gradually phased out, “otherwise, they end up being the main reason for doing an activity”, and then, “once the rewards are withdrawn, usually the activity returns to a baseline level.”

Regardless, adult sticker charts are rising in popularity. Google searches for the term reached a five-year high this February, and Mountain’s business has just moved into a warehouse. But why are people willing to pay for them when there are countless free habit tracking apps? Mountain got the idea for her business after she started marking her workouts with a gold star emoji in her phone – so why didn’t she just keep doing that? “I think we are just generally so fatigued by being on our phones,” she says.

Mountain’s charts come with magnets so you can stick them on the fridge. That means users are constantly reminded of their goals without the need for a pushy app notification.

Gray loves her charts, and is not deterred by people who might find them childish. “We all get caught up in wanting to be grownups, and having to be serious,” she says. “There is no harm if people want to go back to their childhood ways to little extents like this.”

Sticker charts could help people, but we can’t necessarily rely on gold stars forever or for everything, warns Murayama.

“One needs to find a more intrinsic source of enjoyment,” he says, arguing this can sustain your motivation for longer. “If you decide to do exercise to reduce your weight, you may find that running itself is a joy,” he says.

Still, there’s no one magic trick to remaining productive. “It is important to understand that there is no panacea for motivation,” Murayama says. “If so, I wouldn’t need to do research any more.”

I had a blood clot. An AI diagnosis may have saved my life | Gleb Tsipursky | The Guardian

Keyword – Opinion
Trefwoorden – AI (artificial intelligence), Health, Society, Technology, Medical research
Title – I had a blood clot. An AI diagnosis may have saved my life | Gleb Tsipursky | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/gleb-tsipursky
Link – I had a blood clot. An AI diagnosis may have saved my life | Gleb Tsipursky | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T13:00:31.000Z
Category – Opinion
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jun/17/blood-clot-dvt-ai-diagnosis

A calf cramp should not be a brush with death. Mine almost was.

For five days, I had what felt like a stubborn muscle spasm in my left calf. It was tender, swollen and getting worse. I assumed it was a muscle problem and went to my chiropractor, who treated it as a muscle issue.

But the pain kept worsening, and I turned to an AI health tool I had built for myself, based on my expertise training companies on how to adopt AI tools effectively, using my medical records, medications, lab work, and visit notes. It flagged deep vein thrombosis, or DVT, and pointed me to the diagnostic step that mattered: an ultrasound.

DVT is a blood clot in a deep vein, usually in the leg. The blood clot symptoms include pain, swelling, warmth and skin color changes, especially when they affect one leg. It also said suspected DVT should be assessed urgently and, when a doctor thinks DVT is possible, the patient should be referred for an ultrasound scan quickly.

So I called my primary care office, which advised me to schedule an appointment or go to urgent care. Ordinarily, that would have sounded sensible. But urgent care could not provide the scan. My doctor’s office could not provide it either. If I followed the slow path, I might lose days before being sent to the emergency room anyway.

That question mattered because deep vein thrombosis can become deadly when part of a clot breaks off and travels to the lungs, causing a pulmonary embolism. The CDC describes DVT and pulmonary embolism as serious conditions that are often under-diagnosed. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute warns that a pulmonary embolism can cause death when a clot is large or when there are multiple clots.

So I talked to my AI tool and went to the ER, despite knowing I would spend many hours there instead of a few minutes before being seen at urgent care. The ultrasound found four clots in my left leg.

Afterward, the danger stopped being theoretical. I learned that my wife’s grandfather had died from a pulmonary embolism. So had the mother of one of her close friends. What had felt like a nagging cramp suddenly looked like the edge of a cliff.

This is not an argument for replacing doctors with machines. The emergency room doctors did the indispensable work. They ordered imaging, interpreted results, weighed whether to admit me, spoke with specialists and sent me home on blood thinners when it was safe to do so. The AI did not cure me. It just helped me ask the right question in time.

The science is catching up with these stories. A new study on medical AI in Science, led by researchers affiliated with Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, tested a large language model on clinical reasoning tasks, including real emergency department cases. Science News reported that the model was more likely than physicians to include the correct diagnosis among possible answers.

That does not mean patients should trust random chatbots over clinicians. It means doctors and AI may be safer together than either is alone. A useful AI system can surface possibilities, organize medical records, help patients describe symptoms clearly and reduce the chance that a dangerous pattern gets mistaken for something ordinary.

There is a real danger too. A Guardian report on AI health advice found that one in seven people in the UK are using AI chatbots for medical guidance instead of seeing a GP. That should worry everyone. A chatbot cannot examine a leg, hear breathlessness, notice distress or take responsibility for a patient.

But fear should not become denial. AI in healthcare needs regulation, testing, transparency and clinical supervision. It also needs humility from institutions that too often expect patients to navigate fragmented systems alone.

My lesson is not that everyone should outsource their health to software. It is that patient advocacy now has a new tool. A safe AI assistant, trained on your medical data, can help people gather their records, ask whether something urgent is being missed and push for the right diagnostic step. Medicine has always depended on second opinions. The next one may come from software, and the urgent task is to make sure it is accurate, accountable and used to save lives.

Gleb Tsipursky, PhD, serves as the CEO of the future-of-work work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts and wrote The Psychology of Generative AI Adoption at Work (Georgetown University Press, 2026)

Portugal 1-1 DR Congo: World Cup 2026 – as it happened | World Cup 2026 | The Guardian

Keyword – Football
Trefwoorden – World Cup 2026, World Cup, Portugal, Democratic Republic of the Congo football team, Football, Sport
Title – Portugal 1-1 DR Congo: World Cup 2026 – live | World Cup 2026 | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/danielharris
Link – Portugal 1-1 DR Congo: World Cup 2026 – live | World Cup 2026 | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T19:21:53.000Z
Category – Sport
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/football/live/2026/jun/17/portugal-v-dr-congo-world-cup-2026-live

Of the favourites, I don’t think it’s controversial to say France have been most impressive. I wonder if they actually played well, or if Michael Olise was just on one, but it barely matters – he’s now good enough to do that on a regular, and it’s hard to get more than one man on him because of the quality around him. I do, think there are much better midfields than France’s, but converting that on-paper superiority into scoring more goals than them is not easily done.

Is there another game imminent? I’d thought not, but apparently there is – and the great Scott Murray is bringing it youse.

Alex returns on Ronaldo: “I think the answer boils down less to ‘it is impossible to play a modern style’ and more ‘Portugal don’t have the tools to cover his lack of defensive running like some other teams do’. The question of what he offers is a different one, and I do agree that when I see him play these days it is something between a twinge of sadness and a sense of my own mortality that his difficulties moving around evince. I’d like to see him as a super sub!”

I agree, off the bench he’d be a weapon [redacted]. I also think that Messi drops and helps with buildup, something Ronaldo also doesn’t do. Essentially, if he doesn’t score goals that are created for him, he doesn’t offer anything and, as we saw against Algeria, the same is not so of Messi.

Oh man, BBC have just shown footage from Lisbon, where people were watching the game, and when DRC score, a crew of about 15 go up, shouting and dancing . It’s great to see, and speaks well of the people around them – there are many places, I’m sure, where doing that would be bad for your health.

So how do Portugal improve? As I said below, if they’re sticking with Ronaldo – and nothing I’ve seen from Martinez tells me he’s the will or minerals to leave him out – I’d move Bernardo central, get the full-backs high, and try and get some tempo in the passing. If I’m leaving Ronaldo out, I’m probably bringing in Ramos, but also wondering if Neto or Leao might work up front.

The other game in this group. Uzbekistan v Colombia, kicks off seven hours from now. I’m not sure this result will delight either, who probably want Portugal to beat everyone, but at the same time, they’ve been shown how to stop them. Knowing and doing, though, are very different things.

FULL TIME: Portugal 1-1 DR Congo

After 52 years, DR Congo have a World Cup point and haven’t they deserved it, a lesson in fortitude, resilience, organisation and no little quality. Brilliant behaviour from them, a glorious buzz for us, and a lesson to Portugal, who need to improve – a lot.

90+4 min Another Portugal corner, another come-and-claim from Mpasi, and that might be enough!

90+4 min We’ve not even been going a week, but already these are some serious group stages; the problem is that, for all the vibes, there’s not much jeopardy, but when they’re this joyous and intense, we can cope.

90+2 min Moutoussamy turns around the corner for Wissa, so Araujo, isolated with bare space in behind, bodychecks him; he’s booked.

90+1 min We’ll have five additional minutes.

90 min Portugal won’t panic – next for them it’s Uzbekistan – but though they’ve not looked as dull-witted as Spain did, there should be greater cohesion about them than this. They find Bruno, 25 yards out, who bored of relying on others, drills low … and wide of the near post. What a night is in prospect in Kinshasa and around the country; I’m excited from my box-room in north London.

88 min Cancelo drives a low cross into the box and Mpasi is in trouble here because he daren’t fumble … and he doesn’t, diving on it well. He’s been very solid today.

87 min Ramos spreads to Leao, who tries to go at Kalulu with no momentum, and just runs into him. This is wonderful stuff from DRC, an uplifting lesson in the art and craft of defending.

85 min Two more changes for DRC: Kalulu and Banza for Wan-Bissaka and the righteously shattered Bakambu.

83 min Portugal sacrifice Vitinha to get another striker on in the shape of Goncalo Ramos. I’d have made that change a while ago – a front two is much harder to defend than a one, especially when you’re sending in crosses and that one is ancient.

81 min But also, they’re miles away. Ten minutes and whatever’s added is a long time – though they’re looking pretty comfortable, a credit to Sébastien Desabre, who ‘s coached them. Again, they counter cleverly, Kayembe making a mess of his cross, but this isn’t simply a rearguard; they’re springing whenever they can and a winner for them wouldn’t be a massive shock. This is a lesson in how to play against a top team, the mentality – discipline in defence, conviction in attack – as critical as any tactical approach.

80 min Bruno is exerting more influence now and he turns in midfield, then lofts another pass over the top, this time out wide, for Conceicao … so Kapaudi fouls him. But he was already offside, meaning DRC have a free-kick, and they’re nearly there.

77 min DRC counter, Bakamubu barrelling through the middle and finding Sadiki, outside him. He then stops – exactly! – collects the return, and sidefoots wide of the near post. He’s played really well today, a one-man forward-line; his performance reminds me a little of El-Hadji Diouf’s for Senegal against France in the opening game of the 2002 edition, and not just because of their bleached blond hair.

77 min Portugal win another corner down the right, but Bruno’s floaty outswinger is miserable, in the air so long, Mpasi comes a fair way to collect.

76 min Gosh, alone in midfield, Sadiki has Wissa in space, snaps the ball forward … and Araujo stretches to intercept. That was very, very close, and superb defending with no margin for error.

74 min Better again from Portugal , Leao square to Bruno, whose first-time pass picks out Conceicao inside the box, right-hand side. This time, his cut-back is reasonable, but again, Ronaldo’s shot spins around the near post, Tuanzebe’s tackle doing plenty to put him off. He’s having another stormer.

72 min Before we recommence, that change we mentioned: Leao is on, replacing Neto, whole Semedo is on for Nuno Mendes.

71 min Martinez is extremely animated in the huddle, which brings us to Hugh Collins. “Presumably if Portugal go out in first round, Martinez will get and even better job? Managing Brazil, or maybe running SpaceX?”

Ha! And I agree, for what it’s worth, that what he did with Belgium made him someone I’d absolutely have swerved were I picking the Portugal manager, and also think he’s doing well to still be in it.

70 min And that is drinks ads. I actually think that’ll suit both teams, Portugal needing to regroup and DRC needing a breather.

68 min More like it from Portugal , Cancelo slipping a ball into the box for Conceicao, whose cut-back isn’t the best, slightly behind Ronaldo, but Bruno is there behind him … and you can probably guess the rest. Yup, Ronaldo takes the shot anyway, skewing it from right foot on to left, and wide of the near post.

66 min DRC are defending really well and look more comfortable in the second half, now they’re also looking to get forward when they can. We said at the start that their defence is decent, and Portugal are starting to irate, Mbemba dragging Mendes down – and he’s not pleased.

65 min Cancelo tries to slide a ball into the box for Conceicao, but Kapaudi is in quickly to challenge. Portugal need to move the ball quicker and pass forward sooner.

63 min What we’re not seeing from Portugal is Ronaldo darting off the last line to take passes nipped in behind by Bruno. I also thought we might see them strike up a similar cross-header relationship to the he forged with Casemiro last season, but so far, they don’t seem to be trying to make it happen.

61 min But he picks out Wissa, who heads away, and when the ball comes back, it ends up over the by-line for a goalkick. Portugal have created almost nothing this half; actually, in this game, and I don’t think it’ll be long before we see Leao, who I’d have sent on ahead of Conceicao.

60 min Conceicao, who’s been quiet so far, wins a corner down the right, this time to be taken by Mendes…

58 min DRC send on Sadiki for Mukau.

57 min The corner is no good, but DRC sustain the attack and, with Bruno dallying on the ball inside his own box, Bakumbu bounces him off it, then rams a shot against the near post … before the ref penalises him for a foul. That’s harsh and, had he scored, I don’t think VAR would’ve saved Portugal .

55 min Fernandes picks out a cross to Neves, swinging in from the left to the far side of the box, and Neves chests square for Cancelo to score via volleyed overhead, a brilliant goal … but from an offside position. I wonder if Neves, who was on, might’ve headed for goal, or taken down for himself, but in the meantime, DRC move downfield and win a corner. They fancy this, and they’re playing well.

53 min Mendes plays a one-two with Ronaldo, motoring into the box, but when the cut-back comes, Tuanzebe, with a bit of help, from Kapaudi, slides in to avert the danger.

53 min He goes low, looking for Ronaldo peeling away – think Anderton for Sherigham at Spurs in the mid-90s – but the ball’s a little behind him and Kapaudi is there to make the tackle.

52 min Portugal haven’t got going in the second half, but they’ve got themselves a corner because Mpasi hangs on to the ball for too long, losing his goalkick. That’s the first of these I’ve seen, and Bruno goes over to take.

50 min DRC knock it about in midfield, getting Portugal chasing, then Mukau punches into the box from out on the right, Bakambu screaming for the ball; he swivels and shoots, Diogo Costa just about palming away … then the flag goes up for offside.

48 min Portugal get it wide to Neto, who again teases in an inviting cross, Conceicao going down in a challenge with Masuaku and asking for a penalty, but there nowhere near enough going on there.

47 min “I must say,” must says Adam Foster, “Wayne Rooney’s explanation on BBC of the amazing intelligence involved in Ronaldo’s lack of movement is giving me Liz Truss vibes.”

I know what you mean, but also think standing still is an underrated skill; Bruno Fernandes also does this intelligently.

46 min We go again, Portugal sent out very early by Martinez – who also sends on Conceicao for Bernardo, presumably on the basis that he wants dribbling and speed on the outside, rather than a cunning passer and mover.

Borthwick keen to rest Itoje but injuries may force England rethink | England rugby union team | The Guardian

Keyword – Sport
Trefwoorden – England rugby union team, Maro Itoje, Steve Borthwick, France rugby union team, Rugby union, Sport
Title – Borthwick keen to rest Itoje but injuries may force England rethink | England rugby union team | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/guardian-sport
Link – Borthwick keen to rest Itoje but injuries may force England rethink | England rugby union team | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T15:24:28.000Z
Category – Sport
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2026/jun/17/janse-van-rensburg-england-debut-ineligible-france-rugby-union-borthwick

Steve Borthwick will rest the England captain, Maro Itoje, this summer unless injury strikes in the second row over the weekend.

Itoje is poised to be stood down for the Tests against South Africa, Fiji and Argentina next month following a year during which he led the British & Irish Lions to a series victory against Australia, played in the autumn and Six Nations campaigns, and mourned the death of his mother.

It would also be in recognition of the 31-year-old having completed more Test minutes than any other player in the game over the past decade. While acknowledging that giving Itoje the summer off “would be the right thing to do”, Borthwick will wait to see if George Martin and Alex Coles emerge unscathed from their matches on Friday and Saturday.

Martin starts for England in their non‑cap international against a France XV in Vannes, before Coles packs down for Northampton in the Prem final against Exeter at Allianz Stadium. If either or both are injured, Borthwick insists he may be forced to think again knowing that he would be left with Itoje and Ollie Chessum as his only frontline locks for their Nations Championship opener against South Africa on 4 July.

Borthwick said: “Maro’s circumstances have been very specific and the right thing to do, in a best‑case scenario, would be for him not to be with the England squad this summer. Maro had a period this year where he was injured and had to deal with a personal situation on the back of captaining the Lions.

“What I want to make sure is that it’s also the right thing for the team. Clearly, the context is key. There are a number of different factors we take into consideration, one of those being other player availability in the position.

“Any discussion with a player about missing an opportunity to represent their country is challenging. Maro is fully on board with the plan.”

Under the terms of the Professional Game Partnership agreed between the Rugby Football Union and Prem clubs, Borthwick also has the ultimate say on whether Immanuel Feyi‑Waboso and Alex Mitchell play at Twickenham on Saturday. The Exeter wing Feyi‑Waboso could make a comeback from a facial injury, and the Northampton scrum-half Alex Mitchell is close to a return from a pulled hamstring. Both players would be in the matchday 23 against South Africa, but Borthwick hinted that they will be involved in the Prem final if at all possible.

“We want players playing in big games, competing for trophies and hopefully being involved in tight games where decisions have to be made, much like in Test rugby,” Borthwick said. “I want players playing in as many big games as possible because that is good for the England team, but each decision is taken on an individual basis.”

Benhard Janse van Rensburg is poised to make his England debut off the bench on Friday in the match against France. The South Africa-born Janse van Rensburg does not qualify for England on residency grounds until 8 July but may be picked because the Stade de la Rabine showdown is not a Test.

Max Ojomoh forms a centre partnership with Seb Atkinson, with one of them to make way when Janse van Rensburg is thrust into the action in the curtain-raiser to next month’s 25,000-mile tour that spans three continents.

Noah Caluori, Saracens’ teenage try machine, makes his third appearance for a senior England team after being chosen on the right wing, although he has yet to win his first cap. George Ford leads the team and forms a half-back axis alongside Harry Randall while Marcus Smith is fielded at full-back. Players from Prem finalists Northampton and Exeter, who meet at Allianz Stadium on Saturday, are unavailable for selection.

England’s squad for next month’s Tests against South Africa, Fiji and Argentina is named on Monday with Borthwick considering whether to rest captain Maro Itoje . Following the match in Vannes, England begin their Nations Championship campaign taking in Johannesburg on 4 July.

England XV (v France XV, Stade de la Rabine, 20 June) M Smith (Harlequins); N Caluori (Saracens), M Ojomoh (Bath), S Atkinson (Gloucester), C Murley (Harlequins); G Ford (Sale, capt), H Randall (Bristol); A Opoku-Fordjour (Sale), T Dan (Saracens), G Kloska (Bristol), C Ewels (Bath), G Martin (Leicester), T Hill (Bath), T Curry (Sale), A Dombrandt (Harlequins). Replacements J Blamire (Leicester), B Obano (Bath), V Sela (Bath), N Isiekwe (Saracens), J Kenningham (Harlequins), R Quirke (Sale), B Janse van Rensburg (Bristol), A Radwan (Leicester).

Golden ticket: why Versailles invite is the ‘real deal’ for Trump | Donald Trump | The Guardian

Keyword – US news
Trefwoorden – Donald Trump, Emmanuel Macron, France, Europe, G7, US news
Title – Golden ticket: why Versailles invite is the ‘real deal’ for Trump | Donald Trump | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/angeliquechrisafis
Link – Golden ticket: why Versailles invite is the ‘real deal’ for Trump | Donald Trump | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T17:48:18.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/17/versailles-dinner-trump-macron-g7

For a US president who has likened himself to a king and redecorated the Oval Office with golden paint and gold ornaments , it feels like the perfect dinner venue.

Donald Trump said one of the deciding factors in accepting an invitation to dine with Emmanuel Macron at the spectacular, 2,300-room Palace of Versailles was that it was “not gold leaf” but the “real deal”.

The palace, set in grounds of more than 800 hectares (almost 2,000 acres) to the west of Paris, is both a historic seat of royal power and a symbol of the French Revolution.

One of the greatest achievements in 17th-century art, it was designed to be an architectural embodiment of the Sun King, Louis XIV, and was home to his great-great-great-grandson Louis XVI when the Women’s March on Versailles heralded the beginning of the end of the French monarchy in 1789.

Of all modern French presidents, Macron has made most use of the palace as a symbol of French luxury, power and diplomacy. In 2017, he hosted Vladimir Putin there , driving the Russian leader around the grounds in an electric golf cart and holding a joint press event in a gallery of historic war paintings. In 2023, he hosted King Charles in the famed Hall of Mirrors and he regularly uses the palace as a showcase for investment summits.

Trump will tour key rooms in the palace before sitting down to dinner in the Lower Gallery, which opens on to a terrace with views of the gardens. The table will be set amid an array of statues commissioned by the Sun King himself.

It’s rare for a US president to be hosted at Versailles as the main guest of honour with no other foreign leaders present. Notable past recipients of the honour include John F Kennedy, who was hosted for a state dinner in 1961.

The vast estate has long held a fascination for American millionaires, with the Vanderbilts’ Marble House in Newport, Rhode Island, among many buildings inspired by its architecture.

French pomp and pageantry have also been an inspiration to Trump. When he was invited to the Bastille Day military parade in Paris in 2017 , he expressed an interest in a similar show of strength back home.

“Beautiful building,” Trump once said of the Élysée Palace – the 365-room presidential home in Paris that is twice the size of the White House.

Time will tell whether dinner at Versailles gives him any fresh ideas for grand design and décor projects back home.

Real estate event in London ‘advertised sale of land in illegal Israeli settlements’ | Real estate | The Guardian

Keyword – Business
Trefwoorden – Real estate, UK news, Israel, Palestine, West Bank, Business, Middle East and north Africa, World news, Advertising
Title – Real estate event in London ‘advertised sale of land in illegal Israeli settlements’ | Real estate | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/geneva-abdul,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/aamna-mohdin
Link – Real estate event in London ‘advertised sale of land in illegal Israeli settlements’ | Real estate | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T10:18:02.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jun/17/real-estate-event-london-illegal-israeli-settlements-land-west-bank

An Israeli real estate event in north London appears to have advertised the sale of land in Israeli settlements in East Jerusalem and the occupied West Bank, despite previous denials that illegal settlement properties would be marketed at the event.

Pamphlets shared with the Guardian from the event on Sunday showed real estate projects in Ma’ale Adumim, Givat Ze’ev, Kfar Eldad and Teneh Omarim in the occupied West Bank , as well as Ramat Eshkol and Givat Hamatos in East Jerusalem.

The event was held after more than 100 UK lawmakers as well as civil society organisations had called for its cancellation, saying it was inconsistent with the government’s obligations under international law as well as guidance on settlement-related economic activity.

“There is a prima facie case at the very least that people were advertising land in illegal settlements and that is contrary to law, and the government needs to act,” said Andy McDonald MP, co-chair of the British-Palestine all-party parliamentary group.

Last week, McDonald wrote a letter to the foreign secretary signed by 101 politicians saying that the event was “embedded in Israel’s project of colonial expansion” and calling on the government to stop it from going ahead.

Concerns were also raised beforehand by the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, who spoke to the Metropolitan police and said he was informed that any allegations of criminality over the unlawful sale of property at the event would be assessed with a view to investigation.

The Met declined to comment.

The London event was the final stop in a series of international roadshows – after Toronto and New York – which had appeared to advertise the sale of land in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, and invited individuals to “explore the best Anglo neighbourhoods” and find their “dream home”.

The event had invited people to register their interest in Gush Etzion , an Israeli settlement in the occupied West Bank, which the UK government considers an illegal settlement.

Organisers had previously denied claims that the event would feature land for sale in the West Bank, calling the allegations “ridiculous” and “motivated by anti-Israeli and terrorist supporters”, and said exhibitors would provide information about properties and projects within the green line.

On Tuesday, organisers apologised for the “error” in event brochures, after concerns were raised in parliament.

“No one at the event promoted or spoke about properties in the ‘disputed territories’, such as Givat Ze’ev or Kfar Eldad. Their mention in the event brochure was made in error for which we apologise,” organisers told the Jewish News .

The website for the 2025 event that mentioned Gush Etzion has since been taken down, while mention of the settlement on the 2026 event page was removed after concerns were raised publicly. It also included a map of the territory featuring no delineation of Gaza and the occupied West Bank, as well as Syria’s Golan Heights.

“How is it that this government fails even to prevent the marketing of illegal property in this country and still fails to take action?” Ellie Chowns asked the foreign secretary, Yvette Cooper, in the Commons on Tuesday.

It is understood that the Foreign Office minister Hamish Falconer wrote to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) on Sunday, requesting that evidence of advertising or promoting property in illegal settlements be scrutinised under UK law.

“We have asked them now to urgently look into this,” Cooper said on Tuesday. “It is extremely important that those standards are met in the UK, and that is exactly why we have raised this so seriously with the ASA.”

The ASA told the Guardian it had received the letter from the government, but had not received any advertising complaints. The ASA also said it did not have a position on the law in this area and referred the matter to the government.

McDonald said the government’s reference to the ASA was “wholly inappropriate and completely inadequate”, and called on ministers to investigate whether there was a case under English and Welsh law to prosecute any British companies involved.

Amnesty International UK said the government’s decision to refer the matter to the ASA was “a ridiculous gimmick that fails to understand the devastation Israeli settlements cause for Palestinians”.

McDonald added: “You would not accept anybody offering settlement lands in the Donbas in the United Kingdom. The government would, quite rightly, come down on that like a ton of bricks.

“We appear to be completely inconsistent in applying international humanitarian law when it comes to Israel’s egregious behaviours, and that is why so many people in this country are angry and losing faith in the current leadership.”

The event in London took place as settler violence in the West Bank has reached unprecedented levels, and as a coalition of western countries – including the UK, France, Canada, Germany and Italy – called for an end to the construction of Israeli settlements it says breach international law .

Last week, the UK, along with other western powers, announced it was imposing sanctions on six firms and one individual for enabling and financing the recent surge in settler violence in the West Bank.

However, it fell short of banning trade with illegal Israeli settlements, something that more than 140 Labour MPs, including the chairs of every Labour-led select committee, called on the government to do earlier this month .

“They’re not inflicting any pain on Israel sufficient to get them to change course,” said McDonald. “We don’t have to be complicit in it, we can set out the standards that we adhere to and not murderous war crimes being perpetrated in the Middle East.”

Dora, who asked to withhold her surname, attended Sunday’s event undercover with other members of the group Jewish Anti-Zionist Action. “I went in there with the objective of collecting evidence of illegal land sale,” she said.

After being kicked out of the event, she joined a protest outside the venue, during which 14 people were arrested.

“Condemnation from the government is just never enough,” she added. “Nothing’s going to change if there’s no foreign intervention, if there’s no sanctions, if there’s nothing material.”

It is understood that the Charity Commission has not opened a compliance case or a statutory inquiry into the incident. A spokesperson said: “We are assessing concerns raised with us about an event held at a synagogue affiliated with United Synagogue. Our assessment will determine what regulatory role there is, if any, for the commission. In line with our guidance, the charity has submitted a serious incident report relating to concerns raised about the event.”

A source at the synagogue said the event was a third-party hire and due diligence beforehand confirmed that all properties being marketed were legal in English law. They added that trustees were fully aware of their legal responsibilities, and all of the proper checks were applied.

‘He liked that people were scared of him’: my year unpicking fantasy and reality with a veteran of Italy’s football ultras | | The Guardian

Keyword – News
Trefwoorden – News
Title – ‘I’m not a person who puts up with rudeness’: unpicking fantasy and reality with an Italian football ultra | | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/tobias-jones
Link – ‘I’m not a person who puts up with rudeness’: unpicking fantasy and reality with an Italian football ultra | | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-16T04:00:45.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/jun/16/im-not-a-person-who-puts-up-with-rudeness-unpicking-fantasy-and-reality-with-an-italian-ultra

I had heard the name Alessandro Casolari on and off for years. From 2016 onwards, when I was researching my book on Italy’s ultras – a cross between English football hooligans and Hells Angels – the nickname “Caso” kept coming up. In the late 80s and early 90s, he had led the ultras in Ferrara, whose football club is known as Spal.

A red-brick city in northern Italy between Bologna and Venice, Ferrara has always felt sidelined, languishing in a marshy land of fog and floods. I used to go there quite often, drawn by its festivals and famous writers and film directors. A few years ago, when I started writing another book, about the Po River, I hung out there again, but I never bumped into Caso.

Then, in December 2024, he called me out of the blue, having got my number from a mutual friend. He was talking non-stop, weaving together stories about Caracas, Medellín, cocaine and Kosovo. He was jumping from one story to the next, and they were all connected by a dozen subplots he had to explain at length. Every other sentence ended “ hai capito ?”: “you get it?”

I picked up that there had been a murder in 1998, which was how he had ended up at a funeral next to a man who had just won the lottery. That money allowed them both to go to Colombia, which is how Casolari met his wife and made contact with the Farc guerrillas (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia), started working in hostage negotiation and then ended up importing hundreds of kilos of cocaine to northern Italy. It sounded far-fetched, but he seemed to know the whole jungle-to-mirror journey of cocaine. Getting a question in was like chucking a paper plane into a gale.

Around the hour mark he slowed down a bit. He told me had just been “held captive” (his term for prison) for 177 days. “Eighty-two in solitary, hai capito ?” That was why he was phoning: he wanted me to write an article denouncing human-rights abuses in Italian prisons. He had, he said, suffered “a broken nose and a compound fracture of the right cheekbone”, thanks to beatings by guards. “When I was arrested, I weighed 74kg; by the end I was a larva, weighing just 61kg.”

“Hang on,” I said. “Why were you in prison?”

“I only gave someone four slaps. That was it.” He said he would send me links to the newspaper coverage, but he wanted me to know it was mostly rubbish because “the police, the judiciary and the Italian institutions are a mafia-infested wormery”. As “a Marxist-Leninist communist revolutionary”, he had declared himself “a political prisoner”.

He only ever spoke the truth, he told me. “My calling card is unequivocal: I’m a loyal person, an extremely sincere person. I never exaggerate or downplay my experiences.” His language – “larva”, “wormery”, that “unequivocal calling card” – was beguiling, even though I was aware he had avoided telling me that bit about the four slaps. (I later learned that the formal accusation – since cable ties, guns and a Taser were involved – was aggravated robbery, kidnapping and the transfer of explosive devices.)

It was a world I thought I knew. I teach and mentor a few ex-offenders. And I often write about criminals. I know how the journalist-criminal dynamic usually ends: one of us betrays the other. Sometimes they feel as if I’ve stolen their story. Or I discover, too late, that I’ve been sold a story that exists only in their head.

So I assumed that with Casolari the relationship, or the story, might be built on sand. But I was fascinated by him because he seemed to take the ultra philosophy – that there has to be confrontation, there must always be a fight – to the next level, while disguising it with charm and eloquence. “He’s verbally very sophisticated,” Maresciallo Maggiore Giuseppe Fenuta, the officer who arrested him after the “four slaps” incident, warned me.

Casolari and I even had a few things in common. His politics wasn’t so far from mine (he a communist, me a communalist). We had both married outside our nationality and had children in their teens and 20s. Like me, he was a freelancer of sorts, another lone hustler. I was interested in what my life might have looked like if the kaleidoscope of fate had been turned a few degrees. So in January 2025 I went to Ferrara to meet him.

C asolari was under house arrest, pending his trial. Because he had a new lover, his wife had kicked him out of the family home and he was renting a small flat just south of the city walls. He was showily courteous. His tough look – skinhead, stubble, boxer’s nose – was somewhat undermined by his goofy smile.

When we got down to business, he started pacing like a trapped animal, talking double-quick, just as he had on the phone. I couldn’t pin down the details on any of the previous stories because he was constantly launching into new ones. He spoke about his time in the army and in prison, about Marx, Bobby Sands, Jesus, Che Guevara and Hugo Chávez. If I butted in, he stopped and listened, examined the idea, and then set off again.

I quickly noticed a logistical problem. We were facing different directions: I wanted to hear all about his past, but he was using me as a sounding board to figure out his next move. There was an Italian being held hostage in Caracas whom he thought he could “bring home” in return for a pardon. Or maybe he would become a mercenary. Or a peacekeeper. He was going to call his friend, Renato Curcio – founder of the far-left terrorist group the Red Brigades in 1970, who had set up a publishing house while he was in prison – to pitch the idea of writing a prison diary. This wouldn’t have been Casolari’s first foray into publishing: he had already co-authored a book about his ultra gang, Gruppo d’Azione. Did I have any advice about royalties? Rather than writing about his life, I felt I might become his careers adviser.

But over the months that followed, each time I found myself in Ferrara for other reasons, I would want a bit more of the story and go back to Casolari’s bedsit. After his house arrest ended in autumn 2025, he began driving me round the city and sometimes we would have lunch with his two sons. We went to Rome together for a conference organised by Curcio’s publishing house.

I was fascinated by him as a character study: he was both a misfit – a short-fused tough growing up in rich and bourgeois Ferrara – but also, in a fairground mirror way, a distorted reflection of this traditionally leftwing city.

He was born in Ferrara in June 1966. His father was the son of local farmers, his mother the daughter of a Sicilian lawyer. He spent 11 years in the private convent school of Sant’Orsola and studied languages – Latin, French and English – at the city’s Ariosto lycée. He read a lot. He had been going to the football on and off with his father since the age of nine, but at 16 he had started hanging out with the Spal ultras (Spal is an acronym of Società Polisportiva Ars et Labor). A subculture born in the 1960s, the ultras were macho fist-fighters. Unlike British hooligans, they were structured hierarchically and were experts at inserting themselves forcefully into local politics. Casolari enjoyed the riotous atmosphere and, with his new friends, developed a lifelong taste for cannabis.

After leaving school in 1984, aged 18, he spent his nine months of military service with the Italian parachute regiment in Livorno. Every six weeks he came home on leave and talked about bringing together the archipelago of Spal’s ultra groups – the Nutty Boys, the Legion of Hooligans, the Estense Ditch, Stoned Again, the Fringe, Astra-Alcohol and many more – into a single unit, thereby making them a better fighting, and lobbying, force. Uniting them all under one banner took cunning and muscle. “Caso was pure charisma,” remembers one of his many exes, who did not want to be named.

On 2 November 1986, at the away game against Padova, a new banner was unfurled, reading: “Gruppo d’Azione”. This “action group” was to be the “military wing” of the west terrace. They were set up to fight ultra gangs from other teams. For home games, they had a different banner, 50 metres long: “ Gioventù Estense ”, meaning “Estense youth”. (“Estense” is the adjective for the Este family that ruled Ferrara in the middle ages.)

With his black curls, faded denim and maxed-out megaphone, Casolari led the terrace chants. His boys were called “gremlins” because they wore green bomber jackets. Their mottoes – “Hit everything, educate no one”, “City fights and getting shit-faced” – made their interests clear: drugs, violence, thrill-seeking. Every Tuesday, from 9pm, the ultras gathered in Bar Astra. There might be anything from 50 to 200 there, herded by eight members of the “board”. “I always took the final decision,” Casolari told me. In rival cities, the ultras looked to cause maximum carnage as they sang their anthems, “ Di legno Siam ” (“We’re made of wood”) or – to the tune of Red River Valley – “… the city will be destroyed”. Already off their faces, they would break into chemists to top up on Valium or Rohypnol. Since the birth of the ultra movement, at least 19 people have died in football-related violence in Italy.

Casolari picked up seasonal work weighing and unloading sugar beet in the local factory. He supplemented his income through petty theft. He was first arrested in 1986 for mugging the son of a policeman. He was sentenced to 12 months but never served due to a general amnesty for minor crimes, to reduce the prison population. A year later, aged 21, he began a relationship with a 14-year-old, Annina*. (The age of consent in Italy was, and is, 14.)

Casolari’s men took positions on local issues. In 1989, they staged protests against the city’s plan to bury hazardous waste in local landfills. Casolari organised marches and – a sign of how much the ultras were seen as spokesmen for local grievances – was even welcomed into schools to talk with teachers and students. On one occasion he and his followers interrupted a city council debate to protest against the hazardous waste dumping. “He led a popular revolt,” another ex-girlfriend told me. “He always knew how to talk, what to say.” It made no difference, though. The toxins were buried in a landfill outside the city, and other sites across Emilia-Romagna.

In 1990, he was arrested again, after a fight in a pub, though he didn’t serve a custodial sentence. His time as an ultra boss came to an abrupt halt two years later, at a European under-21s game played in Spal’s stadium. Police had confiscated a box of smoke flares from the ultras, but someone retook possession of the box and the flares were quickly passed around. When Casolari unscrewed the bottom of his and pulled the cord, instead of coloured smoke, it fired a nautical flare that struck a young woman standing nearby, causing serious head injuries.

It emerged from the subsequent investigation that the company, Parente, from which the flares had been bought, had a sideline in other materials and the smoke flares had become mixed up with the nautical ones. The injured young woman and her parents sued Casolari, Parente, the ministry of the interior and Spal. In March 1996, the family was awarded damages of 200m lire (about €174,000 in today’s money). A later ruling divided the damages between the accused, leaving Casolari with 70% of the total to pay.

His life fell apart. He was banned from the stadium. All his future earnings would be taxed for that compensation. He and Annina split up. His parents had a tobacconist in the centre of town selling cigarettes, watches and pens. Later they had a jewellery shop. “I was a dimwit,” he said, “dipping into my father’s wallet, stealing blocks of cigarettes.” “It was always his family,” his younger brother Luca told me wearily, “who paid the price for his adventures.”

Casolari continued to smoke weed and have regular run-ins with the police. In 1995, he was arrested for holding a Nigerian sex worker hostage and was sentenced to nine months, later commuted to “conditional liberty”. (After a year with him in which he admitted to pretty much everything of which he was accused, his denial of this one – he said it was a case of mistaken identity – stood out.) He was sent to prison from May to August that year for fighting a carabiniere when – after a long night partying – he drove the wrong way down a one-way street.

At that point, he was just another petty criminal, a street-fighting stoner with sticky fingers. But during those months in prison Casolari met a Colombian who would be the reason he ended up in Medellín, becoming a husband, father and amateur drug lord.

C asolari likes to see himself as a good guy. In his telling, even his wildest escapades begin with an act of kindness. In prison, he met Julio, a Colombian who had been convicted for cocaine smuggling. When Julio’s prison supplies of sugar and pasta kept getting stolen by other prisoners, Casolari and an old ultra mate decided to attack the thugs who were stealing his supplies. From there, a friendship grew.

Casolari introduced Julio to his uncle, a lawyer, who managed to get him transferred to an open prison. They corresponded for years, Julio sending postcards written in courteous English. Casolari has kept them all. There are boxes of archives – diaries, letters and photographs – that pile up in cupboards like a tribute to his career.

On his release in 1996, after working a series of factory jobs, Casolari decided to enrol in the Italian army. “Being a soldier is a proletarian job,” he told me. “The officer class had a few fascists but apart from them, I didn’t struggle with the hierarchy.” He went twice to Kosovo and Bosnia and claims to have served in Afghanistan (though I had trouble verifying the latter). The appraisals from this period – at least the ones he showed me – are, surprisingly, glowing: “lively … loyal … constructive … esteemed”, though one report alludes to his “irritability”. He got shot in the arm in Kosovo. He is now the beneficiary of a veteran’s pension of €1,200 (£1,000) a month.

The army also gave him long leaves of absence. In October 1997, he was at a funeral in Ferrara of an ultra, Luca Sgambellone, who had murdered an old man and then overdosed. At the funeral Casolari met a man who confided that he had just won 66m lire (the equivalent, now, of about €56,000) on the football pools. Casolari suggested that they should go to Colombia to see Julio.

It all seems fantastical: a murder, a lottery win, an international adventure. Casolari appeared to have a super-human ability to bend destiny to his will. Or maybe – I wasn’t sure – it was just manipulation, using people as stepping stones in his grand schemes.

On New Year’s Day 1998, one of Julio’s relatives picked up the Italians at Bogotá airport. They spent a week in the capital and then two in San Andrés, a Colombian island in the Caribbean. It was there that Casolari met his future wife, Ana Eneida Mena Arias. She worked in marketing, one of the few Black people in her cohort of trainees, and was very successful on the doorstep. “I think customers were surprised or curious,” she said.

For a year after they met, Eneida received postcards from Casolari. She lived in a flat in Medellìn that shared a staircase phone and her neighbours sometimes told her that “an Italian” had called. Eventually Casolari got through and they spoke. “He seemed drunk,” she said, “telling me I could be a translator for Nato on a monthly salary of 3m lire [about €2,400 today].” He called her almost daily and she was slowly drawn into his vision for their future. She came to Ferrara in February 2001. In May they married, Casolari wearing his rifleman’s uniform. “It all happened so quickly,” Eneida said.

The following year their first son was born. The Spal president gave Eneida a job in his cleaning firm. (Club presidents often give ultras and their families jobs to keep them sweet.) In 2005, Casolari left the army, and he and other radicals in Ferrara set up an association with his ultra mates called Uno Sguardo Verso Sud (“A glance to the south”), which aimed to raise awareness of the global south through debates and events. (Many ultra groups have charitable arms, although it is not always clear how much charity actually goes on.)

In 2007, when Eneida was pregnant with their second son, the family spent four months in Colombia. Always an avid reader, Casolari came across a newspaper article about Gustavo Moncayo, the father of a Colombian corporal who had been kidnapped by Farc, the communist guerrilla movement, 10 years earlier. Moncayo was now walking all over the country in chains to raise awareness of his son’s captivity. Casolari phoned the paper, obtained Moncayo’s contact details, and the two met in Bogotá. It emerged that Moncayo was about to embark on a European tour to publicise the plight of Farc hostages. Casolari invited Moncayo to stay in Ferrara, and that autumn the two men spent a week together in Ferrara and Rome.

Casolari became involved in the ever-expanding group of Italians, both politicians and priests, lobbying for the release of hostages. He befriended Don Matteo Maria Zuppi, who is now archbishop of Bologna. He held meetings with the Red Cross and the Vatican embassy in Colombia. In December 2007, Casolari was part of a delegation, along with Moncayo, that visited Hugo Chávez in Caracas. Venezuela had long been an escape route for leftwing insurgents, and Chávez saw a chance of international acclaim if he could negotiate the release of hostages.

Photographs and letters attest to Casolari’s presence at various meetings with politicians and hostage relatives, both in Italy and South America. But it’s impossible to confirm the precise role Casolari played in the negotiations. “It was never completely clear what he was doing,” said Eneida. “He always has so many ideas and projects.”

Whatever the truth, in 2010, Pablo Moncayo was released after 12 years in captivity. Having publicly escorted his father, Gustavo, around Italy, Casolari could now boast, in provincial Ferrara, that he was an international hostage negotiator.

O ver the months I spoke to Casolari, factchecking his stories became an increasingly fraught business. I spent weeks trying to find Julio, his old prison friend, to no avail. Casolari began to get angry when I pestered him for proof. “I’m not the sort of person who puts up with unwarranted rudeness,” he said in one of his long voice notes, “so I don’t know what to say to you.”

Yet despite these tensions, and the wild implausibility of what he said, I was surprised to find that much of what he told me checked out. In 2011, for instance, back in Ferrara, Casolari had another reinvention, moving from poacher to gamekeeper: the new president of Spal, Cesare Butelli, awarded Uno Sguardo Verso Sud the contract for setting up and manning matchday crowd-control barriers. Spal was then in Serie C, the Italian third division. Casolari acted on behalf of the club to negotiate repayments to restaurants who had been left with unpaid bills by players or the club president. I visited one of the restaurants seeking confirmation and the owner simply said: “Yes, that happened.”

With his newfound cash and Colombian contacts, the slide into cocaine-smuggling was almost inevitable. Casolari started moving just a few hundred grams, but since the delivery cost of €7,000 was the same whether moving 100 grams or a kilo, it made economic sense to step up the quantities. In 2017, he created a sort of criminal cooperative: former ultras and local heavies would pool their money and share the earnings.

He estimated that he smuggled “around 400 kilos”. Between 2018 and 2023 there were drops all across northern Italy: Sassuolo, Brescia, Verona, Padova and Bologna. “We never went south,” Casolari said. “They have different parishioners there, hai capito ?”

For five years, Casolari lived the high life. He took to carrying “three to five thousand” in cash in the front left pocket of his jeans. He travelled the world with Eneida and his two sons: Iceland, Greece, the US, Canada, Colombia, the UK. “He was staying in top hotels, jumping in taxis,” one friend remembered. “He would buy any pair of trainers his kids wanted: bam, bam, bam.”

Technically he wasn’t even living in Ferrara. From 2018 to 2024 Casolari was resident in London, the director of a dummy company with a clumsy name: Italians Eat It Better. It was supposed to import olive oil, parmesan and wine to the UK. An Italian restaurant in a northern city of the UK offered to supply fake invoices.

Casolari claimed that what he was actually doing was bringing cash into the UK: every time he or associates visited the UK, they would take a bag containing up to €10,000 in notes, to add to his stash. Casolari claimed the accumulated money was banked with the Italian restaurateur in the UK, who is now looking after “around €1m”. (The man in question declined requests for an interview.)

His private life became messy: he claimed that in 2018 he fell for a Haitian escort and, when he couldn’t stand the idea of sharing her with other clients, paid her €2,000 a month to keep her to himself. Eventually he took up with another woman who lived a few doors down from the family home.

He was getting meaner. As the father of two biracial boys, he flipped if he ever heard racist language. One time, in the UK, someone made a comment. “Boom,” remembered the man dining with him. “He stood up and took this guy outside. You can tell he’s been in the army.” Casolari admited to his temper, but gilded it by saying it’s only provoked by injustice. He claimed that, when two young lads were disrespectful to his sons on a bus, he hunted them down, took them to the woods and put a pistol in their mouths to scare them. “I was in that criminal dynamic,” Casolari said. “If anyone pissed me off, I could call someone.”

“When he gets angry he’s capable of the worst,” said one of his friends. “He has to control everyone,” said one Spal ultra. “There’s a lot of ego,” another acquaintance of his told me. “He liked that people were scared of him. That’s what led to his downfall.”

H ere’s what happened. One of Casolari’s coke clients, S, owed him €60,000. There were rumours that the debtor had a bitcoin fortune. On 22 August 2023, the man was lured to a flat by four of Casolari’s accomplices. Casolari came in with a balaclava and gloves. In the ensuing fight, Casolari’s balaclava was pulled off and S saw his face. “I gave him four punches in the mouth,” Casolari said (those were the “four slaps”). S was tied up and Casolari threatened him with a Taser and unloaded pistol.

Casolari left, expecting his men to discover the bitcoin code. But the operation became a farce. S wriggled free of the cable ties and jumped out of the window of the flat. The men chased him, took €100 from his wallet and used his bank card to withdraw €40. Those were the entire takings.

Investigators traced one of the kidnappers and recorded his phone calls. Casolari was put under surveillance. On 1 April 2024, he was arrested. Police confiscated 104 bullets, a sawn-off shotgun, 85 cartridges and 83 grams of cocaine.

Casolari spent almost six months in prison, much of it in solitary. “He was desperate,” remembered a visiting pastor, Giacomo Casolari (no relation). “He’s a man of great contradictions: he wants to be the best man in the world, but he’s got this battle-hardened, violent side.” He picked fights with guards and was, the pastor said, “brutally beaten up”.

When he was released from prison pending trial, Casolari’s relationship with his wife broke down. “I wouldn’t be silent any more,” said Eneida, adding that she now dared to interrupt his monologues, “and we fought a lot. Even physically, in front of our boys.” In September 2024 the couple formally separated. Six months later, in spring 2025, they were divorced.

I n the year I spent with Casolari, I saw his plans shift continually. He wanted to claim political asylum in Venezuela, then in Cuba. He claimed to have contacted the Russians, offering to fight for them in Donbas (a strange choice for a communist opposed to imperialism). Sometimes he would tell me he was desperate to reconcile with his ex-wife (he even moved back into the family home, sleeping on a camp-bed in the garage). Other times that he was about to marry his new girlfriend.

Maybe that’s what being a career criminal is: endless improvisation. But it felt as if he was in the midst of an identity crisis. He was constantly trying to persuade himself he was, at heart, on the side of the angels. “I was only ever an ethical dealer,” he told me many times. “I only ever sold coke to people over 40, hai capito ?” He talked about being a Robin Hood, but sometimes he saw himself as more like the sheriff of Ferrara, the bad guy. At other times he admitted to having suffered “a delirium of power”. “I fell into the trap of all shitheads,” he said. “I allowed myself to be adulated.”

During the months he awaited sentencing, being sent back to prison was his greatest fear. In his mind, prison turned him not into a culprit but a victim. He even went on a sort of hunger strike for 21 days (eating only walnuts and honey) while awaiting his sentencing, losing 9kg (1st 6lb). The Red Brigades veteran Renato Curcio’s publishing house has commissioned him to write that book about the injustices of Italian prison.

That’s why he had contacted me in the first place: to denounce prison abuses. And every time I accompanied him to a court appearance (related to the “four slaps” charges), the spectacle was the same: he was a box of hornets. In his flatcap and tweed suit from Scotland, he would go round his co-accused and their lawyers, hissing questions. He told me he would flee the country if given another custodial sentence.

He’s seeing a psychologist and has had some personal insights. “My inhibitory brakes often don’t work,” he admited. “And I don’t let other people speak. I am a bit of a megalomaniac.”

This introspection can be contagious. After spending so much time with Casolari I began to wonder why he wanted to share his life story with me. Was I being used to launder his reputation? He certainly wanted me to launder his money. He would frequently tell me about that “ milioncino ” (“a little million”) stashed in the UK, and twice he offered me 10% to bring it back to Ferrara. Spend enough time with criminals, and it becomes tempting to believe their tales. The way he told it, Casolari is only a suitcase away from getting back to the high life. His ex-partners perhaps see things more clearly. “He has his fantasy world,” said one, “and he wants to believe his fantasies are real.”

* Name has been changed

Listen to our podcasts here and sign up to the long read weekly email here .

So is the US war with Iran over? In a word: no | Mohamad Bazzi | The Guardian

Keyword – Opinion
Trefwoorden – US-Israel war on Iran, Trump administration, Donald Trump, Iran, US news, Middle East and north Africa, World news
Title – So is the US war with Iran over? In a word: no | Mohamad Bazzi | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/mohamad-bazzi
Link – So is the US war with Iran over? In a word: no | Mohamad Bazzi | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-16T09:00:17.000Z
Category – Opinion
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jun/16/iran-war-mohamad-bazzi

W hen Donald Trump launched his war against Iran in late February, he had ambitious goals: to topple Iran’s theocratic regime, destroy its military capabilities and nuclear program, and instigate a popular uprising by Iranians. A week into the war, Trump said he would only accept Iran’s “unconditional surrender”. On Sunday, Trump settled for a deal that reopens the strait of Hormuz.

The US president celebrated having solved a problem he had created: reopening a vital waterway through which more than a fifth of the world’s oil supply passed each day – before Iran effectively closed it at the start of the war, increasing energy prices and disrupting the global economy. “Ships of the World, start your engines,” Trump wrote on social media in announcing the latest deal. “Let the oil flow!”

This isn’t a typical case of Trump making grandiose claims, declaring victory and moving on to his next obsession. Trump cornered himself by starting a war of choice, along with Israel, aimed at regime change in Tehran. But Iran withstood weeks of intense bombing by two of the world’s most powerful militaries, and its rulers emerged more defiant and with greater leverage than they had before the conflict. The regime turned its geographic proximity to the strait of Hormuz into a new weapon that allows it to disrupt shipments of not just oil and liquified natural gas, but fertilizer and other key agricultural products that could instigate global food shortages. Iran knows it can’t fight a head-on battle with the US military, but Trump showed its leaders that they could hold the world’s economy hostage.

And the much-hyped deal, which is expected to be formally signed on Friday in Geneva, doesn’t end the war. It’s essentially a 60-day extension of a ceasefire that was reached between Iran and the US on 8 April, but did not lead to the reopening of the strait of Hormuz because Trump then imposed a naval blockade against Iranian ships in the region. Several rounds of negotiations also stalled over multiple violations of the ceasefire, and as Trump wavered between making a deal and issuing threats to restart the war.

While the final text of the latest agreement has not yet been released, it once again deferred the most difficult questions to future negotiations. Those talks are supposed to conclude within 60 days of the deal’s signing on 19 June, but they’re likely to continue for months, if not years. In other words, Trump and Iran bought at least two months of breathing space for diplomacy to resolve what bombing could not. And while neither Trump nor Iran’s leaders have an interest in resuming an all-out war, there’s no guarantee that the two sides won’t fight another round.

The unresolved questions are daunting – and they’re the same ones that faced US and Iranian negotiators during their last round of talks in Geneva, held 48 hours before Trump launched the war on 28 February. Those negotiations, which were mediated by Oman, involved the Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, and two of Trump’s most trusted advisers: his special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner. The UK’s national security adviser, Jonathan Powell, also attended the talks, although it’s unclear if he participated directly. Sources told the Guardian that Powell found Iran’s offer to curtail its nuclear program “surprising” – and significant enough to continue negotiations and avoid a rush to war.

Iran is unlikely to offer the same concessions on its nuclear enrichment that it did in the last round of talks. The Iranian regime is emboldened, having survived the assassination of its top leaders and weeks of severe bombardment. In the war’s early hours, joint US-Israeli airstrikes killed more than 30 top Iranian military and political officials, including the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

That early success seduced Trump into thinking he could achieve a quick military victory and topple the Islamic regime that rose to power after Iran’s 1979 revolution. But Iranian leaders rallied around the regime and quickly installed Khamenei’s son, Mojtaba, as the new supreme leader. The younger Khamenei is backed by hardline officers of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Iran’s most powerful military force, which now exerts even greater influence over the country’s economy and political system.

In upcoming negotiations, the Revolutionary Guards and other regime factions are likely to push for Iran’s longterm control over the strait of Hormuz, including continuing to impose fees for “maritime services” on commercial ships passing through the waterway. Trump insists that the strait will remain “permanently toll-free,” but the agreement announced on Sunday only suspended tolls (which Iran had started charging during the war) for 60 days. Any lasting arrangements will be negotiated between the US, Iran and other countries in the region, including Oman, which also borders the strait of Hormuz.

Already, Iranian officials are floating rationales to collect not an outright toll for passing vessels, but what they call fees for “navigation and security” services – even though these levies did not exist before the war. “Only Iran and Oman have the right to receive these fees and no other party can decide about it,” said Mehdi Mohammadi, an adviser to Iran’s chief negotiator and speaker of parliament, Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf. “This process is in place now and will remain in place in any future agreement.”

It would be embarrassing for Trump and his administration to allow Iran to impose tolls (even if they’re shared with its neighbor, Oman) on a waterway that has historically had freedom of navigation. But the president and his aides must also realize that they might not be able to negotiate their way back to the prewar status quo. Trump’s ill-fated war emboldened Iran – and its leaders will seek to extract a higher price for future concessions.

Aside from the future status of the strait of Hormuz, and limitations on Iran’s nuclear program and future capabilities, other difficult questions have been deferred to later negotiations. These include the fate of Iran’s stockpile of more than 400kg of uranium, which has been enriched up to 60% purity – not far from the 90% level required to build a nuclear device. Iran will likely seek significant relief from US and other international economic sanctions in exchange for diluting its existing uranium stockpile and agreeing to limits on future enrichment, which would allow it to operate power plants but not to produce nuclear weapons.

Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister who spent months convincing Trump to launch his regime-change war, has insisted that any deal should also limit Tehran’s ability to develop ballistic missiles as well as its support for regional militias, including Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen. On 28 February, Trump had listed those same concerns among the reasons he decided to take the US to war, arguing that Iran posed an imminent threat to Americans.

All of these questions are still unresolved, and some of them could torpedo the latest agreement and upcoming negotiations. For now, Trump has agreed to at least 60 days of peace – and he seems more eager to make a grand deal with an Iranian regime he could not overthrow.

Mohamad Bazzi is a Guardian US columnist. He is also director of the Center for Near Eastern Studies, and a journalism professor, at New York University