‘That was a dumbass play’: De’Aaron Fox’s gaffe leaves door open for historic Knicks comeback | NBA finals | The Guardian

Keyword – Sport
Trefwoorden – NBA finals, San Antonio Spurs, New York Knicks, Basketball, NBA, Sport, US sports, Victor Wembanyama
Title – ‘That was a dumbass play’: De’Aaron Fox’s gaffe leaves door open for historic Knicks comeback | NBA finals | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/bryan-armen-graham
Link – ‘That was a dumbass play’: De’Aaron Fox’s gaffe leaves door open for historic Knicks comeback | NBA finals | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-11T07:43:15.000Z
Category – Sport
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2026/jun/11/deaaron-fox-spurs-knicks-game-4-collapse-nba-finals

For nearly 47 minutes, the San Antonio Spurs looked poised to leave New York with the NBA finals level at two games apiece.

They’d led by 81-52 in the third quarter, brought a frenzied Madison Square Garden crowd to heel and put themselves on the verge of reclaiming home-court advantage after having dropped the first two games at home. Even after the Knicks mounted a furious second-half fightback and wiped out the entirety of San Antonio’s 29-point cushion, the Spurs still appeared to have one final lifeline.

Then came a decision that could haunt San Antonio for years if the Knicks go on to end their 53-year championship drought.

The Spurs led 106-105 with less than 15 seconds remaining Wednesday night when Jalen Brunson’s floating bank shot ricocheted into the backcourt. The loose ball bounced toward De’Aaron Fox, who sprinted after it and found himself racing toward the basket with only a trailing OG Anunoby between him and what looked like a game-clinching score.

Instead of pulling the ball out and forcing New York to foul, Fox attacked the rim. But Anunoby chased him down and blocked the lay-up attempt.

Seconds later, the Knicks had the ball back. Brunson missed a 31-footer off the front of the rim, but Anunoby soared in from the top of the key and tipped home the winner with 1.2 seconds remaining, completing an improbable 107-106 victory and the largest comeback in NBA finals history.

Fox did not shy away from explaining his thought process afterward.

“You have to score. Try to get a lay-up, get up three [points]. Force them to need a three,” Fox said. “OG made a good block.”

Asked why he went for the basket rather than dribbling out the clock and forcing a foul, the ninth-year point guard was to the point.

“I just thought I’d be able to outrun them. That’s it.”

The explanation did little to quell the criticism.

On ESPN’s post-game show, Charles Barkley delivered a verdict that quickly spread across social media and sports television.

“That was a dumbass play,” Barkley said. “He did not have to shoot that ball.”

The blunt assessment reflected the reaction around the basketball world. With the Spurs clinging to a one-point lead, Fox had safer options available. He could have retreated from pressure and waited to be fouled, shaving precious seconds off the clock. He could have used San Antonio’s final timeout. Instead, he chose the most aggressive path – a gamble Anunoby made him pay dearly for.

Of course, reducing the collapse to a single possession would let the Spurs off too easily. The final mistake merely capped a spectacular unraveling that had begun long before Fox found himself alone in the open floor. San Antonio scored 76 points in the first half but just 30 after half-time. The crisp ball movement and long-distance sharpshooting that had carved apart New York’s defense evaporated as the Knicks chipped away at the deficit.

“Obviously let that get away, being up [29 points],” Fox said. “Got away from doing the things that got us up and put ourselves in that position.”

“I think we played a little slower,” he added. “The ball wasn’t moving the same way that it did in the second half like it did in the first half. We didn’t get a flow on the offensive end in the second half.”

Spurs coach Mitch Johnson saw the same thing.

“We got away from what got us the 76 points in the first half,” Johnson said. “Then you saw at times the aggressiveness and just conviction that we played with early on dissipate a little bit. They made some shots. That’s where you felt the momentum a little bit. We just needed few more tough-minded plays to finish the job.”

He added: “To put as much good work into that first half as we did, get the lead that we had and not finish the job, is disappointing to say the least.”

Wembanyama said he was unable to see Fox’s fateful lay-up attempt after tumbling to the floor during the play, but he offered a curt appraisal of the Spurs’ second-half performance.

“We clearly weren’t the most hungry in the second half,” Wembanyama said. “Stopped moving the ball. Stopped executing.”

That reality may ultimately be what stings most for San Antonio. Fox’s snap decision did not create the collapse. The Spurs had already let a 29-point lead fritter away by then. What the play did was quash their last best chance to survive it.

“Going down 3-1 is obviously very different,” Fox said. “But we feel like we have a team to be able to come back from this.”

Two minutes earlier, the Spurs were still on course to turn these finals into a best-of-three with all the momentum on their side. One costly miscue later, they were staring at the brink instead.

‘I’m not going away,’ says Keir Starmer despite defence secretary’s exit | Keir Starmer | The Guardian

Keyword – Politics
Trefwoorden – Keir Starmer, Labour party leadership, Labour, Politics, UK news, Military, Defence policy
Title – ‘I’m not going away,’ says Keir Starmer despite defence secretary’s exit | Keir Starmer | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/peterwalker
Link – ‘I’m not going away,’ says Keir Starmer despite defence secretary’s exit | Keir Starmer | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-12T13:16:34.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/jun/12/keir-starmer-john-healey-defence-secretary-exit

Keir Starmer has said he knows he has to “turn things around” after a series of crises culminating in the resignation of John Healey, the defence secretary, but warned that any successor would face the same difficult decisions.

In an interview with the BBC after Healey’s departure in a row over defence spending, Starmer promised again to fight any leadership challenge from Andy Burnham or others, saying: “I’m not going to go away.”

He also suggested said that if Burnham did replace him in No 10, there would be a near-identical set of pressures and tough decisions for him given the state of international conflict and the resulting economic impacts.

Starmer said: “I would just gently say this: that whoever is prime minister is going to face the same prevailing winds as I am facing. None of that is going to change.”

In a scathing resignation letter on Thursday, Healey accused Starmer of putting the country’s security at risk and being unable to stand up to his chancellor, Rachel Reeves, and make faster progress in the coming defence investment plan (Dip) towards spending at least 3.5% of GDP on defence by 2035.

Al Carns, the armed forces minister, also quit. Speaking to the BBC on Friday morning, Carns accused the government of not spending enough money on the military and spending on the wrong weapons.

With Burnham increasingly expected to win next Thursday’s Makerfield byelection and return to Westminster, many Labour MPs see a leadership challenge as imminent. It could also involve Wes Streeting, the former health secretary, who quit Starmer’s government last month in the wake of terrible election results for Labour.

Asked if he would lead Labour into the next general election, Starmer replied: “Well, that’s what I want to do. I recognise that, you know, I’ve got to turn things around. We had a very bad set of elections.”

Asked if he recognised he was in peril, the prime minister replied: “Look, I recognise that, given where we are, I need to turn that around and that’s what I intend to do.”

Earlier on Friday, Starmer met the new defence secretary, Dan Jarvis, and Richard Knighton, chief of the defence staff, to discuss the Dip, which was due this week but has been delayed in a wrangle over spending totals.

Asked when it would come, a No 10 spokesperson said only that work was “ongoing to finalise the Dip at pace with the new defence secretary”. They refused to say if Jarvis had any input on the actual sums committed, or had sought any guarantees before accepting the post.

Starmer told the BBC the plan would be “published before the Nato summit” in Ankara early next month. This was the final deadline for it to be released, suggesting the change of defence secretary could have caused new delays.

The prime minister said he had overseen “the biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the 1980s”, adding that every government department had submitted cuts to non-frontline spending to help finance the Dip.

He criticised the idea that balancing such decisions was simple. “Very many people, very often sitting outside of government, give the impression that there is lots of easy decisions that can be taken. There are no easy decisions.”

He added: “Decisions in government involve trade-offs, so they always have to come with that second question: ‘Well, if you’re going to do that, what is it you wouldn’t do?’”

Asked if he would fight in any leadership challenge, Starmer said: “Look, I’m not going to go away. I don’t think we should plunge the country into the chaos of a leadership election.”

He added: “I don’t think it should happen, but if it does then I will fight. And let me just be clear with you: that’s not about personal vanity, it’s not about stubbornness. It’s out of a very deep sense of duty.”

Sign up for The Long Wave newsletter: our weekly Black life and culture email | Newsletter sign-up | The Guardian

Keyword – Global
Trefwoorden – Newsletter sign-up
Title – Sign up for The Long Wave newsletter: our weekly Black life and culture email | Newsletter sign-up | The Guardian
Author – Guardian Staff
Link – Sign up for The Long Wave newsletter: our weekly Black life and culture email | Newsletter sign-up | The Guardian
Publish date – 2024-10-16T12:47:09.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/global/2024/oct/16/sign-up-for-the-long-wave-newsletter-our-weekly-black-life-and-culture-email

Serena Williams’ return ends prematurely at Queen’s Club due to Mboko injury | Tennis | The Guardian

Keyword – Sport
Trefwoorden – Tennis, Serena Williams, US sports, Sport
Title – Serena Williams’ return ends prematurely at Queen’s Club due to Mboko injury | Tennis | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/tumaini-carayol
Link – Serena Williams’ return ends prematurely at Queen’s Club due to Mboko injury | Tennis | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-11T11:50:02.000Z
Category – Sport
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2026/jun/11/serena-williams-return-ends-prematurely-queens-club-mboko-injury-raducanu

Serena Williams’s first tournament since coming out of retirement has ended prematurely after her doubles partner, Victoria Mboko, was forced to withdraw from the Queen’s Club tournament after injuring her knee when slipping on the grass in her singles match.

Williams made a sensational return to competition at 44 after a four-year absence on Tuesday alongside Mboko as they defeated the third seeds , Nicole Melichar Martinez and Erin Routliffe, 7-6(2), 6-2. The pair were scheduled to face Leylah Fernandez and Laura Siegemund on Thursday afternoon.

Mboko, the third seed at Queen’s Club, played her opening singles match on Wednesday after receiving a first-round bye. Mboko had earned a break point in set two after losing the first set against the former world No 1 Karolina Pliskova before a bad fall, slipping on the grass after being wrongfooted. She immediately held her left knee and was forced to retire from the match.

The courts at Queen’s Club are known for being some of the most high-quality grass surfaces on the tour but their slick nature makes them particularly slippery in the first days of the tournament. At past editions of the event men’s players have fallen and injured themselves in similar ways after being wrong-footed on the grass.

Williams will next head to Berlin, where she has received a doubles wildcard, and she is expected to be among the doubles wildcard entries at Wimbledon when they are announced next week. Williams has not ruled out Wimbledon, where she won seven singles titles and six doubles titles alongside her sister, Venus, saying on Tuesday after her victory: “They have been great about giving me that space and time to decide.”

However, the immediate future of one of the best young players on the tour is far more opaque as Mboko navigates the uncertainty of injury.

Wimbledon’s wildcard committee will formally make their decisions next week, but SW19 organisers are certainly aware of the buzz Williams’s return to tennis has already inspired.

Asked if Williams would get a wildcard spot if she wanted to, the All England Lawn Tennis Club chief Sally Bolton, said: “I can’t answer that question, but I guess what I can say is we can all see how much excitement Serena being back on a tennis court and particularly on a grass court has created and so one can only imagine what that would be like at the Championships.

“The wildcard committee will formally make their decisions next week and we’ll be communicating those, but she has certainly created a fantastic buzz and that’s exciting for the sport.”

‘I only want justice’: bereaved families seek closure one year on from Air India crash | Air India Ahmedabad plane crash | The Guardian

Keyword – World news
Trefwoorden – Air India Ahmedabad plane crash, UK news, India, Plane crashes, South and central Asia, World news
Title – ‘I only want justice’: bereaved families seek closure one year on from Air India crash | Air India Ahmedabad plane crash | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/aamna-mohdin
Link – ‘I only want justice’: bereaved families seek closure one year on from Air India crash | Air India Ahmedabad plane crash | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-12T09:00:40.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/12/air-india-crash-ai171-bereaved-families-seek-closure-one-year-on

W hen Sagar Patel’s mother boarded Air India flight AI171 on 12 June last year, she called her son as she always did before takeoff. The flight was due to leave Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel airport in Ahmedabad, in the western Indian state of Gujarat, and was destined for Gatwick.

“We always had a little traditional thing,” said Patel, a business manager from London. “Once she got on the flight, she would sit down and call me. She’d tell me: ‘Yep, I’m on the flight. See you later.’”

He remembers asking her what she would like for dinner. “I told her: ‘I’ll be there to come and pick you up. I’ll see you later on.’ That was my last conversation with her.”

One year after the crash, bereaved family members say they are still struggling to obtain answers about what happened.

The Boeing 787 Dreamliner struck a medical college shortly after taking off. The crash killed 241 people onboard, including 169 Indian nationals and 52 Britons, as well as 19 people on the ground. A further 67 people were seriously injured.

Patel’s mother, Hasumatiben Patel, was returning to the UK after visiting family in India. “We’ve lost literally the heart of the family,” he said. “After losing my dad, the next person I looked up to was my mum. She was my rock.”

After news of the crash, Patel flew to India to get answers, but a year on he has yet to find any. The loss of his mother, who lived with him and his wife and daughter, has had a profound impact on the family.

“When I came back from India and walked into the house, my daughter was going around in her bedroom trying to look for her. It’s heartbreaking to see that.”

Investigators have yet to publish their final conclusions about the crash, though further developments are expected in the coming days.

Mike Andrews, an aviation attorney representing about 135 affected families, said relatives had faced “roadblocks” from Air India while seeking information about the crash. “They are still being victimised, even one year after the crash,” he said.

For Shweta Parihar, whose husband, Abhinav Parihar, died in the crash while travelling back to Britain, the most painful memories are of the days that followed.

She flew out to India with her son after finding out about the crash. Because authorities were still trying to identify victims through DNA testing, she initially shielded the truth from her son. “I had to lie to him,” she said. “He kept saying: ‘I just want to talk to my dad.’”

When he finally learned the truth, he was left devastated. Speaking about her 11-year-old son’s condition since losing his father, Parihar said: “He starts crying over small things now. Every little thing makes him cry.”

The family had moved to Britain only a few years before the crash, hoping to build a better future. “Everything is now lost,” she said.

Parihar, who is on a health work visa, decried a lack of support from the Indian and British governments, as well as Air India and the Tata Group, which owns the airline.

She said she was seeking practical support to rebuild her life as a single parent, including help securing more stable employment in the UK, a work permit or sponsorship assistance, and support for her son’s education, childcare and activities.

Parihar said: “I can’t get him involved in any activities here because they are so expensive. Before, when his father was here, he used to do gymnastics and swimming. Now it’s £30-£40 per session. It’s tough for me.”

Another widower, Mohammed Shoeb Iproliya, said the anniversary brought back memories of the life he and his wife, Nusratjahan, had been building together. “When I come back home she would be waiting at the door.” He said it was hard to put into words what losing that had meant.

The couple had planned to buy a home and build a future together in Britain. “We had a lot of dreams,” he said. “All those dreams are broken now.”

Like Patel and Shweta, he said he was still waiting for clear answers about the crash. “I only want justice,” he said.

Patel said relatives had repeatedly pushed for more information about the investigation. “Even just provide us a little bit of updates,” he said. “We’ve not even heard the black box or anything like that.”

For Parihar, the lack of closure has made it impossible to move on. “Still we don’t believe this happened,” she said. “Still we are in shock. Still at night we can’t sleep.”

Patel travelled to India this week to mark the first anniversary of the crash, hoping that being there would bring “some sort of closure”.

His message to others was simple: “Cherish your parents,” he said. “Not having them around is one of the most difficult things to deal with.”

Add to playlist: the sweet plunderphonics of Quiet Light and the week’s best new tracks | Music | The Guardian

Keyword – Music
Trefwoorden – Music, Culture, Pop and rock, Electronic music
Title – Add to playlist: the sweet plunderphonics of Quiet Light and the week’s best new tracks | Music | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/shaad-d-souza,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/ben-beaumont-thomas
Link – Add to playlist: the sweet plunderphonics of Quiet Light and the week’s best new tracks | Music | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-12T11:30:44.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/music/2026/jun/12/add-to-playlist-the-sweet-plunderphonics-of-quiet-light-and-the-weeks-best-new-tracks

From Boston, via Texas Recommended if you like Grace Ives, Porter Robinson, Grimes Up next Touring EU/UK in November

Riya Mahesh has perfected her own sweet, whimsical brand of plunderphonics; her seventh project as Quiet Light in six years, this year’s Blue Angel Sparkling Silver 2, sounds a little as if it’s been chopped together from samples of Mahesh’s own memory. On Berlin, she sings to a wayward love interest over a moony breakbeat and IDM glitches, as a spoken-word part – what sounds to me like a recording of a lecture – floats in the background. Star100 starts all whispers and garbled laughter, before ceding space to Mahesh’s multitracked harmonies. Sometimes, Mahesh will suddenly deliver a wildly catchy chorus, something she clearly has an aptitude for – check Dealerz, her collab with Danish band A Good Year.

Mahesh’s music is avowedly feminine in its tone; she seems to advocate for sample-heavy music, as a form, as a perfect way to deconstruct and reconstruct fantasies and memories. True to that idea, Blue Angel Sparkling Silver 2 is moody and magical, and recalls singer-songwriter projects such as Samia (in its vocals especially) and Pinegrove while also tapping into the exacting, dreamlike production of artists such as Grimes and Desire.

Mahesh was raised in Texas and played piano from a young age, thanks to the urging of her mother, a sitar player. She self-describes as “an insanely Texas girl” – she was prom queen of her high school – but still wanted to play music when she graduated. After failing to get into Juilliard, the prestigious music college, she decided to pivot and currently balances medical school with her burgeoning music career. It’s an unorthodox backdrop for unorthodox music, which splits the difference between dazed ambient production and big-tent pop melody as if it’s nothing. Shaad D’Souza

This week’s best new tracks

Chat Pile – Deep Blue An awesomely funky howl of frustration and fear from the Oklahoman sludge-groove noisemakers, horrified at how technology has poisoned the groundwater of our lives. Wishy – Lovesick It may sound like it’s beamed directly from 1993, but lean into the nostalgia: this is scuzzy indiepop perfection, anchored by Nina Pitchkites’ lead vocal as she gets swept up in the sweet torture of romantic yearning. Debit – Encasadelciegoeltuerco Taken from her absolutely slamming, top-tier new album Potpourri out today, the Mexican producer sets galloping distortion-laced beats under a gunmetal sky of sustained ambient tones. Rose Gray – Club to Your Arms Sounding a little like Sophie Ellis-Bextor’s wayward younger sister, the Brit award nominee sings of making a beeline from nightclub to bedroom tryst, backed by rapturous electro-pop. RealYungPhil – 2x We’ve long loved this Connecticut rapper’s flow, somewhere between a sensei dispensing wisdom and a mate ​g​rumbling about his ​lot: 2x is another winner, rejecting bothersome rivals over a woozy yet uptempo beat. Daisy* – Punch The artist formerly known as Babii has left her old name behind “due to creative differences with myself”, and she certainly sounds refreshed: Punch pairs whispery singsong vocals with whomping speed garage.

Interpol – This Mirror Weighs a Ton The title track from their forthcoming eighth album has huge drama, a kind of gothic trip-hop topped with Paul Banks’ poetic angst: “The maniac in your head still sleeps in archways / alone as an act of faith”.

Ben Beaumont-Thomas

Subscribe to the Guardian’s rolling Add to Playlist selections on Spotify – or transfer it to Apple , Tidal or other services

Hepworth in Colour review – salty Cornish seascapes compressed into immaculate sculptures | Barbara Hepworth | The Guardian

Keyword – Art and design
Trefwoorden – Barbara Hepworth, Art, Art and design, Culture, Sculpture, The Courtauld Institute of Art
Title – Hepworth in Colour review – salty Cornish seascapes compressed into immaculate sculptures | Barbara Hepworth | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/jonathanjones
Link – Hepworth in Colour review – salty Cornish seascapes compressed into immaculate sculptures | Barbara Hepworth | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-11T12:16:58.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2026/jun/11/barbara-hepworth-in-colour-review-courtauld-london-st-ives-cornish

T hey say in St Ives that if you put your ear to a Barbara Hepworth sculpture, you can hear the waves breaking on Porthmeor beach. Well, maybe they do say that and maybe they don’t. But the sea definitely roars in the ravishing sculptures at the heart of this small survey of just one aspect of her work: her use of colour.

Hepworth’s favourite colours turn out to be – wait for it – blue and white, the colours of the sea: the white foamy breakers and the rippling waters that swaddle the Cornish fishing town where her home and studio are proudly preserved.

And they haunt Hepworth’s rounded, pierced, convex and concave tabletop sculptures. In the first and most beautiful room, a series of objects the size and shape of geodes are displayed on pedestals. The rounded, white plaster objects are cut open to reveal deep blue interiors that seem immemorial, although Hepworth has simply painted them. Across the blue illusionistic depths, red-painted strings are tautly fixed. The red strings might suggest seaweed if, like me, you can’t get nature out of your head looking at these abstract yet evocative works.

Is it OK to see Hepworth as an artist of salty seascapes? The Courtauld frames her in a more formalistic, high modernist way as a pure abstract creator. Around her vivid sculptures, in which so many wild windswept walks by the sea seem compressed, the gallery walls are hung with her precise designs. They feature carefully calculated curves and radiating, intersecting lines that map out a lucid, geometrical beauty.

It’s interesting to see these drawings, at least at first. But the obligation to keep looking from Hepworth’s captivating, self-contained sculptures to her studies starts to feel like a chore. The argument of the exhibition is a bit empty, anyway: this famous British artist used colour. Is that a surprise? It seems reductive that a couple of pieces – a curvaceous, holey stone with a splash of yellow paint and a tall, graceful monolith that resembles jade – seem to be here simply to show Hepworth didn’t think in monochrome. They surely deserve better than to be chucked in as evidence that she enjoyed her colours.

But Hepworth is such a great sculptor, perfect and immaculate. Her 1946 elmwood carving Pelagos curls over like an especially elegant wave, the kind that surfers wait for off St Ives. Hepworth must have watched waves for hours, for years, to be able to visualise this graceful, smooth curve of gathered force, which she has painted white on its underside. Red strings, again, are suspended between the double curve, creating an almost cinematic sense of movement. They add to the sense that Hepworth doesn’t only work with colour but sound, too.

The strings make her sculptures resemble the Aeolian harp, an instrument that can be played by the wind. Samuel Taylor Coleridge had one and wrote: “How by the desultory breeze caressed … the long sequacious notes / Over delicious surges sink and rise.” In this windowless room in central London, Hepworth’s stringed sculptures may not sing in the wind but they resonate in your mind.

Hepworth’s passion for the forms created by the wind and waves fills this exhibition with blues and blue-greens. Her oil and pencil sketch Turning Form (Atlantic) is a rolling white misty spray in a spattered blue ocean, while Sea Form (Porthmeor) suggests those same wild waters in a wide horizon of green bronze. Most mysterious and lingering of all is Sculpture With Colour (Eos). This upright oval was carved from Hopton Wood stone in 1946. Hepworth dug a hole into it and painted it blue. The resulting oceanic oval recess in the miniature monolith resembles a huge staring eye: is it the eye of Eos, the Greek goddess of dawn?

I never thought of Hepworth as a mystic. But the calm and stillness her art creates feels spiritual. When you gaze at the upper and lower curves of her work Wave, time stops, as for a surfer on the water.

Hepworth’s art does not depict nature. Instead, it makes you feel the solitude, peace and the immensely long, dwarfing time cycles of nature: the time it takes for the sea to make a cave in a cliff, or for rain to sculpt a peninsula. The sculptor’s chisel has often been imagined as a penetrating, aggressive tool, shaping stone into convex, upright figures. Hepworth releases concavities, liberates holes. Maybe exhibitions of her art are often careful and fussy, as this one is, because they are a little intimidated by the sheer power of British art’s nature goddess.

At the Courtauld, London , from 12 June to 6 September

Behind the scenes at OpenAI HQ: the Stephen Collins cartoon | Life and style | The Guardian

Keyword – None
Trefwoorden – None
Title – Behind the scenes at OpenAI HQ: the Stephen Collins cartoon | Life and style | The Guardian
Author – Stephen Collins
Link – Behind the scenes at OpenAI HQ: the Stephen Collins cartoon | Life and style | The Guardian
Publish date – Fri 12 Jun 2026 11.30 CEST
Category – Lifestyle
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/picture/2026/jun/12/behind-the-scenes-at-openai-hq-the-stephen-collins-cartoon

From Goop to ‘Gwynocide’: why is Gwyneth Paltrow starring in a luxury Israeli real estate ad? | Arwa Mahdawi | The Guardian

Keyword – Opinion
Trefwoorden – Gwyneth Paltrow, Israel, Israel-Gaza war, Middle East and north Africa
Title – From Goop to ‘Gwynocide’: why is Gwyneth Paltrow starring in a luxury Israeli real estate ad? | Arwa Mahdawi | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/arwa-mahdawi
Link – From Goop to ‘Gwynocide’: why is Gwyneth Paltrow starring in a luxury Israeli real estate ad? | Arwa Mahdawi | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-12T08:00:39.000Z
Category – Opinion
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jun/12/gwyneth-paltrow-51-park-israeli-real-estate-ad

G wyneth Paltrow has built a wellness empire by encouraging people to put questionable things in their mouths and up their orifices. Over the years the Goop founder has promoted parasite-busting goat milk cleanses, urged women to stick $66 jade eggs into their vaginas, and waxed lyrical about the powerful benefits of rectal ozone therapy .

Now, however, it seems that Paltrow’s brand is pivoting from colon cleansing to ethnic cleansing. The actor and businessperson went viral this week for promoting a luxury real estate development in Israel. Paltrow, who has been nicknamed “Gwynocide”, stars in a new commercial and marketing materials for 51 Park , two 51-story towers in Herzliya, just north of Tel Aviv. (The ad was filmed in New York.) The towers boast a swimming pool, a pilates pool, a wine room and gym, among other luxuries. It’s unclear how much they cost, but similar apartments in the area have gone for millions.

Deciding to advertise luxury penthouses in Israel at this particular moment is an interesting decision. Particularly when Melisron, the parent company behind 51 Park, also owns a commercial real estate project in the Israeli settlement of Ma’ale Adumim in the occupied West Bank – which was built on land inhabited by Bedouin communities, most of whom were forcibly displaced by the Israeli government. Just a few miles away from 51 Park, Palestinians are being killed and displaced by settlers and the Israeli military at record levels as this land grab continues. More Palestinians have been killed in the last three years than in the previous 17 years combined, analysis from Oxfam has found. Masked settlers , often protected by the military, have rampaged through villages, beating women , burning property, stealing sheep, clubbing family pets, and making life for Palestinians untenable. According to the UN, over 100 West Bank villages have been fully or partially emptied between January 2023 and April 2026 and more than 7,000 Palestinians have been displaced.

Western politicians – and large swathes of the media – like to characterize the settlers as rogue actors. However, as various rights groups have made clear , settlers are working in tandem with the Israeli government to forcibly displace Palestinians so that more luxury real estate for Israelis can be built. On Wednesday, in a detailed 149-page report , Amnesty International accused the Israeli government of carrying out a campaign of “state-sanctioned, state-driven and state-implemented” ethnic cleansing in the occupied West Bank. “Settler violence is not an aberration but an integral part of an organized state policy,” they note .

I want to make very clear here that Amnesty International does not use the term “ethnic cleansing” lightly. It states that while the term is “not recognized as an independent crime under international law”, it is using it “in line with the UN Commission of Experts on Former Yugoslavia’s definition”, which describes it as “a purposeful policy designed by one ethnic or religious group to remove by violent and terror-inspiring means the civilian population of another ethnic or religious group from certain geographic areas”.

While the situation in the West Bank is terrible, it’s even worse in Gaza – which is only 50 or so miles away from the luxury pilates room at 51 Park. Before 7 October 2023, Gaza was already one of the most densely populated places on Earth. Now Israel controls 60% of the territory (and has said it will seize 70%) , and the population is packed even more tightly together. About 1.7 million people in Gaza are homeless and concentrated in crowded tent camps. While Paltrow advertises apartment buildings with swimming pools, there isn’t a single proper toilet in Gaza’s camps and the sewage system has been decimated.

Waste is not just unpleasant – it is a weapon. Crowded camps, full of rats and lice, are breeding grounds for deadly disease. Unicef USA writes that there have been “more than 70,000 cases of rodent and ectoparasitic infestations have been reported in 2026 alone. Limited access to essential medications makes it difficult to respond to all cases.” Newborn babies are being gnawed on by rats in filthy camps in Gaza, while Paltrow shows off the wine rooms of a luxury tower development down the road. It is some real The Zone of Interest stuff .

Paltrow’s advert has generated intense backlash. Still, that’s nothing new for her. The Goop founder has always courted controversy and doesn’t mind people yelling at her on the internet, so long as it generates headlines. “I can monetize those eyeballs,” she pronounced during a Harvard Business School lecture about the many viral uproars that Goop has been behind. A 2018 New York Times profile of Paltrow notes that “Goop had learned to do a special kind of dark art: to corral the vitriol of the internet and the ever-present shall we call it cultural ambivalence about GP herself and turn them into cash”.

While Paltrow may enjoy inciting internet uproar, going viral because you’ve told women to steam their vaginas is a very different proposition than going viral because you’ve got everyone talking about dead babies. Paltrow isn’t stupid – she’s a very savvy marketer – and I presume she predicted that advertising luxury real estate in a country whose government is currently being accused of ethnic cleansing and genocide would generate anger. Indeed, that might be why she hasn’t promoted her 51 Park advert on her personal Instagram.

So why do it? Why hook your brand to luxury real estate in a country that is bulldozing entire villages in Lebanon, Gaza and the West Bank? Personal sympathies, perhaps: Paltrow has expressed support for Israel’s victims of the 7 October Hamas attack but hasn’t said anything publicly about the innocent Palestinian and Lebanese civilians who have been killed by Israel. It’s possible that Paltrow believes that, in the long run, nobody will really care and this whole genocide thing will blow over. “When you’re at the forefront of something that’s new, people can get really reactive: ‘This is crazy! Why are you doing this?’” she once said about her scientifically dubious ideas. “Then, five years later, everyone’s fine with it.”

It’s also worth noting that the Israeli development isn’t the only odd thing that Paltrow has been promoting. Last week, she had the co-founder of military tech company Anduril on her podcast. While it may seem for a wellness guru to be interviewing someone who profits from death, Mother Jones noted that the podcast “comes amid a larger rightward turn in both Silicon Valley and American wellness culture, perhaps best exemplified by the rise of Robert F Kennedy Jr”.

Anyway, the good news for Paltrow is that if she wants to keep advertising new buildings in Israel, she’s going to have plenty of opportunities to do so. The Israeli government recently established an agency to facilitate the “voluntary” removal of the Palestinian population in Gaza so that Donald Trump’s vision of a luxury riviera can be realized. Give it a few years and we might see Paltrow doing adverts for multimillion-dollar resorts built on mass graves. I can see the tagline now: “Price so good, it feels like a steal!”

David Hockney obituary | Painting | The Guardian

Keyword – Art and design
Trefwoorden – Painting, Art, Art and design, David Hockney, UK news, Culture
Title – David Hockney obituary | Painting | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/charles-darwent
Link – David Hockney obituary | Painting | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-12T12:35:48.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2026/jun/12/david-hockney-obituary

Soon after he moved to Los Angeles in the 1960s, the artist David Hockney was visited by his mother. As they drove back from the airport, far from her native Bradford, she gazed about her in apparent awe at the beauties of sun-kissed southern California. Then, as Hockney was fond of recalling, she turned and said: “I don’t understand it. Such lovely drying weather and no one’s got their washing out.” Mrs Hockney thus joined Mrs Warhol and Alan Bennett’s “Mam” as working-class mothers who delighted in their son’s success without ever quite understanding it.

Hockney, who has died aged 88, had been similarly awestruck when he first went to California in 1963, commissioned to make work for a show in New York. His response, though, was quite different. Looking down from a Pan Am jet, he marvelled at the blue glint of swimming pools and thought, “My God, this place needs its Piranesi.”

His first Californian picture, Plastic Tree Plus City Hall , celebrated the artificiality of Los Angeles – what the critic Robert Hughes called its role as “a flat, glaring, over-lit, antiseptic madhouse”. It also did so in artificial paint, the plastic-based acrylic that Hockney now used seriously for the first time.

Acrylic allowed for brighter saturations of colour than had traditional oil paints while doing away with surface texture. It was the perfect medium for capturing that signifier of a shallow world, the dappled surface of a chlorinated pool.

Back in London the following year, at his flat in Powis Square, Notting Hill, Hockney set to work on Picture of a Hollywood Swimming Pool , based on drawings he had made in California. Pushed up flat against the picture plane, the work’s blue-on-white squiggled surface looks merely pretty, poster-like. Like the artist who made it, though, its frivolity is deceptive. Picture of a Hollywood Swimming Pool is a polished, late-modernist work, its interplay of surface and depth consciously drawing on its maker’s knowledge of Matisse and Cézanne.

It was to be the forerunner of a body of work that, 60 years later, remains Hockney’s best known: paintings such as Peter Getting Out of Nick’s Pool (1966), centred on the tan-lined bare bottom of the artist’s then partner, the Californian student Peter Schlesinger . These works would culminate, in 1967, in the image that is still Hockney’s most famous, lending its name to Jack Hazan’s 1973 semi-fictionalised biopic of the artist: A Bigger Splash .

Square and white-bordered, the 8ft x 8ft canvas, now in Tate Britain , mimics the Polaroid snapshot on which it was based, the better to claim its own status as a painting.

When Hockney had arrived at the Royal College of Art just a few years before, in 1959, after a national diploma in design at Bradford College of Art followed by two years of alternative service (Hockney, like his father, was a conscientious objector) it was a feverish place at a febrile time. Recent graduates included Peter Blake, Frank Auerbach and Bridget Riley. Hockney’s particular admiration was for an older American called Ron Kitaj, better known as RB. It was Kitaj who suggested the subject of his first London paintings, Hockney being at the time a militant vegetarian. “I handed out leaflets about the cruelty involved in making the terrible sausages you got in the common room,” he remembered. “At Kitaj’s suggestion, I started painting vegetarian propaganda pictures and they became absurd and interesting.”

The older man’s magic lay in his nationality. Like most students at the RCA – and, indeed, like most postwar Britons – Hockney was fascinated by the US: Kitaj’s speciality at the time was proto-pop paintings of American motorcyclists and film stars. He also introduced the young Yorkshireman to Walt Whitman , whose poems of gay love would inspire a series of works Hockney called the Love Paintings. One, described by its new owner as “an indecent picture”, was bought by the photographer Cecil Beaton. Whitman’s verse was also the source of Hockney’s best-known college piece, a more-or-less openly homoerotic canvas called We Two Boys Together Clinging . Unusually, this had begun life as an etching. The influence of graphic art would remain central to Hockney’s painting.

Awarded the RCA’s gold medal by Richard Hamilton in 1961 (“David looked fine in his gold lamé jacket,” his proud mother wrote) Hockney was by now the college star. His work hogged reviews of that year’s Young Contemporaries show in London, catching the eye of the gallerist Paul Kasmin, who proposed himself as his promoter. With Kasmin’s backing, Hockney flew to New York on 9 July 1961, his 24th birthday. There, he saw a television advertisement for Lady Clairol hair dye, its slogan “Is it true blondes have more fun?” He returned to London a blond, in which guise he appeared, photographed by Lord Snowdon and alongside Francis Bacon, in the Sunday Times’ new magazine the following June.

The 60s had taken Hockney to the US and stardom, but the decade that followed would be marked by loss. He had, for a time, been the lover of the couturier Ossie Clark; when Clark married the fabric designer Celia Birtwell , in 1969, Hockney was the pair’s best man. His portrait of them, made as a wedding present, is full of foreboding. Mr and Mrs Clark and Percy (1970-71) , painted contre-jour , looks like the depiction of an idealised couple. It is, in reality, a problem painting, peppered with ominous hints and clues.

If Clark has the couple’s cat, Blanche, in his lap, the one in the picture’s title is Percy, slang for penis. Reversing the traditional order of wedding portraits, Clark sits while his wife stands; Hockney remains a presence in their life, in the form of one of the etchings from his early 60s series, The Rake’s Progress , hanging on a wall to the left. (These would feed into his set design for Stravinsky’s opera of the same name at Glyndebourne in 1975.) By 1974, Clark’s marriage was over, as was Hockney’s friendship with him.

All this was a far cry from Hockney’s early life. Born in Bradford, the fourth child of Laura (nee Thompson) and Kenneth Hockney, David had been raised in a back-to-back terrace house. Both of his parents had artistic leanings – Laura had been a pattern-maker in a firm of drapers, Ken was a keen photographer – but life in Steadman Terrace was nonetheless drab.

The elder Hockneys were strict Methodists, high-minded and teetotal; Laura was a vegetarian, Kenneth a pacifist. While his relationship with his parents remained close to the end of their lives, for their third son California was to be everything that Bradford was not.

Signs of his talent emerged early. To the annoyance of his brothers, three-year-old David would draw on their comics. When that was forbidden, he chalked pictures on the kitchen linoleum floor. It was watching his father at work on the old prams he restored for a living that opened David’s eyes to paint. “He had a special brush and he would hold his finger along the brush so he could paint a perfect line,” he recalled. “I thought: incredible that you can make a straight line like that with just your eye. It’s like watching Michelangelo draw a circle.”

The Hockneys were ambitious for their children. From Wellington Road primary, David followed his brothers on a scholarship to the revered Bradford grammar school. His parents were delighted, their son less so. Art at the grammar school was for less clever boys; the scholarship stream was allowed one period a week, the bottom class could study it to A-level. Accordingly, Hockney set about failing, swiftly falling from first in his class of 30 to 30th. When his ploy was discovered, Laura paid for him to have lessons in calligraphy from an artist neighbour. Hockney would count this early grounding in graphics as key to his later work.

His second discovery, arriving at Bradford College of Art in 1953, would be colour. This was a day of kitchen-sink realism in British art, characterised by Hockney’s older contemporary John Bratby as a mood “of ration books, sackcloth and ashes – introvert, grim, khaki”.

A lithograph made at the end of Hockney’s first year shows him bucking this trend. A self-portrait, it shows the artist-to-be on a red plush chair set in front of a wall tricked out in yellow paper, his hair already shaped in the pudding-bowl cut that would become his trademark. His first painted portrait, reverts to the older, Sickertian palette favoured at Bradford. “What you were really concerned about was tonal values,” Hockney recalled. “This meant you ignored colour. Colour was not a subject of painting in that school.” Nonetheless, Portrait of My Father (1955) was to be his first sale, fetching £10 from a show of Yorkshire art at the Leeds Art Gallery. Told the news, Hockney rang Laura and said, “Hello, Mum, I’ve sold my Dad.”

Hockney continued to paint his parents over the next quarter of a century, flying them over to Paris to sit for him in the mid-70s after he had moved there to get over his break-up with Schlesinger. The result was a trio of French double portraits of which My Parents and Myself (1975) and My Parents (1977) survive.

In the former, the artist appears between Laura and Ken, reflected in a mirror in the manner of Velázquez’s Las Meninas. Hockney found the image unsatisfactory: it was taken home to Los Angeles and left there, unseen, until its reappearance in an exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery in London in 2020.

By contrast, My Parents was bought by Tate in 1981 and has been on show ever since. It is a work suffused with nostalgia, focusing on Laura’s slippered feet and Ken’s homely absorption in a book. It would be Hockney’s last portrait of his father, who died in 1979, although he would go on painting and drawing his mother; vulnerable, in reed pen, on the day of Ken’s funeral; asleep in her bed in 1996, arthritic hands twisted in pain. Her son was with her in the Yorkshire seaside town of Bridlington when she died in 1999 .

Photography had proved a useful tool in his painting of the 60s and 70s, and in the 80s it became a medium in its own right. Composite Polaroids such as Still Life Blue Guitar (1982) used the multiple viewpoints of photography to explore the fractured unities of cubism. Photocollages such as Pearblossom Highway, 11-18 April 1981 # 1 turn the differing colour registers of individual photographs into brush marks. All these fed into the large-scale, multipanelled landscapes that Hockney painted in the 90s and 2000s: enormous, wall-sized works such as The Arrival of Spring in Woldgate, East Yorkshire (2011), which drew on sources as diverse as Van Gogh and Uccello. In 2010, he began to experiment with the iPad as a tool for drawing, encouraged by his computer-savvy sister, Margaret. This innovation culminated in a huge audiovisual interactive show of “a personal journey through his art”, at Lightroom, King’s Cross, London, in 2022.

For all this ceaseless reinvention, the loss of his mother seemed to leave him rootless. In 2004, Hockney returned to Bridlington. By now, he lived in a constantly shifting menage of friends, assistants, lovers and former lovers. For the next few years, he moved back and forth between his various homes, finally settling in a 17th-century timbered house in Normandy with his last partner, Jean-Pierre Gonçalves de Lima, in 2019. His iPad landscapes of the region, made in the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic, were shown in an exhibition, A Year in Normandy , at the Musée de l’Orangerie in Paris in 2021.

In an output as vast and diverse as Hockney’s, it was inevitable that there should be weak patches. His 2001 book, Secret Knowledge: Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters, was ridiculed by art historians for its insistence that Jan van Eyck and others had used concave mirrors in their compositions. Hockney’s riff on the French landscape painter Claude Lorrain in the Royal Academy’s 2012 show, A Bigger Picture , drew splutters from British critics – in particular his 15ft x 24ft multipanel remake of Lorrain’s The Sermon on the Mount, the titular mountain rendered in carrot-orange and green.

For all that, Hockney’s work was, for six decades, the most known and liked of any British artist’s, and not just among Britons. His 13-room retrospective at Tate Britain in 2017 , with nearly half a million visitors, was outdone by an even larger iteration at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York the following year. That November, his 1972 Portrait of an Artist (Pool With Two Figures) sold at auction in New York for $90.3m, making it the most expensive painting ever sold by a living artist.

He was made a Companion of Honour in 1997; in 2012, he was appointed to the Order of Merit. In 2019, Time magazine named the then 82-year-old Yorkshireman as one of the world’s 100 most influential people.

He remained an unrepentant smoker, even after a stroke in 2012. At least part of the reason for this was bloody-mindedness at the growing demonisation of cigarettes. “Smoking calms me down,” a defiant Hockney said. “It’s enjoyable. I don’t want politicians deciding what is exciting in my life.”

In 2023, he moved back to London. Hockney’s paintings of Normandy were shown at the Musée des Beaux-Arts in Rouen the following year, and a vast retrospective of nearly 500 works at the Fondation Louis Vuitton in Paris the year after that.

He is survived by Jean-Pierre and two of his brothers, Philip and John.

David Hockney, artist, born 9 July 1937; died 11 June 2026