Champions League opening data shows English dominance and too few shocks | Champions League | The Guardian

Keyword – Football
Trefwoorden – Champions League, Football, Sport
Title – Champions League opening data shows English dominance and too few shocks | Champions League | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/andrew-beasley
Link – Champions League opening data shows English dominance and too few shocks | Champions League | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-09-11T13:29:16.000Z
Category – Sport
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/sep/11/champions-league-opening-data-shows-english-dominance-and-too-few-shocks

T he 2026-27 Champions League is under way. There are still 126 matches to play until we know which 24 teams will feature in the knockout phase but that doesn’t mean we haven’t learned anything yet. Here are the key data talking points from week one.

England good, Italy bad?

Premier League teams took five of the eight automatic qualification spots in 2025-26. England’s representatives all won this week to take a step toward repeating that feat. Arguably the biggest winners were Liverpool , as they were the only English team to play an opponent drawn from pot one.

They were at home, though, so perhaps the away victories for Arsenal , Aston Villa and Manchester City were more impressive. Regardless of which club can be most pleased, the Premier League’s dominance was absolute. English teams collectively out-shot their opponents 102-44, put 28 more efforts on target and had 24 shots deemed by Opta to be big chances while conceding only five.

They topped the expected goal difference by country too, a chart that has Italy at the bottom. Como won , Roma drew at Fenerbahce while Napoli and Inter faced Arsenal and Real Madrid respectively. All is far from lost, but Serie A’s numbers were not pretty.

Inter dominated Real Madrid

It wasn’t all bad for Inter. They were one of two teams who had at least 57 touches in the opposition penalty area this week. It’s an incredibly high tally – one that has only been topped once in the Premier League this season, where the average is 24.6 per team per game. For Paris Saint-Germain to be so strongly camped in the Slovan Bratislava box was hardly a surprise. For Inter to be so busy in the Real Madrid penalty area at the Santiago Bernabéu was more worthy of comment.

It would be easy to dismiss this as classic Real; they did not play well in the Champions League but won regardless. And they mustered an enormous nine big chances, missing seven of them, so might have won more comfortably with sharper finishing. But as Inter had the most shots of any visiting team in the league or Europe (in a 90-minute match) for eight years, Real might have lost too.

The only player among the back four who was there last season was 21-year-old Dean Huijsen, which may help explain how Inter were able to have so many attempts at goal. José Mourinho called it “mad, and not a madness I like”. He wasn’t wrong.

Few even games

There were no draws in the first two nights of action. Ismail Kartal resigned as Fenerbahce head coach on Thursday after his side drew 1-1 with Roma, presumably because he was so shocked that the match had finished level.

There were not even many close games on the underlying numbers, with only four of the 18 matches having an expected goal margin between the two teams that was below one. Every team that won deserved to, at least according to the xG.

With so many games still to play, a relative lack of draws this week may prove insignificant. However, it will affect the points tally required to reach the playoff round if the trend continues. There were 25 draws in the 2025-26 league phase, with the team in 24th (Benfica) finishing on nine points. But there were only 18 the season before when Club Brugge finished with 11 points when taking the final playoff spot. Fewer draws mean more teams earn three points, which lifts the bar for competitiveness. We’re currently on track for 16 draws, so keep an eye on how many matches end all square when match week two rolls around.

No surprises

Despite 16 of the 18 matches being won, there were no shocks. For the bloated league phase to generate serious excitement, it needs major upsets. Only two wins were secured by the underdog according to bookmakers, and one of those was Europa League champions Aston Villa beating Club Brugge. Hardly an upset when you compare their finances.

The surprise of the week based on pre-match prediction was Real Betis winning 3-2 at Lille. They are 49th and 52nd respectively in Opta’s Power Rankings, so Betis did not overcome an insurmountable challenge. The early weeks of last season had Qarabag winning at Benfica and Galatasaray beating Liverpool. We need more of those types of results.

He was at his desk at the Pentagon on 9/11. As the chaos unfolded, he refused to leave | September 11 2001 | The Guardian

Keyword – US news
Trefwoorden – September 11 2001, US news, US politics, US military, Washington DC, US national security
Title – He was at his desk at the Pentagon on 9/11. As the chaos unfolded, he refused to leave | September 11 2001 | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/davidsmith
Link – He was at his desk at the Pentagon on 9/11. As the chaos unfolded, he refused to leave | September 11 2001 | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-09-11T13:16:52.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/11/matthew-klimow-9-11-pentagon

“A ll day I had been a good soldier: stolid, resolute, unemotional, rational, and dispassionate,” writes Matthew Klimow , recalling the wave of emotion that overwhelmed him as he arrived home from the Pentagon on 11 September 2001. There was sadness for the lives lost. But there was another emotion, too: humiliation.

“We, as a nation, had been humbled,” writes the retired army colonel, who remained at the Pentagon even after it was struck by a hijacked airliner, killing all 64 people onboard and 125 inside the building. “The fighting force of which I was part had been impotent, unable to protect our fellow citizens. The darkness I felt matched the darkness inside my house as I opened the door.”

Klimow recalls the longest day of his career in As the Pentagon Burned , a study in leadership and a first-person account of the chaos that unfolded at the headquarters of the US defence department in Arlington, Virginia, on the day that planes also hit New York and Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Donald Trump will mark the 25th anniversary of the United States’ worst terrorist attack in a ceremony at the Pentagon on Friday.

Klimow’s book recalls how leaders at all levels suppressed their emotional shock to respond with calm determination and grace under pressure. But it also tells how the attacks revealed a tension between military protocol and the need for improvisation, and how coordination was plagued by erroneous intelligence, overlapping chains of command and communication gaps – including a critical half-hour when Donald Rumsfeld , the US secretary of defense, was unreachable.

Born and raised in Johnson City, New York, Klimow’s career spans more than half a century of military and diplomatic service. He entered the military academy at West Point in 1970 and graduated in 1974, commencing a 29-year army career that took him from commanding paratroopers in the 18th Airborne Corps to earning the Silver Star for gallantry during the Gulf war.

On the morning of September 11, Klimow was executive assistant to Gen Richard Myers , vice-chair of the joint chiefs of staff. The chair, Gen Hugh Shelton, took off early for Hungary. The acting role fell to Myers, who would assume the position full-time on 1 October.

Klimow was in his office by 5.15am. Since Myers’ confirmation hearings before the US Senate were imminent, he left for Capitol Hill around 8.45am, taking along his young aide-de-camp, Capt Chris Donahue. Klimow remained at his desk, his eyes drifting to a television monitor kept on mute.

Suddenly, the screen filled with the horrific image of the World Trade Center’s north tower on fire . Speaking by phone from Monterey, Tennessee, Klimow, 74, says: “When I looked up, there was the newscast of the World Trade Center burning and I turned the volume up and I was just dumbfounded because it’s such a clear blue sky. I was in denial. I kept thinking it’s some freak accident, a small airplane maybe, and they were speculating the same thing on the newscast .”

The secure “red switch” telephone began to bleep. On the other end was Gen Ralph Eberhart , commander of North American Aerospace Defense Command (Norad). “That set off alarm bells with me as soon as I heard his voice, which I knew. He asked for General Myers. I said he’s on Capitol Hill. And he said, ‘Colonel, it’s urgent. Get hold of him. Get him to a phone. I need to talk to him now.’”

Klimow immediately called Donahue, and told him to barge into a senator’s office and retrieve Myers. The red switch rang again. This time Eberhart’s words were chilling: “We have several airplanes in the air on radar. An unknown number of them have been hijacked.”

As Klimow frantically took notes, his secretary waved wildly: Shelton was calling on an unsecure line. Klimow found himself with the secure red switch handset pressed to his left ear, and the unsecure telephone to Shelton in his right. He began a frantic double-relay, feeding the developments to the towering, impatient four-star general across the ocean.

Then, the ground shook. “All of a sudden, Mary Turner, our secretary, jumped up and said, ‘I think the building moved!’ Then there was absolute pandemonium outside our door. People were shouting, running down the corridor and I yelled, ‘Shut the door, Mary, I can’t hear!’”

Panic

In his deep focus, Klimow had not heard the thunderous impact of Flight 77 slamming into the western facade of the Pentagon. Finally, a National Military Command Center (NMCC) watch officer broke into the red switch conference: the Pentagon had been hit.

By chance the plane had smashed into a newly renovated wedge of the Pentagon, outfitted with state-of-the-art ballistic glass. This helped reduce the casualty count, but prevented the kinetic energy from escaping, channelling fireballs through the long corridors and hallways.

Klimow went to the river entrance to meet Myers, and the two men fought their way back up the stairs into the burning building. Two police officers tried to bar their entry. Myers and Klimow pushed past them and descended into the NMCC, a windowless cold war labyrinth.

Early reports via the red switch incorrectly stated that American Airlines Flight 11 – which had already struck the World Trade Center – was confirmed hijacked, and heading toward Washington.

A critical friction point existed between Norad and the air national guard. Norad scrambled jets from Langley air force base, but initially lacked the rules of engagement (ROE) to shoot down civilian aircraft. Meanwhile, the Secret Service prompted the launch of fighters from Andrews air force base, outside the normal military chain of command. Those aircraft were operating under a more permissive “weapons free” rule of engagement.

The Langley pilots initially flew east because an erroneous generic flight plan sent them that way, and they believed they were responding to the threat of a cruise missile attack from the sea. This lack of “situational awareness” delayed their arrival in Washington.

Klimow, meanwhile, experienced a sudden dread when he turned around and realised Myers was gone. As the executive assistant, Klimow’s sole purpose was to remain at the acting chair’s side.

“I panicked,” he confesses. “I tore out of there. I ran as fast as I could into the corridors of the Pentagon and I can’t tell you how eerie it was because there are 22,000 people who work in the Pentagon and the place was deserted, there was a film of smoke in the air and they didn’t turn off the fire alarm. There’s this blaring alarm with a recorded message to evacuate the building just echoing.

“I ran to our office. It was absolutely deserted and I stood in the centre of our office thinking, where did he go? It struck me, he’s with Secretary Rumsfeld, which is the office above us, so I ran up the staircase and darted into the outer office. Gen Myers was coming out of Rumsfeld’s inner office and he shook his head and said, he’s not here. ”

Humiliation

When Flight 77 struck, Rumsfeld’s immediate instinct was to run toward the fire, helping carry stretchers and rescue survivors. Klimow regards it as an act of personal bravery that nevertheless created a serious operational problem.

“For 30 minutes, no one could get hold of the secretary of defense when our country is under attack,” Klimow says. “He eventually made his way into the NMCC and described the destruction outside and he was calm and cool, like everybody. But when he talked to Vice-President [Dick] Cheney , I knew something was amiss, and it took me weeks later to figure out what had happened.

“He was briefed by General Myers on Norad’s response and the rules of engagement, and the vice-president was talking to him about fighters coming out of Andrews air force base with different rules of engagement, but they were talking past each other. They didn’t realise they were talking about two different responses by the air force.”

Klimow’s wife, Edie, a retired army nurse and major whom he met in Germany, had spent the day racked with anxiety. Their son, Daniel, in middle school, had been told by teachers that the Pentagon was under attack. “He had this vision of terrorists running through the hallways with machine guns,” Klimow says.

It was after midnight when Klimow finally walked out of the smoking ruins of the Pentagon. Covered in grey soot and smelling of burning jet fuel, he drove home to Arlington, Virginia. The silence was broken by a sound he had never imagined hearing over the capital.

“It was the eeriest thing. It was the sound of American jet fighters overhead. When I realised that my own neighbourhood, my own capital city and my own country had to be protected by a combat air patrol, it was humiliating to think that we had been so surprised by such a devastating attack.

“The lights were off in the house and I thought Edie must be asleep, but I opened the door and she was there waiting for me. That’s when we had this big emotional embrace and knew that we would get up the next day and start working on a solution.”

Wisdom

The solution that Klimow and his colleagues began drafting on 12 September would eventually morph into the “ war on terror ”, a sprawling military campaign that would redefine the global order, not necessarily to the US’s advantage. Looking back from the vantage point of 2026, Klimow views those choices with sober realism.

“Everything looks different with hindsight but, that cliche aside, we had little choice but to enter Afghanistan militarily and to make sure that the launching pad for what al-Qaida used to do to us was eliminated from Afghanistan .

“Did we make wise decisions tactically or operationally? Sometimes yes, sometimes no, but strategically I don’t think in the days and weeks following 9/11 there was any doubt in most people’s mind that this required military action, not just diplomacy.”

Diplomacy became Klimow’s own second act during a five-year spell as the US ambassador to Turkmenistan . It gave him a close perspective on the end of the US’s longest war: the 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan after 20 years and the return to power of the Taliban.

Amid the mayhem was a familiar face: Donahue, the captain whom he ordered to barge into a senator’s office on 9/11. Donahue rose to become a major general commanding the 82nd airborne division. On 30 August 2021, a night-vision photograph was beamed across the world, showing a solitary US soldier boarding the final C-17 transport plane out of Taliban-controlled Kabul airport. It was Donahue – the very last US soldier to leave Afghanistan .

“Talk about the irony of being there at the beginning and being there at the end,” Klimow muses.

The days and weeks after 9/11 were arguably the last time the United States was truly united. The Iraq war, financial crisis, social media, rise of Donald Trump and Covid-19 pandemic have divided and redivided the nation. But 25 years later, Klimow refuses to despair.

“There were scenes that were ripping in our society in the 1960s, and I was witness to that. But we pulled things together,” he says. “It’s not the same situation, of course, but I have a firm belief that we go through cycles like this, and America’s principles, and our resilience, and our devotion to liberty and freedom are unshakable.

“I’m still a big believer in the American dream and what we can do together, and the belief that we will continue to pull together, in ways that may be different from some of our historic past, but our resilience and the brilliance of our nation’s founding still make that possible.”

US lawmakers urge secretive British court to open up about Apple case | US Congress | The Guardian

Keyword – US news
Trefwoorden – US Congress, House of Representatives, US news, Apple, UK news
Title – US lawmakers urge secretive British court to open up about Apple case | US Congress | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/joseph-gedeon
Link – US lawmakers urge secretive British court to open up about Apple case | US Congress | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-09-11T13:03:33.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/11/congress-uk-court-apple-encrypted-data-case

A bipartisan pair of American politicians is telling Britain’s most secretive court to stop hiding its handling of Apple’s legal fight against a government demand to break into its customers’ encrypted data, warning that Whitehall’s taste for secrecy is “needlessly” straining relations between the two allies.

The letter , shared with the Guardian ahead of being sent to the investigatory powers tribunal (IPT) on Friday, is signed by the Democratic senator Ron Wyden of Oregon and the Republican congressman Warren Davidson of Ohio.

The row dates back to January 2025, when the Home Office served Apple with a technical capability notice under the Investigatory Powers Act, which requires companies to assist law enforcement in providing evidence. The UK government demanded that Apple provide a mechanism to access encrypted iCloud backups worldwide, a call the company met by withdrawing its Advanced Data Protection encryption feature from UK users the following month. Apple’s challenge to that order at the IPT was later thrown out after the Home Office withdrew the original notice and issued a narrower one targeting only British users’ data.

“It is wholly inappropriate for a foreign executive body to attempt to dictate the distribution of powers within the US government, nor should it be permitted to use secrecy directives under the Investigatory Powers Act to frustrate Article I powers under the US Constitution,” the pair wrote.

In August this year, Apple lodged a fresh complaint at the tribunal challenging the government’s power to issue such notices at all, with a case-management hearing on how that claim will proceed now listed for this month – the very hearing the new letter is aimed at.

Wyden and Davidson also signed an earlier letter to the tribunal in March 2025, alongside other lawmakers, pressing for the case to be heard in public. That intervention appears to have had an effect: weeks later the IPT rejected the government’s attempt to keep the case entirely secret, ruling that the “bare details” of Apple’s claim, including the identities of the parties, could be made public after receiving representations that, the tribunal noted, “strongly argued in favour of open justice and against the proceedings taking place in secret”.

In the new letter, Wyden and Davidson write that Congress “is not only a co-equal branch of government, it is the First Branch”, and argue that no government can be allowed to place “its demands beyond the reach of legislative inquiry”. They accuse the Home Office of trying to use a foreign secrecy order to override the constitutional powers of the US legislature, after Apple told Congress it had been permitted to brief only the attorney general, the vice-president and their staff – but not lawmakers – about the dispute.

They argue that Britain’s own constitutional traditions hold that no government can place its actions beyond the reach of legislative scrutiny – the same principle, they say, the Home Office is now violating.

“The UK government,” they write, “cannot champion legislative oversight at home while using administrative gag orders to kneecap the constitutional authority of the US Congress .”

George W Bush’s impunity led to Trump’s lawlessness | Kenneth Roth | The Guardian

Keyword – Opinion
Trefwoorden – Guantánamo Bay, September 11 2001, US news, George Bush, Trump administration, Donald Trump, World news, US immigration
Title – George W Bush’s impunity led to Trump’s lawlessness | Kenneth Roth | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/kenneth-roth
Link – George W Bush’s impunity led to Trump’s lawlessness | Kenneth Roth | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-09-11T13:00:05.000Z
Category – Opinion
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/sep/11/george-w-bush-torture-9-11-trump

I f George W Bush’s abusive response to the September 11 attacks had been prosecuted rather than swept under the rug, Donald Trump would be less able to pursue his lawless policies. We can’t rewind history, but we can learn from our historic failure.

Twenty-five years ago, on a clear and crisp morning, I was sitting in the Human Rights Watch office in the Empire State Building with an unobstructed view of the World Trade Center towers as al-Qaida operatives flew two commercial jets into them. The horror of the attack required a response, but Bush and his vice-president, Dick Cheney, chose to react by throwing out the rulebook. They deployed torture and endless detention without trial in Guantánamo.

At first, Americans were so fearful of another al-Qaida attack that many accepted the Bush administration’s argument that extraordinary measures were required. But as the utter brutality of the response became apparent, dissenting voices grew more pronounced. Yet the reluctance of later administrations to repudiate these measures laid the foundation for Trump’s misconduct.

A May 2009 meeting I had with Barack Obama epitomized the problem. He had recently assumed office and invited me and several colleagues to the White House to discuss his counter-terrorism program. The meeting was disappointing .

Our top priority was securing prosecution of the senior Bush administration officials who had ordered the systematic torture of terrorist suspects. Obama declined , wanting to look forward, not back. His priority was working with Congress to secure healthcare reform (ultimately the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare) as well as on issues such as education and climate change. He felt that prosecuting senior Bush officials would be too contentious.

Other steps had already been taken to end the torture. Public outrage, hastened by the leaked Abu Ghraib photographs of US servicemembers mistreating detainees in Iraq, led even the Bush administration to stop. The Detainee Treatment Act of 2005, sponsored by the senator John McCain, himself a torture victim, closed some of the legal loopholes used by the Bush administration to justify the unjustifiable. But no senior official was ever prosecuted for the torture.

That left a legacy of impunity that haunts us. Later presidents have not revived the torture, although the administrations of Joe Biden as well as Trump have continued the flow of military aid to Israel despite its systematic torture of Palestinian detainees.

Yet the deliberate use of excessive force by Trump’s deportation agents suggests confidence in a similar impunity for today’s declared crisis du jour: immigration. The Trump justice department has closed its eyes even when immigration officials gratuitously shoot , and sometimes kill, people.

Bush’s lengthy detention of suspects without trial at Guantánamo has had even greater lethal consequences. Ordinarily, a criminal suspect must be charged and tried within a reasonable time or released. But the Bush administration often had no evidence to justify charges beyond confessions secured by torture. The military commissions designed to allow prosecution despite the torture proved to be travesties that to this day have not even begun the trial of the principal 9/11 suspects.

The legal device that the Bush administration used to justify endless detention without trial was to call the suspects “ enemy combatants ”. In war , it is possible to hold opposing combatants without trial until the end of the armed conflict, but there was no armed conflict with al-Qaida, only a series of horrible terrorist attacks.

Bush concocted the “ war on terror ”, but it wasn’t a real war because there was no organized military force on the other side to justify invoking the rules of war. Rather, the rhetoric was a contrivance to sidestep the requirements of criminal prosecution.

At the time, I argued that allowing this legal subterfuge could have dangerous consequences. If a declared but fake enemy combatant could be held indefinitely without charge, why could he not also be shot? After all, in war, there is no duty to capture combatants from the other side. So long as they are not in custody, they can be killed.

I made the argument in the meeting with Obama as a reason to close Guantánamo – to charge or release all its detainees. I couldn’t imagine that the US government would really start to shoot suspects whom it could detain. But that is what Trump is now doing, not with alleged al-Qaida terrorists but with drug suspects, using a similar theory.

Like Bush, Trump has concocted a war, this time with drug traffickers, even though there is no organized military force on the other side fighting the United States. He then declared suspected traffickers in boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific to be “ narcoterrorists ”. His aim is to justify summarily killing them by drone rather than capturing and prosecuting them. Trump has taken the Bush theory, modified it for the new enemy, and intensified the consequences.

Precursors to these murders can be found in the actions of the Obama and Biden administrations. They summarily killed people in Yemen and north-western Pakistan but at least maintained the pretense, though untenable, that these terrorist suspects posed an imminent threat to the United States because arrest was impossible in the relatively lawless terrain of these distant lands. That is, they invoked an exception in policing rules that allows lethal force rather than the fiction that these people were enemy combatants.

But that misuse of policing rules isn’t available for the drug suspects whom Trump is targeting because the US Coast Guard has a long tradition of successfully interdicting them at sea. Trump thus relies on his fake war to order them murdered instead.

The lesson I take is that when past abuses are glossed over rather than prosecuted, they set precedents that can come back to haunt us. It is never easy to establish the rule of law when the perpetrators are powerful officials. An administration rarely prosecutes itself, and later administrations have their own priorities. Addressing the past is often believed to require too much political capital.

But the rule of law is important. It is a value worth upholding even at a price. It is too late to address the Bush-era atrocities, but it is not too late to address Trump’s. He won’t do it, but we should insist that the next administration does. Meanwhile, state and international prosecutors should start now.

Kenneth Roth is a Guardian US columnist, a senior fellow at Yale University and a former executive director of Human Rights Watch. He is the author of Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abusive Governments

Chelsea hand Pedro Neto new deal in wake of his rejecting Manchester City | Chelsea | The Guardian

Keyword – Football
Trefwoorden – Chelsea, Manchester City, Transfer window, Football, Sport
Title – Chelsea hand Pedro Neto new deal in wake of his rejecting Manchester City | Chelsea | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/jacob-steinberg
Link – Chelsea hand Pedro Neto new deal in wake of his rejecting Manchester City | Chelsea | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-09-11T12:55:05.000Z
Category – Sport
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/sep/11/chelsea-pedro-neto-new-contract-xabi-alonso

Chelsea have rewarded Pedro Neto’s strong start to the season and commitment to the club by handing the winger a new contract. The Portugal international had summer interest from several Premier League clubs including Manchester City , but indicated a desire to stay and play for Xabi Alonso. He has signed a five-year deal with the option of an extra year and is to receive a pay rise.

Alonso has used Neto as an attacking wingback and the 26-year-old has scored twice in five appearances. Neto, who has registered 40 goal involvements since joining from Wolves for £54m in 2024, follows other leading players at Chelsea in signing new deals. João Pedro, Reece James and Moisés Caicedo have received improved terms this year, and Cole Palmer signed a new deal in 2024 and committed his future to the club in an interview with the Guardian last season.

Chelsea’s owners have a strategy of giving lengthy incentivised contracts. However, the club have demonstrated that being on those multi-year deals will not stop players from receiving pay increases as reward for good performances. Further contract renewals are expected to be announced soon.

Neto’s determination to stay contrasted with the stance of Enzo Fernández, who was sold to City for £125m during the closing hours of the transfer window.

He was not handed a new contract after initial discussions were held. The Argentina midfielder raised questions over his future in March, criticising January’s departure of Enzo Maresca as head coach and sparking talk of a move to Real Madrid by expressing a desire to live in the Spanish capital. Chelsea responded by banning Fernández for two games.

Madrid downplayed their interest in Fernández but the 25-year-old continued to push for a new challenge. City, who appointed Maresca as Pep Guardiola’s replacement, emerged as Fernández’s strongest suitors. Chelsea were prepared to hold on to him if their valuation were not met but concluded that selling was the right long-term move. There was disappointment that one of the team’s senior players did not show better leadership when Chelsea were struggling. They missed out on European qualification after finishing 10th.

Chelsea sacked Liam Rosenior in April and announced Alonso’s appointment in mid-May. They were willing to reintegrate Fernández but he is understood to have submitted a written transfer request. It is understood he also informed Chelsea he had been in contact with a former coach, believed to be Maresca, at the end of last season and during the transfer window.

The Stamford Bridge hierarchy concluded that Fernández’s relationship with his teammates was broken after his public comments. Fernández’s representatives have been approached for comment.

Sources have dismissed the idea that Chelsea were bullied into selling Fernández. Neto’s renewal is viewed as the latest evidence that key players have bought into the project and will be rewarded.

People ‘incensed’ by North Sea plans can vote Green in byelection, says Zack Polanski | Holborn and St Pancras byelection | The Guardian

Keyword – Politics
Trefwoorden – Holborn and St Pancras byelection, Green party, Zack Polanski, Keir Starmer, Politics, London, UK news, Byelections, England
Title – People ‘incensed’ by North Sea plans can vote Green in byelection, says Zack Polanski | Holborn and St Pancras byelection | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/helena-horton
Link – People ‘incensed’ by North Sea plans can vote Green in byelection, says Zack Polanski | Holborn and St Pancras byelection | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-09-11T12:45:29.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/sep/11/zack-polanski-selected-green-party-holborn-st-pancras-byelection

Zack Polanski has said a vote for him in the upcoming Holborn and St Pancras byelection is a vote against the government’s reported plans to greenlight a North Sea gasfield.

The leader of the Green party in England and Wales, who was selected on Friday to contest the London seat, also said he was considering building a personal stockpile for the extreme weather predicted with the arrival of the biggest El Niño in 1,000 years, a meteorological phenomenon that supercharges floods and droughts.

Speaking after his candidacy was announced to a room of cheering party members, Polanski said: “The climate crisis is very much on the ballot in this election. We know that in this constituency, people care even more about the climate crisis than the national average.”

He said he was “already talking about” the proposed Jackdaw gasfield on the doorstep in the constituency. It is widely expected that the prime minister, Andy Burnham, will allow the field to be drilled, despite recommendations from climate experts not to allow new drilling in the North Sea.

“People are incensed at the idea that they’ve got this new prime minister who is going to continue to drill for new oil and gas,” Polanski said. “It’s a very, very strong way for anyone who cares about the climate crisis and wants to see better action and more effective action from the government to vote Green.”

Some in Labour are understood to be concerned about the impact of upcoming oil and gas announcements on the campaign. Industry insiders expect the government to greenlight the Jackdaw gasfield but there are expectations that any announcement on Rosebank, a contentious oilfield, will be delayed until after the byelection.

The seat, which will be decided on 8 October, became vacant this month when the former prime minister Keir Starmer announced he was leaving parliament .

The UN has said the El Niño climate phenomenon is “ supersizing before our eyes ”, exacerbating extreme weather events worldwide. The environment secretary, Angela Eagle, recently suggested Britons should stock up on food and water in preparation for possible outages.

“I’m massively concerned about it,” Polanski told the Guardian. “What I would say is, if anyone does stockpile extra food or water or whatever it might be, then the worst that can happen is you don’t use it.” He said he “hasn’t yet” stockpiled but added: “I might do.”

Polanski has said the Greens, which made gains in the area in the local elections in May, are underdogs in the race but he is confident they can beat Labour, which won the seat with a majority of more than 11,000 at the 2024 general election.

He also said that crimes such as phone-snatching were too prevalent in the constituency, and that arrests for the crime should be made. “Where people are phone snatching, of course they should be arrested for that. But what I want to see more of is less phone snatching rather than dealing with the consequences afterwards.”

On Wednesday, Labour selected the Camden council leader, Sagal Abdi-Wali, as its candidate. She said: “This place welcomed my family as refugees and gave us hope when we needed it most. I am so grateful to have had the opportunity to build a life here, serving our community as a councillor, school governor and community activist.”

Polanski won the race to stand for the Greens over one of the party’s local councillors, Hamza Chowdhury , who had said the constituency did not need “another MP who arrives during an election campaign” and “disappears once the votes are counted”.

At a meeting to announce his candidacy, Polanski said: “The Greens might be the underdog in this election, but we have the momentum, and we can win. And it’s clear everyone knows it’s the Green party against Labour. And before May we had one councillor here, and now we have 10. And last weekend we had so many people on the streets that we delivered leaflets to the entire constituency in just a few hours.”

But he added: ‘I obviously want to win. We’re going to be throwing everything at this election, not just the kitchen sink, but the entire kitchen. I think we can win it.” He said he would not step down if he lost, saying that coming a close second would “send a message”.

Polanski said he had lived in the constituency when he moved to London 20 years ago and that his barber was still there. He also said that if he won, he would contest the seat at the next general election rather than running in a safer one.

RNLI reports ‘significant’ donations boost after being targeted by far right over small boats | RNLI | The Guardian

Keyword – UK news
Trefwoorden – RNLI, The far right, Charities, Voluntary sector, Protest, Politics, Immigration and asylum, UK news, Far right, Emergency services
Title – RNLI reports ‘significant’ donations boost after being targeted by far right over small boats | RNLI | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/carolinedavies
Link – RNLI reports ‘significant’ donations boost after being targeted by far right over small boats | RNLI | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-09-11T12:35:36.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/sep/11/rnli-charity-reports-donations-boost-far-right-small-boats

The Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI) has had a “significant” boost in donations since becoming a target of far-right agitators protesting over small boat crossings.

The charity’s staff and volunteers have been subjected to “online and physical abuse” after involvement in a rescue on Sunday in which a dingy carrying asylum seekers was brought into Portsmouth.

RNLI vice-president, Sir Robin Knox-Johnston, condemned the intimidation as “frankly quite disgraceful,” amid calls by far-right protesters for people to stop donating.

An RNLI spokesperson said: ‘We’ve seen a significant increase in the number of donations we have received this week, and we’ve welcomed a number of new supporters to our charity.

“As always, we’re so grateful for the support we receive from our amazing supporters, without them we would not be able to deliver our vital lifesaving service.

“Sadly, we have also been contacted by a number of supporters and members of the public who have informed us that they wish to withdraw their support in recent days.

“Everyone at the RNLI remains focused on our core purpose of saving lives at sea.”

The charity has increased security measures and said it will continue to rescue those in danger in the Channel.

After lifeboats took 120 asylum seekers intercepted off the Isle of Wight to Eastney in Langstone Harbour on Sunday, some crew members were targeted by protesters, with their photos and names shared in posts on social media.

On Wednesday evening, dozens of Dorset police officers were posted outside the charity’s headquarters in Poole as about 50 people gathered to protest against the RNLI’s involvement.

Hampshire police have been patrolling RNLI sites, while the Sussex force was investigating “offensive and threatening” remarks made on social media.

On Friday, Poole Old Lifeboat Museum said it had made the decision to close after several incidents of “protesters verbally assaulting our volunteers”, the BBC reported.

Knox-Johnston said of the charity being targeted: “Like many supporters of the RNLI, I am very angry about it because they are picking on the wrong people.

“These are volunteers who risk their lives to go out and save anyone at sea” Knox-Johnson, the first solo sailor to circumnavigate the world non-stop, told BBC Radio Solent.

“What people don’t seem to understand is the RNLI don’t go out looking for people – they only go out when specifically asked by the coastguard, whose job is safety of life at sea – regardless of nationality.

“They are doing their job, they are saying there are people whose lives are in danger – RNLI please can you send a boat and remove the risk.

“If you want this to stop the government have got to stop it, but picking on RNLI crews who are doing the job they are trained to do is frankly quite disgraceful.”

The RNLI has advised volunteers that they should consider not wearing RNLI branded clothing if they feel this might put them at risk. They have also been advised that they should feel empowered to close RNLI shops or lifeboat stations if they feel in danger.

Volunteers have been asked to challenge people near lifeboat stations if they do not have ID, but advised not to engage with members of the public and asked to explain the RNLI’s actions.

The charity emphasised earlier this week that responding to small boats was only a tiny percentage of its work and updated its webpage explaining its work in the Channel. It described rumours that the RNLI housed asylum seekers on its premises, or that there were RNLI missions to move migrants to secret locations as “completely baseless and untrue”.

RNLI lifeboats launched 9,058 times in 2025 but only 109 of those call-outs were to small boats in the Channel, representing 1.2% of its rescue work. Almost 95% of those who crossed the Channel in small boats last year were picked up by the UK Border Force, it said.

A bee’s-eye view: art installation beside the Thames celebrates crucial pollinators | Installation | The Guardian

Keyword – Art and design
Trefwoorden – Installation, Bees, Art, Insects, London, Environment, UK news, Wildlife, Art and design, Culture, Animals
Title – A bee’s-eye view: art installation beside the Thames celebrates crucial pollinators | Installation | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/stevenmorris
Link – A bee’s-eye view: art installation beside the Thames celebrates crucial pollinators | Installation | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-09-11T12:32:32.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2026/sep/11/bee-eye-art-installation-thames-pollinators-luke-jerram-pollinarium

From the outside, it looks a little like something out of the Teletubbies.

In fact, the new installation by the Bristol artist Luke Jerram represents a grain of pollen, and the inside represents an insect’s compound eye.

Jerram wants the Pollenarium, which appeared on the banks of the Thames in east London this week, to entertain but also draw attention to the alarming rate pollinators at which are vanishing from the world.

“I hope it will make people think about how we need to protect pollinators,” Jerram said. “There has been a massive drop in insect numbers. Flying insects in the UK have declined by 60% in 20 years, which is mad.”

He said he was concerned that UK farmers still used some neonicotinoid pesticides . “A minuscule trace can disrupt a bee’s ability to navigate and reproduce , with long-lasting consequences for their survival.”

Best known for touring large scale sculptures of the moon, the sun and Earth, for this new piece Jerram scaled up a microscopic grain of pollen to the size of a small building. It is made of brightly coloured nylon inflated into a 6m metre high dome.

“When we had a test inflation in the car park at Paintworks [where his Bristol studio is based], people streamed out of offices to see what was going on,” Jerram said.

Inside the structure, there are more than 100 lenses, each acting as a camera obscura to create a “mosaic” of the world outside. The idea is to give an idea of how an insect might perceive the world through a compound eye. “I’ve created Pollenarium to be a bit like going inside a bee’s head,” he said.

Pollenarium, which was commissioned by Creative Barking and Dagenham , can be seen on Saturday at the Emerge East festival at Barking Riverside . It is free to visit from 11am.

It will be making an appearance at the University of Bristol after its east London debut, before embarking on a tour of the UK, accompanied by a programme of activities and workshops.

Memo to King Charles: you can’t stop the Sussexes’ reality show bandwagon. You only spice up the script | Marina Hyde | The Guardian

Keyword – Opinion
Trefwoorden – Prince Harry, King Charles III, Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, Monarchy, UK news, Reality TV
Title – Memo to King Charles: you can’t stop the Sussexes’ reality show bandwagon. You only spice up the script | Marina Hyde | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/marinahyde
Link – Memo to King Charles: you can’t stop the Sussexes’ reality show bandwagon. You only spice up the script | Marina Hyde | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-09-11T12:31:49.000Z
Category – Opinion
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/sep/11/king-charles-sussexes-reality-tv-harry-meghan-celebrity

O nce again, it has been a lively week for the Real Housewives of Windsor franchise, with Harry and Meghan back in the UK for precisely 12 days before the king fired out a letter via the lord chamberlain on Monday, reminding viewers that the Sussexes are “private citizens” and not to treat them as working royals. You have to say the producers on this unscripted reality show are truly at the top of their game with these targeted provocations. Harry and Meghan duly took the bait and issued an intemperately hurt rejoinder – but we’ll get to that in a bit.

First, let’s deal with King Charles’s missive to “relevant senior stakeholders across government, the military and Lord Lieutenancies”. Ugh. Not to be too aesthetically sensitive, but I think we can all live without the sovereign being reduced to the ghastly language of “relevant senior stakeholders”. What next? Seeking “buy-in” for ribbon-cutting events and referring to posies as “high levels of audience engagement”? It does all rather reinforce the idea that the Windsors’ cringe-makingly self-styled “ the firm ” really is some dreary mid-range company with a wan Meet Our Team page on its website, in which Prince William – carefully photographed without a tie – explains that he “enjoys long walks with the dog and is a passionate Aston Villa supporter”.

Either way, the letter sent on Charles’s behalf was guaranteed to send the plot into overdrive, much as it does in any Real Housewives franchise when one of the cast sends a cease-and-desist letter to one of the others. (An event that basically feels like it can occur weekly.) Typically these letters then become dramatic drivers. Far from suppressing stories as supposedly intended, they always end up sparking whole new public debates and plotlines in themselves. This is what happened with the Windsors this week – and, indeed, was always going to happen, given the appearance of a pre-emptive slapdown.

The royal household must be able to see that the key thing about the Sussexes is that they are forever desperate to be taken seriously, like a music act that was put together on a TV talent show but now wants you to think they’re up there with Patti Smith and Nick Cave.

And so it was that Meghan and Harry’s spokesperson immediately hit back in public, announcing that the couple “were a little surprised not to have been told about this in advance”. Ouch. Never show weakness, guys! A briefing given to the Telegraph added that: “The Sussexes prefer the term ‘public figures’, and would have liked an acknowledgment that, on a personal level, they remained members of the royal family, despite no longer receiving public funding.”

As indicated, this all hints at a season of endlessly messy dramas to come, given it took less than a fortnight of the pair being back in the country before a public blow-up occurred. In terms of the kind of bizarro unintended consequences you might see on a Housewives episode when someone’s kicked off at a girls’ spa day, the military chief of Uganda promptly announced his country was pulling out of Prince Harry’s Invictus Games because they didn’t want to participate in something “that does not have His Majesty’s approval”. What can you say? Other than: deploy the reaction gifs.

You don’t have to be a reality TV obsessive to spot the faultlines here that should guarantee that the Sussexes’ unexpected return to the UK will result in endless drink tosses. It’s all there in their immediate reaction. Harry and Meghan are really wholly formed reality TV stars now. Not only do they do the tit-for-tat media release to move the plot along, but they also let you know what they were feeling when they read the original press-released letter from the king. In reality TV, moments like these are gleaned from “master interviews” (MIVs), filmed at the end of a season to provide useful retrospective commentary that the producers can cut the main action with. So you’ll see Hell’s Kitchen contestants helpfully reflecting on the scene you’ve just watched, and going: “And I’m standing there thinking – Chef Ramsay is going to go crazy when he sees this.” Or, in this case, “I was a little surprised not to have been told by Chef Ramsay about this in advance.”

This is precisely how the Sussexes now conduct public life, and it remains incompatible with the way the royal household does it. For all their supposed desire for a quiet life, Harry and Meghan have done that thing that the Beckhams – and indeed the secessionist Beckham-Peltzes – seemingly cannot help but do, where they claim to enjoy privacy but in fact live life out loud in a way that has come to feel normal to them but is really anything but.

Which brings us back to the burning question of why on earth you’d move back somewhere you are on the record – multiple times – as absolutely loathing in all its aspects. Increasingly, and faster than predicted, it feels like the answer to that is “for content” – scripted or otherwise. It’s fairly difficult to see the Sussexes’ relocation as anything other than laying the groundwork for a sequel to the only story of theirs that has ever rated with audiences: their own struggle with the forces of the British establishment/media/enemies within the royal household. Or as Real Housewives of Beverly Hills star Lisa Rinna once put it – and her head would be right up there on the franchise’s Mount Rushmore – “you better believe I’m gonna talk about it”.

Marina Hyde is a Guardian columnist

What a Time to be Alive! by Marina Hyde (Guardian Faber, £20). To support the Guardian, order your signed copy at guardianbookshop.com . Delivery charges may apply.

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here .

The 9/11 attacks of 2001 – in pictures | September 11 2001 | The Guardian

Keyword – US news
Trefwoorden – September 11 2001, Osama bin Laden, New York, Virginia, US news
Title – The 9/11 attacks of 2001 – in pictures | September 11 2001 | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/matt-fidler
Link – The 9/11 attacks of 2001 – in pictures | September 11 2001 | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-09-11T12:13:33.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/gallery/2026/sep/11/the-9-11-attacks-of-2001-in-pictures

This gallery contains sensitive images that some viewers may find distressing

Twenty-five years ago, as New Yorkers woke to crisp blue skies after a storm the day before, two planes – United Airlines Flight 11 and Flight 175 – were hijacked in Boston by terrorists loyal to the al-Qaida leader, Osama bin Laden. They were flown into the twin towers of the World Trade Center 17 minutes apart. On the same day American Airlines Flight 77 was flown in to the Pentagon in Virginia, and a fourth hijacked plane, United Airlines 93, was downed in Pennsylvania after a revolt by passengers. The attacks killed nearly 3,000 people