Tell us your favourite film of 2026 so far | Film | The Guardian

Keyword – Film
Trefwoorden – Film, Culture
Title – Tell us your favourite film of 2026 so far | Film | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/guardian-community-team
Link – Tell us your favourite film of 2026 so far | Film | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-18T07:32:27.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/jun/18/tell-us-your-favourite-film-of-2026-so-far

The Guardian’s film writers have compiled their favourite films of the year so far – and we’d like to hear about yours, too.

Which films have captured your imagination this year? Are there any new releases from so far in 2025 that you would recommend watching?

Tell us your nomination and why you like it below.

If you’re having trouble using the form click here . Read terms of service here and privacy policy here .

Iran’s Beiranvand denies 10-man Belgium in World Cup draw as Nathan Ngoy sees red | World Cup 2026 | The Guardian

Keyword – Football
Trefwoorden – World Cup 2026, Belgium, Iran, World Cup, Football, Sport
Title – Iran’s Beiranvand denies 10-man Belgium in World Cup draw as Nathan Ngoy sees red | World Cup 2026 | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/ben-fisher
Link – Iran’s Beiranvand denies 10-man Belgium in World Cup draw as Nathan Ngoy sees red | World Cup 2026 | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-21T21:16:20.000Z
Category – Sport
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/jun/21/belgium-iran-world-cup-group-g-match-report

There was simply no debate over the moment of the match and it is one that Iran will cherish, even more so if they are to progress to the World Cup knockout stages for the first time. Every angle of Alireza Beiranvand’s preposterous save to prevent Belgium taking the lead approaching the hour added to the miraculousness of it all. Perhaps the most ludicrous element was that Beiranvand appeared to have been eliminated from the game when the ball dropped at the feet of Maxim De Cuyper inside the six-yard box, the goal gaping. Yet, while scrambling on the turf after seesawing to his left in an attempt to intercept Kevin De Bruyne’s rolled cross, Beiranvand stuck out a strong left hand to shut the door in the face of De Cuyper, before smothering the ball.

Presumably, given this summer’s apparent appetite for a goalkeeping cult hero, this all means Beiranvand’s following might now increase tenfold, though as Iran’s longtime No 1 who saved Cristiano Ronaldo’s penalty at the 2018 World Cup, he is no unknown. Just ask Vozinha and Eloy Room how their outstanding performances for Cape Verde and Curaçao respectively have done wonders for their profile. At 33, Beiranvand is a youngster compared to those guys.

Iran believes. They have refused to wilt under the restrictions imposed on them by Fifa and the US and have earned creditable draws in their two matches, both of which have been played in Los Angeles. Meanwhile Belgium , who went out at the group stage four years ago, are in a spot of bother. Rudi Garcia, their head coach, accepts the pressure on their final Group G match against New Zealand is clear. “Sometimes when you have to win, sometimes that’s the best situation,” he said. “Obviously we had wished to start better. But, just like cyclists, we have to keep pedalling on and on and show we deserve to move on to the round of 32.”

Belgium were reduced to 10 men midway through the second half after Nathan Ngoy wiped out Mehdi Taremi and the inquest into another disappointing result has begun. Their record at major tournaments now reads two wins from their past nine matches, one from their past six, against Romania at Euro 2024. They have had a total of 38 shots in their opening two games in the US without scoring themselves, their sole goal coming courtesy of the Egypt defender Mohamed Hany. They missed the energy of Jérémy Doku, who was absent through illness, while Romelu Lukaku, making his first start for club or country for more than 12 months, huffed and puffed in attack.

De Bruyne glittered in moments, none more so than when graciously bringing down Leandro Trossard’s lifted pass on the byline. Beiranvand made it his mission to reach De Bruyne’s pass before Lukaku, who became the third-most capped Belgium player. In the end Ali Nemati stopped the cross, his legs splayed as Beiranvand thwarted De Cuyper. Lukaku could only put his hands on his head in disbelief. “Beiranvand is one of our greatest goalkeepers in the history of Iranian football,” said Iran’s head coach, Amir Ghalenoei. “He is extremely experienced, intelligent and he had one of his best days. He had the right concentration and he gave us one very valuable point – even though we could have had three points.”

The last time Iran were at this stadium, they were not so much frogmarched off the premises but advised they were not welcome to stick around, informed they would have to fly back to their base in Tijuana, Mexico. Gianni Infantino visited their dressing room in an attempt to assuage their concerns, though amid Ghalenoei’s plea for more help Fifa’s president ended up riffing that, if required, he could fill in up front against Belgium. In the end, it was Belgium who were blunt in attack.

Thibaut Courtois was alert to thwart a bouncing effort by Hossein Kanaanizadegan and midway through the first half Taremi saw a precise finish, reminiscent of Wout Weghorst’s strike against Argentina four years ago after a free-kick routine initiated by Ehsan Hajsafi disallowed for offside. The ball beat Courtois in slow motion but a video assistant referee review flagged Taremi offside.

Courtois made an instinctive save from Taremi after an Iran long throw but the best stop was undeniably at the other end approaching the hour. Beiranvand somehow pawed De Cuyper’s shot from inside the six-yard box after Nemati initially halted De Bruyne’s cross after a touch of brilliance on the byline. The huge wraparound screen then showed the raw numbers: 15 shots to four in Belgium’s favour. But a few minutes later it was Iran with a numerical advantage when the Lille defender Ngoy wiped out Taremi trying to make amends for a poor pass.

Belgium were rattled, even the most tidy players now unkempt. De Bruyne gave the ball away deep inside his own half, presenting Saeid Ezatolahi with the chance to send a full-throttle shot at Courtois. Beiranvand, though, was not finished and with stoppage time looming he was alert to another De Cuyper effort. “Sixteen hours [to prepare in LA], two flights and a heavy game, I don’t think any team in the world could sustain such conditions and play like this,” Ghalenoei said.

‘They didn’t know or care, or wouldn’t say’: how we investigated the casualties of a covert US war | Press freedom | The Guardian

Keyword – Membership
Trefwoorden – Press freedom, Media, Newspapers & magazines, Somalia, Al-Shabaab, Drones (military), Middle East and north Africa, US foreign policy
Title – ‘They didn’t know or care, or wouldn’t say’: how we investigated the casualties of a covert US war | Press freedom | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/gautam-malkani
Link – ‘They didn’t know or care, or wouldn’t say’: how we investigated the casualties of a covert US war | Press freedom | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-21T09:00:26.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/membership/2026/jun/21/they-didnt-know-or-care-or-wouldnt-say-how-we-investigated-the-casualties-of-a-covert-us-war

T here are many reasons why some military conflicts go unreported or underreported. Local restrictions on press freedom. Prohibitively high risks to journalists’ safety. A lack of resources. The tendency for geopolitical conflicts to attract more attention than civil conflicts. And the sheer number of armed conflicts around the world right now. All these factors can also impede reporting on the humanitarian toll, civilian casualties and attempts to hold armed forces accountable.

Earlier this week, the Guardian published an investigation into the deaths of at least 12 civilians, including eight children, who were killed in a US airstrike in Somalia last year amid Washington’s covert military campaign against the Islamist militant group al-Shabaab. The articles, which are part of our Rights and Freedom series, are an example of the Guardian’s efforts to highlight conflicts that might otherwise receive little public attention.

“We’re reporting on this in the hope that the information and the Guardian’s reach will cut through,” says Mark Townsend, a senior global development reporter who worked on the investigation with Mohamed Gabobe, a freelance journalist and producer based in Mogadishu. “But it’s a very hard conflict to actually report on. Even excellent reporters like Mohamed can’t travel to areas controlled by al-Shabaab where this war is being conducted. And civilians in those areas aren’t allowed internet access or smartphones, so getting footage of strikes or images of the aftermath and victims and all the things you’d want to corroborate testimony is very difficult. On top of that, the US doesn’t release anything about what’s going on – it’s a very opaque campaign.”

The airstrike in question happened in November in the town of Jamaame. It was the deadliest US operation for civilians in Somalia during either Trump administration, and the bombing has become increasingly aggressive .

Mohamed says the impact on civilians caught up in the US drone war is all-too often overlooked by western news organisations. “I sometimes get the sense that many western media outlets view civilian casualties from US airstrikes in Somalia as a norm and part of everyday life,” he says. “But death shouldn’t be normalised, especially when the most powerful nation in the world is doing it on communities that have nothing to do with the armed parties involved in the Somalia conflict.”

Mohamed and Mark’s collaborative reporting illustrates how these kinds of hidden military operations can still be properly probed instead of neglected or normalised. As well as close cooperation between the Guardian and a well-connected journalist with local expertise, the investigation involved piecing together disparate sources of information in the absence of official records and documentation, and putting the findings to the relevant authorities.

“When it comes to this model of working, I think it varies depending on the particular news organisation,” says Mohamed, who has been a journalist for 10 years and first reported for the Guardian in 2022. “For instance, some western media outlets allow the local journalist in the field to take the lead, and once the work is done they’ll continue to coordinate with that local journalist to make sure the story is told in an accurate and authentic way. Meanwhile with others, once you do the work, they will overlook the knowledge and context of the local journalist and will release the story in a manner that fits their narrative – which isn’t always accurate and, in some cases, is biased, sometimes without them even knowing.”

Mark, who has reported for the Guardian and its former sister newspaper, the Observer, for 24 years, has worked on several similar collaborations with local journalists in other countries. “Obviously, it requires trust on both sides,” he explains. “It’s a collaboration in the most complete sense. But Mohamed did the hard yards here in terms of the on-the-ground reporting, so whatever feedback he had – for instance if something needed to be changed or slightly nuanced – then he got the final say, as far as I was concerned because it’s his lived experience, he’s the expert.”

Mark first contacted Mohamed after Tess McClure, an editor for the Guardian’s Rights and Freedom series, first spotted reports of a high number of children killed in last November’s airstrike.

Given the physical restrictions and risks of prosecution for reporting from al-Shabaab-controlled areas, Mohamed had to improvise. “I reached out to clan elders in Mogadishu,” he explains. “Clan elders are the leaders and decision-makers when it comes to the affairs of each respective clan and sub-clan in Somalia. By negotiating with them and explaining my intentions and the importance of survivors speaking out, they helped put me in touch with some of the victims.”

The survivors’ accounts of that day bring home the devastating reality of the drone strikes for civilians caught up in the conflict. “One of the biggest challenges was asking the victims who’d lost loved ones in the attack certain questions that went into details about the bodies of their loved ones, or the screams they heard once the aerial bombardment ceased,” says Mohamed. “I don’t like asking people those kinds of questions – it feels like you’re making them relive horrors that no human being should endure. When asking these questions, if the victim pauses, I get the sense that they’re having a flashback. And if they weep or whisper a prayer, or even make a reference to a verse of the Qur’an, then I know they’re hurting a lot. But these details are crucial for putting together what actually happened.”

Alongside the witness testimony, Mohamed and Mark also pieced the story together using photographs, video footage, X-rays of children’s shrapnel injuries, interviews with drone specialists and military analysts. Mark put about 30 detailed questions to the recently renamed US Department of War. They did not respond. The White House was also approached for comment and their eventual response, which is quoted in one of the articles published this week, is a stark reminder that the current US administration presents its own kind of hostile environment for journalists.

“It’s very important that their response was included in the article because it shows how they’re doing these things without any kind of transparency or proper legal course,” says Mark. “They didn’t know, didn’t care, or wouldn’t say. Either way, it’s pretty dire if you’ve killed innocent people – you’d think you’d feel a responsibility to work out why.”

The articles contain a series of urgent and unanswered questions, such as who signed off the attack on a densely populated family neighbourhood? Why and who, if anyone, was the intended target? The questions provide a powerful accompaniment to the witness testimonies. “Their refusal to share anything about what happened is in itself a galvanising factor,” says Mark.

Mark’s extensive and acclaimed reporting on the wars in Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo has demonstrated that readers are willing to pay attention to underreported conflicts: “Readers have responded brilliantly to our reporting about Sudan and the DRC, which are knotty conflicts that are quite complex. Readers do really care, which is very reassuring. Whether or not the wider world does, I’m not sure, but our readers do.”

This article is taken from the Guardian’s weekly email for supporters, sent on Tuesdays. To support the Guardian’s work, please click here . To find out more about theguardian.org, please click here

How India’s heatwaves are shutting schools – and pushing women out of the workforce | Global development | The Guardian

Keyword – Global development
Trefwoorden – Global development, India, Extreme heat, Global education, Delhi, World news, Environment, South and central Asia, Climate crisis, Women’s rights and gender equality
Title – How India’s heatwaves are shutting schools – and pushing women out of the workforce | Global development | The Guardian
Author – Arsalan Bukhari and Naila Tabbasum in Delhi
Link – How India’s heatwaves are shutting schools – and pushing women out of the workforce | Global development | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-22T03:00:47.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jun/22/how-india-heatwaves-shutting-schools-pushing-women-out-of-the-workforce

O utside, the temperature has passed 41C (105.8F). Inside Sakshi Katyal’s city apartment, the air conditioner is blasting but it does little to relieve the stress of balancing housework and helping her five-year-old log in on a laptop to online classes. Her daughter’s school closed in May and Katyal is not clear when it will reopen. Probably not till the autumn.

Schools across Delhi and in about half of India’s 28 states have been ordered to close from mid-May until the end of June, when in many places the summer break starts. There is no official record of closures in past years but the Guardian has spoken to school officials who say the number of days schools are shut for because of the heat has risen sharply. The impact on families, especially on working women, has been huge.

Katyal and her husband moved to Noida, part of greater Delhi’s National Capital Region, in December 2025, to be closer to their daughter’s school, and to make balancing childcare and work easier.

“Till last year, everything was great,” Katyal says. “I had a great job and last year we even bought our apartment. The apartment meant more than property. It meant stability.

“Then one notification changed everything: the notification that my daughter’s school was shutting.”

Katyal had already left her higher-paying corporate role for a less demanding job to better manage childcare during repeated school disruptions. “Last year felt like a battle,” she says. Between June and September her daughter barely attended school physically at all.

In February, exhausted after months of juggling work and childcare, Katyal quit her job.

“My daughter would ask for food or attention while my manager was demanding reports,” she says. “Sometimes I would hand her a phone or switch on the TV just to keep her occupied.”

The family now survives on a single income while continuing to pay a monthly mortgage of about ₹50,000 (£390). “I already knew schools were likely to shut again because of the heat,” says Kaytal. “That’s when I realised I could not do this any more. Earlier, I managed everything on my own. Now, I have to ask my husband for money even for groceries or my daughter’s school fees.”

India is facing increasingly intense spells of extreme heat, with this year’s heatwaves beginning as early as April . Hundreds of thousands of parents in India are struggling with managing jobs and children as lives are disrupted by prolonged school closures linked to the high temperatures . And as childcare disproportionately falls to women, it is women who are bearing the brunt.

Nearly 15km away from Noida is Nai Basti, a densely packed neighbourhood in Okhla, south-east Delhi. Here 24-year-old Zeenat Khatoon lives in a one-room rented home with her two children. The entrance opens on to a narrow unfinished staircase, with clothes hanging from ropes tied along the walls. She cooks here, in the staircase outside her room, in 40C heat, on a small stove. “I don’t have a kitchen,” she says. Khatoon works as a domestic helper in two homes in Shaheen Bagh, earning about ₹8,000 a month. About ₹5,000 goes towards rent. Her seven-year-old daughter attends a nearby government school, and she hopes to enrol her son next year. But with schools closed, her daughter is at home.

Khatoon estimates that her daughter has been at home for roughly seven months in the past 12, with closures caused by heatwaves and pollution. “When classes go online because of heatwaves, I don’t even know if my daughter is studying properly,” she says. “I can’t stay home to monitor her. If I stop going to work, who will pay the rent, school fees and food expenses?”

She pays a local woman ₹600 a month to supervise the children and help monitor their studies during school closures. “To arrange that money, I cut down on groceries,” she says. “But I don’t want my children to spend their lives washing dishes or mopping floors like me.”

Across the city, another mother, 42-year-old Surbi Devi, who lives in a room in Saket with her disabled child, says she lost nearly a month of wages during last summer’s school closures. “What kind of policy is this?” she asks.

A labour economist, speaking on condition of anonymity because of workplace restrictions, says the disruptions are creating cascading economic consequences.

“The majority of women are being forced either to stay at home or move into precarious, lower-paying work because they have to care for children during repeated school closures,” the economist says. “This reduces household income and pushes some families closer to poverty.”

He says employers are losing productivity when workers miss shifts or leave jobs, especially in healthcare and service sectors where staffing shortages already exist. Children lose months of education, affecting future potential. “Unless schools, childcare systems and worker protections adapt to climate disruption, this will widen inequality and slow economic growth,” he says.

Urvashi Prasad, a former director at government thinktank Niti Aayog, who has worked on public health, says India’s climate response rarely accounts for women’s unequal burden. “Most heat action plans in India barely have a gender component,” she says. “We don’t analyse gender-disaggregated data to understand how climate policies affect women differently.”

She says informal workers such as domestic helpers, street vendors and agricultural labourers, and their children, are hit hard. “If we already know heatwaves and pollution will come every year, why aren’t we planning ahead instead of shutting schools at the last moment?”

A senior official in Delhi’s higher education department, who does not wish to be named, defends the closures as emergency measures. “Sometimes governments are simply trying to save lives,” he says. “Many schools lack the infrastructure to deal with extreme heat. We know online classes are not fully effective, but safety becomes the priority.”

The strain is visible in all sectors. India has fewer than 500 paediatric cardiologists for a population of 1.4 billion. Noopur Goyal, 44, a single mother in Noida, is one. After 16 years of medical training, she works with children with life-threatening heart conditions. But her schedule can collapse because of a school notification.

“How do I work properly on shifts?” she asks. “Suppose I have an important case tomorrow and my child’s school closes. What do I do?” As a single mother, every disruption falls on her shoulders. “My child is barely going to school for six months of the year,” she says. “You rarely hear a man saying, ‘I can’t go to work because my maid hasn’t come.’ But women have to say that all the time.”

In a country already struggling with shortages of specialised doctors, climate breakdown is beginning to reshape careers, households and futures – one closed school, one missed shift and one impossible morning at a time.

Goolagong review – a lovely tribute to an Aboriginal tennis legend | Television | The Guardian

Keyword – Television & radio
Trefwoorden – Television, Television & radio, Culture, Tennis, Sport
Title – Goolagong review – a lovely tribute to an Aboriginal tennis legend | Television | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/hannah-j-davies
Link – Goolagong review – a lovely tribute to an Aboriginal tennis legend | Television | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-20T20:50:11.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2026/jun/20/goolagong-review-tribute-to-an-aboriginal-tennis-legend-bbc-four

G oolagong opens to the soulful strains of Ann Peebles proclaiming: “It’s your thing – do what you wanna do!” It feels a little on the nose as a way to soundtrack an inspirational sporting drama, as Australia’s Evonne Goolagong (played by Lila McGuire) steels herself for her first ever Wimbledon match. (For the uninitiated: not only was Goolagong the first Aboriginal player to compete in tennis’s most prestigious tournament, but she would go on to win the ladies’ singles title twice, in 1971 and 1980, plus a doubles win in 1974. She won seven grand slams in total and was – for a time – ranked world No 1.) This three-part drama from Australia’s ABC is sometimes saccharine, and the opening sequence of a teenage Evonne wandering starry-eyed through the corridors of the All England Club – portraits of former winners on the walls – feels heavy-handed. More difficult themes do come to the fore in time, but Goolagong is largely an unapologetic, flashback-heavy tribute to a sporting legend. It’s beautifully drawn, but do we really need to watch the primary school-aged Evonne (a cherubic Eloise Hart) hit a ball against a wall with a plank of wood this many times?!

Sadly, being a woman in sport – or maybe just a woman in the world – Goolagong would go on to apparently suffer financial abuse and sexual harassment at the hands of her coach, Vic Edwards. The contrast between those fluffier scenes and the unwanted advances of Marton Csokas’s slippery Edwards feels like a screeching handbrake turn. Not least because we see Edwards move Goolagong from her happy but impoverished Wiradjuri family in rural Barellan, New South Wales – with a population in the hundreds – into his family home in Sydney at 14, grooming her for sporting fame but also maybe just grooming her full stop. But – as uncomfortable as that segue is – it is her reality. “When it stops being fun, come home,” Evonne’s mother tells her, with more than a little foreshadowing on the part of the writers. Later, after family tragedy and chicanery on Edwards’s part, Evonne will echo those words, declaring that tennis is “not fun any more”, ruined by the selfishness of her mentor.

Elsewhere, the series does well to weave in the big issues that overshadowed the game in the 70s – and conversations on race, gender and pay equity – without feeling too much like a rehashing of Goolagong’s Wikipedia page. McGuire is brilliantly believable as the clueless upstart who isn’t unfeminist, but sticks her foot in her mouth by telling a journalist that she would play for free if she had to. (Naturally, Billie Jean King is deeply unimpressed, and Goolagong finds herself ostracised by her fellow women players.)

As syrupy as some scenes can be, they are anchored by the brilliance of Hart, McGuire and Rilee Clarke, who play Goolagong as a defiant, determined, quirky woman at different points of her life. The supporting cast is strong, too – in particular Luke Carroll as Goolagong’s father, Kenny, and Chenoa Deemal as her mother, Linda. And who can resist the burgeoning, trans-hemisphere romance between Evonne and English tennis journalist Roger Cawley (Felix Mallard), who would go on to become her husband? (Well, perhaps Vic Edwards could – allegedly, Edwards lied about not being invited to the wedding, then unilaterally announced Evonne’s retirement.) Even so, Goolagong can’t quite make up its mind tonally. The result is a drama that’s frequently charming, but frequently lightweight. Certainly, the crescendo of the final episode – and Goolagong’s return to the sport just months after the birth of her daughter, Kelly, in 1977 – drags on and on with a tension that feels forced. All before a miraculous recovery, a family reunion and that joyous second Wimbledon win. Hurrah! Cue more flashbacks …

Goolagong is an uneven thing, although clearly it’s a story that wholeheartedly deserved to make it to the screen. It ends with a slideshow of images of the real Evonne, which only confirms my sense that a documentary or docudrama would have been more compelling. We are told that she “seeks out a new generation of talented Indigenous children” through her tennis charity, “supporting them to dream, believe, learn and achieve”. She and Roger have now been married for 51 years. There’s a brief clip of her with McGuire, as they wave to a crowd of extras, that is rather moving. It’s not quite smashing, then, but it is lovely.

Goolagong aired on BBC Four and is on iPlayer now. In Australia, you can stream it on ABC iView

How much preventive health screening should I be getting? | Well actually | The Guardian

Keyword – Wellness
Trefwoorden – Well actually, Health, Medicine, Life and style, Society
Title – How much preventive health screening should I be getting? | Well actually | The Guardian
Author – Keren Landman
Link – How much preventive health screening should I be getting? | Well actually | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-21T16:00:34.000Z
Category – Lifestyle
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/global/2026/jun/21/preventive-health-screening

I couldn’t help but roll my eyes when tech entrepreneur and longevity influencer Bryan Johnson posted about his girlfriend’s “vaginal microbiome report” in April. (He said it was in the “top 1% of vaginas”.) While the vaginal microbiome is genuinely interesting, most clinicians don’t routinely recommend this test to patients.

As medical technology has become more powerful – and more marketable – the line between helpful screening and unnecessary testing has blurred.

Of course, some medical testing helps prevent premature disease and death. But the direct-to-consumer testing industry is increasingly promoting tests that promise reassurance but often deliver ambiguous findings. The results may lead to expensive follow-ups or leave people with the creeping sense that their body is full of hidden dangers.

Here’s what you need to know about screening tests.

What is medical screening?

Screening is medical testing that looks for medical conditions before you have symptoms. The best kinds of screening tests find treatable conditions before they’ve caused too much damage, and enable clinicians to reverse or cure the condition to prevent premature disability or death. Importantly, good screening tests don’t themselves cause harm, whether by breaking the bank or by causing new problems.

Blood sugar tests and blood pressure checks are examples of great screening tests. The conditions they flag – diabetes and high blood pressure – have long asymptomatic periods, causing damage to tiny blood vessels in the eyes, kidneys, brain and heart for years before people notice them. If screening finds these conditions early, treatment can stop them in their tracks. If not diagnosed early, these diseases take decades off people’s lives and cause blindness, kidney disease, strokes, heart attacks and other issues.

These screenings are cheap and easy. In addition, interventions to prevent these diseases from progressing – dietary and exercise changes, and medications that have been safely in use for decades – are way less likely to cause harm than good.

Is more screening better?

If knowledge is power, it might seem logical to get as much information as possible about your body. But that’s not always the case.

Experts use the term “overscreening” to describe overzealous testing that finds things that are untreatable, don’t need to be found or raise even more questions, requiring additional costly and potentially harmful interventions with unclear benefit.

It can be hard to get your head around the idea that more testing isn’t always better. Full-body MRI scans are a nearly perfect example. Popularized by techno-optimists and celebrity endorsements, they are sold by for-profit companies as a proactive way for healthy people to identify “silent killers” like aneurysms and solid tumors in their early stages.

MRI technology is great at detecting atypical anatomy, but it’s often unable to determine the significance of it. An astonishingly high proportion of the findings these tests identify are “incidentalomas” – tiny cysts, nodules or anatomical quirks of unclear significance. In one review of studies evaluating whole-body MRI screenings, 95% of participants had abnormal findings, about a third required further investigation, and fewer than 0.5% had findings suspicious for cancer.

“Humans are full of abnormality, particularly as they age,” says Gilbert Welch , a researcher of overdiagnosis at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. Many findings are irrelevant to a person’s health, but clinicians don’t know which are – so they often act on all of them.

What are the harms of overscreening?

By definition, incidentalomas are unlikely to cause harm. But they trigger cascades of additional testing, biopsies and specialist appointments – which all cost time and money, and may lead to discomfort and medical complications.

Even established tests can be applied too broadly or too frequently. For decades, experts have been arguing about the best cadence for screening mammograms, which look for breast cancers in otherwise healthy, low-risk people. Long-term data suggest that more frequent mammography screening substantially increases breast cancer diagnoses, especially of early stage disease. However, the practice leads to much smaller reductions in advanced cancer, and its effects on overall mortality are uncertain . Additionally, a large share of what these screenings find may never progress to cause harm. For older patients, more frequent screening may even raise risk of unnecessary invasive medical procedures.

Overscreening also creates worry and a sense of ill health, says Suzanne O’Sullivan , a neurologist at London’s National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery. Before a hypothetical screening MRI, she said, you might feel perfectly healthy and happy. After a finding of uncertain significance? “I won’t feel healthy any longer,” she says.

When it comes to more routine screenings, note that for those with certain family and medical histories, experts typically recommend earlier and more frequent tests. For example, experts recommend earlier and more frequent colonoscopies for people with a close relative with colorectal cancer.

O’Sullivan thinks elaborate screening tests might be more useful when we understand disease progression better. In the meantime, “someone’s making an awful lot of money pretending to keep people healthy”, she says.

What should you do before signing up for the latest trending screening test?

Most primary care clinicians are well-versed on which screening tests are best for you at different stages of your life, and use evidence-based guidance to make their recommendations. They may also serve as a resource before you shell out for a direct-to-consumer (DTC) test.

The FDA doesn’t review all DTC tests, and it can be hard to find independent evaluations of each test’s accuracy and usefulness. You can also pose several questions to whoever’s selling a test you’re considering: does this test reduce deaths or disability, or just increase diagnoses? How often does it produce false positives or overdiagnosis? And is the treatment for what it finds safer than leaving it alone?

Ultimately, says Welch, the path to health involves doing “things your grandmother might have told you: eat your fruits and vegetables, go play outside”, and find meaningful activity and connection with others. “We’re teaching the next generation the path to health is by collecting data on yourself,” he says, but “you can’t test yourself to health”.

David Hockney’s funeral held in private with just two mourners | David Hockney | The Guardian

Keyword – Art and design
Trefwoorden – David Hockney, Painting, Art, Art and design, Culture, Exhibitions, UK news
Title – David Hockney’s funeral held in private with just two mourners | David Hockney | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/donna-ferguson
Link – David Hockney’s funeral held in private with just two mourners | David Hockney | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-21T12:06:07.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2026/jun/21/david-hockney-funeral-private-two-mourners

Only two people attended David Hockney’s funeral last week – in line with the British artist’s final wishes.

The two mourners at the private ceremony were Hockney’s 61-year-old partner, Jean-Pierre Gonçalves de Lima, and his 33-year-old great-nephew, Richard Hockney, a photographer who worked as the artist’s assistant and frequently modelled for him. Both are trustees of the David Hockney Foundation, established by the artist in 2008.

When the pioneering painter of The Splash died peacefully at his home on 11 June aged 88, Keir Starmer and King Charles were among those who paid tribute to his “vivid, instantly recognisable” work and “irrepressible charm, talent and constant innovation”.

Although Hockney wanted his funeral to be an intimate ceremony, his publicist, Erica Bolton, announced that his life and work would be celebrated in a series of memorial services to be held in places he has lived around the world, including London and Yorkshire.

Bolton said: “We have been overwhelmed by your tributes which have meant so much to us and we wanted to thank you.

“As we have already received so many inquiries about David Hockney’s funeral arrangements and memorials, we would like to clarify that it was David’s clear wish that his funeral should be attended only by his partner, JP, and his great-nephew Richard, and that their privacy would be respected. The funeral has already taken place.

“Also in accordance with David’s wishes, we are able to announce that the first memorial service to celebrate David’s life and work will be held in London in spring 2027, followed at later dates by memorials in Yorkshire, Paris and Los Angeles.”

She added that most of Hockney’s works in his private collection would be given to foundations and public institutions around the world “in furtherance of his legacy”.

Hockney refused a knighthood in 1990 and he revealed why 13 years later, in a 2003 interview with his local newspaper, Bradford’s Telegraph & Argus . “I do not care for a fuss,” he said. “I don’t value prizes of any sort. I value my friends.”

Hockney is thought to have created about 35,000 artworks throughout his six-decade career, including the Queen Elizabeth II window at Westminster Abbey, where the memorial in London is likely to be held.

He donated about 8,000 works to his foundation which were collectively valued at more than £1bn in 2024.

A free exhibition, David Hockney: A Year in Normandie and Some Other Thoughts About Painting , runs until 23 August at the Serpentine in London.

Next year there will be two more exhibitions of Hockney’s work, at Tate Britain and in the Turbine Hall at Tate Modern.

There was a surge in demand for the artist’s work at Art Basel last week, where buyers were given one of the first chances since his death to acquire his work in person.

Clare McAndrew, the author of The Art Basel and US Global Art Market Report, told the Observer there had been a “supply grab” of Hockney’s paintings, with demand reportedly up more than 1,200% in the 48 hours after his death.

Golden Boot: World Cup 2026 top goalscorers | World Cup 2026 | The Guardian

Keyword – Football
Trefwoorden – World Cup 2026, Football, World Cup, Sport, US sports, Australia sport, Mexico, Czechia, South Korea, South Africa football team, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Canada, Qatar, Switzerland, Brazil, Haiti football team, Morocco football team, Scotland, Australia national football team – Socceroos, Paraguay, Turkey, USA, Curaçao, Ecuador, Germany, Côte d’Ivoire football team, Japan, Netherlands, Sweden, Tunisia football team, Belgium, Egypt football team, Iran, New Zealand, Cape Verde, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Uruguay, France, Iraq, Norway, Senegal football team, Algeria football team, Argentina, Austria, Jordan, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo football team, Portugal, Uzbekistan, Croatia, England, Ghana football team, Panama
Title – Golden Boot: World Cup 2026 top goalscorers | World Cup 2026 | The Guardian
Author –
Link – Golden Boot: World Cup 2026 top goalscorers | World Cup 2026 | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-18T08:17:30.000Z
Category – Sport
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/football/ng-interactive/2026/jun/04/golden-boot-world-cup-2026-top-goalscorers-winner

The Golden Boot is awarded to the World Cup’s top goalscorer, with assists used as a tie-breaker if two or more players finish level. The 2026 tournament has three former Golden Boot winners taking part: Kylian Mbappé of France (eight goals in 2022), England’s Harry Kane (six goals in 2018) and James Rodríguez of Colombia (six goals in 2014).

Mbappé and Kane are among the pre-tournament favourites to finish top scorer in North America, alongside Norway’s Erling Haaland – making his World Cup debut – and Argentina’s Lionel Messi.

Other pre-tournament favourites include Spain’s Mikel Oyarzabal and Lamine Yamal, Vinícius Júnior of Brazil and Portugal’s Cristiano Ronaldo. However, history tells us not to discount a surprise package. Totò Schillaci, initially a back-up striker in Italy’s squad, won the Golden Boot in 1990, while Russia’s Oleg Salenko finished joint-top scorer in 1994, albeit aided by five goals in one game against Cameroon.

Golden Boot contenders have an extra match to rack up the goals in 2026, with a 48-team tournament meaning a round of 32 for the first time. Any team that reaches the semi-finals will finish the World Cup having played eight games, although the highest Golden Boot total ever – Just Fontaine’s 13 goals in six games for France in 1958 – remains an imposing target.

You can no longer have joint winners. If two or more players have the same number of goals and also of assists, the total minutes played in the final competition will be taken into account, with the player playing fewer minutes ranked first.

Aiden’s story of life as a young carer | Is Mum OK? Documentary | Society | The Guardian

Keyword – Global
Trefwoorden – Society, Carers, UK news, London, Schools, Education, School attendance and absence, Social care, Documentary films, Documentary, Film
Title – Aiden’s story of life as a young carer | Is Mum OK? Documentary | Society | The Guardian
Author –
Link – Aiden’s story of life as a young carer | Is Mum OK? Documentary | Society | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-09T09:31:31.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/global/ng-interactive/2026/jun/09/how-do-you-give-britains-hidden-army-a-break-is-mum-ok-documentary

Thousands of staff at Czech public broadcasters strike over funding plans | Czechia | The Guardian

Keyword – World news
Trefwoorden – Czechia, Public service broadcasting, Television industry, Radio industry, Media, Europe, World news
Title – Thousands of staff at Czech public broadcasters strike over funding plans | Czechia | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/anna-koslerova
Link – Thousands of staff at Czech public broadcasters strike over funding plans | Czechia | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-22T04:00:50.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/22/czech-television-radio-public-broadcasters-strike-industrial-action-funding-plans

Thousands of public service media employees in Czechia are holding a 24-hour strike after the government of the billionaire prime minister, Andrej Babiš, pushed ahead with controversial plans to change the way the country’s public broadcasters are funded.

Monday’s industrial action by staff at Czech Television and Czech Radio marks the biggest escalation yet in a months-long confrontation between the broadcasters and Babiš’s populist administration .

“The reforms have been prepared without consultation and without guarantees for the independence of public service media,” said Pavla Kubálková, a member of Czech Television’s strike committee. “A large part of society remembers what the news looked like when politicians chose the content before 1989. We don’t want to go back there.”

The legislation, approved by the cabinet last week, would scrap the licence fee system and finance Czech Television and Czech Radio through an annual state-budget allocation.

According to the broadcasters, the changes would in effect return funding to 2008 levels, cutting about £14.3m from Czech Radio’s annual budget and £35.8m from Czech Television’s, despite the nearly two decades of inflation since then. Executives say the reductions would force hundreds of job losses and substantial cuts to programming.

But the dispute is not just about money. Kubálková said it had evolved into a broader fight over the future independence of public service media amid concerns that direct funding from the state would expose broadcasters to political pressure. “What matters most to us is preserving independence and the direct relationship between Czech Television and its viewers,” she said.

“The employees of both broadcasters are ready to defend their service to citizens, and we are determined to continue with even more vigorous protests,” she added. “We will do everything we can to defend public service media in their current form.”

Her concerns were reinforced last week when Josef Nerušil, an MP for the far-right Freedom and Direct Democracy (SPD) party, which is part of the governing coalition, appeared to suggest that changes to funding should eventually lead to greater scrutiny of what public broadcasters air.

“The point is to change the funding,” Nerušil told Czech Radio. “But if we’re talking about what public service media should broadcast, then of course, in a further step, we want to get to a broader discussion.”

He added that the aim was “to control not only the financial side but also the content side”. The MP then accused the broadcasters of political bias.

Presenting the legislation last week, the culture minister, Oto Klempíř, said the broadcasters should prove they could operate more efficiently with less money. In written comments to the Guardian, he rejected claims that the funding proposal threatened the independence of public service media.

“Moving funding into the state budget changes nothing about the independence of Czech Television or Czech Radio,” Klempíř said. “Their legal status, the way their governing councils are appointed, their powers and the guarantees of editorial freedom remain unchanged.”

He argued that the changes only affected the method of financing and noted that “an increasing number of European countries already fund public service media from public budgets. This is not a Czech experiment but a broader trend.”

Babiš has also rejected suggestions that the changes threaten editorial independence. “We want you to save money, and you’re not,” the prime minister told a public broadcaster journalist at a press conference.

Both broadcasters have reacted with alarm to the changes. Hynek Chudárek, the head of Czech Television, said the legislation would “effectively liquidate” parts of the broadcaster, while Czech Radio’s director general, René Zavoral, said cuts would hit regional reporting, children’s programming and foreign correspondents.

The strike will be felt across both broadcasters. Czech Television said all channels except its children’s service would be affected, along with its websites, streaming platform and social media output. Czech Radio plans to merge some stations and alter programming schedules, with presenters explaining the changes on air.

“The strike is a way of showing audiences what they stand to lose,” said Jan Herget, a member of Czech Radio’s strike committee.

Media scholars say the dispute is unprecedented in recent Czech history. “A strike in Czech public service media is a highly unusual event,” said Marína Urbániková, an associate professor of media studies at Charles University and Masaryk University.

She noted that Czech Television had not experienced a comparable strike since 2001, when journalists protested against political interference in the appointment of the broadcaster’s director general.

František Talíř of the Christian Democrats, who chairs the parliamentary media committee, said on Czech Television: “We’re going to the barricades because this is a direct attack on Czech Television and Czech Radio.” The opposition would use every means to block the bill, he said, warning that the country was “copying Slovakia’s path”, referring to Czechia’s neighbour, where the government last year dissolved the public broadcaster RTVS.

Zdeněk Hřib, the leader of the opposition Pirate party and a former mayor of Prague, said the funding plans would take the country “back not one year but at least 36 years, to when we had state media”.

His party has referred the changes to the European Commission and the Council of Europe’s Venice commission, arguing that they may breach European standards designed to safeguard the independence of public service media.

Those concerns have also drawn the attention of international media freedom groups. In a joint statement, a coalition led by the International Press Institute said the bill risked “financially weakening the broadcasters, eroding safeguards for their financial independence and violating the European Media Freedom Act”, and called on the European Commission to scrutinise the plans.