Motorway traffic drones are coming to UK roads, but will they drive us to distraction? | UK news | The Guardian

Keyword – UK news
Trefwoorden – UK news, Road safety, Virtual reality, London, Manchester, Birmingham
Title – Motorway traffic drones are coming to UK roads, but will they drive us to distraction? | UK news | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/raphael-boyd
Link – Motorway traffic drones are coming to UK roads, but will they drive us to distraction? | UK news | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-20T09:17:47.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jun/20/motorway-traffic-drones-driving-distraction-virtual-reality-simulation

I’m barrelling down the motorway at 70mph, swerving from lane to lane, with cars speeding past me. There’s just one problem, I don’t have a driving licence.

Or at least it would be a problem were this a real road test. But despite the life-like surroundings, I am in fact trialling a complex simulation created by virtual reality company MXT on behalf of National Highways, the government-owned agency responsible for the UK’s major roads.

Its purpose, beyond being fun, is to see if drivers are likely to be distracted or disturbed by the introduction of low-flying drones deployed to monitor the state of the country’s 4,500 miles of motorways and A-roads.

Human-operated drones have already been used by the National Highways since 2020, in collaboration with engineering company Arup, but the agency is hoping to roll out even smaller drones that can get closer to sites of possible road maintenance, with the hope of having them in the air above motorways by early 2027.

National Highways say smaller drones flying at a lower altitude of between 10 and 20 metres will be able to pick up more details than larger drones, which are only allowed to fly about 50 metres above the road’s surface. The smaller drones are also about 10 times cheaper.

The simulation examines how feasible this is. The tests, which have taken place in London, Manchester and Birmingham over the course of a month, are described to participants as a standard road safety simulation, with drones only being mentioned after they are finished. Participants are then asked if they had noticed how much – if at all – they felt the drones affected their driving.

On top of their testimony, the test also measures several metrics during the simulation, including the participant’s heart rate, pupil dilation and the amount of time they spend not looking directly ahead, as well as factors such as speed and steer control.

It’s a surprisingly nervy experience and one that is not likely to boost my confidence behind the wheel. Still, while the simulated driving undertaken to write this story was described as “not great”, the administrator did point out that it wasn’t the worst they had seen, adding “at least you didn’t crash”.

Ewan Murdoch, a senior consultant at Arup, said that the results of the test could lead to drones being used for highway maintenance around the world.

“We’ve had some interest from colleagues in Australia who are looking potentially to do some of their things to their road authorities,” said Murdoch. “And in the US as well, they’re looking at opportunities for this, but this kind of methodology is quite interesting and novel, so I think it’s something that globally we’re seeing a strong interest in.”

The tests have been conducted with 120 regular drivers, as well as 19 heavy goods vehicle drivers to see if they were more affected driving large vehicles. While about half of participants said they noticed the drones during the test, significantly fewer drivers said they considered them to be “hazardous” or “dangerous” during the simulation.

Callum Brown, senior adviser on airspace standards at National Highways, described the tests as “cutting edge” and said smaller drones would be the safest and most efficient way to survey roads and buildings in the future.

“They did some tests similar to this in Massachusetts,” said Brown. “But in terms of trying to apply this nationally, this is a world first. We’re at the cutting edge for this and it’s something we’ve been building to for about six years now.”

One participant, Kevin McKeown, 49, enjoyed the experience and, while he found the VR aspect “a bit jarring” at first, did not believe the drones caused him any problems.

“It was a bit surreal like a video game, but if it increases health and safety and takes away an element of risk then I’m all for it,” he said. “And if you can get distracted by a drone flying 10 metres overhead then I think you’ve got bigger issues than just a drone, and I’m not too sure you should be driving a car in the first place.”

‘Streaming gave me a space to be myself’: Twitch creators on what it’s like to grow up on the platform | Twitch | The Guardian

Keyword – Games
Trefwoorden – Twitch, Games, Culture, Social media, Digital media, Media, Technology
Title – ‘Streaming gave me a space to be myself’: Twitch creators on what it’s like to grow up on the platform | Twitch | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/keithstuart
Link – ‘Streaming gave me a space to be myself’: Twitch creators on what it’s like to grow up on the platform | Twitch | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-16T08:30:16.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/games/2026/jun/16/twitch-gamer-creators-twitchcon-rotterdam

A imee Davies, better known as Aimsey to their fans, is 24 but looks much younger. Sitting in a bland meeting room above the annual TwitchCon event in Rotterdam, they’re a barely contained whirl of energy in a beanie hat and T-shirt, all smiles and lightning-fast chatter. Aimsey (who uses they/them pronouns) is also a Twitch veteran, having started streaming eight years ago at the tender age of 16. A million subscribers tune in every week to see them chaotically play Minecraft and share snippets of their life. They have grown up, from teen to young adult, carrying a vast audience with them into maturity. What is it like to experience that?

“When you’re 16 you want to tell everyone everything about you,” they say as music blares from the event below. “When I came out as a lesbian, I told the world. Every part of my identity, my mental health struggles … I thought if I could help one person feel like they weren’t alone, I wanted to do that.”

For several years Aimsey was in a relationship with another content creator, Guqqie, and it played out in front of their fanbases with very little filtering – until it ended. It’s a situation common to streamers – they’re young and naive, they build an audience through sharing personal details with few boundaries, then the pressures of endless invasive attention take a toll. “Honestly, for a long time, the lines got blurred,” says Aimsey. “Streaming would seep into my real-life friendships, where I thought the only way people would be my friend was if I could give them something – because that’s obviously how it is on a stream.”

Recently however, Aimsey has learned how to step back and be a little more guarded. “I’ve been so open all my life, but I was falling into these cracks where I was like, God, who am I? I felt like I couldn’t figure that out. I think that in the last few months something switched in my brain. I’m living a little bit more of a reserved life. I’m still myself when I stream, but I’m trying my best to keep some things private – at least for now. I surround myself with people who definitely remind me that I’m not just content.”

Fellow Twitch star Sweet Anita is older at 35 years old, but she too is a veteran, having streamed since 2018. As a sufferer of Tourette syndrome, the platform has been a kind of emancipation. “Streaming has changed me a lot,” she says. “I used to be a timid person and quite apologetic – obviously I’d learned to be after a lifetime of dealing with Tourettes. I feel like streaming really gave me a space to be myself without constantly having to apologise to people. I have a lot more fun, I reach out to more people, I’m a lot more sociable now.”

It concerns her that so many children are now listing content creator as their ambition. “When I was a kid, it was astronaut or fireman, but now they desperately want to be in my position,” she says. “But it’s a little bit of a trap because once you’re here, people don’t forget you. You could leave tomorrow and someone might continue stalking you for the next 10 years. Once you’re in, you’re in. The only difference is how much security you can afford.”

For its part Twitch recognises the vulnerability of streamers. It has set up guilds to help specific minority groups navigate the platform and communicate concerns to the executives. It has created an AI-driven AutoMod feature, which polices chat during streams to delete abusive messages. “We’ve invested heavily in moderation tools so streamers can define what safety looks like to them,” says head of community Mary Kish. “It is going to be very important to be familiar with how you can protect yourself. I’m worried about anyone who might think on a whim, I’m going to go live. You need to be prepared – you need to have mods, or at the very least, turn Auto Mod on, you need to set your community up. We have a little work to do to make sure that anyone making their first stream understands what they’re getting into.”

Tellingly, neither Aimsey and Sweet Anita have plans to stop streaming any time soon. “Honestly, my vision is I’m probably always going to be streaming,” says Aimsey. “It’s something that’s been so consistent in my life and I adore it. That could change. But I’ve got so much more stuff I want to do with Minecraft – I want to do events, I want to do more stories and role-play, and there are so many more ideas in my head that there’s no point in even thinking about stopping.”

Sweet Anita has plans to move on from video games, at least some of the time. “I used to do animal rescue before this and I haven’t done enough for animals – that’s what I’d like to do next. I hope I get to go to animal sanctuaries, I hope I get to show people endangered animals. I’d love to do some rehab again, release some wild birds, that was the core of my existence before all of this.”

The maturation of both streamers and stream watchers is certainly something Twitch itself is thinking about. A huge majority of streams used to be about playing and watching video games, but recently categories such as Just Chatting and In Real Life (IRL) have become more popular. Streamers are getting out of their home studios and taking their viewers on days out, to restaurants, on walks, and beyond – top creator IShowSpeed has been streaming while scuba diving. Shayanelhawk literally sent his Twitch chat into space.

“Right now our biggest age group is actually 25-34 because people have aged up while using it and they keep using it,” says CEO Dan Clancy. “We’ve seen this in the growing diversity of content because as creators get older, they have new interests and their community stays with them. So I think we’ll see continued diversification. I’ve often conjectured that when the so-called Twitch generation gets to 60-70, we’ll see all these knitting and crochetting streams. As you get into retirement – the issue of looking for connection that you had as a teenager comes back, because the kids have left home, you’re looking for people, for community – and you have time. As we saw during Covid, Twitch is a platform that explodes when you have time.”

The one massive gamechanger lurking on the horizon is AI. There is already a successful AI avatar streamer, Neuro-sama, a cutesy anime girl with 1 million followers. Will Aimsey be part of the last generation of human teens who’ve had the chance to become, and grow up, as streamers? They think not. “No matter what happens there is always going to be an audience for human-made things. It doesn’t matter what we do, it doesn’t matter how big AI gets, there’s always going to be people who need that human connection to feel real.”

Lamine Yamal a genius ‘like Dalí or Michelangelo’, says Spain’s De la Fuente | Spain | The Guardian

Keyword – Football
Trefwoorden – Spain, World Cup 2026, World Cup, Football, Sport
Title – Lamine Yamal a genius ‘like Dalí or Michelangelo’, says Spain’s De la Fuente | Spain | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/sidlowe
Link – Lamine Yamal a genius ‘like Dalí or Michelangelo’, says Spain’s De la Fuente | Spain | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-20T22:48:23.000Z
Category – Sport
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/jun/20/lamine-yamal-genius-salvador-dali-michelangelo-spain-luis-de-la-fuente-world-cup

Luis de la Fuente urged people not to compare Lamine Yamal to Lionel Messi, Diego Maradona or “anyone”, but did compare him to Salvador Dalí and Michelangelo – “geniuses” for whom the exceptional comes naturally.

On the eve of their second World Cup game, against Saudi Arabia in Atlanta, it was put to the Spain coach that Lamine Yamal is confronted by a process similar to those faced by Lionel Messi and Diego Maradona but at the age of 18. His image is everywhere in the United States, a global figure already, and the buildup to the selección ’s participation at the tournament has been dominated by his availability after an injury he suffered in April – a teenager cast as their hope and salvation.

“Those are big names,” De la Fuente replied. “The worst mistake we could make would be to compare him to anyone. He is the midst of a process. He has exceptional footballing maturity and lives it all with total naturalness. He has great serenity and strength. We have to let him follow his path but those players who have something different are ready for that. They’re geniuses, like Dalí [who] can paint a picture, or Michelangelo. They’re different. What is exceptional to us, isn’t to them. In those extremes, they feel comfortable. Why? Because they are different. What we think is exceptional, they consider normal.”

De la Fuente added: “We should help him as best we can on this journey: that would be good for Spanish football and the Spanish national team. Those of us who are parents know that you accompany [your children], guide them, but without invading their space. I am a coach but I am also someone who forms people. When you’re so young, when you’re 18, you still need advice. You can’t talk to them like you do to Jesús Navas. He is intelligent and accepts it. He protects himself from the media, as he should.”

De la Fuente also denied that it is a problem for the national team that so much of the spotlight falls on the teenager, eclipsing everything and everyone else. “That’s because the atmosphere inside is very healthy, very natural,” he said. “We know the human qualities of everyone in this group. We are waiting for Lamine because that’s the way it is. He’s important. We celebrated the expectation there is [around him], because he is with us. We understand his role perfectly, and so do his teammates. Day to day, they are all the same, all equal.”

The Spain coach announced that Lamine Yamal was ready to start against Saudi Arabia in their second World Cup game, after a 20-minute substitute appearance in their 0-0 draw against Cape Verde . But he also said he did not expect the winger to play the entire game, floating the idea that he could get “55, 58 or 63 minutes”, depending on how the game evolved.

Asked what “he’s back” meant, De la Fuente replied: “That he is at the point where we have stop him, hold him back; he has to do the things he has to do at this stage in the process. He enjoys playing so much. We see him train and it’s a joy: the way he is, the way he competes, the spirit and sharpness he has. The best news of all is that he is available and in a good moment.”

A viral doomsday scenario aims to shake Europe out of its AI complacency | AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian

Keyword – Technology
Trefwoorden – AI (artificial intelligence), Technology, Trump administration, US politics, Silicon Valley, Anthropic, OpenAI, Nvidia, Datacenters, Europe, US news
Title – A viral doomsday scenario aims to shake Europe out of its AI complacency | AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/aisha-down
Link – A viral doomsday scenario aims to shake Europe out of its AI complacency | AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-20T09:59:12.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jun/20/europe-sleepwalking-ai-disaster-us-china

It’s 2031 and the US and China are about to tear Europe into pieces.

The US ploughed vast sums into datacentres and the EU did not. China built robots and Europe did not. American companies “restructured” their workflows around AI and fired people, while EU workers went on long lunch breaks and handed over administrative tasks to the AI model Claude.

Now the chickens are coming home to roost. Europe’s economy is a shambles because it does not have its own AI. Populism is surging, the euro is wobbling, cyber-attacks are shredding EU businesses. Brexit seemed like a good idea. It looks like the end of the European Union.

That, at least, is the vision of a speculative thought experiment, called Europe 2031 , penned by Brussels-based thinktankers and published fortuitously one day before the Trump administration decided to block “foreign nationals” from using a much-hyped AI model built by Anthropic, called Fable.

In the heady week of G7 talks that followed, the scenario has gone viral – feeding a feverish discussion of the urgency for EU tech sovereignty. It has been read by members of the European parliament and, say its authors, was brought up in track 1.5 discussions between British and German officials earlier this week.

Its authors say they feel “vindicated”, by the attention it has received and by the fact that one of their predictions – that the US would restrict global access to advanced AI models – appears to have briefly come true. They hope the scenario will spur Europe towards a dramatic course-correction on AI.

The piece is part of a burgeoning genre of fictional AI doomsday scenarios, created by obscure figures, which have gained surprising traction among policymakers over the past year. In 2025 there was AI 2027, a thought experiment which culminates in a superintelligent AI killing all of humanity to make way for more datacentres; in February, another speculative scenario imagined AI upending the US economy . (The first was read by US vice-president JD Vance, the second contributed to a stock market wobble.)

One complication of all this might be that their thought experiment is at times based on current developments in AI whose outcome is uncertain or in doubt.

Maximilian Negele contributed to Europe 2031, he says, because of the “incredible translation barrier” between Brussels and San Francisco, where AI is being developed. Formerly at US thinktank Rand, he left his job this year to focus on the project.

“As somebody who travels to San Francisco quite a bit and talks to people there, what is happening in Europe just seemed like a slow-moving car crash to me,” he says.

The scenario unfolds from the perspective of a fictional bright-eyed Brussels staffer, Caroline Dubois, who has a German friend, Christian Vogt, with a startup in San Francisco. On a visit, she’s impressed by America’s “70 or 80-hour” working weeks and discomfited by the conviction among tech bros that everything is about to change.

Back in Europe, she works to evangelise her well-meaning bosses about the impending AI future – but fails to convince. There’s too much scepticism, and most people think AI is a bubble.

Things go from there. The Americans spend huge sums on a massive AI building programme – the scenario highlights a real-life $100bn (£75bn) deal between OpenAI and Nvidia , the $300bn agreement between OpenAI and Oracle, and “bulldozers” breaking earth in Texas for an AI datacentre. Europeans, meanwhile, put forward a tepid investment package and ignore advisers’ pleas for “a full regulatory carte blanche for datacentre providers”.

In a matter of years, America monopolises 70% of the world’s “compute” – the semiconductor chips that fill the datacentres that power AI models. Europe’s economy is meanwhile gasping for air, mostly because its companies have not adopted AI.

As AI-powered cyber-attacks shred European firms and unemployment surges, EU officials scramble to parlay their one last bargaining chip – the Dutch lithography firm ASML, which is vital to the production of AI semiconductors – into concessions from Beijing or Washington. But it’s too late. The US deploys powerful “frontier AI” spyware and learns the deepest fears of EU officials and also which of them are having affairs.

Curtains drop. Christian and Caroline exeunt stage left for a drink. Disaster impends.

Sceptical readers might point out that a number of the eye-popping sums and big projects that the authors name-check in describing the US’s AI ascent have already fallen apart.

The $100bn agreement between OpenAI and Nvidia , the biggest AI deal of last year, evaporated in February. The $300bn between OpenAI and Oracle seems doubtful , especially as recent reports indicate the maker of ChatGPT is still billions of dollars underwater as it burns money on datacentre infrastructure.

The bulldozers on the ground in Texas may not be bulldozing very much any more, as OpenAI pulled out of the flagship AI project to which that moment in the scenario seems to refer.

The authors are sanguine about these matters. Throughout the piece, they pre-empt potential objections – such as AI being overhyped – by suggesting that the hapless European officials have these worries, too, and they end up tragically wrong.

“I wouldn’t rule out that there’s some exuberance and that one or two AI companies might go bankrupt,” says Negele. “But what we wanted to get across is a general feel for a version of what we think will happen.”

He and his co-author, Alex Petropolous, agree that there could be some bumps in the road – including mounting resistance to datacentres in the US. “I mean, people hate AI in general. A lot of people do. People hate datacentres. They destroy the landscape. They support big tech. It’s a very, very unpopular policy.”

The authors of Europe 2031 think that the solution to this is datacentres. Europe needs to build more, faster, ideally in AI zones where matters such as power and planning can be streamlined and deregulated.

“I think our view is that the total datacentre supply is quite an inelastic supply. So there will only be a limited number of datacentres built in the world built every year, and the question is, how many of those do you want built in the US? How many of those do you want built in Europe?” says Petropolous.

It is further worth noting that the main organisation behind the Europe 2031 scenario, Arq Foundation, based in Brussels, describes itself as “neither an advocacy NGO nor a venture-backed startup” and does not disclose who funds it.

Brussels politicians who read it, though, may take away a simpler message: the scenario has crystallised a conversation about the need for Europe to have technological sovereignty.

“This scenario, Europe 2031, I believe that some of the parts they mentioned can happen,” says Nicolás Casares, a member of the European parliament from Spain. “But I think they are increasing – a bit – the alarms in order to call our attention.”

The US cutting off Europe’s access to Fable, he says, means that the EU needs to ask itself harder questions about who is building its AI infrastructure and who will benefit from it.

“What is the added value of having OpenAI or Anthropic datacentres in Europe?” he says.

“We are buying a narrative that we need a lot of datacentres not to lose the race for AI. But this is crazy … we are paving the way for infrastructure that they will use and sometimes not allow us the possibility of using it.”

Key Trump allies and Musk on leaked list for secretive Peter Thiel retreat | Peter Thiel | The Guardian

Keyword – Technology
Trefwoorden – Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, Donald Trump, US news
Title – Key Trump allies and Musk on leaked list for secretive Peter Thiel retreat | Peter Thiel | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/wilson-jason
Link – Key Trump allies and Musk on leaked list for secretive Peter Thiel retreat | Peter Thiel | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-20T12:00:00.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jun/20/trump-elon-musk-peter-thiel-retreat

A website leak has exposed participants in the secretive, Peter Thiel-founded Dialog retreats which includes top politicians from across the American divide, officials from foreign countries, other titans of the tech industry world and prominent media figures.

The annual Dialog retreats, which have been compared to other quasi-secret elite conferences like the Bilderberg Group and Bohemian Grove since they began in 2006, have had some participants revealed in previous media reports. Fairly little is known about the invitation-only event, which is usually held at luxury establishments around the world and features organized discussions on global affairs.

The list indicates an organization capable of mustering a unique mix of government, corporate and cultural power, though many names on the list likely attended Dialog events prior to Thiel’s association with the political right and the Trump era.

The list was exposed, apparently accidentally, in the Dialog website’s source code, and was visible in an Internet Archive snapshot of the site archived on 15 June. It was first noted by a hacktivist on BlueSky.

The leak was snapshotted on the Internet Archive on Monday, where the Guardian was able to independently verify the information.

Thiel is a secretive and influential billionaire political svengali and tech investor who recently hit the headlines for hosting a series of lectures philosophizing about who the antichrist could be and warning that Armageddon is coming. Thiel has also recently become powerful in conservative politics with close ties to Donald Trump and JD Vance and has helped bankroll Republicans’ 2026 midterm campaigns.

The leaked Dialog list includes governors, senators and congresspeople from both US political parties, leaders and officials from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, the United Kingdom and Japan and prominent opinion writers from outlets including the New York Times, among many others.

It’s not clear when the names were added to the list and under what circumstances, and in what capacity those listed participated in Dialog.

The list has already been the subject of media reports, but it remains unclear whether all the individuals on it have the same degree of involvement with Dialog. Some of those on the list whom the Guardian contacted were prepared to defend Dialog and its mission, which the organization’s website characterizes as the promotion of non-ideological, non-partisan conversation.

Others took pains to distance themselves from the elite networking gatherings, and claimed to have had only fleeting involvement with the gatherings, which had sometimes taken place in the distant past.

The names include serving Trump administration figures such as White House staff secretary Will Scharf and National Science Foundation nominee and former CDC acting head Jim O’Neill; conservative-movement rainmaker Leonard Leo and the retired general Stanley McChrystal ; corporate powerbrokers like OpenAI president Greg Brockman and trillionaire Elon Musk, as well as Neuralink executive and mother of Musk’s children Shivon Zilis ; and writers including Sam Harris, Steven Pinker , and New York Times columnists Ezra Klein and Bret Stephens .

Names from beyond the US include the Saudi royal and former intelligence chief Turki al-Faisal ; former Keir Starmer adviser Matt Clifford and the UK Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat ; and Sheikh Nawaf Al-Sabah, the CEO of Kuwait Petroleum.

Separate reporting in Wired magazine revealed that this year’s Dialog event, to be held in Dublin this August, will range across topics including nuclear power, world war 3, sex, and cults. It’s not known if those on the leaked list were speakers, guests, or full members of the organization.

The Guardian has contacted all participants named in this reporting via publicly listed email addresses, or affiliated organizations, to ask about the details of their involvement with Dialog.

Janine Wedel, co-director of the Corruption, Networks, and Transnational Crime Research Center at George Mason University, and the author of Shadow Elite and other books, said: “It is in these sorts of gatherings – where you have financial, tech and political power coming together – that we’re increasingly seeing agendas being set and opinions being shaped. It’s where the most powerful elites, a cross-section, an interconnected section of the most powerful positions, come together and shape elite opinion.”

Wedel added: “There do seem to be a growing number of fora involved in precisely this – transnational gatherings of the most powerful financial, tech and political elites, coming together. So I think it’s a problem for democracy, in essence. We have to think about it that way.”

And the leak connects with other scandals involving the intersection of wealth and power. Emails released by the House oversight committee show that Dialog’s other founder, tech entrepreneur Auren Hoffman, invited deceased financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein to the 2014 conference. It’s not known if Epstein attended any Dialog gatherings.

US government officials, serving and former

The leaked directory contains the names of several senior Trump administration officials. Dialog’s list includes treasury secretary Scott Bessent; army secretary Dan Driscoll; White House staff secretary Will Scharf; and Jim O’Neill, the former deputy secretary of health and human services and a co-founder of Thiel’s fellowship programme ).

Two sitting senators are listed – Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, and Cory Booker, Democrat of New Jersey – alongside the Connecticut Democratic congressman Jim Himes. Two sitting governors also appear: Wes Moore of Maryland and Jared Polis of Colorado, both Democrats.

Democrats appeared keen to disassociate themselves from the organization.

Jared Polis spokesperson Eric Maruyama wrote in response to a request for comment: “No, Governor Polis is not a member of this organization, whatever it is. He does not know why his name is associated with the organization in any way or appeared on their website.”

Maruyama added: “He does not recall ever having attended functions hosted by them and has not previously heard of them.”

Cory Booker’s spokesperson David Bergstein linked the Guardian to an X post in which he wrote: “Cory is not involved with this group. Back when he was a mayor he regularly attended conferences and speaking engagements, and this might have been among them. He is not a part of this organization and has absolutely no interest in doing anything with them.”

Wes Moore’s spokesperson did not respond directly to the Guardian’s request for comment, but soon after the request was sent, the governor took to X to post “13 years ago I was invited to speak – to an audience largely unfamiliar with the experiences of millions of Americans who grew up like me – about my book The Other Wes Moore”.

He added: “That was my first and last appearance at Dialog. Never met Peter Thiel. Don’t plan to in the future!”

The list also spans figures who have moved between government and the private sector: Robert Hur, the former special counsel; Lisa Monaco, the former deputy attorney general; Julian Castro, the former housing secretary; Preet Bharara, the former US attorney in Manhattan; Mitch Daniels, the former Indiana governor and Purdue University president; and the retired general Stan McChrystal.

McChrystal replied to a request for comment in an email, writing that “I did attend two Dialog events about a decade ago but I don’t believe it constituted ‘membership’. They’ve regularly invited me since but I haven’t attended because I’m very busy – not out of any negative feelings for Dialog.”

He added: “My experience was all positive – a gathering of thoughtful people across the political spectrum (my wife was seated at dinner with a well-known Republican politician) and in my memory the gathering discussed almost every kind of subject but politics. Non-attribution was applied simply to encourage candor.”

He concluded: “I can see a temptation to view these kinds of events as something they’re not, in my experience we need more venues where people feel free to talk openly, without the pressure of public scrutiny – and often misinterpretation – of every word if we’re going to rebuild bridges across the divide in my nation and our world.”

Asked if he was aware of Thiel’s connection with the organization, McChrystal wrote: “He attended one that I was at but I was [not] aware if he was an organizer – seemed to just be attending like everyone else.”

Wedel, the professor and expert on power elites, said of McChrystal’s comment: “While I’m sure it is nice to talk off the record, it is nice to talk freely, at the same time, this shaping of opinion has a great deal of impact on the rest of us who aren’t participating in it.”

She added: “That’s the conundrum we’re in. And it’s only through leaks, and through dogged journalism, that you learn some of these things after the fact – and then you’ve still had no voice in any of it.”

Leonard Leo, the Federalist Society co-chairman who has shaped the federal judiciary, is listed, as are the former treasury secretaries Robert Rubin, and Larry Summers, who recently resigned from Harvard over his association with Jeffrey Epstein; the former state department policy chief Anne-Marie Slaughter, the former FDA commissioner Peggy Hamburg, and the anti-tax organiser Grover Norquist.

A person familiar with Summers’s involvement with Dialog said that he had attended one meeting last April.

Overseas government officials

Dialog’s roster reaches well beyond Washington. Serving foreign officials include Kaja Kallas, the European Commission vice-president and former Estonian prime minister, and Tarō Kōno, Japan’s digital minister and a former defence minister.

In an email, Kallas spokesperson Matthias Eichenlaub wrote: “The High Representative is not a member of this group. If you’re referring to the press coverage that there’s apparently a meeting in Ireland in August, we have no intention of going there, if that meeting even exists.”

The list names Prince Turki al-Faisal, the Saudi royal who formerly ran the kingdom’s intelligence service and served as its ambassador to Washington and London; Reema bint Bandar Al Saud, the current Saudi ambassador to the United States; Sheikh Nawaf Saud Nasir Al-Sabah, chief executive of the state-owned Kuwait Petroleum Corporation; and Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, a former prime minister of Pakistan.

There is a notable British presence on the list. Matt Clifford – who until recently was the UK prime minister’s adviser on AI and now chairs the government’s Advanced Research and Invention Agency (Aria) – is a member, as is the British Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat. A separate retreat registration list is reported to name Randy Kroszner, a former US Federal Reserve governor who now sits on the Bank of England’s financial policy committee.

In an email responding to a request for comment, Matt Clifford wrote: “I’m very surprised this is interesting to anyone! For better or worse, I receive invitations to a large number of conferences, events and gatherings each year; this was one of them.”

Clifford added: “I am not attending the conference. The list being circulated is (as far as I understand it) an invite list rather than an attendee list.”

Clifford also linked the Guardian to International Business Times reporting on his Dialog listing.

Tech and business

Beyond the founders – Thiel and Auren Hoffman, who chairs the group – the directory is heavy with business figures closest to the current administration. They include trillionaire and former “Doge” supremo Elon Musk; Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and foreign policy envoy, now running the Gulf-backed Affinity Partners; Joe Lonsdale, the Palantir co-founder and prominent Maga-aligned venture capitalist; the former Google chief Eric Schmidt; and the investor and All-In host Chamath Palihapitiya.

It also names a row of sitting corporate chiefs: Greg Brockman, the president of OpenAI (and Jason Kwon, its chief strategy officer); Neal Mohan, the chief executive of YouTube; Vas Narasimhan, the chief executive of Novartis; Thasunda Brown Duckett of the pension giant TIAA.

Other names come from the world of media and entertainment, including Ezra Klein and Bret Stephens, the New York Times columnists; the podcaster and author Sam Harris; and the actor Joseph Gordon-Levitt, who is married to former OpenAI board member Tasha McCauley and has recently campaigned to repeal the statute that protects online publishers from liability for content posted by users. Also on the list is the longevity entrepreneur Peter Attia, who this year had a short-lived tenure at Bari Weiss’s revamped CBS News before resigning over his correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein.

Levitt confirmed to media outlets that he had attended two Dialog events.

Epstein invitation

Founded around 2005–06, Dialog maintains a paid, tiered membership with a nominations pipeline, an executive director – Raffi Grinberg – and, for a period, a managing director in Simone Collins , half of the pronatalist couple at the centre of a Silicon Valley movement previously reported on in the Guardian .

Archived versions of an earlier Dialog site show member directories stretching back to 2006 and regional “Around the Table” dinners in several cities. The group is now building a permanent campus in the Washington suburbs, and this year’s retreat is reported to be set for 12–16 August at a hotel outside Dublin.

The 2014 invitation shows Hoffman asking Jeffrey Epstein to that year’s retreat – alongside Tony Blair, Hillary Clinton and Henry Kravis – adding Dialog to the long list of elite institutions that courted the financier after his conviction, a milieu the Guardian has previously reported on . It is not known whether Epstein attended.

Wedel, the professor, said: “What we’re seeing is how all of these [elites] come together, help each other out and absolutely play above the rules. They’re not beholden to the rules the rest of us are subjected to.

“The participants are secret, the agendas and the conversations are secret – and people can get away with shaping opinion that is in their interest but may be absolutely contrary to the interests of you and me.”

US treasury chief urged Trump not to host ‘Mr Bean on crack’ Zelenskyy, book says | Trump administration | The Guardian

Keyword – US news
Trefwoorden – Trump administration, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, US foreign policy, US news, US politics, Ukraine, Europe
Title – US treasury chief urged Trump not to host ‘Mr Bean on crack’ Zelenskyy, book says | Trump administration | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/martin-pengelly
Link – US treasury chief urged Trump not to host ‘Mr Bean on crack’ Zelenskyy, book says | Trump administration | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-20T13:00:02.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/20/scott-bessent-volodymyr-zelenskyy-trump

Scott Bessent, the US treasury secretary, advised Donald Trump not to host Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office, having called the Ukrainian president a “little fucker”, a “special-needs child” and “Mr Bean on crack”, according to a new book.

The suggestion that a US cabinet official described a world leader in such terms is included in Regime Change, a blockbusting account of the second Trump administration by New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan, set to be published worldwide on Tuesday.

News of Bessent’s alleged remarks may embarrass the Trump administration, although the meeting that did take place on 28 February 2025 proved outright disastrous, as Trump and JD Vance blasted Zelenskyy for not being grateful for aid in his fight against Russian invaders, and for not wearing a suit.

The issue of aid to Ukraine remains at the fore, and was discussed at the G7 summit in France earlier this week.

“Several Trump aides had been worried” about the potential for a blow-up when Zelenskyy came to the White House, ostensibly to seal a minerals deal drafted by Bessent, Swan and Haberman write. Then-national security adviser Mike Waltz “tried – unsuccessfully – to get the message across that Zelenskyy should come wearing a suit”, they continue. “Bessent had strongly recommended to Trump that he not even allow Zelenskyy into the White House before he had signed” the deal.

“‘I’ve dealt with this little fucker,’ Bessent would say to associates about Zelenskyy,” according to the book. “‘He’s tricky. He’s like the special-needs child for the Europeans. And he’s acting like Mr Bean on crack.”

The treasury department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Zelenskyy did come, and Bessent was in the room as Vance carpeted their visitor. “Others present could see that Vance was steadily turning red,” Haberman and Swan write, as Zelenskyy’s insistence on pushing for security guarantees “began to sound to Vance like impertinence and ingratitude”.

Things went south from there.

After the disastrous meeting, Bessent told Bloomberg that Zelenskyy scored “one of the great diplomatic own goals”, adding: “I was shocked, shocked that President Zelenskyy would come into the Oval Office, behave like this, speak to the president, speak to the vice-president, but more importantly, disrespect the American people like this.”

Regime Change also contains alleged details of Bessent’s unsuccessful handling of the minerals deal. Prior to the Oval Office fiasco, the treasury secretary visited Kyiv to press Zelenskyy to sign. It did not go well.

“For 45 minutes, the men berated each other,” Swan and Haberman write. “Bessent had only been on the job for a few days, and already he had gotten into a shouting match with the leader of a country in the middle of a war. Finally he looked at Zelensky and said: ‘What the fuck do you want to do?’”

Negotiations are said to have stalled while Bessent battled the commerce secretary Howard Lutnick over how the deal should be worded. Eventually, Swan and Haberman write, “Trump asked JD Vance’s wife, Usha, also a Yale Law School graduate, to review the Ukrainian edits to the minerals deal. She declared the document ‘awful’, and [took] a heavy pencil to it.”

Most embarrassing for Bessent, however, may be his reported view of Trump himself, whom he is said to have compared to perhaps the greatest progressive boogeyman in many Republican minds.

Bessent told associates “Trump reminded him … of his old boss, the legendary investor and major Democratic donor George Soros”, according to the book. “‘They are the same animal,’ Bessent said.”

Tell us your favourite film of 2026 so far | Film | The Guardian

Keyword – Film
Trefwoorden – Film, Culture
Title – Tell us your favourite film of 2026 so far | Film | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/guardian-community-team
Link – Tell us your favourite film of 2026 so far | Film | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-18T07:32:27.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/jun/18/tell-us-your-favourite-film-of-2026-so-far

The Guardian’s film writers have compiled their favourite films of the year so far – and we’d like to hear about yours, too.

Which films have captured your imagination this year? Are there any new releases from so far in 2025 that you would recommend watching?

Tell us your nomination and why you like it below.

If you’re having trouble using the form click here . Read terms of service here and privacy policy here .

Man charged after suspected anti-Muslim attacks across Edinburgh | Scotland | The Guardian

Keyword – UK news
Trefwoorden – Scotland, UK news
Title – Man charged after suspected anti-Muslim attacks across Edinburgh | Scotland | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/nadeembadshah
Link – Man charged after suspected anti-Muslim attacks across Edinburgh | Scotland | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-21T00:30:54.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jun/20/counter-terrorism-officers-investigate-after-five-injured-in-violent-incidents-in-edinburgh

Police Scotland said a man was charged after a series of attacks in Edinburgh on Friday night that are being treated as potential anti-Muslim hate crimes.

Counter-terrorism officers were brought in to investigate the attacks in which five people were injured.

A 36-year-old white Scottish man was arrested on Friday. The force added late on Saturday night: “A 36-year-old man has been charged in connection with a number of incidents which took place in Edinburgh on Friday, 19 June, 2026. A report has been submitted to the Procurator Fiscal, and the individual will appear at court in due course.”

Police said there was no further threat to the public.

Officers were called to the Sighthill area of the city, where two men were injured, at about 8.50pm on Friday. They were taken to Edinburgh Royal Infirmary by ambulance.

The Scottish Association of Mosques said two worshippers were attacked in a park after leaving the Broomhouse mosque.

Reports then came in to police about incidents around shops in the west and north of the city. The force said that during this period three other men were allegedly attacked in the Telford Road and Leith Walk area.

Around 9.30pm, police equipped with Tasers confronted a suspect and, although a Taser was not discharged, the man was detained.

Posts on social media appeared to show a shirtless man carrying a long weapon roaming a street and battering a restaurant door in the Scottish capital.

Another video appeared to show the same man on the ground shouting about “protecting the country” while being held by a police officer.

Police said that five men, two aged 22, and others aged 24, 27 and 39, sustained a range of injuries and three needed hospital treatment though none of the injuries were life-threatening.

Keir Starmer posted on X: “Absolutely appalling. No one should face violence on our streets.

“The suspect appears to be motivated by anti-Muslim hatred. I will not tolerate this – he will face the full force of the law.

“My thoughts are with those who are injured and I thank the police and the emergency services for their response.”

Omar Afzal, director of public affairs for the Scottish Association of Mosques, told the Scotsman: “There is a profound sense of shock, alarm and anger within Muslim communities across Scotland today.

“These latest attacks are deeply disturbing. However, they do not exist in a vacuum. For years, Muslim communities have warned about the consequences of anti-Muslim hatred becoming normalised in public discourse. When prejudice is left unchallenged, it creates an environment in which some individuals feel emboldened to act on that hatred.”

Scotland’s first minister, John Swinney, said he was “deeply concerned” by the incidents. “There is no place for violence, racism or intolerance in our country,” he added.

The anti-Islamophobia non-profit Muslim Engagement and Development urged police to “treat this as what the evidence indicates: Islamophobic, far-right terror”.

Assistant chief constable Catriona Paton said: “I want to send a clear message of support to all our communities that there is no place for racism or faith-based hate in a Scotland which is at its best when we stand together.

“Officers responded to multiple reports of a fast-moving sequence of events across Edinburgh before arresting a man and public safety was our priority.

“Extensive work is ongoing to establish all the circumstances.

“We are being supported by counter-terrorism policing and working under the direction of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service.”

Police closed off Leith Walk on Friday evening as the incidents unfolded.

A major incident public portal has been set up to encourage members of the public to submit information directly to officers.

I called her Joybell, my soulmate since I was eight. Then her partner killed her and blew up their home | Violence against women and girls | The Guardian

Keyword – Society
Trefwoorden – Violence against women and girls, Friendship, Domestic violence, Society, Life and style
Title – I called her Joybell, my soulmate since I was eight. Then her partner killed her and blew up their home | Violence against women and girls | The Guardian
Author – Catherine Milne
Link – I called her Joybell, my soulmate since I was eight. Then her partner killed her and blew up their home | Violence against women and girls | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-21T11:00:30.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/jun/21/my-best-friend-killed-by-her-partner

I t is the summer of 2005, and we are staying on the sun-kissed shores of Busua, a coastal community in Ghana. The sand here is made of crushed pink shells. Annabel and I pick up handfuls and scrub our stained feet in the shallows. We’ve been wearing flip-flops for months, trailing through the rich red dust at the refugee settlement where we work. The Atlantic is rough and alive. Its tumbling motion and the wind are making me feel euphoric. Annabel is smiling to herself, too, and jumping in and out of waves.

“Mori,” she shouts, “it’s like being beaten up by an old friend!”

That afternoon in Ghana, her eyes are flashing turquoise. Her tan is deep, her nose freckly, her hair bleached at the ends with gold. We feel so free. So connected. To our purpose. To each other. We are lucky, privileged young women who want to make our precious lives count.

I didn’t know then I was storing up memories that would need to sustain me for the rest of my life. Because 12 months ago, Annabel was stabbed to death in her own living room by her partner, and the flame of my life went out.

I wake up shocked every morning now; to drink afresh the distilled version of the moment I first heard the news. Losing someone you love to senseless violence is the raw edge of the human experience, that can sometimes feel too deep for everyday life to hold. She was my first love. My life partner since I was eight years old. We are so tangled up together that I feel like part of me has been erased. I used to call her Joybell, because she made me so cheerful. She always called me Mori. I can’t remember why. On the day she died, my husband said: “I feel like you’ve lost your spouse.”

The cold hard facts spin around my head all day, every day, in a desperate attempt to make sense of them. But answers are nowhere to be found. Not in the evening when I look up at the sky for the brightest star. Not in the freezing water of London’s Hampstead ladies’ pond, where I jump in every week to feel brave. Not in the dream I have when she leans into my ear and whispers over and over, incredulous: “He killed me, Mori. He actually killed me.”

I might one day be able to accept she’s gone. But I’ll never be able to accept the way it happened.

W e met aged eight at a small private primary school, above a bookshop in Tufnell Park, north London. We were both a little different from the other alpha kids with successful parents. We were late developers, dyslexic, creative, tentative. We found each other and felt stronger as a unit.

We used to pull shiny pink ballet leotards over our woolly blue school tights and “ice skate” around her parents’ living room pretending to be Torvill and Dean. She always wanted to be Dean so she could lead. Fine by me – she always did anyway. Later on, we had a brilliant Dirty Dancing-style routine to Jennifer Rush’s The Power of Love. Now, I wish she had never heard that damn song. I don’t want her childish self to believe that her love is worth any form of sacrifice.

We became wild teenagers – staying out all night in the park, magic mushrooms, riding skateboards, boyfriends, dancing at the London club Whirl-Y-Gig, swimming in the Thames in nightdresses, jumping the fence and waking up at Glastonbury festival aged 15 with giant beads in our hair. It was a wild and beautiful young life. We were so lucky.

In our mid-20s in Ghana, we worked at the Buduburam refugee settlement with 42,000 people displaced by the Liberian war, with an African NGO called Children Better Way in partnership with the UNHCR, the UN refugee agency.

One weekend, all the other workers had gone away, so it was just us in what Annabel called the gingerbread house. We went to have our daily bucket bath in the lean-to cubicles at the back. It was so hot that day, and as we didn’t need to share the water, I suggested we get inside a water barrel each rather than just standing and scooping as we normally did. It felt so decadent and soothing. We chatted through the wooden slats about what was important to us and the sort of lives we hoped for.

We both wanted to be able to look back when we were old and say we had lived an unselfish, meaningful, love-filled life. To be creative and give something back. Joybell said it was wrong if people who really did care about other people did nothing about it. I remember thinking she had this clarity of purpose that was rare, especially in those so-called “selfish years – our 20s”.

On that Sunday morning, we went to a ramshackle church near our house. Everyone was in their best lappa-printed cloth, babies jiggled to singing and drums. We were so ashamed to be seen in our stained, old cotton shorts and T-shirts. Suddenly, all the women rose up and started dancing around the walls of the church and they grabbed our hands and made us join in. It aroused tears from us both. The women were so unjudgmental and welcoming to us, and grateful for all they had.

Our experience in Ghana shaped us. Years later, we would co-found the London-based MamaSuze community together – a grassroots organisation supporting women and mothers who are survivors of gender-based violence and displacement.

We both passionately believed access to the arts and creativity are integral to being human and can reach places that therapy can’t. We wanted to create something inclusive and holistic, which could support all aspects of women’s needs. Annabel poured everything into it. She was, by this point, an experienced community leader, radiating warmth, playfulness and compassion. Everyone who met her felt it and everyone who came to the community wanted to come back. We were well funded and took referrals from the main refugee charities. We were unique, offering expert-led, trauma-informed creative workshops to marginalised women, with the bonus of a well-staffed creche facility and travel money, so there were no barriers to attendance. Women who lived in extreme deprivation in asylum hotels and had no access to childcare could join every week and begin to build a life outside their daily struggles and trauma.

I used to meet Annabel before the group every Thursday at the coffee truck nearby. Flat white for her, latte for me. She always arrived first and would beam up at me as I approached. I loved watching her manoeuvre through life, making people smile, making people warm. We used to communicate silently. One look was all it took.

I had just arrived in Crete with some girlfriends for three days’ break from family life when it happened. Strolling the winding backstreets of Chania, pausing to capture photos of aged turquoise doors, of pink bougainvillea petals sprinkled on doormats, I didn’t know that she was begging for her life 2,000 miles away. I woke, restless, in the early hours and stumbled to the roof terrace to film the sunrise and the swifts dancing and shrieking with what seemed like joy. By then, she was already dead.

How could I let this happen to her? Why did I believe her when she told me it was all going to be OK? Why did I go to Greece and leave her behind?

I had shared my worst fear – that her partner could physically harm her – with my husband. “That won’t happen,” he said firmly, reassuring. Because Annabel and I worked closely with vulnerable women, we knew that leaving a relationship was statistically the most dangerous time. I was worried enough that I had raised it with her and we had discussed it on the phone. “I know that, Mori,” she said, tense and exasperated. But her voice was flat. She had said her guts were twisted with worry. I now think her body knew what her mind refused to accept: she was in danger.

The only real argument we had as adults was about him. I think it was 2013. We went out for dinner. I hadn’t seen her for a bit, as we lived in different neighbourhoods and I had baby twins. She told me he was moving into the house she owned. I said I thought she didn’t know him well enough, that they had to have more in common than just having a good time. She was upset with my bluntness and the evening never quite recovered. She was desperate to become a mother, and I think she felt time was running out.

After their first baby was born, she started expressing real doubts about his inability to love and show up as a parent, but she was always holding it together and they struggled on. She cherished her two children. He kept the minimum bases covered: he worked consistently as an electrician, was meticulously tidy, did his own washing, and liked cooking for the family. They had a group of shared local friends yet very different temperaments. But sometimes opposites can work.

He told her that his childhood had been filled with neglect and trauma. I think the compassionate side of her, which cared so deeply about people and started MamaSuze, was also the side that felt great empathy towards him and all he had been through. She wanted to help him heal. She hoped that by loving him, giving the kids all the things he had missed, that he might flourish and the bond between them might just keep growing. During one of the last conversations we had about him, she castigated her younger self for her naivety.

He killed her on a Monday evening. He had been away partying all weekend with a group of guys in Barcelona. He knew their relationship was in dire straits – a week before, she’d told him they should separate, and he had seemed to agree. She messaged me saying she planned to avoid him all day and not bring up their relationship until he got over the hangover and was back at work. That morning, she cycled to a meeting I had set up about an Afghan women’s project we were planning. Her brother lived on the same street and she decided to work on her laptop at his kitchen table.

She pottered-off to pick up her kids from after-school club and then went home. I’ve heard that they were arguing. She put their children to bed and he wanted to talk. He wanted her to sell the house and give him half. She planned to help him financially, but she did not want to move and uproot the children. It ended with him punching her repeatedly in the face and trying to strangle her. She screamed, the neighbours heard it. He then left her injured in the sitting room and went to the kitchen to get a knife from the drawer. The rest doesn’t bear description.

When the police and ambulance arrived in the early hours of Tuesday morning, they found her on her sitting room floor where she had lain dead for hours. He had attempted to kill himself with a knife and then tried to spark a gas explosion. Eventually he succeeded.

Her pretty bay windows had blown out, the white shutters in splinters on the pavement. The sound of the explosion was so loud it woke up the whole street, including Annabel’s brother and his family. Her children had run away to a friend’s house nearby.

I went to her house a few days later. As we pulled up outside I had an out-of-body experience – watching myself struck dumb by the sight of her lovely home in that state of devastation. A massive lump formed in my throat that I could feel for six weeks afterwards. I knew I wanted to react in my truest emotional form – to exorcise it, not be poleaxed in shock. It felt performative, but important. On the drive home, I did some anguished screaming and shouting, followed by much heartbroken weeping. I can’t remember if it made me feel any better. But I’m pleased I did it.

I must be very firm about not blaming myself. I know it’s not my fault, and yet … of course, I could have done more. The truth is, I always felt I was treading a line. I was honest with her, always, but I also didn’t want to appear too harsh or judgmental. I wanted her to keep talking to me. I didn’t want her to be isolated. I used to repeat: “I don’t know what you are waiting for – there is never going to be a good time to leave him.” These words will echo around my head for ever. I remember saying to her a month or so before the end: “I would never, ever let a man speak to me like that.” Did she finally stand up to him, with my words ringing in her ears? Is that why he killed her? My head knows ruminating on these words is pointless now, but my heart can’t forget.

Friends tell me they had no idea how awful her life was. This makes me so upset, because it really wasn’t. She loved her life and she lived it so well. My mum used to say she had the happy gene. This was the woman who had hosted a wonderful birthday buffet party not two months earlier, when everyone had sat in the sunny garden and worn a silly hat. The girl who had once stood on the table to make an impromptu speech at her 18th birthday dinner and fallen off, to be caught by adoring boys. Who was fascinated by history and art, and was beginning to get into gardening. Who loved live music and people, and had a multitude of friends. She applied the same energy to her working life, cycling all over London to back-to-back meetings, writing excellent funding applications into the night, making meaningful partnerships and connections. She was effervescent. She was determined. She was powerful. She was not a victim.

Yes, her relationship with him was deteriorating. Yes, there was stonewalling, coldness, isolation, cruelty. But with him, the violence had not been physical but emotional. It resided in the silences, the contemptuous remarks, the degrees of separation between them and the void that grew as she realised who he really was. The loss of control over her that he felt when she said she was leaving him is, we believe, one of the reasons he killed her.

But she was beginning the process of flourishing in deep and profound ways. She was becoming more discerning and making bold steps forward, the first of which was asking him to move out. I was feeling so proud of her, so excited about the next stage. We had arranged a summer holiday to France, so my girls and I could be with her and her kids. In my birthday card she had written: “Here’s to embracing even more of ourselves and each other, always.” She wasn’t waiting to be rescued. She was rescuing herself.

I found a letter she had written to him that was never sent. It was so kind, so measured, so resigned, yet so forgiving. This was who she was – someone who was inherently generous and moral, who poured all her hopes into life, believing things could always be better than they were.

Yet her nature was exploited and she was destroyed for it.

D ay after day, I receive messages and phone calls from the women Annabel supported throughout her career. They are heartbroken at her death. She wasn’t just a community leader – she was a lifeline for isolated women who needed support, who needed someone to believe in them.

Her father went alone to her derelict home. This gentle, deeply moral man, sorted through her special things that survived the fire, bringing them back to his house, box by box. Her African paintings. Her collection of art books. Her wooden jewellery boxes and trinkets. Her makeup. Her colourful knitwear. The children’s toys.

Her kids have lost both parents and their home. The incredible outpouring of love for them has been a tonic, a testament to the quality of her relationships with people. But still the ripples of destruction spread outward, wounding everyone who loved her. Her life was a universe, now shattered into a thousand shards.

Because she was murdered by the man she lived with, it felt like an attack on all of us at MamaSuze. On the safe space for women we’d created together, on everything we’d spent years building. I will never forget the psychotherapist we work with describing it as “an attack from within”. I now think Annabel’s role as a revered women’s group leader exacerbated her partner’s desire to control and destroy her. He could not stand how loved and celebrated she was. He could not stand her independence. Her success. Her lack of reliance on him. He hated women that he could not dominate.

Annabel’s death left me reeling, not just for myself but for the women in our group, many of whom were already survivors of male violence. How could I continue providing a supportive space for vulnerable women who effectively have been retraumatised by our organisation, when I could barely stand upright myself? How could I keep MamaSuze alive when its co-founder was dead?

The answer, I’m learning, is in tentative, curious steps forward and lots of time to reflect. The continuity of coming back together is an act of resistance. The women in the group all want to support me and Annabel’s mother, who comes to the group every week. It has felt like a role reversal, but we now have more in common than ever before. One woman from Afghanistan told me that she was used to stories like this from her homeland but never imagined it could happen in London. Most of the women knew of women who had been murdered in their countries. We are facing the reality that there are no safe spaces. It has been a struggle at times to keep the upbeat essence of the organisation and not let it deteriorate into a bereavement support group. We have found that getting physical and faking it a little helps. We sing, we dance, we laugh, we do clowning workshops. We make bright colourful art. Our joy is visceral and resides alongside our tears.

The irony of supporting traumatised women and then being deeply traumatised myself is not lost on me. I recognise now that, before her death, the capacity I had for holding the space for women came, in part, from my privilege and psychological strength at not having really suffered.

I will never forgive Annabel’s murderer. But I will also not hold on to the hate he perpetrated and let it destroy me, or worse, spread. His contempt for women and lack of respect for her right to a life, for her children’s right to have a mother, for her parents’ right to have their daughter, for all of us who loved her – is unfathomable. But he wasn’t born this way. Yes, he suffered abuse as a child, but he could have sought help and thought about the impact his life could make. He was emboldened by society and his peers. Of course, there are men who try hard not to let sexism or misogyny go unchecked. But it also seems there are plenty of men without the courage or emotional intelligence to question what surrounds them – to stand up for women in tiny, everyday moments.

Men and boys’ lives also suffer greatly when women and girls are abused. Women can’t do this alone. What can we change in our society so that some men don’t feel so entitled, so arrogant and so embittered that they kill us? How can men be encouraged to explore these deep-rooted problems, yet still be allowed to feel like men? Annabel’s brother-in-law has started a men’s group. Her little brother sings his heart out in a choir set up for men affected by her death. More of this would be good.

Femicide affects women from all social spheres, across all definitions. Where is the collective outrage? These atrocities happen every week in the UK. In the month when it happened to us – June 2025 – 11 other women were killed by men around the country. A total of 113 women were killed by men in 2025 . Violence against women and girls is now accelerating . We can’t change anything if we don’t acknowledge there’s a cultural problem first.

His denial of what he so evidently did wasn’t just cowardly, it was callous – dragging us through the emotional warfare of a long and costly trial. In court, Annabel’s younger sister and I scoured his face for signs of remorse, for even a quiver of guilt about what he had done. But we couldn’t even sense regret. He seemed to have swallowed his own narrative that he was the victim and she was the perpetrator.

Court 1 at Snaresbrook is surprisingly intimate. When, giving evidence, he referred to me in relation to something Annabel had said, the sound of my name in his mouth made me shudder – but it really wasn’t how I thought it would be. For months leading up to the trial, I thought I would feel rage when I saw him; I wanted to see his face and stare him down. But on seeing him I just felt such sadness. There wasn’t even any satisfaction in watching him squirm under cross examination. Just near pity. He must truly hate himself, to do what he did.

On the way to court to wait for the verdict, I was panicking. I counted 12 people in my train carriage and thought about how random it was that a collection of the same number of strangers on the jury would decide the outcome of something that meant so much to us.

I started to prepare myself for the worst, as a not-guilty verdict would shift my world on its axis and I felt I would never have faith in humanity again. When the jury came in after only a few hours’ deliberation and the foreman declared him guilty, he looked him straight in the face. We all exhaled collectively in the public gallery and wept. But it was an empty win. All I felt was, “OK, that’s over, so can we have her back now, please?”

Compared with many of the women at MamaSuze, I feel lucky to live in a country where the criminal justice system can crank into action and many crimes against women are not left unpunished. Our justice system isn’t perfect, of course, but it was there for us when we needed it, and it worked. However, I do wonder if the tariff for domestic homicides needs to be increased. He was given life with a minimum term of 23 years because he killed her at home. That would have been much longer had he killed her in the street.

W hat I find most agonising, when I think about that night, is that I can’t tell Annabel that everything has worked out OK. As she died, she must have felt such anguish for her children and what was going to happen to them. Sometimes, I allow myself to imagine that I can reach her, hold her in my arms in that moment, and soothe her, telling her everything’s going to be all right: because violence reverberates, but love does much more; because her wonderful kids live on, her blood pumping in their veins; that they adore their new family and have a good new life; that they still make us laugh and are as entertaining and warm as she was; that her parents and siblings are coping as best they can and trying to rebuild their lives; that MamaSuze is going strong and the women who come still feel supported and joyful. So nothing she did, nothing she was, nothing she created, was ever or will ever be wasted. She led a meaningful life full of love and nobody can ever take that truth away.

I’m not a religious person, but I feel Annabel’s energy woven into the fabric of this beautiful universe: in the warmth she added to rooms; in the chemical bonds of every breath she exhaled; in the memory-forged tapestries of every brain she touched. Energy persists. Nothing is lost, only transformed. Am I transforming, too? Into what? I must accept I don’t know yet.

I gaze up at the full moon rising near my house. I’ve escaped my teenagers and climbed up the hill to lie on a bench. The dog lies guarding me nearby. Suddenly, I am back in Camden Town, where I grew up, outside the tube station, circa 1998. I’m waiting in the snow to meet her. The ground is sparkling. A Rasta wearing a big, brown crocheted hat is banging a djembe.

“You are waiting for the moon lady?” he asks me.

“Yep,” I say. “I am.”

And then she comes, sweeping out of the station, in a long patchwork skirt, her trademark black eye makeup twinkling, dangly earrings, lustrous hair, radiant, moonlike face. Total Joybell.

“Here she is,” he says. “Moon Lady, meet Earth Girl.”

We both laugh with him. It’s just a Camden Town moment. But now, years later, perhaps it makes sense.

If you or someone you know is experiencing domestic violence, call the UK national helpline on 0808 2000 247, or visit womensaid.org.uk . In the US, the domestic violence hotline is 1-800-799-SAFE (7233). In Australia, the national family violence counselling service is on 1800 737 732. Other international helplines may be found via befrienders.org .

Catherine Milne is the co-founder of MamaSuze , a community organisation supporting women who are survivors of forced displacement and gender-based violence .

‘It’s Russian roulette’: alarm as Europe backs critical minerals mines in water-stressed regions | Mining | The Guardian

Keyword – Environment
Trefwoorden – Mining, Water, Drought, European Commission, European Union, Environment, Business, Europe, World news
Title – ‘It’s Russian roulette’: alarm as Europe backs critical minerals mines in water-stressed regions | Mining | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/rachel-salvidge
Link – ‘It’s Russian roulette’: alarm as Europe backs critical minerals mines in water-stressed regions | Mining | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-20T06:00:03.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jun/20/europe-backs-critical-minerals-mines-water-stressed-regions

The European Commission plans to rewrite the EU’s flagship water protection law to speed up the development of critical minerals mines, despite many being located in drying and water-stressed regions, analysis has found.

Mining is a water-intensive industry, requiring large volumes of water for ore processing, dust suppression, waste management and mine dewatering. While modern projects recycle water, they still require significant amounts, and in water-stressed regions those demands can add to pressure on already stretched rivers, aquifers and water supplies.

Analysis and mapping by Watershed Investigations, shared with the Guardian, found that more than half of the 33 planned new or expanded mines designated as “strategic projects” under the EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act are located in areas that have been drying over the past two decades, according to Nasa satellite data.

Nearly half are in zones that experienced drought conditions in the past three months, according to EU data, and a quarter are in regions deemed water-stressed.

Six of the strategic mines are planned for highly water-stressed areas in Spain, with others in Portugal and Greece. All three countries rank among the top 10 EU nations with the worst water scarcity, according to the European Environment Agency.

In 2024, the Spanish region of Catalonia declared a state of emergency over its worst ever drought, and water-use restrictions were imposed in Andalucía. In 2022, 96% of Portugal was experiencing “extreme” or “severe” drought conditions, according to the EU’s Earth observation programme.

Some projects have already sparked fierce opposition. The environmental organisation Ecologistas en Acción is challenging the European Commission’s decision to grant strategic project status to all six Spanish mines, arguing that it failed to properly consider risks to water resources, biodiversity and protected areas.

Global demand for critical minerals has tripled since 2010 as countries race to build artificial intelligence infrastructure, electric vehicles, renewable energy technologies and defence systems. It is expected to more than double again by 2030, with graphite, lithium and cobalt need projected to rise nearly 500% by 2050 from 2020 levels.

Concerned about its dependence on imports, the EU designated 47 mining, processing and recycling projects as “strategic projects”, including 33 mines. The designation puts projects within the EU on a fast track through permitting processes and is designed to accelerate development. Those located outside the bloc will gain political backing and potential access to EU funding.

In a move that has alarmed environmental groups, Brussels is also preparing to revise the water framework directive (WFD), the EU’s key law protecting rivers, groundwater and wetlands, with the stated aim of removing permitting bottlenecks and improving access to strategic minerals.

Euromines, the trade association for Europe’s mining and metals industry, has been pushing for these changes. It wants longer deadlines for countries to meet water quality targets, amendments to how the WFD’s “no deterioration” rule is applied to water bodies, and greater legal certainty for mining and other industrial projects.

Environmental groups fear the proposed changes could weaken protections but the industry body rejects this suggestion and insists it is “not a licence to pollute”.

A Euromines spokesperson said: “Our overarching priority remains constructive engagement with policymakers to ensure strong environmental safeguards alongside legal clarity and predictability for permitting authorities.”

The European Commission defended its choice of mines, saying the strategic projects were assessed by independent experts and must comply with EU environmental law. A spokesperson said the WFD review would consider ways to improve access to critical raw materials while protecting the environment and human health, with environmental and water impact assessments carried out by national authorities.

But Sara Johansson, a water policy manager at the European Environmental Bureau, called the plans reckless. She said the mining industry had “not presented a shred of evidence” that the WFD was creating bottlenecks for mining projects.

“Dismantling those protections undermines Europe’s water resilience and leaves taxpayers, farmers and communities to pay – both with their health and their wallets,” Johansson said.

Prof Kaveh Madani, the director of the United Nations University Institute for Water , Environment and Health, also warned against removing protections. “The safeguards now being portrayed as obstacles are already fragile and full of gaps. Removing them may be celebrated as efficiency today, but history may judge it as recklessness tomorrow,” he said.

He added: “Fast-tracking mining in water-stressed regions by weakening safeguards is a form of Russian roulette. It may look like an economic booster in the short term, but one serious failure in the wrong location can neutralise many of the promised gains – especially when the damage to people, rivers, aquifers and ecosystems is long-lasting or irreversible.”

Several companies contacted disputed suggestions their projects would place undue pressure on water resources. They pointed to environmental assessments, closed-loop water recycling systems, monitoring programmes and regulatory oversight designed to minimise risks.