How Arteta overcame setbacks, crises and boos to defy doubters at Arsenal

Mikel Arteta
How Arteta overcame setbacks, crises and boos to defy doubters at Arsenal
Rob Draper
Wed 20 May 2026 18.07 CESTLast modified on Thu 21 May 2026 06.10 CEST
News
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/may/20/mikel-arteta-arsenal-overcame-setbacks-crises-boos-defy-doubters

I t didn’t start well for Mikel Arteta and Arsenal. On a crisp December night in 2019 at about 1am in a Manchester suburb, Vinai Venkatesham stepped out of Arteta’s home. The Arsenal managing director looked around, satisfied with his meeting. Arteta had just outlined a “hugely impressive” five-year plan to rebuild a club reeling from Arsène Wenger’s departure and Unai Emery’s failed succession. Venkatesham stepped into his car and was driven away with his colleague Huss Fahmy.

The club were about to take a huge gamble, but one with which they were increasingly comfortable. For many Arsenal executives, Arteta had won the interview round in 2018 when Wenger left. Yet it seemed too much to ask a 36-year-old rookie to manage a seismic transition and Emery had pedigree and experience; Arteta had charisma and a strong playing record.

Now Venkatesham was pushing Arteta as the principal candidate to replace Emery. It was important not to antagonise Manchester City , where he was Pep Guardiola’s assistant. Discretion was essential. Which was why Venkatesham was puzzled to be woken early that morning by a phone call from Arsenal’s media chief telling him to look at the Sun. The first he knew he had been photographed leaving Arteta’s house was when the images were published online. It was, to put it mildly, an embarrassment. There was “displeasure” from City, said one source. “Noises were made at boardroom level.”

Arteta, who was announced as head coach a week later after several days of somewhat fraught negotiations, could have joined Arsenal’s staff when he quit as a player in 2016 . But even some at the club told him that joining Guardiola at City would be “the equivalent of a master’s degree in coaching”.

The prognosis for the new Arsenal manager did not look promising when he stepped out at Bournemouth on Boxing Day for his first game. His five-year plan outlined how the club had fallen behind. He and the sporting director, Edu, wanted to rebuild a squad of 22 high-quality, tactically flexible players. For that they needed money, which is where Arteta fits Napoleon’s maxim of requiring “lucky generals”.

“It was much better to be the manager that followed the manager who succeeded Wenger,” said one source. Even more fortuitously, his arrival came two transfer windows after the Kroenke family had finally bought out the 30% stake of the now-sanctioned Russian-Uzbek oligarch Alisher Usmanov. The Kroenkes had always said they would invest when they had full control; most assumed that was deflection yet it turned out to be true. “Mikel had money Unai and even Arsène didn’t really have,” said a former employee.

“It was the perfect storm in that you had a really driven young manager, bright, well-schooled, ambitious and enthusiastic. You’ve got the money and you had a board that gave him time,” said one former senior employee at the club who was close to Arteta. “He told them it would take five years.”

All the senior Arsenal sources spoken to for this article have praised the Kroenke family and some pointed to the more active involvement of Josh Kroenke, the 46-year-old son of the patriarch Stan, as a key player at that point. “I had the impression he persuaded the board to pull the emergency cord on funding,” said one.

FA Cup and Community Shield wins in Arteta’s first eight months were somewhat overshadowed by Covid restrictions, before a terrible 2020-21 season meant Arteta looked doomed to outsiders. “There were never internal discussions about that,” said a source familiar with board meetings at the time. However, in December 2020, Arsenal lost 2-1 at Everton , a run of seven Premier League games without a win, five of which were defeats. They then lost a Carabao Cup tie 4-1 at home to Manchester City before Chelsea came to the Emirates. Arteta’s intensity is extreme even in good times; this looked like terminal pressure.

“They looked poor at Everton,” said one executive. “His future wasn’t being discussed, but I feared for him.”

The board did not waver. Arsenal beat Chelsea 3-1 on Boxing Day to relieve immediate pressure and although Arteta struggled and finished eighth that season he remained backed to the hilt, evident by the departure of Mesut Özil in January 2021. “That was totemic,” said one source. “It cost the club a lot of money [to pay up his contract], but they backed Mikel’s judgment.”

Arteta had made clear there were certain characters he would not tolerate; Özil’s friend Shkodran Mustafi left in the same window. A line had been drawn and when Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang attempted to cross it a year later he, too, was sold, even though Arsenal were in a race for Champions League places and desperate for his goals.

A key scene in the Amazon Prime documentary that chronicled the 2021-22 season was Rob Holding and Mohamed Elneny discussing Aubameyang’s departure. “Boss had balls,” says Elneny. “Yeah, boss had balls,” agrees Holding. The message had landed.

That said, the 2021-22 season started shambolically, Arsenal losing at promoted Brentford, to Chelsea at home to jeers and boos, then 5-0 at City, with Granit Xhaka sent off and indiscipline a clear problem. Insiders say Arteta did not waver. “Mikel is not the type of person to get overwhelmed about anything,” said one senior member of the football staff. “He’s very driven and very solid in his mind. There were difficult times and then obviously Arsenal had invested massively. But the Kroenkes deserve credit.”

Arteta has left his own distinctive stamp of the club – he is most definitely the manager not head coach, a development Arsenal initially wanted to avoid in the post-Wenger era to avoid the personality-cult syndrome – but was also bequeathed building blocks of a first-class side.

William Saliba had been signed by a scouting team subsequently dismantled by Edu, and Arteta almost lost him, sending him away on loan, unimpressed, until he was persuaded to take him back; a deal for Gabriel Magalhães had been put in place by the same scouts and he arrived in September 2020; and he had Bukayo Saka coming through from the academy.

No one at Arsenal doubts the significance of the summer of 2023 in making the step from good to great: the £200m spent to bring in Declan Rice, Kai Havertz, Jurriën Timber and David Raya indicated not only an intent to take on nation-state funded teams. It also showed Arteta’s charisma was a key part of a recruitment success story, with Rice rejecting Chelsea, Manchester United and City. “The project seemed more exciting and I believe we’re on to big things here,” he said.

Over the past couple of seasons, Rice might have privately questioned that. Now his words look uncannily prescient.

Struggling with the nine times table? I have a failsafe method

Mathematics
Struggling with the nine times table? I have a failsafe method
Adrian Chiles
Thu 21 May 2026 12.00 CESTLast modified on Thu 21 May 2026 12.09 CEST
News
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/may/21/struggling-with-the-nine-times-table-i-have-a-failsafe-method

M aths was never my thing. I quite enjoyed it at O-level, to the extent that I chose to do it at A-level. As early as the first week of the A-level course, however, it became abundantly clear that the subject was quite beyond me. I simply couldn’t make head or tail of what the teacher was on about.

Looking around at the rest of the class quietly getting on with it, I remember wondering if there had been some primer course over the summer that everyone but me had attended. I just didn’t get it. There didn’t seem to be any certainties any more, rarely anything so straightforward as a right or wrong answer. There were enough grey areas in my other subjects – English and history. From my maths I wanted certainty, objective truth, which as far as I could see wasn’t part of it any more.

Where were the times tables, for example? I’d nailed those good and proper at a very early age. In ascending order of difficulty I would rate them as follows: two, 10, five, 11, three, four, six, eight, seven and 12. You’ll notice that the nine times table does not feature on this list. Why? Well, I found it too easy. It was my speciality. But that’s because I was cheating – or so it felt – as someone had showed me a quick trick with which to nail the nines, as it were.

For this reason, I was fascinated to read that in an analysis of times tables answers by primary school children, it was ones that involved the number nine that were most often wrong. They’re not the only ones. When the then school standards minister Nick Gibb announced the rollout of national multiplication tests in 2018, he refused to attempt 8×9 on ITV’s Good Morning Britain.

What’s the matter with everyone? Nines are easy! If you kind of cheat, like me.

What you do is this. Hold your hands up, palms facing you. If it’s 8×9 you’re interested in, just fold down the eighth digit from the left, which will be the middle finger of your right hand. Now count the number of digits still standing to the left of the one you’ve folded down. There will be seven. Now count the number still standing to the right of the one you’ve folded down. There will be two. And there’s your answer: 8×9=72. And it works for every digit , right up to 10×9.

After that, admittedly, I’m stumped. Thank God for calculators.

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster, writer and Guardian columnist

Jess Cartner-Morley on fashion: Posh Grandpa is fashion’s new main character

Fashion
Jess Cartner-Morley on fashion: Posh Grandpa is fashion’s new main character
Jess Cartner-Morley
Wed 20 May 2026 15.00 CESTLast modified on Wed 20 May 2026 17.06 CEST
News
https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2026/may/20/jess-cartner-morley-on-fashion-posh-grandpa-is-fashions-new-main-character

W elcome to the season of the Posh Grandpa, fashion’s newest main character. We’ve had Brat , we did Coastal Grandma , we loved Tomato Girl Summer . The world is pretty heavy right now, as you’ll have noticed, so any opportunity to lighten up is precious. The nonsense is the point.

Character dressing is style that makes you smile, but it’s not just that. There is infinitely more joy in these looks, however silly they are, than there is in aspiring to look rich and pretty, which is where the aesthetic centre of gravity of our culture swings back to again and again. The esoteric sides of fashion’s personality capture something important about style, which is that it needs a bit of friction to make it interesting. The pebble in the boot, the surprise to snag the eye. This is where the magic happens.

I am all in with Posh Grandpa dressing, and not just for the lols, although I am also very much enjoying the spectacularly ridiculous vibe name. This is exactly how I want to dress most of the time. Slip-on shoes? Check. Comfy trousers? Copy that. Henley button-ups, or maybe a sensible quarter-zip? All over it.

Taking inspiration from menswear is the oldest trick in the chic woman’s playbook, but if streetwear was about dressing like an adolescent boy and normcore was a nod to the dads, Posh Grandpa is retro and refined.

If you want to know where fashion is going next, the best place to look is not the catwalk but vintage stores and car boot sales. Vintage shoppers are the most fashion-forward demographic, so what they are wearing now you’ll be wearing in a year or so. The look is Harry Styles, A$AP Rocky and David Hockney. It is Timothée Chalamet in Marty Supreme and Cillian Murphy in Peaky Blinders . It is Alexa Chung in a perfect navy crewneck sweater, and Bella Freud in a trouser suit.

This look is mellow but never dull. Muted colours and classic cuts are undercut by a sly sense of humour. You can play it straight, all soft tailoring and thoughtful layering, or you can lean into the eccentricity. For evening, instead of the usual tropes of glamour – sparkle, skin – embrace camp and drama. Velvet trousers with a silky shirt. Possibly a smoking jacket? Keep the jewellery minimal, the hair simple: we want louche glamour not Dynasty power dressing.

But start, always, from the ground up. The right shoes will do a lot of the heavy lifting. Tasselled loafers are encouraged, as is shoe polish. If loafers feel too obvious, consider a slim lace-up jazz shoe. A velvet slipper, if you are feeling bold. From there, the silhouette builds itself quite naturally.

Trousers, crucially, not jeans. Denim is a little too blunt an instrument here, because you want something with drape: pleated fronts, a slightly higher waist, a leg that falls cleanly rather than clings. There is something marvellously liberating about a trouser that isn’t trying to be sexy. A Henley instead of a white T-shirt is a good starting point for layers on top – faintly old-timey, but also very modern-utility, especially under an overshirt. Or layer a shirt under a cardigan or a quarter-zip.

And then (this bit is important) you need to interrupt it with something modern that jolts the eye. A leather jacket thrown over the top is perfect to stop things from veering into pastiche. Or something as simple as a contemporary belt or a pair of angular sunglasses can shift the balance.

Beneath the tongue-in-cheek name and the nostalgic references, the Posh Grandpa trend speaks to a desire for comfort but also character. In a fashion landscape that can feel relentlessly polished, there is romance in a look that finds beauty in the slightly off-kilter. Instead of a fantasy of youth or wealth, it is an allure that leans on less obvious signifiers. Impeccable taste, a favourite armchair and great shoes? A life well-lived is always a good look.

Model: Fu at Milk Management. Hair and makeup: Delilah Blakeney using Hair by Sam McKnight and Charlotte Tilbury Styling assistant: Charlotte Gornall. Jacket , £69.99, Zara. Jumper , £49.99, John Lewis. Shirt , £29.90, Uniqlo. Trousers , £29.99, Zara. Shoes , £165, by Camper from Schuh. Chair , £199, John Lewis

Football fans: are you excited about the World Cup? We would like to hear from you

World Cup 2026
Football fans: are you excited about the World Cup? We would like to hear from you
Guardian community team
Thu 21 May 2026 11.00 CEST
News
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/may/21/football-fans-world-cup-we-would-like-to-hear-from-you

The men’s World Cup in the US, Mexico and Canada is nearly upon us, kicking off on 11 June.

Amid the excitement around the tournament, there has been controversy over Fifa’s ticketing process, the cost of travel, and security concerns for fans travelling to the US.

We would like to hear from football fans from around the world, including the host countries. Are you looking forward to the tournament? Have you made plans to go to matches? Or are you watching from home? And have you been following the storylines around this World Cup ? What do you think about them?

If you’re having trouble using the form click here . Read terms of service here and privacy policy here .

Don’t be scared of acid exfoliants – they can be gentler and better than scrubs

Women
Don’t be scared of acid exfoliants – they can be gentler and better than scrubs
Sali Hughes
Wed 20 May 2026 11.00 CEST
News
https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2026/may/20/dont-be-scared-of-acid-exfoliants-better-than-scrubs

The words “acid exfoliant” scare the bejesus out of those with more sensitive skin, but they can be a godsend in making texture more even and makeup smoother and more long-lasting.

In fact, a liquid containing the right blend of dead-skin-sloughing alpha or beta hydroxy acids will be infinitely more gentle, effective and even than those gritty physical scrub exfoliants many still reach for.

The influence of South Korea’s wildly popular milky toners, with their focus on hydration and skin-barrier protection, can be seen in a new crop of milky acid exfoliants. These combine sturdy skin-clearing acids with skin-softening, soothing ingredients to cushion the blow.

I love most things from US brand Naturium, but its recent launch of Multi Bright Milky Toner (£19), is a smash. This is a blend of exfoliating polyhydroxy acid gluconolactone (already gentler than most), azelaic acid (for uneven tone) and moisturising ingredients such as squalane, glycerin and rice bran oil that smooths and brightens.

It’s a great option for those who’ve previously craved the glow of glycolic acid toners, but have found them too tingly, harsh and/or reddening. (Sturdier skin more experienced with acid may instead wish to try Naturium’s matching serum , £26, which uses lactic and glycolic acids for more punch.) I’ve worn the toner a lot in recent weeks and found it to be as effective as any exfoliant, but with no sting in its tail.

Trinny Woodall is of the same mind. Her company Trinny London’s new Tiptoe In exfoliant (£36) is a milky non-watery serum, that is applied with hands straight after cleansing. Offered as a gentler alternative to the brand’s popular Reveal Yourself exfoliant, this uses gluconolactone to exfoliate, but also includes lactobionic, another polyhydroxy acid with a gentle touch. Add in humectant trehalose and you have a plumping, comfy layer that earns its keep throughout the day.

Sensitive skin doesn’t necessarily lack moisture, of course – oilier skins can be just as tetchy when it comes to harsh chemicals. The Ordinary’s Saccharomyces Ferment 30% Milky Toner (£12.40), is a gorgeous product at a brilliant price that’s equally suitable for dry and oily skins (and all types in between). A drenched cotton pad sweeps away dead skin and excess oil gently, without leaving even my dry skin parched.

I would use these products maybe four times a week, after cleansing, then increasing to daily use if all is calm.

Sánchez is loved everywhere – but not so much in Spain, say Andalusia’s voters. Can he pull off another comeback?

Pedro Sánchez
Sánchez is loved everywhere – but not so much in Spain, say Andalusia’s voters. Can he pull off another comeback?
María Ramírez
Thu 21 May 2026 06.00 CESTLast modified on Thu 21 May 2026 10.29 CEST
News
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/may/21/pedro-sanchez-loved-everywhere-not-so-much-spain-andalusia-voters-another-comeback

L ately, I often meet people outside Spain who praise the prime minister, Pedro Sánchez . In Britain, Italy or the US, friends, acquaintances or random people who learn I am Spanish offer admiring words about his positions on Gaza and Iran. It’s understandable.

Sánchez spoke out against Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump earlier and more forcefully than most European leaders did, with a powerful message on international law. And the Spanish leader has been one of the clearest and most effective advocates for immigration in one of the fastest-growing countries in the west.

Most Spaniards back Sanchez’s outspoken positions on Israel-Palestine and his economic case for immigration . So how can it be that his party, the centre-left PSOE, has just lost its fourth regional election in six months and appears headed for defeat in next year’s general election?

The results in Andalucía , the most populous region in Spain and one of the nation’s poorest, are particularly devastating for the socialists, who governed there for almost 40 years. The party’s first prime minister after Franco’s death, Felipe González, is from the regional capital, Seville, and the PSOE’s national successes in the 1980s were deeply rooted in Andalucía. On Sunday, María Jesús Montero, a former minister in Sánchez’s government, delivered the party’s worst result in the region since the restoration of democracy in Spain, securing just 22.7% of the vote – about half the tally the party was securing at elections in the 2000s .

The beneficiary of the socialists’ defeat is not just their traditional opponent, the centre-right Partido Popular (PP), but the far-right Vox, because the PP’s insufficient majority means it will need Vox support to govern. The PP’s own national corruption scandals and public health service mismanagement saw Andalucían president Juanma Moreno lose seats on Sunday too. Meanwhile the leftist, regionalist Adelante Andalucía emerged as the other unexpected winner of the election, going from two seats to eight .

The socialists’ result in Andalucía can partly be explained by local factors, such as the popularity of a mild-mannered conservative president and voter resentment toward a PSOE candidate perceived to have been parachuted in from the national government. But it’s also another sign of Sánchez’s weakening position.

The PP has been leading the national polls for more than a year now, amid corruption scandals involving former socialist officials and even Sánchez’s wife, who has been charged in a legal case brought against her by a far-right group – she denies any wrongdoing. And only this week, another major scandal involving a socialist grandee has emerged: a judge has put former prime minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero under investigation for alleged influence peddling. He too denies any wrongdoing.

All this is unfolding in a context in which every aspect of public life in Spain is hyper-partisan and highly contested. Even judges and journalists are increasingly drawn into political conflict, and it is often difficult to clarify the basic facts of any issue. The natural attrition that comes after eight years in power is another explanation for Sánchez’s declining popularity during a period in which so many incumbent governments have been struggling.

In Spain, the decline in trust in politicians and institutions is often fuelled by this constant confrontation between parties. This dynamic tends to demobilise voters, particularly on the left, as the Andalucían results suggest. Even the recent outbreak of hantavirus became an excuse for acrimonious political squabbles. After the Spanish government allowed the affected cruise ship, the MV Hondius, to dock in the Canary Islands , every aspect of the episode turned into a partisan spat, from (imaginary) infected rats swimming ashore to the World Health Organization’s response.

The irony is that beneath the toxicity of Spanish political debate, the country’s economy remains strong. Growth continues to exceed expectations, driven by exports, services and immigration. Sure, the cost of living is a challenge in Spain, as it is elsewhere: house prices are soaring in major cities and salaries have been flat for several decades . But energy bills remain lower than in Germany, France, Italy or the UK, thanks to the country’s heavy investment in renewable energy. Meanwhile, public transport is clean, affordable and extensive – and life expectancy is among the highest in the world.

Immigration, mostly from Latin American countries, has made Spain a more diverse and open society than ever before, while also helping to sustain economic growth and offset demographic decline. The far right is now refocusing its messaging on immigration, but some conservative leaders are reluctant to join the backlash. In some cases, they’ve openly pushed back against Vox’s xenophobic rhetoric.

Sánchez’s calculus is that enough Spanish voters will look at what the new rightwing regional governments do in power and come back to PSOE. Administrations where Vox are a governing party have already changed policies on immigration, gender equality and even bike lanes.

Spain’s next general election must be held by August 2027. Pedro Sánchez could still pull off a comeback, as he has done several times before. But the increasing fragmentation of Spanish politics and the weakness of the parties to the PSOE’s left will make his path to victory far more difficult this time. He has just one year left to turn things around.

María Ramírez is a journalist and deputy managing editor of elDiario.es, a news outlet in Spain

All this talk about ‘difficult’ cuts, yet the largest part of Britain’s welfare bill is never mentioned. Why?

Pensions
All this talk about ‘difficult’ cuts, yet the largest part of Britain’s welfare bill is never mentioned. Why?
Zoe Williams
Thu 21 May 2026 09.00 CESTLast modified on Thu 21 May 2026 09.49 CEST
News
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/may/21/politicians-hard-choices-welfare-bill-pensions

N othing makes you feel more like a de-developing nation than being reprimanded by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Rachel Reeves can take solace in trace amounts from the fact that the IMF advised her only to “ stay the course ” on spending limits – whatever energy or inflation crises are down the line, she shouldn’t cave to demands for government support. Basically, “when the facts change, do not change your mind” – the opposite of the economists’ classic, but then, haven’t we all had enough of classics?

It’s a milder rebuke than the one delivered to the then chancellor, Kwasi Kwarteng, in 2022, about which the BBC’s economics editor, Faisal Islam, admitted “ even I was taken aback ”, creating a ripple effect: other, lesser economy-watchers were taken aback at the abackness that had taken the unflappable Islam. But it still has a sting in its tail, enjoining Reeves to keep her focus on “controlling the rising welfare bill, as well as delivering further efficiency measures in public services, while protecting the most vulnerable”.

After 16 years of austerity or austerity-lite, there isn’t much to trim from disability or unemployment benefits, which is why we see analysis slide instead into unserious questions about who deserves what. Is that person claiming welfare suffering from a “real” disability or an endlessly contestable mental illness? Is the unemployment rate a result of lack of opportunity or lifestyle choices? Where it is discussed in any detail, the problem is always young people. They are unfit for the labour market because of the school curriculum, unfit for any market since they’re in the grip of a mental health crisis, and the jobs aren’t there anyway – this was the “perfect storm” identified in February by Alan Milburn , ahead of his report on Neets (young people not in education, employment or training) this summer. The more urgently the welfare bill needs to be slashed, the more heated this debate becomes, until we’re all rightwing pundits asking each other whether ADHD is real or just a fig leaf for a generation that can’t concentrate on anything longer than a TikTok video – and whatever the balance of truth and fairness in that, it surely can’t fall on you, the taxpayer, to fund it?

The numerate younger voter – of which there are legion, the curriculum isn’t that bad – can be forgiven for asking a couple of follow-up questions. Why, when low-income benefits mostly go to in-work parents rather than Neets anyway, are pensioner benefits (a total of £31bn, excluding the state pension) untouchable? Not only have they been defacto ringfenced by the government’s U-turn on means testing the winter fuel allowance, the new consensus is that even trying to reserve that benefit for people who truly needed it was the stupidest thing an incoming government has ever done.

Why, when pension benefits and the state pension amount to £178bn annually – which is greater than the housing benefit, disability benefit and unemployment or low-income benefits bills combined – do we never talk about the triple lock?

Nor do we ever look directly at the tapered tax relief on private pensions , which straightforwardly delivers more, pound for pound, to higher earners. This alone is the most expensive non-structural tax relief in the country, costing nearly £35bn a year – roughly 10 times the amount we spend on affordable housing annually. What would happen if you flipped that? Would young people be able to pay their rent?

These figures, or at least the skewing they describe, are all so familiar that it feels almost rude to mention it, like blundering into a conversation about Brexit to say that it actually hasn’t made us richer. The centre ground of politics cleaves to a particular etiquette where you don’t repeat things everyone has heard before, even while they remain unresolved. And the rationale – offered as a gentle truism, a level of political cynicism that we can handle – is that pensioners vote and young people do not.

That electoral calculus may have made sense when the triple lock was introduced in 2011, along with the obvious benefit of protecting one group so the whole country wouldn’t unite against austerity. But as this generational imbalance reaches maturity, it is no longer rational. Voters are coming of age now whose first experience of the state was when their Sure Start centre closed and their child trust fund was scrapped . Their prospects of home ownership depend almost entirely on intergenerational transfer, their further-education debt the Treasury will decide on a whim, and their value in the job market, vaunted as the fruit of their degree, could only be realised in vacancies that don’t exist .

If they make any demand on the social safety net, their problems are minimised as self-created, and whenever there’s a book that needs to be balanced – whether to boost defence spending or unspook the bond markets – the spotlight is back on the snowflakes. Young people can see what policies that actively seek to prevent hardship look like, but they have never seen one applied to them. They will not vote for a party that thinks this is OK. It is not because they are too woke.

The paradox is, nobody asked for this generational imbalance – it’s the most fundamental building block of nation-building and social cohesion, to want things to be better for the next lot. But we’ll be frozen here until we stop staying “welfare bill”, start saying “pensions bill” and just see where the conversation takes us.

Zoe Williams is a Guardian columnist

Football quiz: when English clubs play in European finals

Football
Football quiz: when English clubs play in European finals
Richard Foster
Tue 19 May 2026 16.26 CESTLast modified on Tue 19 May 2026 19.16 CEST
News
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/may/19/football-quiz-english-clubs-european-finals-arsenal-aston-villa-crystal-palace

This is a quiz by Richard Foster, who presents the It Started With A Kick podcast and writes a daily quiz on the Seventh Heaven Football Quiz App , which is available on Apple and Google.

You be the judge: should my husband stop telling me how to mop the floor?

Life and style
You be the judge: should my husband stop telling me how to mop the floor?
Georgina Lawton
Thu 21 May 2026 09.00 CESTLast modified on Thu 21 May 2026 10.53 CEST
News
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2026/may/21/you-be-the-judge-should-my-husband-stop-telling-me-how-to-mop

The prosecution: Deirdre

What gets to me is that whenever I get the mop out, instead of helping, Martin criticises me

My husband of five years, Martin, and I have different views on how to best keep our floors clean.

We have a cat and a dog so naturally the floors get dirty. There’s hair, dust and whatever gets walked in from outside. Vacuuming helps, but it doesn’t actually clean the floor – it just removes the visible bits. At some point, you need to wash the floor with a mop.

I mop once a week. I don’t enjoy it, but I watched my mother do it every week growing up and it feels like a basic point of hygiene. What frustrates me is that Martin treats this like an optional extra, or something silly that doesn’t work. We split chores and he does the cooking, but mopping has somehow become a running joke, because he’s decided it doesn’t work.

His main argument is that mopping just spreads dirty water around. Sure, if you do it badly – if you don’t wring the mop or replace the water regularly – it can be inefficient, but that’s not what I’m doing. I wring out the mop, I go over the floor evenly, and it makes such a difference.

We have sparkling floors, which I love – even if it’s only for 10 minutes because of the animals.

What really gets to me is that whenever I get the mop out, instead of helping, Martin criticises me. He explains why it’s ineffective or how it should be done differently, but he won’t do it himself. When he did, he tipped a whole bucket of water on the floor and mopped it up, saying that was more efficient. But he just made a mess.

He says vacuuming is enough. I’ve suggested we invest in a fancy bucket that keeps the clean and dirty water separate, but he says he doesn’t want to get involved. The thing is, he does get involved – from the sofa.

Don’t dismiss the entire chore if you can’t do it yourself. This isn’t about loving or hating mopping. It’s about basic cleanliness and doing a job that has to be done. People have been mopping like I do for centuries. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to think we should both do some mopping, and if Martin doesn’t want to, the least he could do is let me mop in peace.

The defence: Martin

The way most people mop is inefficient. It isn’t cleaning – it’s just redistributing the dirt

I’m not against cleaning. I vacuum regularly, I keep things tidy, and I do all the cooking in our home. I don’t think our flat is ever dirty.

The issue isn’t whether we clean the floors, it’s whether the way we’re cleaning them makes sense. In theory, mopping can be a good way to clean – but only when it’s done properly.

My concern is that, most of the time, what people call mopping is just moving the same bucket of increasingly dirty water around the floor. You dip the mop in, wring it out, wipe a section, then go back into the same water, which is what Deirdre does. How is that cleaning?

You should empty the water every time before you put the mop back in, or have two separate buckets, which isn’t how Deirdre does it. I suggested tipping all the clean soapy water on the floor first, then mopping it up, and I was called “ridiculous”. So I said, “Fine, I’ll bow out of this conversation as my contributions aren’t wanted.”

I just want us to engage our brains: the normal way of mopping, which – yes – people have done for centuries, is inefficient. Why does everyone just accept it as normal? At a certain point, you’re not cleaning any more, you’re just redistributing the dirt.

Deirdre said I should buy a fancy bucket for us to use that has a system that separates clean and dirty water, which would mean we’re not changing the water throughout the process.

I don’t want to get involved. It’s not a protest: I would support her decision to buy a new mop if it’s a good one, but I want to focus my efforts on other tasks. Again, I don’t want to be seen as housework-shy, but if she wants to upgrade the mop, I don’t think I should be involved.

I am a vacuuming man. It’s efficient and straightforward. Using a dustpan and brush is level one, vacuuming is level two. Mopping is level three if it’s done right, but the way Deirdre does it surely spreads more germs. I’m not refusing to contribute to cleaning; I’m questioning whether this specific task, done this way, is necessary.

The jury of Guardian readers

Martin’s weird aversion to mopping, which is the most effective way to clean a hard floor, doesn’t seem to be based on experience or evidence. Unlike Deirdre, he isn’t prepared to compromise and he isn’t listening to her. What a nightmare it must be having him wanging on from the sofa while she’s doing the work. I’d like to throw a bucket of water over him. Caro, 61

Martin refusing to mop the floor just because he doesn’t like Deirdre’s (very normal) method is childish. It’s a basic household task that should be shared, and if he is so fussy about how it’s done, he should lead the charge in buying a bucket that fits his exacting standards. Sarah, 30

Does Martin drain the sink for each individual item of washing up, too? He seems more interesting in objecting than in solving the problem at hand. When Deirdre suggested a fancy mop and bucket that would fit his requirements, he said he was not against it but still dismissed it. Martin can weigh in when he starts mopping himself. Molly, 26

Martin says he’ll bow out of the conversation, but it sounds like he can’t resist giving notes every time Deirdre mops. It must be extremely annoying. As long as you change the water regularly, mopping makes your floor look and smell cleaner than vacuuming alone. Cath, 46

Martin is being pedantic and it’s not helpful – it’s just nitpicky! Mopping gets rid of tough stains, whether he thinks it’s good enough or not. Olivia, 21

Now you be the judge

In our online poll, tell us: should Martin shut up and mop up?

The poll closes on Wednesday 27 May at 9am BST

Last week’s results

We asked whether Lucinda stop leaving the windows and doors open

80 % of you said yes – Lucinda is guilty

20 % of you said no – Lucinda is innocent

Trump envoy says it’s time for US to ‘put its footprint back on Greenland’, during visit to Arctic territory

Greenland
Trump envoy says it’s time for US to ‘put its footprint back on Greenland’, during visit to Arctic territory

Thu 21 May 2026 02.11 CESTLast modified on Thu 21 May 2026 11.32 CEST
News
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/21/greenland-trump-us-envoy-jeff-landry-visit

The US special envoy to Greenland has said it’s time for Washington “to put its footprint back” on the Arctic island, as he wound up his first visit to the island since his appointment in December 2025.

Donald Trump has repeatedly argued that the US needs to control Greenland – a Danish autonomous territory – because of national security concerns, claiming that if it does not, the island risks falling into the hands of China or Russia.

Greenland is on the shortest route for missiles between Russia and the US. It is also believed to have untapped rare-earth minerals and could be a vital asset as the polar ice melts and new shipping routes emerge.

“I think it’s time for the US to put its footprint back on Greenland,” the US envoy Jeff Landry told Agence France-Presse, adding “Greenland needs the US.

“I think that you’re seeing the president talk about increasing national security operations and repopulating certain bases in Greenland,” he said.

At the height of the cold war, the US had 17 military facilities in Greenland, but closed them over the years and currently has just one – the Pituffik base in the north of the island.

The US wants to open three new bases in the south of the territory, according to recent media reports.

A 1951 defence pact, updated in 2004, already allows Washington to ramp up troop deployments and military installations on the island provided it informs Denmark and Greenland in advance.

Trump backed down from threats to seize Greenland in January, and a US-Danish-Greenlandic working group was set up to address his concerns.

Even if a “master’s” desire to “secure control of Greenland … is completely disrespectful … we are obliged to find a solution”, the Greenlandic prime minister, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, told reporters on the sidelines of a Greenland economic forum on Tuesday.

US envoy Landry, who is also the Republican governor of Louisiana, arrived in Greenland’s capital Nuuk on Sunday . He was not officially invited and his presence has stirred controversy on the island.

Greenlandic and Danish officials have repeatedly said that only Greenland can decide its future.

Landry met with Nielsen and the Greenland foreign minister, Mute Egede, on Monday.

Nielsen said the talks were “constructive” but noted there was “no sign … that anything has changed” in the US position.

In an interview published in Greenlandic daily newspaper Sermitsiaq on Wednesday, Landry fanned Greenland’s dreams of independence.

While polls show a majority of Greenlanders are in favour of gaining independence from Denmark someday, the government has no such immediate plans, as many issues remain unresolved – primarily regarding the island’s economy, which is heavily dependent on Denmark.

“I think there are some incredible opportunities that can actually lift Greenlanders from dependency to independence,” Landry said in the interview.

“I think that the president of the United States would like to see the country become economically independent. And I think it’s possible here,” he said.

Adding to the controversy around Landry’s visit was the fact that he was accompanied by a US doctor, who told Danish television TV2 he was there “to assess the medical needs” in Greenland.

Denmark and Greenland in February rejected Trump’s offer to send a naval hospital ship “to take care of the many people who are sick, and not being taken care of there”.

The Greenland health minister, Anna Wangenheim, criticised the US doctor’s presence.

“Greenlanders are not guinea pigs in a geopolitical project,” she said.