Category Archives: Culture

‘How do I deal with my rage? I put it in everything I do’: Killing Eve’s Sandra Oh on fury, friendship and hitting her prime in midlife | Sandra Oh | The Guardian

Keyword – Television & radio
Trefwoorden – Sandra Oh, Theatre, National Theatre, Killing Eve, Television & radio, Film, Stage, Culture
Title – ‘How do I deal with my rage? I put it in everything I do’: Killing Eve’s Sandra Oh on fury, friendship and hitting her prime in midlife | Sandra Oh | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/emmabrockes
Link – ‘How do I deal with my rage? I put it in everything I do’: Killing Eve’s Sandra Oh on fury, friendship and hitting her prime in midlife | Sandra Oh | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-20T11:00:05.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2026/jun/20/sandra-oh-interview-killing-eve-theatre

S andra Oh bursts into a back room at the National Theatre in London with wayward post-rehearsal energy. The 54-year-old, long one of the most stylish actors in Hollywood, is in brown linen, a herringbone jacket and hat and sunglasses, which she removes before collapsing into a chair and throwing her head forward, arms outstretched, hair splayed across the table. “It’s just the fucking process of it,” she groans. “We just finished our first stagger-through, which if anyone is an actor – it’s early days, so the fact we made it through was great. It’s brutal. We started in the Lyttelton, and it’s interesting to be in that space and to hear verse. You can really hear it. It’s not just about volume or speed. It’s not even solely about intention. You learn so much just being in that space, but the big thing is – sorry.” She catches herself. “I’m just marching on.” And she bellows with laughter.

Oh has been in London for just over a month rehearsing her role as Alice in a modern reimagining of Molière’s Le Misanthrope. It’s a happy return; eight years ago, she was in the capital to film the first of four series of the hit show Killing Eve , which became a phenomenon and changed her life as an actor for ever. Oh played Eve Polastri, the shambolic but brilliant British intelligence agent, who, along with Jodi Comer’s Villanelle, made for one of the best spy capers of recent years. Now, she is playing a novelist – gender-flipped from the 17th-century original, in an adaptation by Martin Crimp – who is fed up with the flattery and dishonesty of the people around her. It’s a deliberate pivot to theatre; last summer, she appeared as Olivia in a starry production of Twelfth Night at the Delacorte Theater in Central Park, New York. In the autumn, she made her debut at New York’s Metropolitan Opera in a production of Donizetti’s comic opera La Fille du Régiment. Unlike the sometimes fraught me-me-meism of screen work, says Oh, working in theatre in general and at the National in particular “is a collaborative thing” – not least, she adds drily, because no one does it for the money. “Everyone has to bring their best and most open selves. And everyone else loves watching everyone succeed.”

It’s a dynamic that suits Oh in her current phase. In the last few years, she has become that rare figure in Hollywood, a famous woman who has only grown more powerful with age, a champion of younger performers and something of a truth-teller in an industry full of people encouraged by flattery to talk absolute rubbish. She is funny, shrewd, insightful and, above all, generous in her insights. A few years ago, in the New Yorker , she spoke about surviving years of racism as a woman of Asian origin trying to get ahead as an actor. (On white male directors not casting her, she said: “It’s like being able to get over a bad boyfriend. They’re not going to call. Just move on and hang out with the young women who want you to be their mom.”) Later, she described to the New York Times a sense of being “deep into this very rich middle part of [my] life” in which “only now do [I] have enough strength and hopefully curiosity to go into the places of asking the question: why did I do that? Who has been steering the ship? Because now, in this back half of my life, I’m the captain of the ship.”

In the diaries Oh has been keeping since she was a child – extracts of which have appeared in papers and podcasts – one gets the sense of an introspective, literary person, with a deep connection to where she came from – the suburb of Ottawa, Canada, where Oh still has friends from grade school. If we loved her 20 years ago as Dr Cristina Yang in Grey’s Anatomy – a blunt, brilliant cardiothoracic surgeon – these days Oh appears as a sage-like person very much in her prime, which, she tells me, she finds, “incredibly liberating and also, like, enraging”.

We’ll get to that. A fortnight before I meet Oh at the theatre, I see her in a studio on the eve of the first week of rehearsals. As an actor gearing up to appear at the National for the first time, Oh had, a few weeks earlier, the amazing good fortune to run into Fiona Shaw at a grocery store in her LA neighbourhood, where her Killing Eve co-star happened to be living while filming. “She’s one of the greatest stage actors of her generation and knows the National,” says Oh. In the supermarket aisle and later, over breakfast at Oh’s house, Shaw gave her a bunch of hacks about the stage at the Lyttelton. “She said, ‘If you’re going to be on this stage, look out for [the sight lines] in this area,’ or, ‘This is the strongest area on stage, do this technicality this way.’ She was giving me the gold. I could not believe it.”

In the studio that first day we meet, Oh is in a cropped leather jacket and soft leather shoes that are “good and supportive. I need structure.” Don’t we all, I say, and Oh cackles. In fact, while it’s the structural and technical aspects of theatre work that she enjoys, it’s TV that made Oh. Her jump to leading roles came relatively late. It’s strange, these days, to stumble across Oh in old movies in parts that seem wildly too small for her – the other day, while watching the 2001 film The Princess Diaries with my kids, I was taken aback to see Oh as the cartoonish Vice Principal Gupta. Other credits from that period include “fourth fired employee” from something called Full Frontal and “marketing person” from the movie For Your Consideration.

Despite enjoying great, early success in TV in Canada and becoming a prominent ensemble player for nine years in Grey’s Anatomy (2005-14), it wasn’t until Killing Eve that she really ascended to leading role status. Famously, when her agent called her with the script for the show, Oh assumed she was to read for a minor character. “‘So Nancy, I don’t understand, what’s the part?’” Oh recounted saying to her agent at the time. “And Nancy goes: ‘Sweetheart, it’s Eve, it’s Eve.’”

Oh as Eve was a revelation; by turns sardonic, baffled, excavating every nuance of what it is to be a frustrated, overlooked cog in the machine, and all the while harbouring star status that let out in her electric chemistry with Comer.

Eight years and another big show – Netflix’s excellent comedy drama, The Chair – later and Oh’s attitude to all this history is by turns philosophical, resigned and, increasingly, weary of being asked to relive it. She’s that rare actor willing to say crunchy political things such as “Patriarchy runs within all of us” or “If you’re going to put all your stock and wait for the white dude to give you the opportunity … that’s destructive.” Equally, however, raking over and over the bad times gets old. When I ask what makes her angry these days, she says: “Isn’t that just the question and the challenge of life? How do you deal with life not being fair, or/and turning out the way you want? You’ve gotta figure it out. You have to find different avenues to work out what’s going on subconsciously and consciously. Typically women have – I shouldn’t say ‘typically women’.” She thinks for a moment. “No, I will say that. I think this is the one thing that particularly straight men have a much more difficult time with, which is to find friendships where there are deep conversations, and where they can talk things out. I have that relationship with friends, both men and women, because I’m lucky, but also when you’re an artist you’re trying to figure that out all the time in your work.”

Figure out what, exactly?

“Figure out what you’re saying, which is: how do I deal with my rage? Or: how do I deal with what’s going on in the world? You can work that out physically, or talking-wise, or you can work that out in art. I will say I’ve been putting that in every single project.”

The talking part is vital to Oh, a “big believer in therapy” who maintains strong connections with her oldest friends. For two years in the early 2000s she was married to Alexander Payne, the director, with whom she worked on the 2004 movie Sideways, and while she won’t talk about her personal life, she will talk about her other relationships. Oh grew up as one of three children of parents – mother a biochemist, father who worked in business – who moved to Canada from South Korea in the 1960s, and thinks her middle child status has something to do with her self-appointed role as a “bringer-inner. I’m a keeper of people. I’m not an outsider that way. I like the harmony and community.”

Just that morning, she says, she was on a video call with her oldest friend in Canada, a woman she has known since she was six and with whom she has been through many phases of friendship. “You have to grow out of your teenagehood, and then you hit another thing when you’re in your 30s.” This was the period during which she and her friend sought help from a therapist together because, “we were growing into different people and were trying to figure out how to still stay close”. And, “I gotta tell you,” she says, “it was really hard.” Was there a chance it might not have worked out between them? “No. I feel like the people who are closest to me have to be able to confront things.”

She bursts out laughing at my expression. “Look how nervous you got.”

I did!

“You thought about who you’re anxious about and then you thought, could I [confront them]? That would be really bad. But then …” She’s not far off.

It’s useful to remember that Oh isn’t American, and while Canadians can be as avoidant as the British when it comes to emotional honesty, she reminds me that “Korean people are pretty confrontational. There’s a different thing within the [Korean] family structure – although I do think I’m different, even within my family.” It took her time to learn how to confront people without flying off the handle. “I had to go through so much therapy not to be so reactive.”

Her broad rule of thumb in relationships is, “openness, confidence, willingness. Being non-judgmental. I just think the freer you are, the freer you let everyone else be.” She says: “I have a lot of longstanding friendships. I cherish them and I’m good at maintaining them. I’m the connector of the various groups. I’ll start the WhatsApp, or I’ll start the Zoom during Covid. I’m the one, often times, saying: ‘OK, let’s all go somewhere!’ You need to put the work in, you can’t just sail by.” These things take work, of course. There is the question of resentment. “Yes. You think it only happens in love relationships, but that’s not true.”

W hen Oh was fresh out of theatre school, someone said something to her that she never forgot. Acting hadn’t been her first goal, or rather, she’d disguised to her family how intent she was on pursuing it. “I’m the only person in my family who doesn’t have a master’s,” she has said. She won a place to study journalism at university, which she promised her parents she’d return to if nothing came of the acting gig. Instead, after graduating from the National Theatre School of Canada in Montreal, Oh was immediately cast in the 1994 Canadian premiere of David Mamet’s Oleanna. “And a good friend said to me: ‘Oh my God, congratulations, I’m so happy for you. I’m so jealous, and I’m so happy.’ And I saw that she meant both things and that she held both things, and that I could hold both things as well.”

The crucial lesson Oh took from this exchange is that jealousy can be neutralised as long as you own up to it, and this has been key to her experience of hanging on to old friends. “I kept all my friends from early childhood and my theatre school mates, and my working relationship with people in Canada. I’m hopefully going to shoot something in Toronto and went out to dinner with the producer and I was ‘cheersing’ him, like, you know darling, this is our 30-year relationship. That has great meaning for me.”

She thinks and adds: “Life can be destabilising, so you have to figure out: what are your stabilisers?”

During those early years of her career in Canada, Oh enjoyed huge amounts of success. After the Mamet play, she was cast as the lead in a critically acclaimed TV movie called The Diary of Evelyn Lau, which told the story of a teenage runaway, followed by the title role in a CBC biopic of Adrienne Clarkson, a Chinese Canadian who became an acclaimed journalist and the governor general of Canada. For her lead in a film called Double Happiness, Oh won a best actress award at the Genies, the Canadian equivalent of the Baftas. And so she did what successful Canadian actors do: packed up and headed for Hollywood.

The crash was brutal and instantaneous. Soon after arriving in LA, an agent told her there were no roles for Asian actresses for at least another year and she’d be better off returning to Canada to “get famous” (she was already famous in Canada). Oh had to take encouragement where she could find it, as she had been doing since she was 10 years old and noticed every person of colour on screen, or, later, took heart from the example set by Yoko Ono. She had two personal interactions “in very key moments” during those years that helped her stay the course when it seemed as if the breakthrough would never come. In 1997, Oh won a CableAce award for best actress in a comedy, for her role in an HBO show called Arliss. At the ceremony, she ran into Alfre Woodard, the Oscar-nominated actor currently knocking it out of the park alongside Alfred Molina in the Netflix sci-fi hit The Boroughs. “She didn’t know who I was,” says Oh, “but she took me aside and said something very wonderfully encouraging, which was just, basically, keep going, baby. And that meant a lot to me; I knew who Alfre Woodard was and respected her as an artist, and it was someone just saying, ‘Keep on going.’”

The second encourager was Jamie Foxx, whom she met at another awards do – Oh laughs, “that’s when you meet these people. And he also basically said keep going.” It doesn’t take much. “No. Sometimes when young people will come to you, they are open and vulnerable and it’s a certain responsibility as adults to guide them. It can be just a kind word or you can actually invest in a moment and really talk to the young person.”

Oh does this admirably and with a certain amount of amused tough love. To those in her industry who complain endlessly about the cost of fame, she says mildly, “Nothing is free.” If it all gets too much – the attention, the speculation – she points out, “You can always go away.” (They never do.) Oh says she has never been particularly vulnerable when it comes to being addicted to fame, or to anything else for that matter. “I don’t think that I was ever in danger. Meaning, like, even my lowest times, they were normal lows, like being heartbroken or depressed because you don’t know what to do – normal things. Maybe I’m not willing to say what my addictions are, but they’re not the classic ones. I’ve got to this point where – it’s so boring; it’s so boring,” she says with comic despair, “‘I have to drink less, because of my stomach.’ It’s bullshit. It’s such a bore.”

She meditates. (“Everything you need to figure out in life is found sitting on that cushion.”) And she moves around. Before any new role, Oh leans into the physicality of the piece – she’s a big fan of body work. “But not exercise; not sports. I like dancing; I like moving my body. I think there are answers in the body. I think there are things that are trapped in the body.” She preps for roles on the move and will often walk a circuit to help memorise a script. “I always look for a park and a tree to learn my lines. It works better for me. When I was doing Killing Eve, I was in this garden and there was a specific tree.” Round and round she went, until she had the part down.

She says good writing is the key to good acting, and I ask if Phoebe Waller-Bridge’s scripts for that first series of Killing Eve made her job easier. “Yes, and that has to do – specifically with television and film – that has to do with tone. Something like a play you have a lot more room to interpret it. Something like television, you need the tone to be right there on the page. To write tone, you have to be coming from a very specific point of view.”

While the new version of Le Misanthrope has been put into modern language, the dialogue is still in verse and Oh finds it thrilling – “the challenge of technical language is juicy for me, because you have to work a different muscle. It’s a different way of putting in the emotional discovery. It’s an old play!”

It is; Le Misanthrope opened in 1666 at the Théâtre du Palais-Royal in Paris, though Oh finds it has relevance for our times. “Molière set it in his theatre milieu where there are artists and writers and gossip. It’s a lot about hypocrisy and Alice’s own search for honesty and truth, which has meaning in 2026 – the difficulty in finding truth. I hope it has a wider meaning about what it is to want to tell the truth, want to be honest, and how difficult it is.” In the play, Alice gets into trouble for speaking her mind, and, says Oh, “I need to figure out what that means – not only for the character. What does it mean to speak your mind at this time of your life? What is it about a woman who speaks her mind and then gets shot down because of it?”

A few months ago, Oh voiced her support for Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist and newly elected mayor of New York, and was thrilled when he showed up at a performance of Twelfth Night in Central Park. “What was amazing, as a non-New Yorker, was to witness how he affected our entire cast, which was very diverse; half over 50, half very young. And the way the cast lit up meeting Mamdani, it was like, oh, this is who he represents and this is how much hope he elicits in New Yorkers.”

Oh is active in promoting the authentic representation of Asian cultures on screen. In 2021, she gave a passionate speech at a Stop Asian Hate rally in Pittsburgh, in which she repeated what has come to be a famous mantra: “I am proud to be Asian. I belong here.” In 2022, she wrote about her career for an online literary magazine, in which she said, “For the first time, I’m finally getting film roles where my character’s name is Korean.”

It has taken such a long time to get here, both in terms of the industry she works in and what she has had to do to process and absorb the years of being sidelined. She’s not there yet, she says. And yet. “All the work that you’re doing, on your own time, with your own heart, in the middle of the fucking night. That doubt? And the raw depression? And the questioning, and the anger? It’s alchemising into something.” When she talks about owning all the different parts of herself – including the internalised racism and misogyny – the conclusion she often comes to is, “There is no self. Meaning you don’t have to be tied to self. But that’s not easy.”

In the meantime, Oh is here to have fun. Backstage at the National, she’s doing the thing she does best, which is creating community. On the table between us is a water bottle decorated with stickers she had made during the run of Twelfth Night of all her co-stars, including Peter Dinklage and Jesse Tyler Ferguson, pulling a face. “Oh, that’s Jesse, tasting hot sauce,” she says, laughing. Later, Oh asks a production assistant if he can get her candid photos of her present co-stars to be made into stickers for the same purpose – an ad-hoc team building thing that amuses her.

And when she leaves the theatre? “I shit you not, I have to sleep,” she says, eyes wide with amazement; Oh, who is by nature wildly energetic, also knows her limitations. “With this play, I need to sleep 10 hours. I get into bed at 8.30pm, and I get up at 7am.” It’s as single focus as it gets, but after all those years of feeling herself to be in the wrong place, denied the opportunities, that’s a luxury she’s here for. “I’m allowed to concentrate on that one thing. I’m doing this for a purpose. It’s a privilege to be able to focus on that. Then hopefully you deliver.”

The Misanthrope is at the Lyttelton at the National Theatre, London, until 1 August.

Shoot credits: Hair: Carlos Ferraz. Makeup: Sara Hill. Stylist’s assistant: Charlotte Gornall. Main image and final shot: pink shirt and white trousers, both Carven ; bracelet, resin ring and resin pendant necklace, all Dinosaur Designs ; earrings and gold ear cuff, both Otiumberg . Fabric and sofa, House of Hackney. Sofa shot: midi dress and embellished shoes, both Simone Rocha . White and yellow dress shot: sequin dress, Huishan Zhang ; earrings, Completedworks . Pink dress shot: organza dress, Cecilie Bahnsen; earrings, Completedworks .

‘Once my tummy stopped shaking, I was absorbed by the scale, spectacle and wonder’: your Steven Spielberg film favourites | Steven Spielberg | The Guardian

Keyword – Film
Trefwoorden – Steven Spielberg, Film, ET: The Extra-Terrestrial, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Empire of the Sun, Culture
Title – ‘Once my tummy stopped shaking, I was absorbed by the scale, spectacle and wonder’: your Steven Spielberg film favourites | Steven Spielberg | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/guardian-readers,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/alfie-packham
Link – ‘Once my tummy stopped shaking, I was absorbed by the scale, spectacle and wonder’: your Steven Spielberg film favourites | Steven Spielberg | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-20T12:00:02.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/jun/20/readers-favourite-spielberg-films-close-encounters-et-raiders-hook

ET the Extra-Terrestrial (1982)

ET is my favourite Spielberg film. It was the first I ever saw at the cinema, when I was eight years old, at Bolton Odeon in 1982. It was also the first film that made me cry – not just cry, but sob all the way home on the bus. I remember feeling completely confused by the fact that I was so happy and yet so sad at the same time. I watched the film with my mum and some of her friends from the Gingerbread Club, a single parents’ organisation that arranged social events and outings, mainly for single mothers. At a time when there was still a stigma attached to being a single parent, it provided a sense of community and support.

Looking back, I think part of the reason I connected so strongly with ET was that it featured a single mum rather than the perfect nuclear family that dominated so many films and TV programmes of the time. It felt much closer to my own reality, and that made me love the film even more. That Christmas, my favourite present was an ET doll with a light-up stomach and glowing fingertip. I adored it. More than 40 years later, I still love the film dearly and never hesitate when someone asks me what my favourite film is. Even now, hearing a few notes of John Williams’s score is enough to bring tears to my eyes within seconds. Andrea, 51, Manchester, UK

Hook (1991)

Universally touted as a Spielberg flop. So much so, that even Spielberg himself started to regret ever making the film. All of this is inconsequential to its meaning for me as a child of the 90s. The film is a trusted comfort. I can quote all the dialogue, and even use phrases from it in my day-to-day life. The casting, the effervescently sad Robin Williams as the boy who accidentally grew up, the lawyer jokes, the warm haze that permeates the film. I remember it being played on free-to-air many times as a child and having my own – pardon the pun – pirated copy. I returned to this film often as a child, and still return to it at least once a year now, when a dose of nostalgia is needed. So despite Spielberg’s protestations, it is my favourite of his oeuvre for many selfish reasons. Rhea, Melbourne, Australia

Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977)

Close Encounters of the Third Kind will always be the Spielberg movie that means the most to me, as much for the circumstances that led to me seeing it as the wonderful film itself. I was five years of age and my mum decided to take my sister and I to see a movie double bill at a cinema in nearby Chester. From memory, the films we were meant to see were a Spider-Man movie that was actually made for TV, and a much older, Ray Harryhausen-animated, Sinbad film. Long story short, my dad dropped us at the wrong cinema, on the opposite side of town, and my mum decided we should see whatever was showing there rather than venturing through an increasingly dark, wet evening.

The only “suitable” movie was Close Encounters, although my mum said numerous times before buying the tickets that she was worried I might find it scary. Needless to say, her saying that made me feel very nervous indeed! Up until that point, my only issue with seeing a movie with the words “of the Third Kind” in the title was that I hadn’t seen the first two films (I was similarly confused when the crawling text at the beginning of the original Star Wars movie referred to it as “Episode IV”).

Anyway, I sat in the cinema next to my mum, quaking like crazy at this scary movie she was making me watch. But not for long! About 15 minutes in, I famously announced that my tummy had stopped shaking and from that point on I was utterly absorbed by this film of such mindblowing scale, spectacle and wonder. I vividly remember going to bed that night and asking my mum to leave the curtains open so I could see the stars. Spielberg’s genius had opened my very young mind and made it suddenly more curious as to what magic there might be out there. More importantly, I wasn’t afraid to look for it. Scott Harrison, 54, north Wales, UK

Always (1989)

Always, starring Holly Hunter, Richard Dreyfuss and John Goodman, is my feelgood movie. Funny, heartbreakingly sad, great action and classic dialogue: “Girl clothes!” Holly and Richard at their peak, their chemistry was excellent and that they are not your typical Hollywood handsome made you love them more. I have to watch this film every couple of years and I always laugh and always messy-cry and it never fails to reaffirm my faith in people. Spielberg made the perfect love story, but its joy is so often overshadowed by his summer blockbusters. Karen Cusick, 61, Devon

Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)

Raiders, for its propulsive energy and giddy excitement as Indiana Jones cracks his whip through a booby-trapped temple in the South American jungle. Also choosing Nazis as the villains (and snakes!) was a masterstroke that helps keep the plot itself timeless. Steven Spielberg tips his fedora to the cliffhanger serials of the 1930s and the Tintin stories to bring us the adventure of a lifetime!

Spielberg’s name translates as “play mountain” in German and he brings that playfulness to the screen from the opening shot of the Paramount logo transitioning into a mountaintop in the Peruvian jungle as Indy searches for hidden treasures, before getting caught in snowbound Himalayan bar fights, foot chases through Cairo and an exhilarating truck chase through the desert. As you catch your breath, the chemistry between Indy and Marion has the alchemy of a 1930s screwball comedy. Niall Laverty, Dublin, Ireland

Empire of the Sun (1987)

For me, it is Empire of the Sun . It was one of the first major Hollywood productions allowed to film in communist China, in Shanghai. It is also faithful to JG Ballard’s excellent book. In fact, I can’t read the book now without seeing young Christian Bale as Jamie/Jim. The imagery is extraordinary, the acting feels real, and John Williams’s score is beautiful. The opening scene, with coffins floating down the Yangtze as Suo Gân plays in the background, hooked me immediately. I think I first saw it in year 11, towards the end of term, when our history teachers played it for us.

I already loved history, so the setting was the perfect recipe for me. But what really stayed with me was Jim himself. I was only a few years older than him at the time, and I remember wondering how I would have coped in his situation: separated from his parents, forced to fend for himself and having to grow up amid some awful scenes. I didn’t much like the conclusion I came to. There are scenes I still think about: the young Japanese pilot, the “difficult boy” scene, the atom bomb, and that extraordinary “Cadillac of the skies” moment. War might be the backdrop, but I don’t see it as a film about war. It is about imagination, resilience, choices and consequences. That is why it has stayed with me. Matthew Vandermeer, 50, Brisbane, Australia

The Fabelmans (2022)

I’m a high-school English and film studies teacher. I’m 49 – just a few months older than Close Encounters. The Fabelmans is my favourite film of all time, and is the capstone film we watch to finish my film studies class at Appleton West High School. In it, Spielberg explicitly tells the story of his own childhood and adolescence and his family’s influence on him becoming a film-maker, but he also uses that story to reveal the “how” and the “why” of a lifetime influencing the emotions of his audiences.

Watching The Fabelmans for the first time is an almost religious experience for Spielberg fans around my age. It’s a meditation on growing up with the movies and a sincere attempt to show the next generation of film-makers and enthusiasts all they need to take up the mantle themselves. For fans of Spielberg and the rest of the “New Hollywood” visionaries, there is no better (or more accessible) film to demonstrate how the movies that move us are built on foundations of both science and art, how Spielberg is an absolute master of both, and how his parents’ influence in those polar-opposite arenas made him (and us!) capable of dreaming so vividly on screen.

The Fabelmans also features the most joyous final shot you’ll see in a movie. It made me leap out of my seat in 2022 the same way I did as a kindergartener when ET’s heart started glowing again 40 years prior. The whole film is an elaborate magic trick, and nothing is spoiled when Hollywood’s master emotional illusionist reveals his – and his family’s – biggest secrets. Nathan Ossmann, Appleton, Wisconsin, US

The Color Purple (1985)

The Color Purple tells the stories of sisters separated and of women who help each other through hard times and characters who grow and mature. It shows the downtrodden rising, features fantastic singing and love lasting through decades of separation. The Color Purple is Spielberg’s best film because it shows the strength of women to overcome their circumstances when they support each other. It also has an amazing soundtrack of gospel and jazz and blues. The scene that sticks in my mind is Shug singing gospel demanding her father forgive and accept her. Mandy Purcell, 54, Melbourne, Australia

Duel (1971)

I first read Duel as a very enjoyable short story in Playboy magazine early 1970s. I was elated to learn it had been made into a film and first saw it on UK Channel 4 TV. Now have it as a DVD, regularly watch it, pleased that the lead is played by Dennis Weaver whom I recall from 1950s TV as Chester in Gunsmoke, an American western series. I am mesmerised by the way Spielberg captures the menace of the anonymous driver in the equally anonymous, oversized, unmarked, rust-brown truck, repeating the same conceit – the truck appearing from nowhere to intimidate, bumper to bumper. It’s a one-trick pony but Spielberg makes it fresh every time the bullying takes place. And the ending. Literally a cliffhanger, as an intimidated car driver abandons his vehicle at a cliff’s edge while the truck follows, over the edge and to oblivion. Very clever for a directorial debut. Mike Abbott, 83, London, UK

Week in wildlife: a squirrel with a splint, hungry hyenas and a great white shark | Wildlife | The Guardian

Keyword – Environment
Trefwoorden – Wildlife, Animals, Environment, World news
Title – Week in wildlife: a squirrel with a splint, hungry hyenas and a great white shark | Wildlife | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/joanna-ruck
Link – Week in wildlife: a squirrel with a splint, hungry hyenas and a great white shark | Wildlife | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-12T07:00:38.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/environment/gallery/2026/jun/12/week-in-wildlife-squirrel-hyenas-great-white-shark

Jude Bellingham reveals England got ‘things wrong off the pitch’ at Euro 2024 | England | The Guardian

Keyword – Football
Trefwoorden – England, Jude Bellingham, World Cup 2026, World Cup, Football, Sport, Euro 2024
Title – Jude Bellingham reveals England got ‘things wrong off the pitch’ at Euro 2024 | England | The Guardian
Author – PA Media
Link – Jude Bellingham reveals England got ‘things wrong off the pitch’ at Euro 2024 | England | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-12T09:35:01.000Z
Category – Sport
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/jun/12/jude-bellingham-england-got-things-wrong-off-pitch-euro-2024

Jude Bellingham has revealed things were not right off the pitch in England’s camp at Euro 2024. Despite reaching the final, where they were beaten by Spain , Sir Gareth Southgate’s side were far from convincing during their run in Germany.

Thomas Tuchel has spoken of creating a “brotherhood” in his squad as he tries to win the World Cup this summer and Bellingham, speaking from inside England’s camp in Kansas City, said that was not the case at the European Championship two years ago.

“At the Euros I think we got a few things wrong off the pitch, I don’t feel the group connected as well as it could have for a number of reasons,” he told the Lion’s Den. “When it came to the tournament, we were seen as one of two or three teams that could win it. We weren’t playing well, which doesn’t help, so even when we were winning, we didn’t get the feeling that we were as happy as we should be.”

England needed Bellingham’s last-minute overhead kick to force extra time against Slovakia in the last 16, penalties to beat Switzerland in the quarter-finals and a last-minute goal to get past the Netherlands in the semi-finals.

Bellingham’s intervention against Slovakia was one of England’s most memorable moments in tournament football, but he says the shine is taken off it by the circumstances of the goal. The Real Madrid midfielder said: “I still remember how I was feeling at the time. It always makes me feel a bit uncomfortable because it was such a bad situation.

“We weren’t playing well. I remember as a kid watching World Cups and Euros where we crashed out against teams we shouldn’t have gone out to and I remember thinking: ‘Wow, I’m about to be a part of one of those moments.’ It shakes up the whole of English football.”

Bellingham faces a fight for a starting role in England’s World Cup opener against Croatia on Wednesday because Tuchel appears to have pitted him against Morgan Rogers in a straight shootout for the No 10 position. The pair have a close relationship, having grown up in the same area in the West Midlands and played junior football together.

Bellingham, who advanced his case for winning the shirt with his display in Wednesday’s final warm-up win against Costa Rica, said there were no problems between the pair.

“He is a top guy, he can get along with anyone, can have conversations with anyone,” Bellingham said. “He can be a bit loud. We have debates that turn into arguments a lot. But we get on like brothers, to be fair.

“The manager has made it very clear in a lot of the times where he has spoken that we are playing for the same position. I know that has eased up a bit more now that he sees me playing more positions and Morgs playing more positions, but I honestly have no ill feelings when he is playing and I’m not playing.”

‘That was a dumbass play’: De’Aaron Fox’s gaffe leaves door open for historic Knicks comeback | NBA finals | The Guardian

Keyword – Sport
Trefwoorden – NBA finals, San Antonio Spurs, New York Knicks, Basketball, NBA, Sport, US sports, Victor Wembanyama
Title – ‘That was a dumbass play’: De’Aaron Fox’s gaffe leaves door open for historic Knicks comeback | NBA finals | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/bryan-armen-graham
Link – ‘That was a dumbass play’: De’Aaron Fox’s gaffe leaves door open for historic Knicks comeback | NBA finals | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-11T07:43:15.000Z
Category – Sport
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2026/jun/11/deaaron-fox-spurs-knicks-game-4-collapse-nba-finals

For nearly 47 minutes, the San Antonio Spurs looked poised to leave New York with the NBA finals level at two games apiece.

They’d led by 81-52 in the third quarter, brought a frenzied Madison Square Garden crowd to heel and put themselves on the verge of reclaiming home-court advantage after having dropped the first two games at home. Even after the Knicks mounted a furious second-half fightback and wiped out the entirety of San Antonio’s 29-point cushion, the Spurs still appeared to have one final lifeline.

Then came a decision that could haunt San Antonio for years if the Knicks go on to end their 53-year championship drought.

The Spurs led 106-105 with less than 15 seconds remaining Wednesday night when Jalen Brunson’s floating bank shot ricocheted into the backcourt. The loose ball bounced toward De’Aaron Fox, who sprinted after it and found himself racing toward the basket with only a trailing OG Anunoby between him and what looked like a game-clinching score.

Instead of pulling the ball out and forcing New York to foul, Fox attacked the rim. But Anunoby chased him down and blocked the lay-up attempt.

Seconds later, the Knicks had the ball back. Brunson missed a 31-footer off the front of the rim, but Anunoby soared in from the top of the key and tipped home the winner with 1.2 seconds remaining, completing an improbable 107-106 victory and the largest comeback in NBA finals history.

Fox did not shy away from explaining his thought process afterward.

“You have to score. Try to get a lay-up, get up three [points]. Force them to need a three,” Fox said. “OG made a good block.”

Asked why he went for the basket rather than dribbling out the clock and forcing a foul, the ninth-year point guard was to the point.

“I just thought I’d be able to outrun them. That’s it.”

The explanation did little to quell the criticism.

On ESPN’s post-game show, Charles Barkley delivered a verdict that quickly spread across social media and sports television.

“That was a dumbass play,” Barkley said. “He did not have to shoot that ball.”

The blunt assessment reflected the reaction around the basketball world. With the Spurs clinging to a one-point lead, Fox had safer options available. He could have retreated from pressure and waited to be fouled, shaving precious seconds off the clock. He could have used San Antonio’s final timeout. Instead, he chose the most aggressive path – a gamble Anunoby made him pay dearly for.

Of course, reducing the collapse to a single possession would let the Spurs off too easily. The final mistake merely capped a spectacular unraveling that had begun long before Fox found himself alone in the open floor. San Antonio scored 76 points in the first half but just 30 after half-time. The crisp ball movement and long-distance sharpshooting that had carved apart New York’s defense evaporated as the Knicks chipped away at the deficit.

“Obviously let that get away, being up [29 points],” Fox said. “Got away from doing the things that got us up and put ourselves in that position.”

“I think we played a little slower,” he added. “The ball wasn’t moving the same way that it did in the second half like it did in the first half. We didn’t get a flow on the offensive end in the second half.”

Spurs coach Mitch Johnson saw the same thing.

“We got away from what got us the 76 points in the first half,” Johnson said. “Then you saw at times the aggressiveness and just conviction that we played with early on dissipate a little bit. They made some shots. That’s where you felt the momentum a little bit. We just needed few more tough-minded plays to finish the job.”

He added: “To put as much good work into that first half as we did, get the lead that we had and not finish the job, is disappointing to say the least.”

Wembanyama said he was unable to see Fox’s fateful lay-up attempt after tumbling to the floor during the play, but he offered a curt appraisal of the Spurs’ second-half performance.

“We clearly weren’t the most hungry in the second half,” Wembanyama said. “Stopped moving the ball. Stopped executing.”

That reality may ultimately be what stings most for San Antonio. Fox’s snap decision did not create the collapse. The Spurs had already let a 29-point lead fritter away by then. What the play did was quash their last best chance to survive it.

“Going down 3-1 is obviously very different,” Fox said. “But we feel like we have a team to be able to come back from this.”

Two minutes earlier, the Spurs were still on course to turn these finals into a best-of-three with all the momentum on their side. One costly miscue later, they were staring at the brink instead.