Harry and Meghan to bring children to UK for first time in four years | Prince Harry | The Guardian

Keyword – UK news
Trefwoorden – Prince Harry, Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, King Charles III, Monarchy, UK news, Invictus Games, World news
Title – Harry and Meghan to bring children to UK for first time in four years | Prince Harry | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/carolinedavies
Link – Harry and Meghan to bring children to UK for first time in four years | Prince Harry | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T14:26:55.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jun/17/harry-meghan-children-uk-first-time-four-years

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will bring their two children to the UK for the first time in more than four years, it is understood.

Prince Archie, seven, and Princess Lilibet, five, last visited Britain in 2022 during the late Queen Elizabeth II’s platinum jubilee celebrations.

Prince Harry last year lost his battle against the Home Office for automatic police protection while in the UK, having previously claimed it was not safe to bring his family without it.

He has since been granted a full risk assessment and is awaiting a final decision from the royal and VIP executive committee (Ravec), the Home Office committee responsible for authorising such protection.

Harry intends to bring his family to an event next month promoting the one-year countdown to his Invictus Games for wounded military, which are to be held in Birmingham in 2027, after being assured that adequate security provision would be in place, according to the Daily Telegraph .

A spokesperson for the Sussexes has been contacted for comment.

King Charles has not seen his youngest grandchildren in person since 2022 and it is not known if he will meet them during next month’s reported visit.

An LA-based business associate of Harry and Meghan, who live in Montecito, California, told the newspaper there had been a “warming of the frost” between the king and his youngest son after Harry’s very public attacks in his memoir, Spare , and television interviews.

Harry has reportedly told friends in the US that he was “excited” for his children to reconnect with their paternal grandfather. The source was reported to have said: “Harry says he’s coming back before the end of the year with the children with the express intent to reunite with his dad.”

Harry met his father last September at Clarence House in London, their first face-to-face meeting since February 2024. The meeting was seen as a first step in improving relations between them.

During next month’s visit the duke will visit many of his remaining patronages, including WellChild and Scotty’s Little Soldiers.

Booksmaxxing: how reading became sexy | Books | The Guardian

Keyword – Books
Trefwoorden – Books, Culture, TikTok, Dating, Life and style
Title – Booksmaxxing: how reading became sexy | Books | The Guardian
Author – Guardian Staff
Link – Booksmaxxing: how reading became sexy | Books | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T16:08:39.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/books/2026/jun/17/booksmaxxing-how-reading-became-sexy

Name: Booksmaxxing.

Age: The next big thing.

Appearance: Thoughtful, intelligent, well-versed and highly desirable.

Are you about to tell me that reading is now fashionable? Not just fashionable – being a big reader is considered sexy.

You haven’t seen me in my reading glasses. Tinder claims that mentions of books in dating bios are up 29% overall, and up 41% for women. The dating app’s relationship expert told HuffPost that “reading is clearly having a moment”.

A moment? Really? According to research from book summary app Headway, 75% of people “find partners who read or indicate that they are well-read more attractive”.

Yes, but that’s just a thing people say to make themselves seem more attractive. Nevertheless, books are huge. See the growing BookTok community, who post reviews, discussions and recommendations about favourite books.

Looking at T ikToks about reading isn’t reading. Meanwhile, book club participation has been rising steadily in the UK. Between 2022 and 2023, book club listings on Eventbrite rose by 41%.

Book clubs aren’t fashionable. They’re for nerds. Are you kidding? Dua Lipa has a book club, Service 95. And her romance with new husband Callum Turner was sparked when they discovered they were both reading the same book.

Don’t get me wrong: I like reading books , I just don’t like talking about reading books. In that case you might be interested in a reading retreat.

Where do I have to go? Any location that gives you the time and space to read and reflect – a “bookcation”, if you will.

Are you trying to sell me on the idea that reading on holiday is now a thing? Because it was already a thing. What’s new is a holiday that whisks you to the locale of a favourite novel. According to Skyscanner, 55% of travellers had booked – or would consider booking – a holiday inspired by a particular tome.

So reading the book isn’t enough – you now have to go where it’s set ? There are also overseas literary festivals, resort book clubs and hotels with libraries.

This is beginning to sound a trifle insane. That’s booksmaxxing!

Isn’t this all coming at a time when book reading is actually in decline? Overall, yes. Since 2003 the number of Americans reading for pleasure has dropped by 40%.

So booksmaxxing is a niche trend cocooned within a much larger trend that’s heading in the opposite direction ? That’s what makes it cool.

Wrong – that’s what makes it an entirely performative exercise aimed at convincing the world you are intelligent and possess an attention span. What’s that? Sorry, I wasn’t listening. *Performatively flicks page of book*

Do say: “If anything gets people reading – even pretending to like reading – then it can only be a good thing.”

Don’t say: “Great! Now take a picture of me holding Middlemarch.”

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here

Farmers: tell us how you’re coping with rising costs and extreme weather | Farming | The Guardian

Keyword – Environment
Trefwoorden – Farming, Environment
Title – Farmers: tell us how you’re coping with rising costs and extreme weather | Farming | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/guardian-community-team
Link – Farmers: tell us how you’re coping with rising costs and extreme weather | Farming | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-04T07:51:51.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jun/04/farmers-tell-us-how-youre-coping-with-rising-costs-and-extreme-weather

Farmers are facing rising costs for fuel, fertiliser and animal feed as a result of the conflict in Iran, adding to existing pressures on the industry.

The sector is also grappling with extreme weather after the UK’s hottest May day on record, alongside wider concerns about the impact of climate change. Europe also experienced record-breaking temperatures in late May and the UN has warned about the imminent return of El Niño – a powerful weather pattern that raises global temperatures and worsens some rainfall.

We would like to hear from farmers around the world about how these issues are affecting them. Have rising costs changed the way you farm? How have recent weather conditions impacted your business? Are you concerned about the effects of climate change on farming?

If you’re having trouble using the form click here . Read terms of service here and privacy policy here

Trump says he has signed peace deal – as it happened | US politics | The Guardian

Keyword – US news
Trefwoorden – US politics, Republicans, Georgia, US midterm elections 2026, US news, US Senate, Donald Trump, Trump administration
Title – ‘Regrettable’: Republican senator breaks with Trump after president delays Jay Clayton’s nomination for intelligence director – live | US politics | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/tom-ambrose,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/shannon-ho,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/lucy-campbell,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/gaya-gupta,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/michael-sainato,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/george-chidi,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/jakub-krupa,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/joseph-gedeon,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/sam-levine
Link – ‘Regrettable’: Republican senator breaks with Trump after president delays Jay Clayton’s nomination for intelligence director – live | US politics | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T19:06:24.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/jun/17/trump-georgia-primary-mike-collins-jon-ossoff-midterms-g7-us-politics-latest-news-updates

Jay Clayton’s nomination hearing canceled after Trump directs him not to appear

We’re going to quickly pivot from Trump’s press conference to share that Jay Clayton’s nomination hearing has officially been canceled for Wednesday, according to the Senate intelligence committee chair, Tom Cotton.

Trump directed Clayton to not appear at the hearing scheduled for this afternoon, according to Cotton. The Republican senator, a staunch ally of the president, called the order “regrettable” in rare public criticism of Trump.

In a post on X , he wrote:

It’s regrettable that the president has directed Jay Clayton not to appear at his confirmation hearing today. Mr Clayton is a patriot and a highly qualified nominee, as the president has said repeatedly. While today’s hearing is now unfortunately postponed, I look forward to proceeding with his confirmation in the near future.

The day so far

Donald Trump abruptly derailed the confirmation process for his own nominee as the US’s top intelligence chief, Jay Clayton, early this morning , in a move that will allow the US president’s controversial selection for acting director of national security, Bill Pulte, to assume the role and remain in place for at least several weeks until Clayton is confirmed. Tom Cotton, a Republican senator and chair of the intelligence committee, initially said on X that the hearing would go ahead as planned “unless the president directs [Clayton] not to appear or withdraws his nomination”. Trump later directed Clayton not to appear and the hearing was cancelled, which Cotton called “regrettable”. My colleague Cate Brown has the story .

Trump also responded to criticism of his ceasefire deal with Iran, warning at the G7 summit that he was prepared to go back to dropping bombs and insisting the deal did not require the US to pay even 10 cents to Iran. Here’s Patrick Wintour’s report .

Senior US officials dictated the memorandum of understanding with Iran to journalists after days of secrecy. According to the officials, the draft agreement includes a new “minimum” standard for down-blending of highly enriched Iranian uranium and has provisions to ensure the “territorial integrity” of Lebanon after Israel’s continued attacks against Hezbollah in Lebanese territory. In return, the US will move to waive, but not eliminate, some wide-ranging sanctions against Iran once the deal is signed. The US draft of the agreement also secures toll-free passage of the strait of Hormuz for only 60 days, and it does not preclude fees in the future, the officials said. The accord, which Trump said today is “not final”, is due to be signed on Friday in Bürgenstock, Switzerland.

The Federal Reserve left interest rates unchanged for the fourth time this year after its first meeting under new chair, Kevin Warsh, a Trump appointee who has taken over the central bank during a tumultuous time for the US economy. Here’s Gaya Gupta’s report .

Fed begins Warsh era by keeping rates on hold, but sees hike later this year

And we have that now. The Federal Reserve has left interest rates unchanged for the fourth time this year after its first meeting under new chair, Kevin Warsh , a Donald Trump appointee who has taken over the central bank during a tumultuous time for the US economy.

“ Economic activity is expanding at a solid pace despite elevated uncertainty that owes, in part, to the conflict in the Middle East ,” the Fed’s open market committee said in a short statement. “ Productivity growth and capital investment are strong. Job gains have kept pace with the workforce, and the unemployment rate has changed little .”

The Fed was widely expected to keep rates at a range of 3.5% to 3.75%, where it has remained since December.

The Fed also removed in its monthly policy statement the easing bias, which previously a signal that indicated that the central bank was looking for further opportunities to make a rate cut as their next rate change. Last month, three Fed governors dissented over the inclusion of this easing bias.

Warsh begins his four-year term as chair at a time when the US economy has been rattled by heightened inflation and geopolitical uncertainty .

A sharp spike in energy prices caused by Trump’s war on Iran has pushed inflation to 4.2% – the highest level the US has seen since 2023 and far from the Fed’s 2% target. Though the announcement of a ceasefire deal between the US and Iran sent oil prices tumbling to a three-month low, it will likely take months for energy prices to return to prewar levels.

Meanwhile, hourly earnings dropped to a seasonally adjusted 0.7%, indicating that price increases have stripped out wage gains over the past year.

But it’s unclear whether higher inflation will ever convince a majority of the Fed’s 12 voting members to call for a rate increase. Core inflation, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, has increased only mildly, to 2.9% from the year prior. The country’s labor market has also remained relatively strong, with the unemployment rate holding steady at 4.3%.

Even as Americans continue to balk at higher prices, Trump has continued to advocate for lower rates but said last week that he doesn’t “want to have a big influence” on Warsh .

“ Kevin is fantastic, and I want him to do whatever he wants, ” Trump said in an interview with Meet the Press on NBC News, while also reiterating his desire for a rate cut.

Kevin Warsh is due to hold his first news conference as chair of the Federal Reserve shortly, following his first federal open markets committee meeting in the role, where he is expected to announce where the Fed sees interest rates going.

Before that, we expect the Fed to release a policy statement alongside its rate decision, and economic projections for where policymakers see interest rates going over the coming years.

Senior US officials dictate US-Iran memorandum to journalists

Senior US officials have dictated the memorandum of understanding with Iran to journalists after days of secrecy.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to read the draft, which Iran has not released, ahead of a formal signing ceremony set for Friday in Switzerland.

According to the officials, the draft agreement includes a new “minimum” standard for down-blending of highly enriched Iranian uranium and has provisions to ensure the “territorial integrity” of Lebanon after Israel’s continued attacks against Hezbollah in Lebanese territory.

In return, the US will move to waive, but not eliminate, some wide-ranging sanctions against Iran once the deal is signed .

The US draft of the agreement also secures toll-free passage of the strait of Hormuz for only 60 days , and it does not preclude fees in the future , the officials said.

The accord is due to be signed on Friday in Bürgenstock, Switzerland. The Associated Press reports that it also envisions Iran receiving at least $300bn to rebuild after the war, citing leaked copies of an interim agreement that officials say broadly matches the document.

Trump’s Department of Labor claims without data that states defrauded government

Keith Sonderling sent letters to 53 states and US territories demanding action to “combat waste, fraud and abuse” within the unemployment insurance program, threatening to withhold administrative funds from states for the first time history .

“We are officially putting governors on notice,” said the acting US secretary of labor. “The American people will no longer tolerate the blatant waste, fraud and abuse of their hard-earned tax dollars – no state should allow it either. If states allow it, they will suffer the consequences. This department is no longer afraid to use every lever available to ensure taxpayer money is protected.”

The agency did not provide data on fraud or alleged fraud in unemployment systems, but highlighted three Democratic-led states – California , New York and Illinois – and made claims about each.

The agency says California owes $20bn to the federal government for a loan during the Covid-19 pandemic. California has struggled paying off the loan, as the state did with a similar federal loan received during the 2008 economic recession, due to the current setup of how employers are taxed to fund unemployment. The unemployment payroll tax system in California has been unchanged since 1984 at a taxable wage ceiling of $7,000 on a workers’ wages and maximum tax rate of 5.4%, leaving the state with insufficient funds to cover its unemployment reserve while legislators on both sides of the political aisle have been working to try to resolve the issue.

The Department of Labor also claimed that New York loses an estimated $2m per day in unemployment insurance fraud and improper payments, but did not differentiate between the two. They also cited that Illinois has improper payments of $320m, at a rate of 14%.

Legislators in the halls of the Georgia state capitol are saying that the Georgia house speaker has announced that the state will not engage in redistricting during the special session that began today.

Legislators were called to the capitol by Governor Brian Kemp to manage a legal problem with QR codes on ballots that lingered over from the regular session, and tacked on redistricting as an additional effort.

That effort appears to have been quashed after Republican lawmakers questioned the political risks ahead of what is expected to be a bruising general election in a swing state.

More to follow.

Why did Trump delay Clayton’s nomination? He wants the controversial Save America Act passed

Going back to Jay Clayton’s postponed nomination, Donald Trump said he would not approve the renewal of Fisa section 702 without passage of his Save America Act , which would require Americans to provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote, a provision critics say would strip millions of Americans of their right to vote, the Associated Press reported.

Trump has previously said the controversial act would deliver his Republicans a “guaranteed” win in November’s midterm elections.

With Trump’s approval rating dropping, polls show that his party will struggle to keep their ‌slim control of the House and Senate when Americans head to the polls this year.

Trump says he is looking forward to a “very special” dinner with Macron as he wants to see the Palace of Versailles, because it “has a lot of gold”.

He then says he hopes Europe will “find its way ” , as it is “having a lot of hard times” with energy and immigration.

And curiously, Trump also thanks Russia’s Vladimir Putin and China’s Xi Jinping for staying neutral on Iran, saying otherwise “they could have made it much more difficult for us”.

‘I think they both want to do something,’ Trump says after talking to Zelenskyy and Putin

Meanwhile at the G7 press conference, Trump has moved on to Ukraine .

He says he had “a productive conversation” with Ukraine’s Zelenskyy and then Russia’s Putin on the phone.

He suggests “something is going to happen”, as he says Russia is losing more soldiers than Ukraine.

He says he had “a very good conversation” with Putin and “a very, very good conversation with Zelenskyy”.

“ I think they both want to do something. They just don’t know how to do it.”

He then swiftly moves on to international aid and the Ebola outbreak in Africa.

What’s at stake with Clayton’s delayed nomination? An expired powerful surveillance power

The Associated Press has succinctly summarized the stakes of the intelligence director nomination, and why even Republicans are wary of Trump’s interference in today’s hearing:

Hanging in the balance is not only the director of national intelligence, but also section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Fisa) , which permits spy agencies to collect without a warrant the communications of targeted foreigners located outside the United States.

National security officials across both major political parties have for years described section 702 as vital for gathering intelligence that can disrupt terror attacks and espionage operations, though some lawmakers and civil liberties advocates have raised concerns over the government’s use of information about Americans that is incidentally collected through the program .

Clayton’s Senate confirmation hearing was expected to be fast-tracked because of the program’s lapse. Democrats had said they would not renew Fisa until Trump withdrew the selection of Bill Pulte.

Trump’s post suggested that debate to revive section 702 could be indefinitely postponed.

GOP senator: ‘mistake’ to cancel Clayton hearing, blames administration for not ‘dialing the president in’

The Republican senator Thom Tillis , who is retiring from his North Carolina seat at the end of his term in 2027, told Punchbowl reporter Laura Weiss that Jay Clayton was on track to have a good hearing before Donald Trump interfered with the proceedings.

“Now we’re in a posture where it may be the reason 702 doesn’t get reauthorized,” Tillis said. “That’s a mistake.”

But Tillis also doesn’t think Trump is intentionally creating an issue. “I think somebody’s not dialing the president in to the complexities of what he’s done.”

It’s worth noting a slight sense of Trump’s frustration with Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu as he says he “gets a little excited sometimes”, and they “have a little dispute over Lebanon”.

“Bibi, you don’t have to knock down a building every time somebody walks into it that’s from Hezbollah,” he says.

Meanwhile, Trump is still on Iran.

He says the deal will be signed shortly; maybe tomorrow, maybe Friday.

Jay Clayton’s nomination hearing canceled after Trump directs him not to appear

We’re going to quickly pivot from Trump’s press conference to share that Jay Clayton’s nomination hearing has officially been canceled for Wednesday, according to the Senate intelligence committee chair, Tom Cotton.

Trump directed Clayton to not appear at the hearing scheduled for this afternoon, according to Cotton. The Republican senator, a staunch ally of the president, called the order “regrettable” in rare public criticism of Trump.

In a post on X , he wrote:

It’s regrettable that the president has directed Jay Clayton not to appear at his confirmation hearing today. Mr Clayton is a patriot and a highly qualified nominee, as the president has said repeatedly. While today’s hearing is now unfortunately postponed, I look forward to proceeding with his confirmation in the near future.

I once protested against the G7. I feel no need now, because it’s collapsing all by itself | Zoe Williams | The Guardian

Keyword – Opinion
Trefwoorden – Protest, G7, Donald Trump, Elon Musk, World news, US news, G8
Title – I once protested against the G7. I feel no need now, because it’s collapsing all by itself | Zoe Williams | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/zoewilliams
Link – I once protested against the G7. I feel no need now, because it’s collapsing all by itself | Zoe Williams | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T16:28:17.000Z
Category – Opinion
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jun/17/i-once-protested-against-g7-collapse

W hen 200,000 protesters gathered to meet the G8 summit in Genoa , 25 years ago, their point (our point, in fact; I went on a coach, it took two and a half days) was that eight rich nations shouldn’t dictate the rules to the rest of the world. If you accept that power concedes nothing without a demand, this demand probably sounds a bit broad, boiling down to “abnegate your power”. But it was part of a wider anti-globalisation movement, in which many of the precise mechanisms by which the developed world exploited the developing had been nailed down.

Many of the protest tactics and networks had been honed at the battle for Seattle in 1999, outside the World Trade Organization summit, along with an agenda that was capacious and versatile. Unfortunately, the authorities had also learned a thing or two, and both the elaborate security of the G8’s red zone and the police brutality outside it were met with some astonishment from the world’s (liberal) media, but not from anyone with a memory exceeding two years.

Genoa also became a no-fly zone, citing concerns about terrorism . Since this was before 9/11, it made the world’s establishment look rattled and paranoid. The profile of the demonstrators was pretty well-understood – they (we) looked like anti-capitalists, but did not look like people who could get anything dangerous into the air.

Was anyone rattled? Did the subsequent anti-poverty initiatives of the G8 in the next few years come from any of that activism, any of that messaging? It was certainly hard to miss what was called the inside/outside coherence, where street activists and NGOs syncopated their messages to insist that a rules-based order had to be pro-social or its moral authority would be empty and disorder would ensue. The G8 would never admit it if they had, and the protesters would say the anti-poverty crusade was just an interim phase in a broader neoliberalist unfolding that was very much pro-poverty.

Nevertheless, it’s interesting to consider these heritage moves of dissent and rebellion from the vantage point of the G7 just gone: there were protests , smaller in number at 20,000 , met by police with kettling overnight, which is just a mass arrest without the facilities.

The target was simpler than ever – grotesque and unsustainable wealth inequality – and one of the opening moves from protesters was to set fire to a Tesla . There’s nothing new about burning a car, but there is something stark about this particular car. Since Elon Musk became the world’s first trillionaire last Friday, his wealth has already gone up to $1.4tn . The person with £1 in the world is as close to the second-richest man on Earth as that man is to Musk.

National governments, even the ones that still say “social democracy” on the tin, seem paralysed by his power, sometimes domestically bemoaning his calls for civil foment, but where it counts, devoting a whole agenda item to banning social media for the under-16s.

There is no doubt that social media, Musk’s and beyond, misrepresents truth to people (not just children) for profit, to the detriment of democracy and society. Answering that with a call for society to better police its children is the clearest possible signal that governments will unite to do anything, as publicly as possible, to delay the moment when they have to take on the forces of concentrated private capital. It makes perfect sense for protesters to torch a Tesla, but it also throws into painful relief the weakness of state powers that once seemed so omnipotent.

Germany’s Friedrich Merz, meanwhile, declared it a success that the summit had “ found common language ” in its support for Ukraine. But the wild card in that commonality has always been Donald Trump, whose relations with Vladimir Putin are opaque, whose support for Volodymyr Zelenskyy looks more like coercive control and who hasn’t committed to any military aid for the country since he took office .

Whether that’s all strategic, or whether US foreign policy is now decided from day to day by an unsteady mood is secondary (though it’s not that mysterious, in the light of Trump’s pronouncements: “I am the boss,” he said of the summit; “If they don’t behave, we will go right back to dropping bombs right smack in the middle of their heads,” he said about Iran). These G7 nations are no longer unified; it doesn’t matter whether or not most of them are, you cannot watch a rules-based order in its pomp where only most participants are playing by the rules. It’s like watching a game of football with a horse on the pitch.

The leaders, meanwhile, look personally insecure in a way with which one can deeply sympathise while, at the same time, lose patience. Emmanuel Macron reportedly spent the week worrying about Trump leaving early ( as he did last year ). Keir Starmer was caught on a news feed asking whether the rest of the leaders were in a meeting he hadn’t been invited to . For every trenchant statement of success, there is an image of power unravelling. The only sense in which all these leaders are united is in their determination to pretend that their unity has held.

None of which is to say that protest is misplaced, nor that it is unsure of its aims. But it is fighting a different entity: rather than being strong and sure of themselves, heads of state are insecure and in denial. But perhaps the protesters’ crucial target in this meeting of rich nations wasn’t a nation at all, but the richest man in the world.

Zoe Williams is a Guardian columnist

‘A neoliberal nightmare’: my ride on the Vegas Loop – Elon Musk’s answer to traffic jams | Elon Musk | The Guardian

Keyword – Technology
Trefwoorden – Elon Musk, Technology, Las Vegas, US news, City transport, Cities
Title – ‘A neoliberal nightmare’: my ride on the Vegas Loop – Elon Musk’s answer to traffic jams | Elon Musk | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/steverose
Link – ‘A neoliberal nightmare’: my ride on the Vegas Loop – Elon Musk’s answer to traffic jams | Elon Musk | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T10:53:15.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jun/17/neoliberal-nightmare-my-ride-on-vegas-loop-elon-musk-answer-to-traffic-jams

I t’s another blindingly bright day in Las Vegas but I’m 30ft underground and strapped in for a rocket ride to the future. Actually, it’s a Tesla ride to the future, and not a self-driving one. And it’s pretty slow – my driver tells me the speed limit down here is 30mph. It’s also pretty short: the journey is over in a matter of minutes. In fact, the Vegas Loop is a pretty underwhelming experience: a brief trundle down a white-walled tunnel only slightly larger than the vehicle itself, lined by strips of LEDs that change colour every few seconds, in an attempt to inject some Vegas glitz. I’d been hoping to ask other Loop-riders what they made of the experience, but … there aren’t any. I’m the only person here.

This is not the futuristic transport solution Elon Musk originally promised. When he first announced this innovative technology in 2017, it was accompanied by sci-fi visuals showing a car pulling over from the street traffic on to an elevator platform, which then descended into a network of tunnels and whizzed along on an “electric skate” at 200km/h (124mph). “There’s no real limit to how many levels of tunnel you can have … so you can alleviate any arbitrary level of urban congestion,” Musk said. A few months earlier, with characteristic edgelordly nonchalance, Musk had announced on Twitter : “Traffic is driving me nuts. Am going to build a tunnel boring machine and just start digging …” Followed shortly after by: “I am actually going to do this.” He did, and he named it the Boring Company .

The Vegas Loop’s underwhelmingness will come as no surprise to seasoned Musk-watchers. The all-powerful CEO has established something of a reputation for overpromising and underdelivering when it comes to his grand initiatives, from self-driving Teslas to intelligent robots, to missions to Mars – none of which have materialised within his promised timeframes. But the Boring Company can also be seen as a stark illustration of “Muskism” in action, in terms of not only the reality not matching the fantasy, but also of how the trillionaire’s credulous admirers and political clout seem to insulate him from scrutiny, criticism and regulatory red tape, and afford him a degree of control and latitude apparently unavailable to others.

In the early days, the Boring Company also reflected Musk’s tendency to mix serious intent with juvenile trolling. In 2018, he raised $10m by selling 20,000 Boring-branded flame-throwers , plus another $1m selling Boring baseball caps. Musk fans lapped it up, and so did investors. By 2022 the Boring Company was valued at $5.7bn . It was building test tunnels in Los Angeles and at its Texas headquarters. It was said to be involved in projects in cities across the US and beyond: Los Angeles, Washington, Chicago, San Jose, Miami. But one by one, these projects fizzled out. At present, the only city that has taken up the Boring proposal is Las Vegas, although this is about to change.

The first three stations of the Vegas Loop opened in 2021, connecting one end of the vast Las Vegas Convention Center (LVCC) to the other – a distance of about a mile. Between 2022 and 2025 the network extended to three nearby casino resorts: Resorts World, the Westgate and the Encore. You can’t drive your own car into the tunnels: you have to book one of the Loop’s Teslas (which are standard issue, no electric skates), then access the vehicles at what are essentially taxi ranks, above ground or beneath the resorts. Tickets are $4.25 (£3.15) for a single trip, or $12.50 (£9.30) for a day pass.

It is not really a loop, either. Some tunnels are two-way, meaning if there’s another car coming in the opposite direction, your car has to wait for it to come out before you can go in.

The system is much busier when there’s a convention happening, the drivers tell me, but today the stations beneath the LVCC are closed. At its peak, the system might have 160 Teslas in circulation, but today there are just four – which turns out to be three more than are needed.

Is this in any way a viable alternative to public transportation? “It really doesn’t have that much utility,” says Ray Delahanty, a former traffic engineer and urban planner who now broadcasts on social media as CityNerd . After his visit last year, Delahanty posted a YouTube video titled “ The Vegas Loop is getting progressively more stupid ”.

“Theoretically, there are times when there is enough congestion on the surface streets that an uncongested tunnel underneath could be faster,” he says, but “tourism has really dropped off in Las Vegas”, so there’s less traffic congestion anyway. In addition, he has usually had to wait 10 to 15 minutes for his ride to arrive, he says, so there was no time saving.

The Boring Company claims its operation is cheaper than traditional metro systems since its tunnels are smaller and its operation leaner, but it is hard to see how the numbers add up. Leaving aside the Loop’s claim that it will one day serve “ 90,000 passengers per hour ”, at its current maximum capacity of six cars a minute, with four passengers a Tesla, that adds up to 2,400 passengers an hour, or 33,600 a day tops (it is only open 10am to 9pm). By comparison, London’s Elizabeth line alone carried more than 240 million passengers last year, or 665,000 a day. Added to which, the Loop requires one driver for every four passengers, whereas one Elizabeth line train, with one driver, can carry 1,500 people.

“If you were to take what should be public transportation planning and turn it into a neoliberal nightmare, this is exactly what you would get,” says Ben Leffel, an assistant professor of public policy at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. In March Leffel told legislators at a meeting of the Nevada Regional Rail Transit Advisory Working Group: “The Loop by the Boring Company is the biggest, most absurd transit scam I have ever heard of … The Boring Company has been lying to policymakers all around the world that their form, which is Teslas in tunnels, can transport more people more quickly than any kind of rail. And take it from me: that is physically impossible. So any policymaker that they’re saying this to should challenge them to provide even a shred of material evidence that that is true, but they cannot.”

Why did Las Vegas go for it? Part of the appeal to legislators, Leffel explains, is that the Loop is privately funded. “It is not paid for by tax dollars; it is paid for disproportionately by investors, and a lot of those investors are real-estate people,” he says. This means that the location of stops is determined by developers, rather than the needs of the city. “So we have diverted from a proper public rail system that moved more people and gone to a cheaper substitute, where influence over the design goes to the highest bidder.”

Private funding also enables Boring to avoid official oversight in Las Vegas and rigorous environmental analyses – which have often been why its projects have faltered elsewhere. Musk has publicly expressed his dislike of environmental regulation. “You have to get permission in advance, as opposed to, say, paying a penalty if you do something wrong, which I think would be much more effective,” he told the libertarian Cato Institute last year .

Boring has some experience in this. Last October ProPublica alleged that it had violated environmental regulations nearly 800 times in Las Vegas in the last two years, including “starting to dig without approval, releasing untreated water on to city streets and spilling muck from its trucks”, as well as missing 689 inspections. A separate report by Fortune alleged that Boring “feigned compliance” after one inspection, “only to continue dumping the wastewater after a company manager ‘assumed district inspectors had departed the property’”. There have also been reports of employees and firefighters suffering chemical burns and other injuries while working on the project – penalties for which seem to have been minimal.

None of this helps mitigate the real problems faced by US cities such as Las Vegas that are heavily car-dependent and also increasingly vulnerable to extreme heat as a result of the climate crisis. The solution, as other cities have shown, is more trees and fewer cars, which means moving people around by metro or light rail networks.

“Las Vegas is the only large metropolitan city in the Mountain West region of the US that does not have a real mass public transit system,” says Minja Yan , a former real-estate professional who is running for Clark County commissioner. “But because our elected officials haven’t been prioritising public transit, the Boring Company came up with a private project and our elected officials were kind of like: ‘OK, maybe it sounds like a cool idea.’” So is light rail, she says – “but it takes work to make it happen. It takes vision, it takes coordination, it takes a lot of time.”

Work is under way to massively expand the Vegas Loop. The city has approved a network of 68 miles of tunnel and 104 stations , connecting the Strip to downtown, the airport and the 65,000-capacity Allegiant sports stadium, “cementing the Vegas Loop as a vital piece of the city’s future infrastructure”, as Boring’s website puts it.

What happens in Vegas is no longer staying in Vegas. In July 2025, Nashville, Tennessee, announced it was also committing to a Boring project: the Music City Loop. About 20 stations are planned, but its first 13-mile stage will connect the airport to the downtown convention centre and state capitol. By the time of the announcement, construction had already begun, much to the surprise of the public and many local officials.

“We were not informed about what was going to happen at any point along the way until it was a done deal,” says the state senator Heidi Campbell – “we” meaning her and her Democrat colleagues. She describes the process as “abnormally opaque. We got a special little memo sent to our mailboxes the day before the announcement was made by the governor [Trump ally Bill Lee]. And we were not invited to the ceremony or privy to the details subsequent to that. They wanted to keep us in the dark and they continue to do that.”

Campbell and others have raised similar objections to those in Las Vegas: that this is more a “tourist shuttle” than meaningful public transport; that it precludes other transport solutions; that the city’s geology and water table present risks; that if it fails, Nashville, not Musk, will be left holding the bag. “Even if this went really, really well, inevitably what you’re doing is still finding a creative way to move cars, not solving congestion problems.”

Last December there were protests against the Music City Loop outside the courthouse. Campbell believes the project’s approval is a case of politics over practicalities in the Republican-dominated state: “The guys I work with, they are so in love with Donald Trump that anybody who is adjacent to him is their friend. They feel like Elon Musk is Donald Trump-adjacent, and they are so excited to be able to do a project with him that they are not even thinking about the logistics.”

It’s telling that the only places that have taken up Musk’s Boring vision are aligned with him commercially as well as politically. Tennessee is already home to Musk’s Colossus datacentre – which provides computing power for his Grok AI, SpaceX operations and X social media platform. Located in Memphis and across the border in Mississippi, it attracted some controversy earlier this year when it was revealed to be using environmentally harmful methane gas turbines for electrical power.

Nevada, meanwhile, is the location of Tesla’s Gigafactory, near Reno, which opened in 2016 after stiff competition from rival states (Nevada reportedly offered a $1.2bn tax incentive). That deal was largely shepherded by Steve Hill , the director of the Governor’s Office of Economic Development. In 2018 Hill became the CEO of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (LVCVA), which promotes the city and owns the convention centre. He is credited with bringing the Boring company to the city, and “remains actively involved in expanding the system throughout the Las Vegas Valley”, according to the LVCVA’s website.

The Boring Company did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

This intertwining of commercial and government interests fits a familiar pattern, says Quinn Slobodian, a co-author (with Ben Tarnoff) of Muskism, a new book that argues Musk’s business strategy is often to achieve some form of symbiosis with the state, by identifying an area where he can establish a monopoly, then benefit from public funds. The strategy has worked successfully with SpaceX, which has historically benefited from Nasa contracts (and built upon Nasa’s state-funded infrastructure), and with Tesla, where more than 40% of its revenue came from government carbon credits in the first nine months of 2024. Even as he was supposedly helping the Trump administration find $2tn in “efficiencies” ( another Muskian overpromise ), a report in 2025 estimated Musk’s companies had received $38bn in government funding .

“He really profits from a kind of terra nullius environment, where there’s as few regulations as possible, and he can quickly move into a relatively empty space and dominate it,” Slobodian says. Just as he achieved that with SpaceX’s rockets and Starlink’s low Earth orbit satellites, so Musk doubtless saw the underground realm as territory for the taking. Musk excels at what Slobodian and Tarnoff call “financial fabulism” – “which is the promise of not just an incrementally better product, but of a transformed future in which whole new sectors and markets that didn’t exist before will be created”. Unfortunately, the space under our cities is not as frictionless as the Boring Company might have liked, Slobodian points out, packed as it is with physical and regulatory obstacles. There is apparently another Boring project planned for Dubai , but it’s safe to say Musk’s pipe dream has not taken the world by storm.

Is Musk getting bored of Boring? It now seems like an insignificant backwater of his vast empire, overshadowed as it is by the tech titan’s inflammatory social media posting , and the much-hyped stock market listing of SpaceX last week, which valued the company at more than $2tn. SpaceX’s registration statement makes more grandiose claims: it anticipates future revenues of $28.5tn – “the largest actionable total addressable market in human history”. Growth strategies include AI datacentres in space, asteroid mining and “passenger and cargo transport to the moon and Mars”. It might happen one day, just as the Boring Company might whiz you beneath Las Vegas in a driverless Tesla at 200km/h one day. In the meantime, Musk’s master plan seems to be too good to be true and yet too big to fail. It could take us to infinity and beyond, it could usher in a hypercapitalist dystopia or, like Boring, it could simply be headed nowhere, not very fast.

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here .

Seven-year-old Abdiqadir was hit in a US airstrike. Without a $750 operation, he may lose his ability to walk | Somalia | The Guardian

Keyword – Global development
Trefwoorden – Somalia, US foreign policy, Africa, US news, World news, Global development
Title – Seven-year-old Abdiqadir was hit in a US airstrike. Without a $750 operation, he may lose his ability to walk | Somalia | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/marktownsend
Link – Seven-year-old Abdiqadir was hit in a US airstrike. Without a $750 operation, he may lose his ability to walk | Somalia | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T09:00:27.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jun/17/boy-injured-us-strike-somalia-ability-walk-operation-abdiqadir-salah-surgery-civilians-november-attack

A seven-year-old boy who was riddled with shrapnel during a deadly US airstrike in Somalia faces losing his ability to walk unless he has a £750 emergency operation.

But Abdiqadir Salah’s family cannot afford the surgery and the US – which refuses to admit that any civilians were killed or injured during its attack six months ago – appears unwilling to pay compensation to those affected by airstrikes in Somalia.

Shards of shrapnel are lodged in two places in Abdiqadir’s back and in his upper thigh after US airstrikes that killed at least 12 civilians, including eight children.

It is the deadliest attack on civilians in Somalia during either Trump administration and one of the worst since the botched 1993 US military operation in Mogadishu known as Black Hawk Down .

A Guardian investigation into the strikes in the town of Jamaame raises myriad questions over US intelligence, how the targets were selected and why children were hit while they were in the open and were likely to have been clearly identifiable to the drone’s strike team.

His mother said Abdiqadir was in the street outside his family home in Jamaame on 15 November 2025 when he was struck by a missile.

“That’s where three of my children got wounded. All three of them were laying on the ground covered in blood,” said Marian Haji Abdi Guled.

“When I tried to tend to them, shells began falling everywhere. Every step you took, or direction you turned, there were shells and missiles raining everywhere.

“There was no warning before the strikes but we could [hear] drones hovering above town before the strikes. It was very loud.”

After the attack, Guled took her three injured children into the surrounding countryside to flee the drones.

Her eldest, Mohamed, 16, had shrapnel lodged in his fingers, while her daughter Sumaya, 14, had three metal fragments lodged in her head, which have since been removed. Abdiqadir’s X-rays, which have been viewed by the Guardian, show shrapnel still lodged near his hip socket from where it entered his lower back.

“They bled throughout the night,” Guled said. “We couldn’t leave the countryside because we feared the drones hovering above would bomb us again.”

The next day Guled travelled 40 miles (60km) to Jilib, the de facto capital of the territory held by the Islamist militant group al-Shabaab , which was the stated target of the US airstrikes on Jamaame in November.

The hospital there, however, could not help. After borrowing money for the two-day journey, Guled travelled with Abdiqadir and his sister to Somalia’s capital, Mogadishu.

“My oldest still has shrapnel lodged in his body but I left him back in Jamaame because I couldn’t afford to take him to Mogadishu and took the younger ones.

“During the two nights and two days to reach Mogadishu, we couldn’t even eat anything. All I thought about was saving my children.”

Although her daughter received treatment in the capital, Abdiqadir remains in desperate need of help.

Doctors at Kaafi hospital in central Mogadishu told his mother that the shrapnel inside the child needed to be urgently removed to avoid life-changing consequences for him.

“They [doctors] told me if the shrapnel isn’t removed from his body, it could affect his ability to continue walking,” Guled said.

“But I don’t have $1,000 [£750] needed for the operation to remove the shrapnel from my son’s body. What’s worse than being a mother who can’t do anything for her wounded children?”

Despite being unable to afford the surgery, Guled has stayed in Mogadishu because it is the only place her child can get the required treatment. However, the cost of renting accommodation in the capital – nearly £190 a month – makes it impossible for the family to save enough for the surgery.

The US has not paid compensation to any Somali civilians injured or killed in airstrikes. Under the Trump administration, the Pentagon has also quietly scrapped a programme making it a legal requirement to prevent and respond to civilian deaths.

“I don’t know where the money [for the operation] will come from,” Guled said. “I left the children’s father back at the farm in Jamaame to protect our crops from wild animals. He also doesn’t have money to reach Mogadishu.”

The airstrikes were conducted alongside Somali ground forces in a joint operation led by the US military’s Africa command , suggesting the possibility that some of the casualties may have been inflicted by those troops.

Witness testimonies, however, all describe the Jamaame casualties being caused by bombs dropped from drones, rather than fire from ground troops. US officials would not answer questions over Somali forces’ role in the attack.

Guled has no doubts over the origin of the strikes that injured her children, insisting they had not been inflicted by infantry weapons such as mortars. “It is the Americans who are responsible for our suffering,” she said.

The US Department of War did not respond to a series of detailed questions regarding the airstrikes on Jamaame.

Macron hails US alignment with G7’s ‘shared commitment’ on Ukraine | G7 | The Guardian

Keyword – World news
Trefwoorden – G7, Ukraine, US foreign policy, Europe, US news, World news
Title – Macron hails US alignment with G7’s ‘shared commitment’ on Ukraine | G7 | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/patrickwintour
Link – Macron hails US alignment with G7’s ‘shared commitment’ on Ukraine | G7 | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T17:26:44.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/17/macron-hails-us-alignment-with-g7s-shared-commitment-on-ukraine

Emmanuel Macron has said the whole of the G7, including the US, recognises “the territorial integrity of Ukraine” as he hailed a “re-synchronisation” of positions on the issue.

The French president welcomed a “very deep change in the US approach”, saying Donald Trump and all the leaders present at the G7 summit at Évian-les-Bains understood that Vladimir Putin was not interested in peace.

“President Trump, like all of us, simply acknowledged that there was no serious willingness on Russia’s part today to discuss peace,” he said.

Macron repeatedly emphasised a “shared commitment to making progress on this issue”, which he described as “a very profound shift and remobilisation of the G7”.

The annual G7 meeting brings together the leaders of the world’s biggest economies: the US, France, Germany, Italy, the UK, Canada and Japan.

Macron’s remarks were in sharp contrast to last year’s G7, when the chasm between Trump’s courtship of Putin and European support for Kyiv was so marked that the US president walked out early and there was no attempt to agree on a final statement.

Trump also met the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, twice on the margins of the summit. Zelenskyy updated Trump on the Ukrainian military’s progress, which apparently impressed the US leader. The summit’s joint communique vowed to increase sanctions on Russia , including in the energy field.

Challenged on whether Trump could be trusted to follow through on a commitment to consider further sanctions against Russia, Macron said: “I have always trusted President Trump. When he has made commitments to us he has always done what he said he would do.”

Macron’s belief that Trump was re-engaging with the Ukraine issue was echoed by Canada’s prime minister, Mark Carney, who said he believed Trump had shifted to “a more realistic understanding of how this war will develop”. He described this as a gamechanger.

Diplomats at the summit said they had sensed that Trump’s relief at the apparently imminent end of the Iran war had brought him to the G7 summit in a far better mood than expected, and he showed a genuine willingness to engage on issues.

At his closing press conference, Macron said Zelenskyy had proposed that Putin come to the G7 summit to discuss the impasse, but “nothing had come back from Russia”.

The US and several European G7 countries also agreed to produce long-range missiles and air-defence systems under license in Ukraine . The move will not only fill a hole in European defences, but also give Ukraine’s increasingly efficient arms factories extra income.

The German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, said: “We are all currently producing too little, and this can be compensated for by granting licenses to companies that have these production capacities, including European and Ukrainian companies.”

Trump has said he would look into US missiles being produced under licence, but there are bound to be issues involving commercial secrecy and patents.

Gout Gout flies home for third in rarely-contested 150m behind US great Noah Lyles | Athletics | The Guardian

Keyword – Sport
Trefwoorden – Athletics, Gout Gout, Australia sport, Sport
Title – Gout Gout flies home for third in rarely-contested 150m behind US great Noah Lyles | Athletics | The Guardian
Author – Australian Associated Press
Link – Gout Gout flies home for third in rarely-contested 150m behind US great Noah Lyles | Athletics | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T01:30:30.000Z
Category – Sport
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2026/jun/17/gout-gout-sprinter-third-150m-sprint-behind-usa-noah-lyles-golden-spike-ostrava

Teenage sprint sensation Gout Gout has flown home to finish third behind his training mate and new 150m world record holder Noah Lyles at the Golden Spike track and field meet in Ostrava.

Paris Olympics gold medallist Lyles clocked 14.67 seconds in the rarely-contested distance, smashing the previous previous mark of 14.92 set by Jamaica’s Kishane Thompson earlier this year in Florida.

Second-placed South African Sinesipho Dambile (14.78) also dipped under Thompson’s previous record, while the fast-finishing Gout was third in a national record of 14.96.

It was a huge improvement on Gout’s Diamond League debut last week in Oslo, when the 18-year-old struggled out of the blocks and could only finish sixth in the 200m.

“This is definitely a race I was needing after Oslo, and I am glad I got it, and I am ready for more,” told the Straight At It podcast.

“Usually when I get a bad start it’s hard for me to come back, but today I got an OK start and I brought it home.”

Earlier this year, Gout smashed his own Australian 200m record with a time of 19.67 at the national championships in Sydney.

It was faster than the legendary Usain Bolt had run at the same age.

The flying Queenslander has decided to skip the upcoming Glasgow Commonwealth Games to focus on the 200m at Under-20 world championships in Oregon.

US star Lyles, 28, won the 100m at the Paris Games and is a multiple world champion over 100m and 200m.

He and Gout embraced after crossing the finish line in Ostrava. The pair have regularly trained together at Lyles’s US base.

In other action at the Golden Spike meet on Tuesday night (Wednesday morning AEST), Australian Peter Bol won the 1000m in two minutes 15.13 seconds, also bettering the Australian record in a non-championship event.

‘It makes no sense’: 16- and 17-year-olds on UK social media ban | Social media | The Guardian

Keyword – Media
Trefwoorden – Social media, Young people, Digital media, Media, Society
Title – ‘It makes no sense’: 16- and 17-year-olds on UK social media ban | Social media | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/jane-clinton
Link – ‘It makes no sense’: 16- and 17-year-olds on UK social media ban | Social media | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-17T16:24:24.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/jun/17/it-makes-no-sense-16–and-17-year-olds-on-social-media-ban

The UK government has announced a social media ban for under-16s .

They will be blocked from accessing social media, including Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Snapchat, Facebook and X, from next spring.

Livestreaming and stranger communication, including in gaming, will be switched off by default for 16- and 17-year-olds.

We asked 16- and 17-year-olds for their thoughts on the forthcoming ban and restrictions.

Here are some of their responses.

‘The plan is flawed – it makes no sense’

I will finish school when I’m 17 and go to university when I’m 17, but wouldn’t be able to livestream? It makes no sense. If I can vote, leave home, get married, pay tax, and join the army, why can’t I use my phone how I would like?

I relied on livestream revision sessions for my recent exams, and I know the younger children in my school were talking about this and worried that this resource may not be available to them with the ban.

People living in rural areas could also lose their connection to the world around them through platforms like TikTok. Using social media to build confidence and discover new hobbies will cease.

I just hope politicians sitting in Westminster realise the plan is flawed – they need to have another look at it. Mia, 16, Scotland

‘To suggest a digital curfew is laughable’

While I recognise some of the issues raised about the use of social media, I am concerned that this has been rushed out more as a political win than as an evidence-based solution.

No one should be scrolling Instagram until three o’clock in the morning – but to suggest a digital curfew is laughable. The government has no answers to any “how?” questions, only the response that this is “Australia plus”… Australia plus what, and how? Robert, 16, south-east England

‘Kids should be banned, not teens’

I don’t agree with entirely blocking social media from under-16s. It shouldn’t be our fault that the internet is an unsafe place; we should be blaming the [tech] companies for not doing better.

I feel it should be kids who are banned, not teens. Under-13s would be a better idea. The curfews for 16- and 17-year-olds is also utterly ridiculous. At this age, we can have sex. Why should we have a bedtime like we’re babies? We are basically recognised as young adults, so this curfew isn’t the right idea. Nate*, 16, South Wales

‘I think it will positively affect the young generations to come’

I don’t believe the ban is a bad thing. I think it has good intent to protect children from predators on the internet and from becoming addicted to social media.

If we can stop other generations from being addicted to the internet and these platforms, I think that’s absolutely a great thing. Social media has such an impact on mental health as well. I think we’ve all seen a decline in young people’s mental health as social media has had an increase in popularity. Overall, the ban has good intent, and I think it will positively affect the young generation to come. Hayley*, 16, Shropshire

‘Teenagers will find a way around the ban’

I welcome a social media ban, although I am sceptical of its effectiveness. When I was younger, with just a bit of ingenuity, I was able to get around standard parental controls on my devices. Teenagers, given a couple of months, will definitely find a way around the ban.

It is heartening to hear of the ban, but I am highly sceptical of the agency of the government to do anything with effect. All I have known is political flakiness and unrest, and I feel the damage has already been done, but I hope this ban may help my younger siblings have a better start. Fraser, 17, Edinburgh

‘It could push young people to less regulated spaces’

Supply and demand don’t stop just because the prime minister says so, and history shows that if anything, adding the allure of petty criminality to an action just makes it more appealing to most people.

The ban could push people to less-regulated places – places they would not have gone to before.

Why did the government promise to “tread [more] lightly” on our lives when what it actually plans to do is increase the strength of the law on an already maligned group – teenagers? Max, 17, Wiltshire

‘Decisions about social media use should be made within families, not by government’

Many teenagers use social media for creative outlets, education, and support networks, not just entertainment. The ban raises questions about where the line is drawn between protecting young people and restricting their freedoms. I believe that decisions about social media use should be made within families rather than by the government. Leo, 16, Cumbria

‘Marginalised groups could miss out on online communities’

I think I’d have been a lot happier and less self-conscious without social media, and I think it’s something kids can do without, but I think marginalised groups who perhaps struggle with being in public will be impacted, since their friends can be largely online.

I found online music communities can be really helpful and enriching when I was younger. We connected over our shared love of bands and became online friends. I think it would be really sad for young people to miss out on those communities and friendships because of the ban.

While I don’t agree with a blanket ban, I do agree there should be tighter controls on endless scrolling and maybe on the content that young people can see – there definitely should be more restrictions on that. Owen, 17, West Yorkshire

‘The ban punishes children, not the tech companies’

I don’t support a blanket ban. I see it as patronising. That said, I think some restrictions are needed – but more on the companies providing the services than the children using them. I feel that the ban punishes children rather than tech companies.

The tone of the [proposed] policy implies that under-16s cannot be trusted with their own free-time habits, something I rather disagree with.

Treating social media as a universally negative force is reductive. For many of us, it’s not so much an addiction as something we genuinely enjoy participating in. Online communities can be wholesome and supportive. Alice*, 17, Yorkshire

*Names have been changed