The one change that worked: I saw a woman lift 100kg and decided: ‘I want to do that!’ | Life and style | The Guardian

Keyword – Life and style
Trefwoorden – Life and style, Fitness, Training programmes, Women
Title – The one change that worked: I saw a woman lift 100kg and decided: ‘I want to do that!’ | Life and style | The Guardian
Author – Laura Evans
Link – The one change that worked: I saw a woman lift 100kg and decided: ‘I want to do that!’ | Life and style | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-22T10:00:21.000Z
Category – Lifestyle
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2026/jun/22/the-one-change-that-worked-i-saw-a-woman-lift-100kg-and-decided-i-want-to-do-that

I t’s fair to say I don’t come from a long line of athletes. When I was growing up in the 1990s, sport was something other people did; we were not a family who cycled, much less jogged. In PE I was the wheezing child hiding behind the bins, pretending I’d twisted an ankle. When I contemplated working out – not often – I had the vague idea it was supposed to turn my body into something other people might find attractive.

I evolved from an unsporty child into an unsporty adult. Occasionally, mostly in an attempt to lose weight without having to stop eating croissants, I would attempt something like Couch to 5K, which I’d either abandon after a couple of sessions or see through to the bitter end out of the perverse determination to prove I’d been right all along: exercise was a mug’s game and endorphins an invention of Big Wellness.

Then came children. A large-headed baby delivered two weeks late via C-section was not all that kind on the body. My back, in particular, began to protest; doubly so when, three years on, I did it again, this time while wrestling a toddler. Was this just what age felt like? Things that used to work becoming, overnight, a bit of a letdown?

I tried physio, osteopathy, chiropractic treatment. Eventually, someone suggested strength training. Apparently I had something called a core and it could do with being, well, stronger. I was desperate enough to try. That, and I was becoming increasingly incensed at the decades of internalised misogyny that had shaped the way I thought women ought to look. I didn’t want to be slim; I wanted to be strong .

Infuriatingly, it turned out that putting in actual effort did, in fact, work. Within weeks, I wasn’t waking from backache. I could pick up my children without wincing. For the first time in my life, I was beginning to understand my body’s potential in terms not of what it could look like, but of what it could do.

Still, I wasn’t hugely enjoying the exercising, and I didn’t need much of a reason to message my ever-patient personal trainer with a half-arsed excuse. But one day I saw the author Fiona Cummins had tweeted about managing, finally, to reach her goal of deadlifting 100kg. There was something about that number – its sheer, round, solid chutzpah – that made me tell my PT: “I want to do that.”

So we did. A programme of deadlifts, squats and bench presses, supplemented with complementary exercises, and I began to work towards some properly heavy weights. Weights that initially sounded impossible – but with only one hour-long session a week, I found myself getting closer. Within months I was deadlifting 80kg, then 85kg, then 90kg. At first a single rep, but a month later, five, 10. My body was changing, too – not as the byproduct of growing a child or mainlining cake, but as the direct result of what I was pushing it to do. It was a strange and exhilarating feeling.

Even more significantly, something about the measurable, incremental progress made the competitive side of my brain tick in a way no other exercise had. When I eventually hit my 100kg goal, it felt like being handed a trophy – but there were countless other rewarding moments, many of them outside my training sessions. I could swing my toddler over my shoulder and into a back sling. (I tried the move a few weeks ago, now that she’s nearly seven, and yes, I can still do it. Strong-arm emoji.) I could carry my own Ikea order in from the car. Hell, I could carry it up the stairs, and build it singlehandedly as well. I didn’t need a man to move something for me. Quite often I could move something for them.

Now, when I think about fitness, it’s as an end in itself. In the gym or out on my paddleboard – yes, a second form of exercise I genuinely enjoy – sport is no longer somewhere I don’t belong. And I’ve gone from feeling like a passenger in my body to feeling in control of it, C-section scars and all.

Laura Evans’s debut novel, Little Wild, is published on 25 June.

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here .

European leaders pay tribute to Starmer as EU-UK summit is postponed | European Union | The Guardian

Keyword – World news
Trefwoorden – European Union, Keir Starmer, Ursula von der Leyen, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Friedrich Merz, Europe, Ukraine, Politics, UK news
Title – European leaders pay tribute to Starmer as EU-UK summit is postponed | European Union | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/jennifer-rankin
Link – European leaders pay tribute to Starmer as EU-UK summit is postponed | European Union | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-22T15:07:40.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/22/european-leaders-pay-tribute-keir-starmer-eu-uk-summit-postponed

European leaders have paid tribute to Keir Starmer after he announced his resignation as the British prime minister, triggering the postponement of an upcoming EU-UK summit.

The European Council president, António Costa, said: “For sure we need to postpone it, but we are reassessing the opportunity to hold this new summit …

“My wish is ⁠that [Starmer’s] successor ​will give ​continuity on ​this path to ​reset ‌our relationship ​with ​the UK.”

Soon after Starmer’s resignation speech at No 10, the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen , tweeted: “It can take many leaders years to grow into the statesman you became in just two years. European and Ukrainian security is stronger because of you. Thank you, dear Keir.”

The annual EU-UK summit was announced for 22 July only last week, after weeks of uncertainty and delay. With Andy Burnham hot favourite to be the next British prime minister and unlikely to face a contest, Starmer’s last outing on the world stage could be the Nato summit in Ankara on 7-8 July.

Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, thanked Starmer for “all our cooperation, your support, and the joint decisions that have helped make our Europe and our protection of life stronger”. While Kyiv expressed frustration with UK support during the early part of Starmer’s premiership , Zelenskyy offered warm praise: “Keir, you are always a welcome guest in Ukraine.”

The Kremlin’s chief spokesperson said Starmer had “not done anything to distinguish himself on the issue of British-Russia relations” adding that it was unlikely anyone on the British political scene would take a different position.

German chancellor Friedrich Merz’s spokesperson said Starmer had always been “a reliable and close partner in foreign policy questions, particularly regarding Ukraine”. Starmer is expected to attend an E5 meeting on Wednesday in Berlin, where Germany, France, the UK, Italy and Poland will prepare for the Nato summit.

Donald Trump offered his best wishes, laced with characteristic attack lines, even before Starmer made his Downing Street announcement. “Keir Starmer will resign as Prime Minister of The United Kingdom,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. “He failed badly on two very important subjects- IMMIGRATION AND ENERGY (OPEN NORTH SEA OIL!). I wish him well!”

After an unexpectedly smooth start between the pair, differences were revealed when Trump disparaged Nato allies, prompting an angry rebuttal from Starmer over the “insulting and frankly appalling” comments about British troops in Afghanistan. Trump also criticised the UK over the Chagos Islands and, most significantly, over Starmer’s refusal to offer military support in the US-Israeli attacks on Iran.

Trump, who waged an unsuccessful legal battle with the Scottish government to stop a windfarm development near his Aberdeenshire golf course, has also accused Starmer of “windmilling the country to death”.

Other traditional allies struck a different note. Australia’s prime minister, Anthony Albanese, said he was thinking of his friend on “what must be a very tough day. Serving in public life is a tremendous privilege but politics can also be a harsh business.”

Norway’s prime minister, Jonas Gahr Støre, also a centre-left leader, said: “The United Kingdom is Norway’s close ally in Europe, and over the past two years our countries have grown even closer through important agreements.”

Before he announced the postponement of the summit, Costa said under Starmer’s premiership “we turned a new page in EU-UK relations”.

“The EU is committed to continued cooperation in this spirit,” he added, describing Starmer as a friend.

At the postponed EU-UK summit, the two sides hoped to sign agreements on a food and drink deal to ease border checks, linking emissions trading systems and a youth mobility programme.

Post-referendum EU-UK relations turned a corner under the last Conservative prime minister, Rishi Sunak, in 2023 with the signing of a Northern Ireland Brexit deal. Relations became warmer when Starmer won power in July 2024, although many EU officials thought the government’s reset hopes were unrealistic.

While the EU and UK signed a security partnership in May 2025, the two sides failed to find an agreement on British participation in the EU’s €150bn Safe defence loans scheme.

Speaking to the Guardian earlier this month, Germany’s former Europe minister Micael Roth, who was Starmer’s counterpart during the Brexit negotiation years, said: “We cannot be happy if a close partner is in such a very, very challenging, difficult situation.

“We very much hoped for a more stable government.” He added that Germany, France and Spain were among the European countries also afflicted by political troubles.

Cristiano Ronaldo risks ruining his legacy if he continues to stymie Portugal by starting | World Cup 2026 | The Guardian

Keyword – Football
Trefwoorden – World Cup 2026, Cristiano Ronaldo, Portugal, World Cup, Football, Sport
Title – Cristiano Ronaldo risks ruining his legacy if he continues to stymie Portugal by starting | World Cup 2026 | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/miguel-dantas
Link – Cristiano Ronaldo risks ruining his legacy if he continues to stymie Portugal by starting | World Cup 2026 | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-22T04:00:49.000Z
Category – Sport
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/jun/22/cristiano-ronaldo-portugal-world-cup

At 41, Cristiano Ronaldo’s problem is not his age. It is that nobody seems willing to tell him to his face what everyone else can see. In Portugal, patience for the legend has run dry.

Ronaldo is not fit to be a Portugal starter any more. What would have sounded like a treasonous statement a few years ago now looks an obvious truth. At least to everyone except the national team manager, Roberto Martínez, and his coaching staff.

More than the shock of Portugal drawing against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) – a team that had never earned a point at a World Cup – Ronaldo’s future has been the country’s biggest talking point. Whether you’re on the subway, walking your dog through the park or doing your shopping, you can’t escape the debate. It raged before the tournament and is deafening now.

Before discussing Ronaldo’s form, let’s get a few things straight. As a Portuguese citizen, football fan and journalist, I feel indebted to him. Travel to almost any corner of the globe, mention where you are from and his name will probably be the first thing you hear in response. People will ask whether you like him. They will recall a goal he scored against their favourite team. They will tell you where they were when they watched him play.

At the height of Ronaldo’s rivalry with Lionel Messi, choosing the Argentinian felt almost unpatriotic. Family lunches descended into chaos when the subject came up and two uncles had opposing views. Few athletes have done more to project the image of their country and Ronaldo has the merit of having done so since the early stages of the social media boom.

But that legacy is beginning to suffer. It is hard to understand why Martínez continues to start Ronaldo and, even more puzzlingly, leaves him on for the full 90 minutes. Against the DRC, he touched the ball 25 times, the lowest number of anyone who played the entire game for Portugal. He neither threatened the opposition goal nor disrupted the DRC’s defensive structure in any meaningful way.

The DRC midfielder Ngal’ayel Mukau in effect said as much after the match: “We know that he isn’t the same as before. He is a little bit older now. But still, he is one of the greatest to play the game. We have much respect for him.”

Can you imagine an opponent saying that about Ronaldo in 2016? Today, it reflects a reality that the vast majority of people can plainly see. Portugal have one of the best squads in the world, with players such as Vitinha, Bruno Fernandes and João Neves. They do not need Ronaldo to start any more.

So, who is responsible? Ronaldo is among the least culpable. It is natural for a footballer, regardless of age, to want to play as much as possible – especially someone with his relentless competitive drive, the quality that allowed him to conquer multiple leagues and countries.

More surprising is Martínez’s approach and that no one in Ronaldo’s inner circle appears willing to tell him what has become increasingly obvious: if he truly wants to serve the team, he should approach the coach about taking a reduced role.

Players of his stature have a duty to recognise when they are no longer contributing to the team as they once did. By continuing to occupy a position he can no longer justify on merit, he is holding Portugal back and damaging the image he spent his career building.

Should Ronaldo be part of Portugal’s World Cup squad? Absolutely. A player with his experience remains invaluable off the field. He can guide younger players through high-pressure moments, provide leadership from the sidelines and serve as a source of inspiration. It would be naive to ignore his commercial value for the tournament and the Portuguese football federation, and there may be moments when it would be useful to bring him off the bench.

The saddest part of the story is that the greatest player in Portuguese football history risks seriously tarnishing his legacy. How will he be remembered? As the boy from humble beginnings who left Madeira at a young age, moved to Lisbon alone and conquered world football? Or as the ageing superstar who tried to defy time and ended up a shadow of his former self?

Ronaldo no longer tracks back during defensive transitions. He lacks the explosiveness and relentless movement that once defined him. These were observations that many privately acknowledged years ago but hesitated to voice publicly. Now they are impossible to ignore or stay silent about.

Fernando Santos recognised this during the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, when he made the bold decision to leave Ronaldo out of the starting lineup. For the first time, his untouchable status within the national team was challenged. When Santos departed, a reset button was pushed and Ronaldo returned to being an automatic starter.

Will this criticism motivate Ronaldo to work even harder? Absolutely. Can he still prove everyone wrong? Realistically, no. Would I like him to enjoy a dignified farewell on football’s biggest stage? There is nothing I want more.

Barack Obama’s gripping new show: best podcasts of the week | Television & radio | The Guardian

Keyword – Television & radio
Trefwoorden – Television & radio, Culture, Podcasts
Title – Barack Obama’s gripping new show: best podcasts of the week | Television & radio | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/hannah-j-davies,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/alexi-duggins
Link – Barack Obama’s gripping new show: best podcasts of the week | Television & radio | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-22T06:00:52.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2026/jun/22/barack-obamas-gripping-new-show-best-podcasts-of-the-week

Pick of the week Reconstruction: The Unfinished Promise

Who would have thought, back in 2008, that Barack Obama (pictured above) would become one of podcasting’s biggest movers and shakers? The former president is front and centre of this series on the post-slavery period in the US, a collaboration with Malcolm Gladwell for Audible and the History Channel. It’s slick and excellently researched, but it’s the calibre of conversation and careful dot-joining that make it so compelling. Hannah J Davies Widely available, episodes weekly

Tocqueville Road Trip

John Prideaux, the Economist’s US editor, embarks on a road trip to assess America’s democracy on its 250th anniversary. He’s following the 1831 tour of French aristocrat Alexis de Tocqueville, whose book is “the single most insightful thing ever written about the United States”. It’s a colourful way to wrestle with anxieties over whether it can survive Trump. Alexi Duggins Widely available, episodes weekly

Swingers

Journalist Catrin Nye tells the tale of a woman who joined a swinging website to please her husband – and says she had non-consensual sex with more than 100 men. It’s graphic, troubling and spares no detail, as Nye looks into swinging, including interviews with the men who do it. What she uncovers is not easy listening. Alexi Duggins BBC Sounds, all episodes available now

Here for the History

According to legend, a leaf drifted into Chinese emperor Shen Nung’s drink of boiling water in 2737BC and the cuppa was born. Tea is just one British tradition that historian Alice Loxton and the BBC’s Ben Henderson explore in this podcast – though the conversation soon turns to the violence and smuggling it provoked. HJD BBC Sounds, episodes weekly

Bone Valley

Rolling Stone writer Paul Solotaroff hosts the fifth season of the acclaimed true-crime strand, on the murder of a 12-year-old girl in New York State in 1995. While the circumstances of Josette Wright’s death are nightmarish, this is a careful, powerful investigation: says Solotaroff, this is a story that has “pierced the skin, and will not give me peace”. HJD Widely available, episodes weekly

The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to Life After AI by Cory Doctorow review – the real price of artificial intelligence | Science and nature books | The Guardian

Keyword – Books
Trefwoorden – Science and nature books, Books, Culture, AI (artificial intelligence), Technology, Computing
Title – The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to Life After AI by Cory Doctorow review – the real price of artificial intelligence | Science and nature books | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/dorianlynskey
Link – The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to Life After AI by Cory Doctorow review – the real price of artificial intelligence | Science and nature books | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-22T06:00:52.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/books/2026/jun/22/the-reverse-centaurs-guide-to-life-after-ai-by-cory-doctorow-review-the-real-price-of-artificial-intelligence

A s former Google CEO Eric Schmidt  could tell you, AI is a hard sell these days. Last month, he tried talking up the AI revolution during a commencement address at the University of Arizona and was loudly booed by students about to enter an AI-ravaged job market. His discombobulation was telling.

Schmidt is not the only AI booster to crash out with students recently as the popular backlash grows. Every week brings a new story about some writer, publisher or academic who has torched their reputation by using an unreliable chatbot. Most US voters are opposed to the construction of vast, resource-guzzling new datacentres. A majority believe AI will negatively impact not just jobs but creativity and human relationships. In some quarters, saying that AI has any benefits at all is akin to saying that biological warfare gets a bad rap. As a New York Times column put it : “AI populism is here. And no one is ready.”

A decade ago, when the likes of Elon Musk and Sam Altman were still passionate advocates of heavily regulated ethical AI (ha!), the technology’s most widely discussed downside had an apocalyptic glamour: superintelligent AI could one day destroy the human race. But since Altman’s company OpenAI released its large language model ChatGPT in November 2022, AI’s public image has fallen to earth: it’s now widely seen as a job crusher, a fact mangler, a slop maker, a privacy invader, a climate trasher and a general pain in the neck. Never before has a new technology been rammed down our throats with such speed, determination and complete disregard for public opinion. Cory Doctorow’s book pithily explains why.

Doctorow, who writes like he talks and talks like he writes, is not somebody who needs AI to fill pages. Counting fiction, nonfiction and graphic novels, this is, by my calculation, his 36th book, hard on the heels of last year’s Enshittification . That polemic expanded on his own neologism to describe why Big Tech’s grow-or-die business model has made online platforms so much worse. This tawdry contempt for its customers is one of the reasons AI is so reviled. The Silicon Valley oligarchs telling us that AI will change the world are the last people we trust to change the world for the better. As a technology, AI has pros and cons; as a rushed project of rapacious elites, it is transparently obscene.

Doctorow speeds through this entertaining primer with his usual vivid analogies, righteous ire and snarky asides – OpenAI, currently valued at $852bn, is parenthetically dismissed as “a grossly overhyped and terrible firm”. But as the central metaphor illustrates, this is not an anti-AI polemic and Doctorow is no purist. A centaur, in automation theory, is someone assisted by a machine, whether using a hearing aid or driving a car. A reverse centaur is someone whose freedom is diminished by the demands of a machine, like an Amazon warehouse worker. The technology of AI theoretically allows every worker to be a centaur, but the business model demands the reverse. Take radiology. In the centaur scenario, a human radiologist works with an AI radiologist to produce more accurate analysis, but that costs the hospital money. In the reverse centaur version, the AI radiologist demotes the surviving humans to the level of results-checking drones who are more likely to make mistakes. Much cheaper, but you see the problem.

Doctorow, who has written several science fiction novels, cites one of the genre’s defining messages: “The most important thing about the gadget isn’t what it does, it’s who it does it for and who it does it to.” Just as the Luddites weren’t angry with machines per se, most anti-AI sentiment is really anti-capitalist rather than anti-tech. Doctorow uses a framework a 19th-century socialist would recognise: the bosses will pull every trick to avoid paying workers more unless workers unionise to fight back.

The problem with the AI business is the same thing that drives enshittification. The improbable price-to-sales ratios of tech companies are based on the promise of future growth, hence high-stakes bets like the Metaverse or the failed social media platform Google+. The AI sector’s colossal valuation derives largely from the salaries of the human workers it aims to replace – Morgan Stanley predicts it will add almost a trillion dollars a year to the S&P 500. And because the net worth of tech bosses is tied to stock value rather than actual profits, they have a personal incentive to keep investors excited: today AI may be a money pit, but just you wait. If the investor is the real target of the AI industry’s marketing, then the consumer becomes simply a cog in the hype machine. Individuals using chatbots are not so much a crucial revenue stream as unwitting salespeople for the message that the machines will replace us any day now, as are journalists who cover such snake-oil absurdities as the AI-generated “actor” Tilly Norwood.

Doctorow despises the doctrine of “inevitabilism”, which he explains by way of Margaret Thatcher’s slogan “there is no alternative”. When Eric Schmidt told students, “[If] someone offers you a seat on the rocket ship, you do not ask which seat, you just get on,” that was inevitabilism. The idea is that revolutionary new technology gives you, the worker or consumer, no choice but to get on board. Yet the technology is shaped by the choices of people like Schmidt, and they aren’t inevitable at all. If you give people an ultimatum – use our product or suffer – then booing is the very least you can expect.

One thing to give anti-AI hardliners pause is Doctorow’s suggestion that the industry is deliberately juicing outrage about things like AI-generated art as a form of hype: if people are this scared and angered, then the promise of replacing human labour must be real. In this book, at least, he isn’t animated by the headline-grabbing concerns, whether existential risk or AI psychosis, deepfake porn or election disinformation, because those are unintended consequences. His target is the revenue model and the bubble it has created: “To be an effective AI critic, you need to strike at the source of AI’s power, which is the investment capital it attracts.”

It certainly looks like a bubble. Last year, two studies found that 90% of us are less likely to use a product if it is advertised as AI-enabled, and that 95% of generative AI pilot schemes are failing. In fact, many companies have been forced to hastily rehire employees that they had replaced with inadequate chatbots. For gen Zs, according to an NBC poll, AI has a favourability rating of minus 44. As Doctorow writes, “The tech platforms are desperate to convince Wall Street that you love AI, which is very different from convincing you that you love AI.”

Unfortunately, seven big tech companies alone account for one-third of the US stock market’s value, so the schadenfreude of watching the bubble burst would soon turn bitter – it is likely to cause an economic shock comparable to those of 2008 and 2020. This is the story of a remarkable new technology rolled out in the most reckless, self-serving way one could imagine, by the worst people, for the worst reasons. It’s not the machines you should be angry with.

The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to Life After AI: How to Think About Artificial Intelligence Before It’s Too Late is published by Verso (£16.99). To support the Guardian, order your copy at guardianbookshop.com . Delivery charges may apply.

I tried the new soft drinks from Trump’s son and granddaughter. Bad! | Life and style | The Guardian

Keyword – Life and style
Trefwoorden – Life and style, Donald Trump, US news
Title – I tried the new soft drinks from Trump’s son and granddaughter. Bad! | Life and style | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/adam-gabbatt
Link – I tried the new soft drinks from Trump’s son and granddaughter. Bad! | Life and style | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-22T11:00:23.000Z
Category – Lifestyle
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2026/jun/22/barron-kai-trump-yerba-mate-energy-drink-review

Do you like sugary soft drinks? Do you like Donald Trump and his family? Do you want to support nepotism?

If the answer is yes to all these questions, then have I got the products for you: a pineapple yerba mate co-founded by Trump’s son, and a syrupy, energy-drink-thing developed by his granddaughter.

Both endeavors represent the first steps by First Boy Barron Trump and First Granddaughter Kai Trump into the world of business. But how will they fare? Have the pair inherited Donald Trump’s famed business nous, a special kind of shrewdness that saw the president file for corporate bankruptcy six times and oversee the failure of numerous business interests? Or could their investments actually be successful?

I bought both drinks to find out.

Barron Trump’s effort, Sollos, came first. Sold with the vaguely threatening slogan “It begins where it ends”, Sollos says it is a “brand built around the Florida lifestyle”. Which lifestyle? Retirement home? Monster truck? It doesn’t say.

The drink’s “about” page does, however, claim that “SOLLOS is designed revolving around the cycle of the sun”, a phrase as grammatically incorrect as it is meaningless, while its creators – Trump, 20, is one of five co-founders, all of whom have spent some time in Florida – also say the drink “is built to move with your day”, a phrase I do not understand.

“Most brands launch with four flavors hoping you’ll like one of them; we have been obsessing over one flavor until it was flawless,” the website claims. The flavor they went with is pineapple and coconut, and it retails at an eye-watering $39.99 for 12 cans. It arrived, to its credit, in very nice packaging.

Excited, I opened a can of Sollos. It smelled like suncream mixed with pineapple juice. I took a sip. It tasted like suncream mixed with pineapple juice. I poured some out. It’s the color of a sort of posh apple juice, with the glass-staining sugariness to match.

It’s not for me. But then, I am not the target audience: I am neither seeking a beverage that will, in Sollos’s words, “truly fit how people in Florida actually live”, nor I am necessarily looking for something which “all started in a cabana”.

In fairness to Trump and his Sollos collaborators, their drink does feature some commendably natural-seeming ingredients, including organic raw honey and organic monk-fruit extract, neither of which I could taste.

So, what about Blue Raz Slush, the drink by Kai Trump?

It’s a collaboration with an existing drinks company called Accelerator, and is, according to Accelerator, “inspired by nostalgic blue raspberry slushies and summertime memories”.

“Blue Raz Slush delivers a bold, icy flavor profile designed to channel the feeling of summer while powering high-performance days,” the company said in a press release announcing the drink.

I bought 12 cans on Amazon for $24.99: about $5 more than the same amount of Celsius, a popular drink and likely competitor, but with slightly worse branding. The cans are in a sort of Sonic the Hedgehog blue, with blurry lettering claiming the drink has “clinically proven benefits” that include “sustained energy” and “enhanced focus”. It also claims that a study found it accelerates a drinker’s metabolism: the Accelerator website has a link to a page where that study is supposed to be available, but there is no study there .

So how does it taste? Bad. It is a bad drink. Like Red Bull but with a more chemical finish, it did not taste of summertime memories – none of my memories, anyway – although I suppose one could say that it does have a bold flavor.

Keen not to present as biased, I asked my wife to try the Kai Trump Accelerator. She refused, instead asking when I was planning to remove the 22 cans of Trump family drink from the corner of our living room.

“Working on Blue Raz Slush with the Accelerator team was such a fun experience because I was involved from the very beginning,” Kai Trump said in a press release accompanying the launch.

She said the team had “tested so many different versions to make sure the flavor felt authentic to my tastes”. The less said about that the better.

Accelerator contains 200mg of caffeine, which is three times the amount in an espresso, and the can warns that the drink is “not recommended for use by individuals under 18 years of age”. Kai Trump turned 19 in May.

While the move into the beverage industry represents a new move for Barron and Kai, it is far from the Trump family’s first foray.

Donald Trump launched Trump Vodka in 2005, telling reporters : “I fully expect the most called-for cocktail in America to be the ‘T&T’ or the ‘Trump and tonic’.” Trump Vodka was discontinued in the US in 2011 due to a lack of demand.

Trump Ice, a bottled water, was pushed by the president in the early 2000s. Trump described it as “one of the highest quality spring waters in the world”. It was reportedly discontinued in 2010.

It’s not the best track record, but perhaps Barron and Kai can shake off the failures of their ancestor’s past.

Maybe people want a drink designed revolving around the cycle of the sun, or a beverage inspired by nostalgic blue raspberry slushies and summertime memories.

All I know is: I don’t.

Met Office issues rare red weather warning for Wednesday and Thursday | UK weather | The Guardian

Keyword – UK news
Trefwoorden – UK weather, Climate crisis, Extreme heat, Extreme weather, UK news, Environment, England, Wales
Title – Met Office issues rare red weather warning for Wednesday and Thursday | UK weather | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/kevin-rawlinson,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/sallyweale
Link – Met Office issues rare red weather warning for Wednesday and Thursday | UK weather | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-22T12:58:13.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jun/22/uk-met-office-issues-rare-red-weather-warning-for-wednesday-and-thursday

Met Office forecasters have issued a rare red weather warning for Wednesday and Thursday in the face of extreme heat and humidity, while a red heat health alert has been issued in England indicating “a risk to life for even the healthy population”.

The weather warning covers southern Wales as far west as Swansea, and an area of England that includes London and runs from the inland areas of Kent across to Somerset, as far north-west as Birmingham, and as far north-east as southern Cambridgeshire.

People in those areas have been told to take immediate action to keep themselves safe as the UK prepares for dangerously high temperatures.

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) issued a red heat alert for six regions of England.

The West Midlands and East Midlands, the south-east and south-west, London, and the east of England are covered from 1am on Wednesday until 11pm on Thursday. It is only the second red heat health alert to be issued. The first was in July 2022 when temperatures exceeded 40C (104F).

The “area now looks increasingly likely to see a two- to three-day period where maximum temperatures in the shade exceed 37C, perhaps rising to 38 to 40C in some places”, forecasters said. “The heat will be accompanied by high humidity, exacerbating the potential for discomfort and health impacts, with very warm and humid night times also reducing the ability for people to recover overnight.

“Significant disruption to daily life is likely and the public should take every effort to make precautions and adapt their daily routines where possible to cope with these levels of heat, which up to now have been extremely rare for the UK.”

An amber warning – serious in its own right – also incorporates almost all of the rest of Wales, and most of the rest of England across to Cornwall, and up to Yorkshire and Lancashire.

A red weather warning, which indicates high degrees of both likelihood and impact on people’s lives, is rare in the UK. It means “dangerous weather is expected and, if you haven’t already done so, you should take action now to keep yourself and others safe”.

Met Office forecasters say such severe conditions present a genuine risk to life, with “substantial disruption to travel, energy supplies and possibly widespread damage to property and infrastructure”.

Bill McGuire, a professor emeritus of geophysical and climate hazards at University College London, said temperatures of more than 43C were possible in the UK’s current climate, with heatwaves lasting for several days.

But the country’s health services, energy infrastructure and transport are “simply not built for these conditions”, hesaid. “As 40+ temperatures become ever more common, expect many thousands sleeping in the streets as poorly insulated homes become uninhabitable heat traps, widespread power cuts as power cables sag and break, transport chaos as rails, overhead wires and signalling fail, and A&E departments overwhelmed by the old, very young, and vulnerable suffering from overheating.”

Friederike Otto, a professor of climate science at Imperial College London, said: “Our first 40C day was supposed to be a wakeup call, but clearly someone hit snooze. Hitting 40C again, and in June this time, would be incredibly alarming.

“There’s a sad inevitability to all of this, with scientists like me trotting out the same quotes year after year. Yes it’s climate change, yes it’s us, no it’s not El Niño. Simply put, we remain on a one-way trip towards a more dangerous future, and it’s time we hit the brakes.

“Right now, children are struggling to finish their exams in sweltering classrooms and the elderly are enduring dangerously hot homes and care facilities with little relief. This heat is not an inconvenience, it is a growing public health threat. Every heatwave puts lives at risk, and it’s long past time we treated it with the urgency it demands.”

Some schools are closing early this week to avoid the worse of the heat. Among them is Kingdown school in Warminster, Wiltshire, where lessons will finish at 12.25pm from Monday to Thursday for the “safety and wellbeing of our students and staff”.

Other schools are relaxing uniform rules, limiting vigorous PE lessons, relocating classes to cooler spaces and making sure additional water is available. At Kingsholm C of E primary school in Gloucester, where the school day is finishing at 1.30pm, children have been advised to wear PE kits to school.

The general secretary of the school leaders’ union NAHT, Paul Whiteman, said: “While there is no legal ‘upper limit’ for temperature in schools, they will certainly be doing all they can to mitigate the effects of such high temperatures.

“For most, this will mean making straightforward adjustments such as limiting the time spent in the sun during breaks, ensuring additional water is available, making adjustments to uniform expectations where appropriate and ventilating classrooms as best they can.

“If, as it appears, warmer summers are going to become the norm, then government really does need to act more urgently to improve and modernise school buildings, including a focus on ventilation and potentially air conditioning.”

The Department for Education does not normally advise schools to close in hot weather, insisting it can usually be managed safely. It advises sunscreen, relaxing uniform rules, adapting PE lessons and ventilation.

Bare bums brave the cold for Hobart’s Dark Mofo annual nude solstice swim – in pictures | Dark Mofo | The Guardian

Keyword – Culture
Trefwoorden – Dark Mofo, Swimming, Tasmania, Hobart, Festivals
Title – Bare bums brave the cold for Hobart’s Dark Mofo annual nude solstice swim – in pictures | Dark Mofo | The Guardian
Author –
Link – Bare bums brave the cold for Hobart’s Dark Mofo annual nude solstice swim – in pictures | Dark Mofo | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-22T02:38:44.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/culture/gallery/2026/jun/22/dark-mofo-nude-solstice-swim-hobart-tasmania-in-pictures

Clive Davis: a life in pictures from Diana Ross to Aretha Franklin | Music | The Guardian

Keyword – Music
Trefwoorden – Music, Culture, Music industry, Whitney Houston, Aretha Franklin, Diana Ross, Pop and rock
Title – Clive Davis: a life in pictures from Diana Ross to Aretha Franklin | Music | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/guardianmusic
Link – Clive Davis: a life in pictures from Diana Ross to Aretha Franklin | Music | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-22T17:21:30.000Z
Category – Culture
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/music/gallery/2026/jun/22/clive-davis-photos

‘They didn’t know or care, or wouldn’t say’: how we investigated the casualties of a covert US war | Press freedom | The Guardian

Keyword – Membership
Trefwoorden – Press freedom, Media, Newspapers & magazines, Somalia, Al-Shabaab, Drones (military), Middle East and north Africa, US foreign policy
Title – ‘They didn’t know or care, or wouldn’t say’: how we investigated the casualties of a covert US war | Press freedom | The Guardian
Author – https://www.theguardian.com/profile/gautam-malkani
Link – ‘They didn’t know or care, or wouldn’t say’: how we investigated the casualties of a covert US war | Press freedom | The Guardian
Publish date – 2026-06-21T09:00:26.000Z
Category – News
URL – https://www.theguardian.com/membership/2026/jun/21/they-didnt-know-or-care-or-wouldnt-say-how-we-investigated-the-casualties-of-a-covert-us-war

T here are many reasons why some military conflicts go unreported or underreported. Local restrictions on press freedom. Prohibitively high risks to journalists’ safety. A lack of resources. The tendency for geopolitical conflicts to attract more attention than civil conflicts. And the sheer number of armed conflicts around the world right now. All these factors can also impede reporting on the humanitarian toll, civilian casualties and attempts to hold armed forces accountable.

Earlier this week, the Guardian published an investigation into the deaths of at least 12 civilians, including eight children, who were killed in a US airstrike in Somalia last year amid Washington’s covert military campaign against the Islamist militant group al-Shabaab. The articles, which are part of our Rights and Freedom series, are an example of the Guardian’s efforts to highlight conflicts that might otherwise receive little public attention.

“We’re reporting on this in the hope that the information and the Guardian’s reach will cut through,” says Mark Townsend, a senior global development reporter who worked on the investigation with Mohamed Gabobe, a freelance journalist and producer based in Mogadishu. “But it’s a very hard conflict to actually report on. Even excellent reporters like Mohamed can’t travel to areas controlled by al-Shabaab where this war is being conducted. And civilians in those areas aren’t allowed internet access or smartphones, so getting footage of strikes or images of the aftermath and victims and all the things you’d want to corroborate testimony is very difficult. On top of that, the US doesn’t release anything about what’s going on – it’s a very opaque campaign.”

The airstrike in question happened in November in the town of Jamaame. It was the deadliest US operation for civilians in Somalia during either Trump administration, and the bombing has become increasingly aggressive .

Mohamed says the impact on civilians caught up in the US drone war is all-too often overlooked by western news organisations. “I sometimes get the sense that many western media outlets view civilian casualties from US airstrikes in Somalia as a norm and part of everyday life,” he says. “But death shouldn’t be normalised, especially when the most powerful nation in the world is doing it on communities that have nothing to do with the armed parties involved in the Somalia conflict.”

Mohamed and Mark’s collaborative reporting illustrates how these kinds of hidden military operations can still be properly probed instead of neglected or normalised. As well as close cooperation between the Guardian and a well-connected journalist with local expertise, the investigation involved piecing together disparate sources of information in the absence of official records and documentation, and putting the findings to the relevant authorities.

“When it comes to this model of working, I think it varies depending on the particular news organisation,” says Mohamed, who has been a journalist for 10 years and first reported for the Guardian in 2022. “For instance, some western media outlets allow the local journalist in the field to take the lead, and once the work is done they’ll continue to coordinate with that local journalist to make sure the story is told in an accurate and authentic way. Meanwhile with others, once you do the work, they will overlook the knowledge and context of the local journalist and will release the story in a manner that fits their narrative – which isn’t always accurate and, in some cases, is biased, sometimes without them even knowing.”

Mark, who has reported for the Guardian and its former sister newspaper, the Observer, for 24 years, has worked on several similar collaborations with local journalists in other countries. “Obviously, it requires trust on both sides,” he explains. “It’s a collaboration in the most complete sense. But Mohamed did the hard yards here in terms of the on-the-ground reporting, so whatever feedback he had – for instance if something needed to be changed or slightly nuanced – then he got the final say, as far as I was concerned because it’s his lived experience, he’s the expert.”

Mark first contacted Mohamed after Tess McClure, an editor for the Guardian’s Rights and Freedom series, first spotted reports of a high number of children killed in last November’s airstrike.

Given the physical restrictions and risks of prosecution for reporting from al-Shabaab-controlled areas, Mohamed had to improvise. “I reached out to clan elders in Mogadishu,” he explains. “Clan elders are the leaders and decision-makers when it comes to the affairs of each respective clan and sub-clan in Somalia. By negotiating with them and explaining my intentions and the importance of survivors speaking out, they helped put me in touch with some of the victims.”

The survivors’ accounts of that day bring home the devastating reality of the drone strikes for civilians caught up in the conflict. “One of the biggest challenges was asking the victims who’d lost loved ones in the attack certain questions that went into details about the bodies of their loved ones, or the screams they heard once the aerial bombardment ceased,” says Mohamed. “I don’t like asking people those kinds of questions – it feels like you’re making them relive horrors that no human being should endure. When asking these questions, if the victim pauses, I get the sense that they’re having a flashback. And if they weep or whisper a prayer, or even make a reference to a verse of the Qur’an, then I know they’re hurting a lot. But these details are crucial for putting together what actually happened.”

Alongside the witness testimony, Mohamed and Mark also pieced the story together using photographs, video footage, X-rays of children’s shrapnel injuries, interviews with drone specialists and military analysts. Mark put about 30 detailed questions to the recently renamed US Department of War. They did not respond. The White House was also approached for comment and their eventual response, which is quoted in one of the articles published this week, is a stark reminder that the current US administration presents its own kind of hostile environment for journalists.

“It’s very important that their response was included in the article because it shows how they’re doing these things without any kind of transparency or proper legal course,” says Mark. “They didn’t know, didn’t care, or wouldn’t say. Either way, it’s pretty dire if you’ve killed innocent people – you’d think you’d feel a responsibility to work out why.”

The articles contain a series of urgent and unanswered questions, such as who signed off the attack on a densely populated family neighbourhood? Why and who, if anyone, was the intended target? The questions provide a powerful accompaniment to the witness testimonies. “Their refusal to share anything about what happened is in itself a galvanising factor,” says Mark.

Mark’s extensive and acclaimed reporting on the wars in Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo has demonstrated that readers are willing to pay attention to underreported conflicts: “Readers have responded brilliantly to our reporting about Sudan and the DRC, which are knotty conflicts that are quite complex. Readers do really care, which is very reassuring. Whether or not the wider world does, I’m not sure, but our readers do.”

This article is taken from the Guardian’s weekly email for supporters, sent on Tuesdays. To support the Guardian’s work, please click here . To find out more about theguardian.org, please click here